logo
Offense, not defense: As data regulation evolves, organizations should get on the front foot

Offense, not defense: As data regulation evolves, organizations should get on the front foot

Fast Company13-05-2025

Few, if any, leaders would dispute the importance of data to their organization's success. In fact, a robust and effective data strategy has become central to everything from improving customer experiences and retaining top talent to unlocking the full potential of technologies like artificial intelligence (AI).
Yet, as the use of data has exploded, so too has the regulatory landscape surrounding it. Since the arrival of GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) in Europe and the CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act) in California, we've seen a raft of new legislation passed at state, sector, and federal levels that makes the risks of noncompliance increasingly severe.
Likewise, nobody's slowing down in the hacking game. If anything, cybercriminals are becoming more aware of the value of consumers' personal information and, therefore, more relentless and sophisticated in their attempts to illegally obtain it.
For organizations, the result is a tightrope walk. On the one hand, they have to continually (and rapidly) innovate their data strategy to keep up with advancing technology and meet the product and service expectations of customers. Yet at the same time, they must be seen to be doing everything possible to protect stakeholders' personal information and comply with an ever more complex regulatory landscape.
This balancing act is supercharged in the most high-stakes and heavily regulated sectors, like health care and financial services. But it should also be a priority for organizations in other, less scrutinized industries. After all, even a retailer's loyalty program can house all kinds of sensitive details around buying patterns, family members, memorable dates, and personal preferences—information bad actors may use to target customers in other areas of their life.
PERSONAL PERSONALIZATION?
Not that consumers are saying 'no' to surveillance capitalism completely. If you travel a lot to New York and get an offer for great hotels in the city at low prices, that's probably the kind of deal you want to see. But any lack of transparency or hint of overstepping in how their information is captured, shared, or deployed will quickly evaporate trust and ultimately result in people opting out of it for good.
To complicate matters, personalization itself is personal. What one person is OK with from a targeted marketing perspective might be too intrusive or frequent for someone else, and vice versa.
Any data strategy must therefore be based on a carefully weighed decision about the value it could drive for the organization versus the value it could lose by crossing over a consumer's (or regulator's) perceived line of usage.
THE TOOLS OF SUCCESS
So, how do leaders get the tightrope walk right?
The first step is understanding the data privacy rules and regulations that exist in their jurisdictions, be that geographic or by sector. With legislation constantly evolving, this requires consistent monitoring, usually by CISOs and CDOs, to ensure the organization's practices don't contravene the rules.
Awareness of what data is being held has also become table stakes. To retain their stakeholders' trust, organizations must demonstrate in-depth knowledge of how, when, and where that information is captured and managed, including a fine-grain understanding of lineage and provenance.
The sheer volume of that information is also increasing significantly. As AI enables the creation of more data from more sources, it's important to consider how to manage those insights with the appropriate level of transparency and control.
Here, dynamic data tagging provides a potential solution. It lets firms mark and manage the purpose of data across various analytics platforms, making it easier to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate use based on context while helping mitigate the risk of reidentification among multiple downstream uses.
Similarly, synthetic data, which mimics real data without using actual personal information, is becoming a valuable tool in any organization's arsenal. By eliminating the risk of exposure, synthetic data helps address privacy and anonymization concerns while supporting the development and testing of new AI models.
INVEST FOR TOMORROW, TODAY
Above all, organizations should adopt an offensive approach to data governance, not a defensive one. That means rather than being driven by the need to address legal and/or compliance issues, leaders should focus on value (i.e., how to use the right data to deliver the right outcomes at the right time).
Policymakers at the state and federal levels can play a supportive role here, too. Right now, privacy laws and data legislation often lag technological advancements, which, in turn, stifles innovation, particularly in highly regulated industries. More open conversation between regulators and business leaders would help better balance progress and governance while promoting a greater tolerance for risk in areas where harm is unlikely.
Adopting this offensive approach will take more firepower, both in terms of the capital resources organizations devote to data management and the types of roles and skills they recruit for and develop within their workforce. Getting on the front foot may seem like a significant investment now, but the rewards it delivers for marketing effectiveness, customer engagement, security, and regulatory compliance in the future will be worth it.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe
States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Dozens of states have filed a joint lawsuit against the bankrupt DNA-testing company 23andMe to block the company's sale of its customers' genetic data without explicit consent. The suit, filed this week in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Eastern District of Missouri, comes months after 23andMe began a court-supervised sale process of its assets. The South San Francisco-based venture was once valued at $6 billion and has collected DNA samples from more than 15 million customers. The company's bankruptcy has raised questions over privacy standards for genetic data, which experts say is uniquely sensitive, immutable and irreplaceable if stolen. Twenty-seven states and the District of Columbia filed the lawsuit, arguing that 23andMe customers have an inherent right to their own genetic information. Read more: 'People should be worried': 23andMe bankruptcy could expose customers' genetic data 'This isn't just data — it's your DNA," said Oregon Atty. Gen. Dan Rayfield in a statement. "It's personal, permanent, and deeply private. People did not submit their personal data to 23andMe thinking their genetic blueprint would later be sold off to the highest bidder." 23andMe announced in May that it would be sold to New York-based drug maker Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, which had agreed to comply with 23andMe's existing privacy policy. However, a competing offer from nonprofit TTAM Research Institute led the bankruptcy judge to reopen the auction last week. TTAM is run by 23andMe co-founder Anne Wojcicki, who has made several failed attempts to take the company private. In a statement, a 23andMe spokesperson said the lawsuit's claims "are without merit" and that the sale of genetic data does not violate privacy regulations. 'Customers will continue to have the same rights and protections in the hands of the winning bidder," the spokesperson said. Read more: Congressmen sound alarm over data privacy following 23andMe bankruptcy 23andMe customers have the right to delete their genetic information from the company's database at any time, as outlined in the Genetic Information Privacy Act and the California Consumer Privacy Act. During a testimony in Washington earlier this week, 23andMe interim Chief Executive Joseph Selsavage said that 1.9 million customers have requested their data be deleted since the company's bankruptcy filing in March. Sara Geoghegan, senior counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said that 23andMe's privacy policy was subject to change and not adequate to protect customers' data. In an interview in March, she stressed the sensitivity of genetic data. 'I would be very concerned if I had given a swab to 23andMe," she said. "There is little we can do to control what happens to it." Sign up for our Wide Shot newsletter to get the latest entertainment business news, analysis and insights. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe
States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Los Angeles Times

time10 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Dozens of states have filed a joint lawsuit against the bankrupt DNA-testing company 23andMe to block the company's sale of its customers' genetic data without explicit consent. The suit, filed this week in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Eastern District of Missouri, comes months after 23andMe began a court-supervised sale process of its assets. The South San Francisco-based venture was once valued at $6 billion and has collected DNA samples from more than 15 million customers. The company's bankruptcy has raised questions over privacy standards for genetic data, which experts say is uniquely sensitive, immutable and irreplaceable if stolen. Twenty-seven states and the District of Columbia filed the lawsuit, arguing that 23andMe customers have an inherent right to their own genetic information. 'This isn't just data — it's your DNA,' said Oregon Atty. Gen. Dan Rayfield in a statement. 'It's personal, permanent, and deeply private. People did not submit their personal data to 23andMe thinking their genetic blueprint would later be sold off to the highest bidder.' 23andMe announced in May that it would be sold to New York-based drug maker Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, which had agreed to comply with 23andMe's existing privacy policy. However, a competing offer from nonprofit TTAM Research Institute led the bankruptcy judge to reopen the auction last week. TTAM is run by 23andMe co-founder Anne Wojcicki, who has made several failed attempts to take the company private. In a statement, a 23andMe spokesperson said the lawsuit's claims 'are without merit' and that the sale of genetic data does not violate privacy regulations. 'Customers will continue to have the same rights and protections in the hands of the winning bidder,' the spokesperson said. 23andMe customers have the right to delete their genetic information from the company's database at any time, as outlined in the Genetic Information Privacy Act and the California Consumer Privacy Act. During a testimony in Washington earlier this week, 23andMe interim Chief Executive Joseph Selsavage said that 1.9 million customers have requested their data be deleted since the company's bankruptcy filing in March. Sara Geoghegan, senior counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said that 23andMe's privacy policy was subject to change and not adequate to protect customers' data. In an interview in March, she stressed the sensitivity of genetic data. 'I would be very concerned if I had given a swab to 23andMe,' she said. 'There is little we can do to control what happens to it.'

BoldSign® Wins Developer's Choice in the 2025 Postman API Network Awards
BoldSign® Wins Developer's Choice in the 2025 Postman API Network Awards

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

BoldSign® Wins Developer's Choice in the 2025 Postman API Network Awards

The Syncfusion® eSignature solution earns top honors for outstanding experience, performance, and community impact RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, N.C., June 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Syncfusion®, Inc., the enterprise technology provider of choice, today announced that its eSignature solution, BoldSign®, won the Postman Developer's Choice Award. Selected by Postman's worldwide developer community, the award spotlights APIs that deliver exceptional user experience, measurable business value, and active community engagement. Syncfusion coming in at number one is a result of its commitment to building tools that developers and businesses trust. 'BoldSign started with a simple goal: give developers an eSignature API that lets them plug in, sign, and ship without friction,' said Daniel Jebaraj, CEO of Syncfusion. 'This award tells us we're on the right path and motivates us to keep raising the bar with features that help our customers move their products forward.' Businesses choose BoldSign due to its: Fast, friction-free signing: Legally binding signatures captured in seconds. Easy implementation: Most teams roll out in under a day with no heavy IT lifting. Web-to-mobile flexibility: Seamless experience for in-office and on-the-go staff. Bank-grade security and compliance: Robust encryption and compliance with SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, and eIDAS regulations. Scalability: Usage-based plans stay cost-effective for individuals, startups, and large enterprises. Real-time human support: Direct access to BoldSign experts whenever questions arise. Customer-driven roadmap: Continuous feature drops shaped by user feedback. 'Winning Developer's Choice is both humbling and energizing,' added Jebaraj. 'We're just getting started—look for new features, expanded SDKs, and deeper integrations so teams can scale from 10 to a million documents without switching platforms.' Learn more about the BoldSign® eSignature APIs in Postman. For more information about fast, secure, and scalable eSignature functionality in BoldSign, visit its website. About Syncfusion, in the technology hub of Research Triangle Park, N.C., Syncfusion®, Inc. delivers an award-winning ecosystem of developer control suites, embeddable BI platforms, and business software. Syncfusion was founded in 2001 with a single software component and a mission to support businesses of all sizes—from individual developers and start-ups to Fortune 500 enterprises. Though its pilot product, the Essential Studio® suite, has grown to over 1,900 developer controls, its mission remains the same. With offices in the U.S., India, and Kenya, Syncfusion prioritizes the customer experience by providing feature-rich solutions to help developers and enterprises solve complex problems, save money, and build high-performance, robust applications. Contact: Brittany KearnsPhone: 571-271-7211Email: brittany@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store