
Letters to the Editor, April 23rd: On Pope Francis, trans rights, Pakistan's Indus river, and space tourism
Sir, – The death of
Pope Francis
after a challenging illness is a sad time for all who admired him and his radical papacy.
For divorced and remarried practicing Catholics it is gratifying and a gift to have marriage recognised and blessed by a person's birth faith. This is something that would not have happened under previous popes.
Pope Francis was courageous and was happier to encourage and hug rather than to point the finger and scowl. – Yours, etc,
THOMAS MORRIS GORMALLY,
READ MORE
Rathangan.
Sir, – Despite the great sadness of Pope Francis's death, it is a great relief to observe so many facets of the media acclaim a world leader who spoke out for the disenfranchised, the disabled and the impoverished, and who understood and campaigned from a climate change perspective, and was deeply committed to mitigating the horrors of 'man's inhumanity to man'.
With great personal humility, little sense of self and a compassionate insight on the vulnerability of humanity, he laid comprehensive foundations for making the Catholic Church Great Again.
Would that others note his blueprint! – Yours, etc,
MICHAEL GANNON,
Kilkenny.
Sir, – While I'm certain the pilgrims in St Peter's Square were delighted to see the Holy Father on Sunday morning and to receive his blessing, it's impossible not to be haunted by the feeling that, had he been dissuaded from exerting himself, he might still be with us.
One is reminded uncomfortably of the late Queen Elizabeth, so much frailer than we had ever seen her, accepting the credentials of Liz Truss as prime minister, shortly before her majesty died. Now her heir, King Charles, is soldiering on despite his health problems.
Do we expect too much of people in these positions, so that they feel unable to take a well-earned rest when it's called for? – Yours, etc,
PAUL GRIFFIN,
Merseyside,
UK.
Trans rights in Ireland
Sir, – Under the heading 'UK ruling on biological sex' three letters published in The Irish Times were supportive of the UK's decision do define a woman (or man) as being the biological sex at birth (
Letters
, April 19th).
Your correspondents cite issues with ladies' Gaelic football changing rooms, single-sex spaces and lesbian clubs and bars. But none of them point to a basic truth: trans women pose almost no threat to women.
People have been able to self-identify as trans in Ireland since 2015 (when Gender Recognition Certificates were introduced). Since then, there have been no recorded incidents of assault by trans women on women in single space areas in Ireland.
If Ireland were to replicate the UK's decision, trans women will be expected to use the male toilets. It's not hard to imagine how a female-presenting trans woman would face increased danger in that situation. For almost no increase in security for women, the trans community would be made to feel even more vulnerable and marginalised.
In addition, will masculine-looking women be challenged in women's toilets, simply based on appearance? Will we require some form of door check on those using public facilities? How will they perform the check? Will processes be standardised across all public single-sex spaces?
In short if we were to go down this path, we will create increased danger, confusion, division and resentment, all for little or no benefit to women's safety.
I have little doubt that the decision in the UK will increase the pressure to reopen the debate on trans rights here. We need our public representatives to prepare themselves and be determined to defend the equality we have created in Ireland. – Yours, etc,
RICHARD KAVANAGH,
Wicklow.
Impressive space mission
Sir, – The opinion piece written by columnist Liz Carolan was disappointing ('
Katy Perry's 11 minutes as an astronaut were a waste of space. It could have been so much more
', Opinion, April 19th).
Whatever one might think of space tourism, this was a promotional flight designed to show that space flight is not (quite) as dangerous as before. If
Katy Perry
returned excited and kissing the ground, it was perhaps because the crew was under no illusion that a failed parachute deployment might well have spelt death.
Oprah Winfrey
revealed that her friend Gayle King was 'absolutely terrified' by the prospect. Last week's helicopter crash in New York should be a reminder that technology can still catch us out with fatal results.
The six women on the Blue Origin flight included an aerospace engineer, an astrophysicist, a TV editor/producer, a singer/songwriter, a film producer and an aviation executive/helicopter pilot. They were a diverse group that included a 70 year old.
My granddaughters were impressed, which is all the proof I need that the mission was a success. – Yours, etc,
GEORGE REYNOLDS,
Blessington,
Co Wicklow.
Tech giants bow to Trump
Sir, – Huge amounts have been written off the valuations of the tech giants, whose chief executives have flocked to support US president Donald Trump ('
The silence of the CEOs in the face of Donald Trump's tariff chaos
', Economy, April 21st).
Why are these chief executives not protesting vociferously about the
Trump tariffs
that are causing market chaos? The same charge could have been levelled at British leaders of the business community during the
Brexit
campaign. There were few manifestations of protest about this self-inflicted damage being wrought on the UK economy.
Our society has become much more intolerant and woe betide the person who does not conform to the views of those who have become so powerful.
There is a new ruthlessness in this, of a kind we used to associate with totalitarian dictators.
Informed discussion and civilised exchanges on procedures and policies are unfortunately not the norm any more. – Yours, etc,
EITHNE O'CALLAGHAN,
Ballsbridge,
Dublin 4.
A lifeline under threat
Sir, – I write to you not only as a general practitioner living in Ireland, but as a son of Sindh, a historic province in southern Pakistan where one of the world's oldest Indus Valley civilisations once thrived.
I watch in anguish as my homeland rises in a wave of protests and sit-ins in a desperate call to save the Indus river – the lifeline of our culture, economy and existence.
The Pakistani federal government, alongside Punjab province and supported by the military establishment, has launched a controversial plan to construct six large canals under the 'Green Pakistan Initiative'.
These canals would divert water from the already depleted Indus to arid lands in Punjab's Cholistan desert. This is not a small technical project. For Sindh, it is an existential threat.
The Indus is not just a river, it is the only source of fresh water for Sindh's people and the foundation of our agriculture, drinking water and ecosystem. Without it, life becomes impossible.
The scale of devastation this canal project could unleash is hard to overstate: mass displacement, collapse of farming communities, disease and famine. If allowed to proceed, this plan may not just damage Sindh, it risks triggering a slow, systematic genocide through economical and ecological destruction, where an entire nation is denied the means to survive in its own homeland.
What is remarkable – and largely unseen in Pakistan's history – is the scale and unity of the response. Lawyers have launched indefinite sit-ins, professors have closed colleges, farmers and students have joined the streets. This is not a political movement, it is a civil, social, and cultural uprising. And yet, the federal authorities remain unmoved.
We Sindhis are not asking for charity or conflict. We are demanding fairness, sustainability and the basic right to exist. The world must understand: this is not merely a water dispute. It is a question of life and death. A nation without its river is a nation condemned. – Yours, etc,
Dr MUHAMMAD MATARO
HINGORJO,
Limerick.
Aviation industry and climate
Sir, – Dr Ola Lokken Nordrum's refers to the media offering free PR to high-emission industries by encouraging carbon-intensive air travel, and that this must be addressed 'if we are serious about climate action' (
Letters
, April 22nd).
But the media is not the only culprit. Our Government contributes to the profits of the aviation industry and encourages people to frequently fly by providing approximately €600 million each year to that industry in the form of exemption from tax on jet kerosene. I receive no tax exemption on my fuel if I drive to Cork but I do if I fly!
In addition, in 2009-2014 Ireland had an air travel tax (passenger charge) but it was abolished to support the aviation industry. Furthermore, we impose a zero VAT rate on tickets.
If we are serious about climate action, these issues must also be addressed. – Yours, etc,
PAUL O'SHEA,
Shankill,
Dublin 18.
Worthwhile career choice
Sir, – Brian Mooney gives too narrow a perspective in answering your correspondent's question: '
My son wants to study sustainability but has no idea what course to choose. Can you help
?' (Education, April 20th).
In his reply, he talks mainly about agriculture, which indeed the letter writer highlights as one of their son's strongest subjects, but agriculture is more than farming and food.
Nor is sustainability a new idea. Forestry, based on the ideal of sustained yield, was well developed in 19th century Germany, following centuries of overexploitation. Today, our forests and their harvested wood products are critically important in the battle against climate change because they capture and store carbon as well as substitute for steel and concrete.
I can think of few more worthwhile careers. – Yours, etc,
DR CORMAC O'CARROLL,
Salzburg,
Austria.
Bearing witness
Sir, – Primo Levi, survivor of Auschwitz, taught us that the act of bearing witness is not just a moral obligation, but a warning. He wrote: 'It happened; therefore it can happen again.' His words were not meant to serve one people alone, but to protect humanity from the spiral of dehumanisation and indifference that enabled the Holocaust.
Today, as we witness the suffering of civilians in
Gaza
– trapped, bombarded, displaced – we echo Levi not to compare tragedies, but to recognise patterns of violence that must never be normalised. To speak out against the suffering of Palestinians is not to deny Jewish suffering; it is to affirm our shared humanity.
And yet, in invoking Levi's name to call for an end to collective punishment and state violence, many are accused of anti-Semitism. This is a cruel irony.
To bear witness to the horrors of the Gaza ghetto is not an act of hate – it is an act of conscience.
We cannot allow moral clarity to be distorted by political defensiveness. If 'never again' is to mean anything, it must apply to all people. Levi's legacy belongs not to any one nation, but to all who choose to see clearly, speak bravely, and defend the dignity of every human life. – Yours, etc,
DECLAN DOYLE,
Kilkenny.
Dublin now and then
Sir, – I grew up in the Dublin of the 1960s travelling daily across the city from Drumcondra to Sandymount for school over 10 years.
Viewed from the top of the bus some of the older buildings en route had a certain charm. However, there was large-scale dereliction, 'tooth gaps' on streets and poor quality housing . All resulting in a grim city.
Since then the quality of architectural design has improved immeasurably with great examples of public and private housing.
Una Mullally in her column sees the city through a prism of ugliness ('
Why are most new housing schemes in Dublin so terrible?
', Opinion, April 14th). However, I agree with your correspondent (
Letters
, April 17th) and am not buying into Ms Mullally's opinion. - Yours, etc,
KIERAN GALLAGHER,
Architect,
Rathgar,
Dublin 6.
Bank holiday reading treat
Sir, – I would like to thank Miriam Lord whose intelligence and wit kept us going during the unruly first term of the new Dáil.
Her end-of-term '
Easter awards
' were a welcome bank holiday treat after the long political Lent we have endured (April 19th). I particularly liked the 'Best Leo Varadkar tribute act' that went to US vice-president JD Vance for his 'very Leo' novelty shamrock socks.
I look forward, as always, to more of Ms Lord's Dáil reports. Silk purses come to mind. – Yours, etc,
CHRIS FITZPATRICK,
Dublin 6.
Truth standing on its head
Sir, – How does he do it? I refer to the cartoon by Martyn Turner regarding Jesus the Palestinian (
April 18th
). He is perhaps the most famous person in the world and unfortunately the Palestinian people are the most persecuted people in the world today, and the victims of mass murder.
GK Chesterton has defined paradox as 'truth standing on its head to attract attention'. So often these cartoons display such paradox. Congratulations Mr Turner on your astute artwork. – Yours, etc,
KATHLEEN FORDE,
Dublin 9.
'Clean rotten'
A chara, – May I add to
Frank McNally
's Hiberno-English intensifying adjectives ('pure') the word 'clean' meaning extremely or thoroughly, as in the expression 'clean rotten'. – Le meas,
CAOIMHÍN Ó SEANÁIN,
Béal Feirste.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Independent
3 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Re-enactment of Daniel O'Connell's famous speech to take place in Cork town this Friday
2025 marks the 250th anniversary of the birth of Irish political leader who was one of Ireland's foremost politicians in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. The Kerry native has often been hailed in his time as The Liberator. O'Connell a qualified barrister was the acknowledged political leader of Ireland's Roman Catholic majority in the first half of the 19th century. Born near Cahersiveen on August 6, 1775, O'Connell was instrumental in the Catholic Emancipation Act that granted political and civil rights to Catholics in Ireland. He was also a leading abolitionist who sought to ban the international slave trade in the early 1800s. Two of Ireland's major cities – Limerick and Dublin – have their main streets named in honour of O'Connell. He staged one of his famous Monster Meetings in Mallow on June 11, 1843 which attracted a reported crowd of 250,000 people from all over north Cork and further afield at the Repeal of the Act of Union meeting. 40 bands also marched in the parade. The heights and fields were crowded with spectators. As a person, O'Connell was extraordinary. Deeply popular with the public, rather than being a 'populist', he could explain the essence of complex arguments to audiences of thousands. O'Connell's constitutional approach was carried on by Thomas Davis and by Charles Stewart Parnell. ADVERTISEMENT Friday's re-enactment in Mallow town will attempt to recreate the events of that famous day in Mallow history. A number of monster repeal meetings were held at various locations throughout Ireland and preparations for the great Mallow Repeal Meeting commenced in October 1842. During a powerful oration Mr O'Connell told the captivated audience that there was one thing which gave him pleasure, and that was the length of time he enjoyed the confidence of the people. He was counsel for Ireland – the people were his clients - he had none other. He also told the spectators that he had given up the profession in which he was successful; and now for the remainder of his life he was resolved to devote himself to the advocacy of the Irish people and old Ireland. The speech by Daniel O'Connell in Mallow became known as the Mallow Defiance. The famous sculptor John Hogan carved an 18 feet marble statue of O'Connell which is located in the City Hall in Dublin. Famous orator Daniel O'Connell made his first ever speech in 1800 in City Hall, then called the Royal Exchange, and his statue shows him as an orator, raising his right hand to make a point. In November 1841, O'Connell became Lord Mayor of Dublin, another reason for having his statue in City Hall, where council meetings are still held.

The Journal
6 hours ago
- The Journal
Health Minister calls for CHI report on consultant misuse of waiting list system to be published
THE HEALTH MINISTER has said she wants an internal investigation which found a consultant had breached guidelines by referring public patients to his own private clinic to be released in the 'public interest'. It follows reports that an internal investigation by Children's Health Ireland (CHI) found that the consultant breached HSE guidelines with these referrals . The consultant was paid €35,800 via the National Treatment Purchase Fund (NTPF), which aims to cut waiting times by paying private practices to treat patients on public waiting lists. While CHI said the 'confidentiality of those who participated' in the internal investigation needs to be respected, Health Minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill called for a redacted version of the report to be released in the public interest. The Irish Times today reported that the consultant at the centre of the internal CHI investigation didn't fulfil his on-call hours for more than three years due to health issues, yet went 'above and beyond his contractual hours' to conduct weekend clinics. The Irish Times reports that the consultation seen twice the number of patients in the weekend clinic than during his regular weekday equivalent, and received €35,800 for this weekend work. Caroll MacNeill said these reports 'suggests a very significant problem'. She told RTÉ's Morning Ireland that she wants 'maximum productivity' in the public system and wants to 'remove incentives that may create perversions of the kind that's described there'. She added: 'I do not want to see a situation where there is less than full productivity in the public system and then private clinics picking that slack up when insourcing an NTPF model. 'I have a concern that that has led to some incentives to delay treatment, and that is why a number of weeks ago, we commissioned a full audit of that practice right across the board. 'Where we look at this report, that has not been published, my concern for that is the correct use of taxpayer's money, but even more importantly, patient safety and patient outcomes for very young children who needed surgical intervention.' 'Inaccurate reporting' The internal CHI report in question was conducted at the end of 2021 and finalised in January 2022. In a statement on Monday, CHI said the 'recommendations have been implemented and are ongoing'. However, the CHI statement said there has been 'inaccurate media reporting in relation to NTPF payments to a Consultant'. CHI said these clinics did not take place in the Consultant's private rooms but 'occurred in a public clinic, in one of its hospitals, on a Saturday'. 'The NTPF funded the hospital for this waiting list initiative and there was no charge to patients,' said CHI. Advertisement 'This was over and above the Consultant's contractual hours. There are no direct payments to CHI staff from NTPF.' CHI added that it considered requests to publish the report and sought legal advice. The statement said it is 'primarily a HR report where the confidentiality of those who participated and fair procedures need to be respected given the sensitive nature of the report'. NTPF funding The NTPF aims to cut waiting times by paying private practices to treat patients on public waiting lists. However, NTPF funding to CHI has been suspended and Carroll MacNeill said the NTPF has 'looked for certain assurances from CHI, which I understand they're in the process of receiving'. Carroll MacNeill said she had been assured by the NTPF that the existing surgery scheduled will not be impacted by this. The Health Minister added that she had a 'very good meeting' with the Attorney General last week and she was informed that she does not have a 'legal basis to publish the report' as it is the 'property of CHI'. 'I do recognise some of the difficulties that CHI face in that this was a HR report where people contributed on a confidential basis and put themselves at risk in doing so,' said Carroll MacNeill. 'There's a measure of management, because we do want people to contribute to other HR processes. 'Nevertheless, I think it's important that a redacted version of this report is published in the broader public interest. 'It is important that people understand the broad issues that have happened here and what needs to happen next.' Last month, HSE CEO Bernard Gloster said that the potential for CHI to be fully subsumed into the HSE will be one option considered amid concerns around clinical care and governance. Carroll MacNeill today said this is a 'separate, longer term public policy consideration'. Meanwhile, three board members of CHI resigned last week , and Carroll MacNeill remarked that there has been 'a significant refresh'. 'There are more board vacancies and I think the correct approach to this is to continue to appoint members of the HSE board to CHI board, insofar as that is possible.' And while Carroll MacNeill called on CHI to release a redacted version of the report, she said she has 'confidence' in its chair Lucy Nugent, who was appointed last November and took up the role in February. Carroll MacNeill said Nugent 'has begun a significant program of transformation in a couple of different ways'. 'A lot of these practices predate her, and I want to offer my support to the new CEO.' Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


RTÉ News
10 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Pope Leo, in first month, makes a break in style from Francis
In his first month, Pope Leo XIV has taken a very different approach to his predecessor Francis. Leo, the former Cardinal Robert Prevost, has led some two dozen public events since he was elected as the first US pope on 8 May but not made notable appointments, nor announced plans for foreign trips, nor said where he will live at the Vatican. It's a stark contrast to when Francis, originally from Argentina, was selected as the first pope from the Americas in March 2013. Within a month, Francis had announced he would be the first pontiff in more than a century to live outside the Vatican's apostolic palace, appointed his successor as Archbishop of Buenos Aires and created a new formal advisory group of senior Catholic cardinals. Two of Leo's long-time associates said they expect the 69-year-old Pope to take a deliberative approach to the challenges facing the Catholic Church and may require months before making major decisions. "Leo is taking his time," Rev Mark Francis, a friend of the new pontiff since the 1970s, said. "While he is going to continue in the path indicated by Pope Francis, his disposition is very different." Leo was first appointed a bishop by Francis in 2015 and then chosen by the late pope to take up a senior Vatican role two years ago. He has frequently praised his predecessor in his first weeks. He has also repeated some of Francis' main themes, and has echoed the Argentine pontiff's emotional appeals for an end to the wars in Gaza and Ukraine. But the two men have different temperaments, according to Rev Francis, who attended seminary with Leo in Chicago and later knew him when they both lived in Rome in the 2000s. "Leo is much more focused and methodical and not inclined to hasty decisions," he said. Among the challenges facing the American pope is the Vatican's €83 million budget shortfall, which Reuters reported in February had stirred contention among senior cardinals under his predecessor. Other looming issues facing the 1.4 billion-member Church include declining adherence to the faith in Europe, ongoing revelations of clerical sexual abuse, and doctrinal debates over matters such as inclusion of LGBT Catholics and the possibility of women's ordination. Francis, who sought to modernise the Church, did not formally change many doctrines but garnered criticism from conservative cardinals by opening the door to communion for divorcees and blessings for same-sex couples. Rev Anthony Pizzo, who has known Leo since 1974 when they attended Villanova University outside Philadelphia together, said the pope is someone who listens carefully and seeks to hear many viewpoints before making decisions. "This is going to be his modus operandi," said Rev Pizzo, who leads the Midwest US province of the Augustinian religious order, to which Leo also belongs. "When you first come into leadership, listen well, get to know your constituency … to make a well-informed decision," he added, describing the pope's thought process. A 'shy' listener Francis and Leo came to the papacy at different ages and with different career backgrounds. Francis, elected at age 76, had been a cardinal for 12 years before ascending to the papacy. He had earlier been a leading contender in the 2005 conclave that elected his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI. Leo, seven years younger when he donned the white papal cassock, is a relative unknown on the world stage who only became a cardinal and Vatican official two years ago. He spent most of his prior career as a missionary in Peru. Early in his tenure, Francis told journalists that, due to his age, he expected to have a brief papacy of only a few years. Leo, the youngest pontiff since John Paul II was elected at age 58 in 1978, can perhaps expect a papacy of ten or more years. Among the challenges facing the new pope is the Vatican budget shortfall and the city-state also has a much larger gap in its pension fund, said to total some €631m by the Vatican's finance czar in 2022 but estimated by several insiders to have since ballooned significantly. In his first weeks, Leo has not addressed the budget issues and has made only a few new appointments to Vatican roles. But he has held formal one-on-one meetings with many senior Vatican officials, which Rev Pizzo suggested the pope could be using to try to learn quickly. Rev Jorge Martinez Vizueta, who knew Leo in Peru, said he is someone who pays close attention to what people tell him. "He listens a lot, even with a certain shyness," said Rev Martinez, an Augustinian at a monastery where Leo previously was a spiritual advisor. Although Leo has not announced where he will live, more than three informed sources said he is expected to move into the official papal apartments in the Vatican's apostolic palace overlooking St Peter's Square. Francis shunned the palace in favour of a Vatican hotel. One senior source, who asked not to be identified, said the papal apartments, which have not been lived in since 2013, will require at least two to three months of renovations. Careful with responses While Francis made some big decisions quickly in his first month, he also took time on other issues. He did not make his first trip abroad until late July 2013, four months into his papacy. Leo's first foreign trip is likely to be to Turkey, to celebrate the 1,700th anniversary of an early Church council with Patriarch Bartholomew, the spiritual leader of the Eastern Orthodox Church. The Vatican has not announced the trip, but it was previously planned for Francis. Bartholomew told an Italian television station that he and Leo discussed the possibility of the new pope travelling to Turkey in late November. Francis, who often spoke off the cuff, was known for giving freewheeling news conferences on flights home from his trips abroad and frequently responded to queries with an unexpected quip. Asked during his first flight home about a Vatican official said to be gay, Francis famously responded: "If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge him?" Rev Francis said Leo, who in his first month has largely read from prepared texts, is likely to be more careful with his responses during news conferences. "He won't be shooting from the hip like Francis did while speaking with journalists," he said.