logo
Karen Read was acquitted of murder in John O'Keefe's death. What's next?

Karen Read was acquitted of murder in John O'Keefe's death. What's next?

CBS News6 hours ago

Karen Read was acquitted Wednesday of the most serious charges in the 2022 death of her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe. Why did the jury clear her and what's next for Read?
Read was found not guilty of second-degree murder, manslaughter while operating under the influence of alcohol, and leaving the scene of bodily injury in O'Keefe's death in Canton, Massachusetts. She was only convicted on a charge of operating under the influence (OUI) and was sentenced to one year of probation.
Former CBS News legal analyst Rikki Klieman, who's covered the case extensively, said the verdict was "predictable."
Karen Read case "riddled with reasonable doubt"
"This was a case that I think was riddled with reasonable doubt," Klieman said Thursday on "CBS Mornings."
"One of things that people don't understand until they get in it on a jury is what that means. If you think someone's guilty, if you guess they're guilty, you suspect they're guilty, but you don't have a conviction to a moral certainty, you must acquit. Doesn't mean a person is innocent. Just means the Commonwealth didn't prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt."
Karen Read trial experts "cancel each other out"
Both the prosecution and Read's attorneys presented experts to bolster their cases, and described very different versions of events.
Prosecutor Hank Brennan said Read "was drunk, she hit him, then she left him to die." Read's attorney Alan Jackson told the court, "There was no collision," and that "There is no evidence that John was hit by a car. None. How much more reasonable doubt could there be?"
"It depends on which expert you believe," Klieman said of the jury. "You had Commonwealth experts who had one theory, and you had very good defense experts who had the opposite theory. And the defense expert said that car, Karen Read's car, never hit John O'Keefe. They cancel each other out as experts. And if that isn't doubt, I don't know what is."
Klieman also highlighted the role of lead investigator Michael Proctor, who was fired by Massachusetts State Police for his conduct while handling Read's case.
"He was someone who also supervised one of the most sloppy police investigations of all time," she said.
Karen Read attorneys had "dress rehearsal" advantage
In 2024, Read's first trial ended with a mistrial due to a "starkly divided" hung jury. In her second trial, jurors deliberated for about 20 hours.
"In this case, the defense clearly had an advantage because they had had a dress rehearsal. They knew what their weak points were," Klieman said.
"Alan Jackson is one of the best criminal defense lawyers in the country. And Hank Brennan is also right up there as a defense lawyer. He was appointed as special prosecutor. So, for a student of the law, if you can take emotion out of it, to watch them work was a thing of real beauty and it could teach young lawyers how to try cases."
What's next for Karen Read?
Read is still facing a civil wrongful death lawsuit that was filed by O'Keefe's family in August 2024. It was filed in Plymouth Superior Court in Brockton, Massachusetts, and seeks at least $50,000 in damages. Klieman said the civil case will feature a much lighter burden of proof than the criminal trial.
"First of all, we have to remember that someone died here who was a very decent human being by all accounts," Klieman said. "The civil case is in a civil court, it's in a different courthouse, different burden of proof, proof to [standard of] 'a preponderance of evidence.' As I always say, that's like a feather on the scale, whereas proof beyond a reasonable doubt, you need like a lead balloon. And so is there a great chance that they will prevail — that is, the family — in the civil court? Yes, they have a great chance. And very smart, they also sued the bars who they claimed over-served her. And there was no question she was drunk that night."
Read has not been deposed yet in the civil case. A judge ruled in November that it could wait until her second criminal trial ended.
In a civil trial, Read would only be liable for monetary damages if she's found responsible for O'Keefe's death.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Juror reveals why Karen Read walked free in boyfriend's death
Juror reveals why Karen Read walked free in boyfriend's death

Fox News

time23 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Juror reveals why Karen Read walked free in boyfriend's death

One of the 12 jurors who cleared Karen Read of murder charges in the death of Boston cop boyfriend John O'Keefe explained the panel's reasoning Thursday, a day after her second trial came to a close. The juror also explained brief confusion Wednesday afternoon that arose out of a verdict that jurors later retracted before it was read in court. Judge Beverly Cannone sealed that one. Within minutes, jurors handed down a verdict for real. "Everything on that initial slip was the same as the slip that was presented," Juror No. 4, identified only as "Jason," told TMZ Live. He said they pulled the first slip back over the OUI charge – operating under the influence of liquor, of which jurors found her guilty. WATCH: Juror No. 4's interview "In our deliberations, we had decided there was enough evidence and proof that she was driving under the influence," he said. Jurors found Read not guilty of murder, manslaughter and fleeing a deadly accident in a trial that stretched on for more than 30 days of testimony and four days of deliberations. The lesser included charge of OUI is the Massachusetts term for drunken driving. "I don't know what happened to John," Jason said. "I was only presented a limited scope of what happened at the night, and I can only base my opinion off of the evidence that was shown in the courtroom. So, I don't really know if there was a cover-up or not. "I know that's the big conspiracy around it, but I don't really know. All I know is there was a lot of holes in the investigation. Whether they were deliberate holes or not deliberate holes, it's kinda hard for me sitting back to know that — you know, what actually happened." He said the defense claim that O'Keefe could have been killed by someone in the house — in an attack that involved a dog — was an "example of reasonable doubt." "We were tasked with finding ... with deciding this person's fate based on the proof in the evidence that the commonwealth was able to present, and there was a lot of holes," he said. He said another important factor for the jury was video that showed Read's taillight. "We could see from the car, after the alleged incident happened, when we could see the taillight it was lit up red, where it shouldn't just have been red," he said. "I don't believe that the SUV collided with John O'Keefe." Still, he added, there was no way for jurors to know whether claims of a "corrupt" police investigation were true. "I don't know that there was any corruption going on," he said. "But do I know that there wasn't enough proof or evidence secured by the police to convict Karen Read? Absolutely." Also Thursday, Massachusetts State Police brass broke their silence on the years-long case marred by investigative missteps and the firing of a state trooper who played a central role in the case. Read was accused — and acquitted — of killing her boyfriend by slamming an SUV into him and leaving him to die on the ground during a blizzard after a drunken argument. Jurors found her guilty only of drunken driving, for which she received a sentence of one year probation and outpatient treatment. Col. Geoffrey Noble, the state police commissioner, said the entire department sends its condolences to O'Keefe's family. "The events of the last three years have challenged our department to thoroughly review our actions and take concrete steps to deliver advanced investigative training, ensure appropriate oversight and enhance accountability," Noble said in a statement. "Under my direction as colonel, the state police has, and will continue to, improve in these regards." He said the goal is to deliver "excellent" service and maintain public trust. GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB Jurors did not appear to trust the investigation after four days of deliberation, when they rejected the prosecution's case almost entirely. The lead investigator on the case, former State Trooper Michael Proctor, lost his job in March after an internal investigation concluded he shared confidential and sensitive law enforcement information with civilians in a group text, the contents of which were also lewd in nature and mocked Read's health issues. It was Noble who announced the firing, days before Read's second trial began. Her first trial ended with a deadlocked jury last year after the texts were read in court and Read's defense exposed other glaring flaws in the investigation. "It is incumbent upon me, as well as every member of this department, to hold one another accountable when any member compromises our mission by failing to uphold our values," he said at the time. Noble and the department were also sued by true crime reporters and some of Read's supporters over the enforcement of a "buffer zone" around the Dedham courthouse that their lawyers called unconstitutional. Separately, local police in Canton, Massachusetts, were subjected to an external audit that recommended increased training and oversight while dispelling claims of a conspiracy to frame Read for O'Keefe's death. A federal investigation into the case ended without charges against members of either law enforcement agency.

2 Gang Members Will Spend Life in Prison for Killing 11-Year-Old in Tragic Case of Mistaken Identity
2 Gang Members Will Spend Life in Prison for Killing 11-Year-Old in Tragic Case of Mistaken Identity

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

2 Gang Members Will Spend Life in Prison for Killing 11-Year-Old in Tragic Case of Mistaken Identity

Froylan Villegas, 11, was killed in a 2023 drive-by shooting as his family left an Albuquerque baseball game Two gang members, Jose Romero and Nathan Garley, mistook the family's truck for a rival's and fired more than a dozen rounds Froylan's cousin, Tatiana, was paralyzed; his mother and infant brother were also in the truck but were uninjuredTwo gang members have been sentenced to life in prison after opening fire on a truck carrying a New Mexico family — killing an 11-year-old boy and paralyzing his cousin in a tragic case of mistaken identity. Jose Romero, 23, and Nathen Garley, 22, were sentenced Monday to life in prison plus 46 years for the September 2023 shooting that killed Froylan Villegas outside an Albuquerque Isotopes baseball game, according to NBC News. The pair were convicted in February of first-degree murder, attempted murder, shooting at a motor vehicle and tampering with evidence, per the outlet. PEOPLE previously reported that Froylan had been riding in the backseat of his family's white Dodge pickup when suspects in another vehicle opened fire through the sunroof of their Dodge Durango, mistakenly believing they were shooting at a rival gang member they had argued with that night. More than a dozen rounds were fired — Froylan was shot in the head and died at the scene. His cousin, 23-year-old Tatiana Villegas, was hit multiple times and is now paralyzed from the chest down. Froylan's mother and his infant brother were also in the car, but were not physically harmed. Bernalillo County District Attorney Sam Bregman said in a statement that he hopes the verdict brings "come sort of peace and justice to Froylan's family." "We're very happy as a family that we got justice for Froylan and me," Tatiana Villegas told ABC affiliate KOAT. "And that's what matters. The rest we leave in God's hands. We're glad to close this chapter and move on." The shooting sparked statewide concern over youth gun violence, prompting Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham to declare a temporary public health emergency with a ban on firearms in parks and playgrounds across said surveillance video, ballistic analysis and eyewitness testimony were crucial in securing the two mens' New Mexico law, their verdict automatically triggers an appeal. Read the original article on People

Woman shot and killed by ex-husband near Desert Ridge Marketplace, Phoenix police say
Woman shot and killed by ex-husband near Desert Ridge Marketplace, Phoenix police say

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Woman shot and killed by ex-husband near Desert Ridge Marketplace, Phoenix police say

A 39-year-old woman has died after the Phoenix police said she was shot by her ex-husband near the Desert Ridge Marketplace on June 18. Jessica Shukers was shot at least once, the Phoenix Police Department said in a statement. Justin Creed, 38, was detained at the scene, the statement said. Police responded to the scene around 9:40 p.m. in the area of Tatum Boulevard and Deer Valley Drive in north Phoenix. Shukers died at the scene, the police said. Creed was booked into jail on one count of murder, the police said. The victim and suspect were previously married but divorced, the police said. Police are considering the homicide as a case of domestic violence. The investigation is ongoing, the police said. This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Woman killed by ex-husband near Desert Ridge Marketplace, police say

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store