Former Prasa CEO Lucky Montana defends against SARS asset attachment
Former Prasa CEO and Member of Parliament Lucky Montana challenges SARS over R46 million tax claim.
Image: David Ritchie/
Former Prasa CEO Lucky Montana and Member of Parliament has publicly challenged the South African Revenue Service's (SARS) application to attach his assets, claiming the tax claim against him is unfounded and politically motivated.
The dispute revolves around an R46 million tax assessment SARS sought to recover from Montana. The tax authority's application, filed in the Pretoria High Court, also seeks to declare Montana insolvent.
SARS alleges that Montana owes this amount in taxes, penalties, and interest from assessments dating back over a decade.
The case is currently before the court, and the proceedings are expected to shed light on the validity of SARS's claims.
Montana's Defence and Public Statement
Montana, who served as the CEO of the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa), vehemently denies that he owes SARS any money.
In a detailed statement issued before Tuesday's court hearing, Montana described the case as a 'personal attack' aimed at humiliating him.
'I don't owe SARS,' Montana declared firmly. 'This matter is aimed at humiliating me and tarnishing my reputation just before the court hearing.'
'The truth is, this case goes back to 2018. The papers in this specific leg of the SARS application are from May 2023, but I want it to be clear—I owe no outstanding amounts to SARS, and I will not be paying SARS any money.'
Key Points in Montana's Response
Historical Context: Montana recounts that in 2018, SARS initially contacted him regarding an outstanding tax amount of R1.6 million, which he agreed to pay.
'I informed SARS that I was in the middle of a property sale and would settle the amount once the transfer was complete. I later paid R1.49 million from the proceeds of that sale,' he explained.
Disputes Over Assessments: Following this, he stated that SARS conducted a decade-long retrospective assessment (2009-2019), claiming Montana had undeclared income of R23 million.
'SARS claimed I owed roughly R8 million, but I have made it clear I do not owe them this,' Montana emphasised.
'I have objected to the assessment and believe their calculations are incorrect. I have evidence and legal advice to support my position.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Alleged SARS Overreach
Montana criticised SARS for 'vindictive' actions, including raising taxes on six vehicles financed through hire purchase, which he argues was inconsistent with tax principles.
'SARS said the funds to settle these vehicles did not originate from my account. But standard practice is that dealership settlements are routine, and my legal advisors say SARS's treatment of this is incorrect,' he stated.
'Some of my vehicles were financed and sold at a loss, which should not result in additional tax liabilities.'
He also pointed out that SARS targeted him during periods when he was unemployed.
'Between 2016 and 2024, I was not earning an income, yet SARS assessed me as if I was still earning at the CEO level. I told them this directly, both in writing and in meetings,' Montana asserted.
Legal Actions and Court Proceedings
Montana recounted that SARS obtained a default judgment of R46 million against him 'without properly serving me or giving me a fair chance to defend myself.'
He said, 'I have consistently rejected this default judgment and reserved my rights to challenge it. How the judges of the Tax Court allowed such an injustice to pass is beyond me.'
Montana questioned how SARS intends to recover the alleged R52 million.
'I do not have assets or funds to pay such an amount,' he said.
'The assets SARS is targeting do not even come close to covering what they claim I owe. This is more about humiliating me than recovering taxes.'
Montana's Broader Perspective
Montana emphasised his commitment to lawful compliance.
'I understand my tax obligations, and I pay taxes when legally required to,' he declared.
'But this case is not about tax; it's about abuse of power, illegality, and victimisation by an institution that is supposed to serve the people.'
He firmly stated, 'I will not be bullied or victimised. If necessary, I am prepared to defend my legal rights to the Constitutional Court. This is a fight for justice, not just for myself but for all South Africans who believe in the rule of law.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The Financial Wellness Coach: How to calculate your retirement savings capital
The amount of retirement capital that you need depends on how much you will require to live on every month. Question: My friends tell me I need R30-million in order to retire. My savings are nowhere near that. Am I in trouble? Answer: The amount of money that you need in order to retire will depend on how much you need to live on when you have retired. I do a lot of retirement counselling with individuals approaching retirement, and determining how much they need to live on is always the first step in the planning process. I've found that this amount can vary dramatically – from as little as R8,000 to as much as R230,000 per month. Depending on how much you need in a month, the amount of retirement capital that you need will vary. If you need an after-tax income of R100,000 a month, you will need about R32-million in savings. I suspect that this is where the R30-million story comes in. However, I find that most retired people I help need an after-tax income of between R30,000 and R50,000 a month. I will go through the factors you need to consider when working out how much you will need in order to retire. Monthly retirement budget The first step in working out how much you need when you retire is to get an idea of how much you need to live on each month. I would recommend that you draw up a budget based on what you are spending now, and then amend it to reflect the type of spending pattern you may have when you retire. For example, your parking and lunchtime costs will probably reduce and your medical costs will increase. If you need help here, I have a retirement budget spreadsheet that I can email to you. Tax Once you have figured out how much you need, increase that amount to account for income tax. Drawdown rate and investment strategy You need to ensure that you will have enough money to live on until you, your spouse and any dependants pass away. As one in 10 of us is likely to live to 100, you need to plan on having enough capital for the next 35 years when you retire. What's more, this capital needs to be invested in such a way that it can withstand all the economic and political challenges that you are going to experience over the next 35 years. For someone who is retiring at the age of 65, just think back to what the world was like when you were 30 and all the political and economic challenges you had to deal with. When you retire, you will have a similar set of challenges, but will only have your retirement capital to depend on. There will be no promotions or performance bonuses to help you. It is therefore vital that you get the right investment strategy in place. The recommended drawdown rate for a 65-year-old is 5%. The thinking here is that the typical costs of a living annuity come to about 2.5%, so as long as your investments are growing by more than 7.5%, your pension will increase each year and be sustainable for the rest of your life. In order to work out how much capital you will need in order to retire, you would do the following: Calculate your monthly expenses when you retire; Work out what tax you'll be paying when you retire and increase those expenses by the tax rate; and Divide that number by 5%. This will give you the capital needed to provide you with a sustainable income when you retire. Some examples can be found in the table below. What I've shown you is a rough guide for how to calculate your retirement needs. I would strongly recommend that you speak to a financial adviser who is experienced in retirement planning. They will have access to software that will help you structure your retirement income in the most tax-efficient way and be able to model your investments to ensure you get the right level of returns without risking your capital. DM Kenny Meiring is an independent financial adviser. Contact him on 082 856 0348 or at Send your questions to [email protected] This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.
eNCA
4 hours ago
- eNCA
Explosive report into Prasa contracts
CAPE TOWN - A draft forensic report by law firm Webber Wentzel into Prasa reveals disturbing corruption at Passenger Rail. It shows how the state owned entity has been bleeding money on sub standard contracts, some of which were unnecessary and others that were never completed. WATCH | Open Secrets wants Hawks to finalise PRASA investigation findings A News24 article has detailed how Prasa was overcharged, defrauded, and exploited, with findings that some contractors over-inflated prices by 2000% . The report has also found that some trains are being repaired only to be left at depots. These repairs have already cost the entity R2.5 billion rand. Following the explosive report, ActionSA has written to the Transport Minister demanding accountability.
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Sars launches Project AmaBillions: expect a surge in VAT audits
Discover how Sars' new initiative, Project AmaBillions, is set to increase VAT audits significantly, impacting businesses across South Africa. Learn what steps you can take to ensure compliance and avoid penalties Image: Ziphozonke Lushaba / Independent Newspapers According to recent media reports, Sars has launched a new initiative — Project AmaBillions — as part of its broader strategy to boost revenue collection by an additional R70 billion over the next three years. To support this objective, Sars has reportedly already recruited 500 new staff members, with an additional 1,000 to 1,500 appointments anticipated. While this expanded capacity will enhance Sars' ability to collect, across multiple tax types, Value-Added Tax (VAT) remains an easy target, with a notable increase in VAT-related audits, verifications, and additional assessments already being observed. In this evolving compliance landscape, businesses, particularly those operating in complex or high-risk sectors, are encouraged to revisit their VAT positions and ensure that both legal interpretation and supporting documentation are up to standard. VAT as an Easy Win for Sars The government's recent proposal to raise the VAT rate met significant public resistance and was ultimately shelved. However, the fiscal demands that prompted the proposal remain unchanged. In the absence of a rate increase, an easy target is the enhanced enforcement of existing VAT obligations as a more immediate mechanism to protect the tax base. Given the transactional nature and extensive reach of VAT, it remains one of the most active areas of Sars enforcement, and from a tax collection standpoint, is second only to Personal Income Tax, per Sars' Revenue Announcement for the 2024/25 Financial Year: Except from the 2024/25 Revenue Announcement presentation: Recent trends confirm an increase in audit activity, particularly where VAT positions rely on complex interpretation or are not fully substantiated by documentation. Certain areas are particularly at risk: Input tax deductions , where Sars may challenge the deductibility based on the nature of the underlying expense, its link to taxable supplies, or the quality of supporting invoices; Zero-rated supplies , especially exports, where documentary proof and timing requirements are closely examined; and Apportionment calculations , in cases where businesses make both taxable and exempt supplies, and Sars queries the method used to determine the deductible portion of input VAT. In addition to heightened audit activity, input tax deductions have become increasingly the subject of legal proceedings, with courts being asked to assess whether deductions meet the requirements of the VAT Act. Often, the success or failure of a claim rests both on the commercial reality of the transaction and on whether the taxpayer can demonstrate compliance with the relevant documentary and legal criteria. Discharging the burden of proof As a self-assessment system, VAT places the burden of proof squarely on the taxpayer. Sars does not need to prove a taxpayer is incorrect; rather, it is the taxpayer who must prove that the tax position adopted is correct. Documentary shortcomings that can result in adverse audit findings may include: Incomplete or non-compliant tax invoices; Missing or outdated export documentation; Contracts or agreements that do not support the VAT treatment applied; and A lack of internal policies governing apportionment or exempt supply treatment. Even businesses with reputable systems or historic Sars engagements should not assume automatic compliance. Audit readiness requires continuous alignment with Sars' current expectations and the evolving interpretation of the VAT Act. High-risk for high reward: which businesses are most scrutinised? While all VAT-registered vendors are subject to review, recent enforcement trends suggest that the following types of businesses may be more susceptible to VAT scrutiny, especially in light of the looming 'Project AmaBillions': Exporters of goods and services , particularly where zero-rating is applied; Foreign suppliers of electronic or remote services to South African recipients; Property developers and investors , due to the complexity of VAT on construction, disposals, and mixed-use properties; and Enterprises with substantial input tax deductions or recurring VAT refunds . In these cases, a proactive review of VAT compliance and risk report may assist in identifying and addressing potential exposure, before they are raised by Sars. A Coordinated Tax Debt Collection Strategy 'Project AmaBillions' is more than a revenue slogan — it reflects a deliberate shift by Sars toward coordinated and data-driven enforcement, leading to increased tax revenue collections. This includes the use of Artificial Intelligence tools, targeted audit selection based on risk modelling, and specialised teams focused on high-yield areas such as VAT, High-Net-Worth taxpayers, and Cryptocurrency. With the recruitment of up to 1,500 additional staff, Sars is positioned to expand its enforcement reach significantly over the coming months. Proactive compliance is key While increased audit activity may place pressure on internal finance and tax teams, early intervention and strategic review can help businesses avoid prolonged disputes or unintended liabilities. A targeted VAT review can assist in confirming that: Zero-rated supplies are supported by adequate and compliant documentation; Input tax deductions meet all legal and documentary requirements; Invoicing and contractual frameworks comply with SARS standards; and Internal VAT procedures, including apportionment and record-keeping, are robus t. Early action prevents future exposure Where there is uncertainty around VAT treatment, and businesses find themselves in a potentially precarious position of now facing Sars scrutiny, the best practice is to seek the assistance of a tax professional, ensuring the best compliance strategy is followed. Early assessment can help prevent future challenges, reduce the risk of penalties and interest, and ensure Sars readiness in an increasingly vigilant digitized environment.
