logo
Two communities seeking better roads in Ring of Fire, reject new mining law

Two communities seeking better roads in Ring of Fire, reject new mining law

Two First Nations that signed deals with the provincial government to improve access to the Ring of Fire are speaking out against a new Ontario law that seeks to ease mineral extraction in the northern region.
Aroland First Nation Chief Sonny Gagnon said his community objects to the law known as Bill 5, which seeks to speed up development in the face of pressure from the United States.
The legislation passed last week and allows Ontario to suspend provincial and municipal laws by creating so-called special economic zones for certain projects it chooses, such as new mines.
"We do not stand with Ontario in support of Bill 5," Gagnon said in a statement.
"We do stand in support of the other First Nations in Ontario who are opposed to Bill 5 and working to have it thrown out."
Ontario intends to name the mineral-rich Ring of Fire as the first such zone, but the law has created a firestorm of anger among many First Nations. They say they want to be involved in development, but that the new law violates their treaty rights and ignores their concerns.
Aroland signed a shared-prosperity agreement with the province in January for major upgrades to roads that lead to the proposed roads to the Ring of Fire, a 5,000-sq-km region about 450 kilometres north of Thunder Bay, Ont.
Two First Nations that signed deals with the provincial government to improve access to the Ring of Fire are speaking out against a new Ontario law that seeks to ease mineral extraction in the northern region.
Aroland sits outside the Ring of Fire region with access to the provincial highway system that ends near its territory.
Premier Doug Ford has trotted out Gagnon's name at least five times in recent weeks in defense of Bill 5.
Ford also often points to Marten Falls First Nation and Webequie First Nation, which are the lead proponents for three roads that will connect their remote communities to the provincial highway system.
One of them would connect the Eagle's Nest site in the Ring of Fire, a proposed mine owned by Australian mining giant Wyloo, to the other two roads.
"There's going to be a group that doesn't want anything done," Ford said last week.
"Well, good, don't do it then. There's going to be another group in the middle that says, 'Boy, let's see what happens.' And then there's the progressive group that's saying, 'Let's get it done,' like Chief Sonny from Aroland — and Webequie and Marten Falls."
Gagnon said Aroland has never consented to mining the Ring of Fire. Rather, part of the agreement was designed to give road access to its neighbouring First Nation, Marten Falls.
Marten Falls and Webequie First Nation are fly-in communities that have a month or so of winter road access.
"Aroland has never said Marten Falls cannot build a road so that it is no longer remote; if they want to have road access to the highway system like we do, they should be able to," Gagnon said.
"But that has to be done right – with proper assessment and protection measures and Aroland involvement and consent. The agreement with Ontario is about that, and some necessary electrical power to our community. We were to get funding to support that initiative and so far we have received nothing and instead have spent our own dollars trying to ensure our community has basic services.'
Aroland does not consent to that road being used for mining companies, he added.
"We have consistently in writing indicated that no such decision on what happens to the Ring of Fire should be made until the regional assessment being conducted now and being co-led by many First Nations, including Aroland, is complete, and indicates that mining in this sensitive and vulnerable peatlands region is safe for humanity, for us, for wildlife, climate and water," Gagnon said.
"We don't yet know that. More important – Ontario does not yet know that."
Ford took issue with Gagnon's comments.
"Does he want the $200 million electricity deal that we handed over to him? Does he want to get off diesel because they live on diesel? Does he want a road that they can actually leave their community and drive? Does he want a community centre? Does he want a hockey arena inside that community centre? The answer is 1,000 per cent yes," Ford said Monday at Intersect/25, an event hosted by The Globe and Mail.
Ford said he will be speaking to Gagnon shortly.
"Mark my words in this room, he will be moving forward with us, not because of me, not because of pressuring me, because he's a smart man, and he understands his community needs to prosper," Ford said.
Marten Falls First Nation also has an agreement with the province on roads, and its chief says he cannot support the law as it is written — though he hopes Ontario can correct course with consultation.
Chief Bruce Achneepineskum said he is feeling conflicted.
"I'm not OK with this bill," he told The Canadian Press in an interview.
On the one hand, he and his community want road access built so they do not have to rely on winter roads. Last year, the frozen road only lasted a month as the winter road season keeps shrinking, he said.
Marten Falls also wants to be in the driver's seat for any development in its territory, Achneepineskum said.
"Our intent is to take the lead on development in our area and with that we're still in discussions with government on how to move forward," he said.
"We don't agree with everything that government says and does. So we're taking it on an approach that's based on a negotiation."
Marten Falls First Nation has been working on environmental assessments for the roads.
One of the assessments has been in development for going on six years, though about half that time was lost due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Achneepineskum said.
"Sometimes, you think to yourself, that is a really long time," he said.
Ford, Indigenous Affairs Minister Greg Rickford and Energy and Mines Minister Stephen Lecce have said the province will consult First Nations on the new law throughout the summer.
Achneepineskum said he is willing to listen to the province and give them time to get Bill 5 right, but, like many other First Nations have said, he wanted the province to consult with them on the language in the legislation rather than starting those conversations after it is already law.
"I have to support Aboriginal and treaty rights that other First Nations are talking about because, in principle, that's what we're fighting for also: to have our rights and interests in our traditional area — and that includes the Ring of Fire — recognized," Achneepineskum said.
Webequie's chief was not available to talk, as he continues to deal with a wildfire that has forced the evacuation of his entire community to southern Ontario.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘No buyers' remorse' for voters as Doug Ford's Tories enjoy big poll lead
‘No buyers' remorse' for voters as Doug Ford's Tories enjoy big poll lead

Toronto Star

time3 hours ago

  • Toronto Star

‘No buyers' remorse' for voters as Doug Ford's Tories enjoy big poll lead

Premier Doug Ford's third-term Progressive Conservatives are enjoying an extended honeymoon with voters, a new public-opinion survey suggests. In the first major Ontario political poll since Ford's Tories were re-elected in the snap Feb. 27 provincial election, Abacus Data found the governing party well ahead of its rivals. The PCs were at 49 per cent to 28 per cent for Bonnie Crombie's Liberals, 14 per cent for Marit Stiles' New Democrats and five per cent for Mike Schreiner's Greens. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Provincial Politics Doug Ford wins third majority after gambling on winter election Ford defied the odds Thursday becoming the first premier to win three consecutive majority 'We're seeing the highest vote share for the Tories we've measured since we've been tracking and we see Ford's personal numbers better than they've been since we've really been tracking,' said Abacus president David Coletto. 'At least right now, there's no buyer's remorse in re-electing the PCs,' said Coletto. In the February election, the Tories received 43 per cent of the popular vote to 30 per cent for the Liberals, 18.6 per cent for the New Democrats and 4.8 per cent for the Greens. Abacus surveyed 1,000 Ontarians from June 2 through last Thursday using online panels based on the Lucid exchange platform. While opt-in polls cannot be assigned a margin of error, for comparison purposes, a random sample of this size would have one of plus or minus 3.09 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. That means the poll was conducted during the first ministers meeting in Saskatoon — where Ford played a prominent role with Prime Minister Mark Carney — and as the Tories were ramming through their controversial Bill 5 designed to fast-track mining and infrastructure projects. Federal Politics Mark Carney, premiers agree on 'nation-building priorities,' but First Nations raise alarms over lack of consultation Prime Minister hints at prioritizing energy infrastructure — such as pipelines — after first While the premier received mostly positive press for working with Carney to counter U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war against Canada, Queen's Park has been roiled by protests against the Protect Ontario By Unleashing Our Economy Act. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW First Nation leaders have warned there will be 'fierce resistance' if long-standing treaty rights are overridden by the law passed last week. 'Bill 5 has generated, at least from my vantage point, no ... negative implications for the popularity of this government at least right now,' said Coletto, warning that could change. 'There's a lesson for those opponents of it — that they're going to have to do far more to get the public engaged, to be opposed to this at a time when people are really focused on just getting things done.' Indeed, Ford's current standing appears largely due to his vocal stance against Trump's tariffs and a willingness to work with Carney's re-elected federal Liberals. 'There is this moment where Ontarians, like the rest of the country, are rallying around their political leader. I don't think people are overly optimistic, but I do think they get a sense that their political leaders are working together ... working with a common purpose,' said Coletto. 'We have a common goal or enemy, or however you want to frame it,' he said, pointing to the existential threat to Canada that Trump poses. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW The pollster said Carney's popularity is 'definitely benefiting the Liberal brand in Ontario,' which is encouraging news for Crombie's provincial Grits. But 'the collapse of the federal NDP has put downward pressure on the Ontario NDP' that's hurting Stiles' party. 'They're at the lowest we've measured them at in our tracking — 14 per cent,' said Coletto. In terms of personal popularity, Ford was at 44 per cent positive, 33 per cent negative for a plus 11 per cent favourability rating with 21 per cent of respondents neutral and two per cent unsure. Stiles was at 28 per cent positive, 25 per cent negative for plus three per cent with 31 per cent neutral and 16 per cent uncertain. Schreiner was at 24 per cent positive and 23 per cent negative for plus one per cent with 34 per cent neutral and 20 per cent unsure. Crombie, the subject of a multimillion-dollar pre-election attack ad blitz from Ford's Tories, was at 31 per cent positive and 33 per cent negative for minus two per cent with 25 per cent neutral and 11 per cent uncertain. Politics Headlines Newsletter Get the latest news and unmatched insights in your inbox every evening Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. Please enter a valid email address. Sign Up Yes, I'd also like to receive customized content suggestions and promotional messages from the Star. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Politics Headlines Newsletter You're signed up! You'll start getting Politics Headlines in your inbox soon. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page.

Opinion: It's time to fast-track actions to defend B.C.'s lands, waters, fish and wildlife
Opinion: It's time to fast-track actions to defend B.C.'s lands, waters, fish and wildlife

Vancouver Sun

time7 hours ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Opinion: It's time to fast-track actions to defend B.C.'s lands, waters, fish and wildlife

B.C. Premier David Eby and Prime Minister Mark Carney have outlined visions for rapid development of B.C. and Canada's natural resources to 'aggressively develop projects that are in the national interest in order to protect Canada's energy security.' As a drastic action to fast-track key projects, the provincial government recently narrowly passed Bills 14 and 15, laws that risk trampling Indigenous rights and circumventing environmental protections. As a scientist who studies the health of western Canada's oceans, rivers, and salmon, my alarm bells are going off. B.C. and Canada have an unfortunate track record of failing to protect ecosystems and people from industrial activities. From Eagle Creek to Mount Polley, mining disasters are releasing toxins into drinking water and killing fish — 70 per cent of B.C.'s salmon populations are declining . In the 2021 B.C. vs. Yahey decision, the B.C. Supreme Court found that the province enabled oil and gas and other industries to cumulatively degrade northeast B.C.'s ecosystems to such an extent that moose and caribou populations collapsed, violating Blueberry River First Nations' treaty rights. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Risk of such harms to lands, waters, fish, wildlife, and Indigenous rights could be decreased through effective implementation of environmental policies. Eby also states he wants to advance 'conservation of precious water and land, and partnership with First Nations.' Here are five actions that the province could advance to fast-track safeguards for the lands and waters that sustain fish, wildlife, and people: First, set interim limits of cumulative industry disturbance to minimize risks of pushing lands and waters over thresholds of unacceptable harm. Currently, neither B.C. nor Canada has a policy that provides certainty for local peoples and industry by saying, 'This is too much.' There is an opportunity to leverage the existing B.C. Cumulative Effects Framework and the 2021 Yahey legal precedence to set interim baseline thresholds for cumulative disturbance with statutory power across all sectors. Second, support and empower regional planning processes. There are various new and ongoing planning processes that work with local rights-holders and other groups to incorporate local values and priorities to identify opportunities and limits for industry. Local peoples may want more, or less, stringent regulations than provincial thresholds. There is an opportunity to increase investment in and authority of land-use planning processes that supersede provincial guidelines. Third, protect 30 per cent of B.C. by 2030, guided by local rights-holders and scientific information. Indigenous protected and conserved areas and other Indigenous-led conservation initiatives can protect key ecosystems for current and future generations. Collectively, these locally and science-driven conservation areas could prioritize the protection of critical areas for cultural keystone species such as moose, caribou, and salmon and set no-go zones for industry. Continued action is needed if commitments of 30 per cent protection by 2030 are to be met. Fourth, prevent empty promises of economic benefits of industries. A 2023 study found that mines underdelivered promised jobs by 40 per cent, and delivered only one-third of forecasted tax revenue. A 2024 report found that many mine claims are doing environmentally harmful explorations aimed to garner investments that make mining executives even richer, but without intent to actually extract minerals. B.C.'s lands, waters, and local peoples would have some defence against get-rich-quick schemes if mining companies were required to submit a robust economic feasibility plan as part of their project description in the early stages of environmental assessment. Fifth, reconsider Bills 14 and 15 and clarify their application. Bills 14 and 15 give authority to fast-track projects and thus are a bellwether for the true colours of the province. Amendments to the bills could clarify how selected projects will consider environmental risks and incorporate free, prior, and informed consent to avoid violation of B.C.'s 2019 Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. If the bills are used to fast-track a gold or coal mine, then it will be clear that B.C. is extracting its resources for short-term dollars at the expense of environmental well-being and future generations. In these times of crisis, B.C. and Canada have the very real opportunity to be global leaders in the triple bottom line of social, economic, and environmental thriving. As Canada takes action to fast-track sustainable development, there is a parallel need to fast-track actions to not sell off the health of our lands, waters, and futures to extractive industries. Healthy watersheds mean healthy people and healthy economies. Jonathan Moore is a professor of aquatic ecology and conservation at Simon Fraser University and Liber Ero Chair of coastal science and management.

Lawsuit accuses province of failing to protect Saskatchewan River delta, violating treaty obligations
Lawsuit accuses province of failing to protect Saskatchewan River delta, violating treaty obligations

CBC

time10 hours ago

  • CBC

Lawsuit accuses province of failing to protect Saskatchewan River delta, violating treaty obligations

Social Sharing Cumberland House Cree Nation says the provincial government is not protecting the Saskatchewan River system, and now it's time to take the province to court. Lawyers for the First Nation in northeastern Saskatchewan filed a statement of claim Tuesday in Saskatoon Court of King's Bench, alleging the government has failed to uphold its treaty obligations. It names the government of Saskatchewan as the defendant. For generations, the people of Cumberland House Cree Nation have depended on the Saskatchewan River delta, the largest freshwater river delta in North America, stretching 9,700 square kilometres from northeast Saskatchewan into western Manitoba, the lawsuit says. But government-approved activities upstream — such as dams, irrigation and industrial and urban uses — have dramatically reduced the amount of water that reaches the delta, continually degrading the ecosystem, the lawsuit says. That has affected the ability of the people there to exercise their treaty rights to maintain their way of life, Cumberland House Cree Nation Chief Rene Chaboyer said at a Tuesday news conference in Saskatoon. "We feel that our hand is being forced to … move forward into the court of law to seek justice, and today's a very important day in the history of our community, our province, in our country." He and other community members spoke about how the delta has changed over their lifetimes: the water is no longer safe to drink, species of fish have disappeared, moose are migrating elsewhere, birds are changing their migration patterns and muskrats are hard to find, they said. "Back in the day, it was healthy.… Nowadays it's scary," Chaboyer said. Treaty rights Treaty 5 covers an area of about 260,000 square kilometres in parts of what are now Ontario, Manitoba and Saskatchewan. It was signed in 1875, with the ancestors of Cumberland House signing on in 1876. The inhabitants agreed to share their land with the newcomers in exchange for promises, including that Cumberland House would be free to continue to hunt, fish, trap and harvest in the treaty territory, the lawsuit says. "The treaties are what allowed the newcomers to come and settle in Saskatchewan, and the treaties were only made because of that promise that Cumberland House Cree Nation could continue to maintain its way of life," Tim Dickson, the First Nation's lawyer, said at Tuesday's news conference. "That treaty promise is part of the foundation of Canada and of Canadian law. It's protected by the Canadian Constitution and it's enforceable in court." WATCH | Massive Saskatchewan irrigation plan threatens wildlife, opponents say: Massive Saskatchewan irrigation plan threatens wildlife, opponents say 10 months ago Duration 1:55 First Nations and environmental groups warn Saskatchewan's $4 billion farm irrigation plan threatens the diverse ecosystem of the Saskatchewan River Delta — North America's largest inland river delta. The Saskatchewan River delta is the First Nation's homeland and "essential" to their culture and identity, Dickson said. CBC News has reached out to the Saskatchewan government for its response to the lawsuit. Ongoing degradation Activities upstream — including hydroelectric dams, water diversion and withdrawal of water for irrigation, industrial uses and drinking water — have starved the delta of its vital sediment and polluted the water, Cumberland House is arguing in its lawsuit. The proposed construction of the $1.15-billion Lake Diefenbaker irrigation megaproject, which the government has committed to beginning this year, is also seen as "a very serious threat," Dickson said. Cumberland House has tried to engage with the province on the project, but "there has been very little engagement from the government," Dickson said. Instead, residents have watched as, year after year, the delta degrades. The loss of the delta would be felt not just by the people who live there, but by everyone, said Cumberland House Cree Nation Coun. Beverly Goulet. At the end of Tuesday's news conference, she responded to a question asked earlier by a journalist about how much compensation the community was seeking. "Instead of worrying about money, because we certainly can't take it with us when we pass … remember the children," Goulet said. "That's who we want to protect, because we've done enough damage to this planet. Like, what are they going to have? What have we done? "So, let's all think about that."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store