How to crack down on open drug use? 5 Londoners on what police should do
Social Sharing
Months after he promised to crack down on drug users smoking and injecting substances out in the open, Chief Thai Truong will unveil a new approach to guide police officers as they interact with drug users in the city's downtown, midtown and Old East Village.
At his state of the city address, Mayor Josh Morgan said, "Blatant public drug ... must not be tolerated" and welcomed an open-air public space drug strategy. Truong has said it's a problem police can't "arrest their way out of."
The new policy, called Project Pathways, will be unveiled at police headquarters Tuesday morning. CBC News spoke to several Londoners about what they'd like to see.
Scott Courtice
Executive director, London Intercommunity Health Centre
"I hope that as we're trying to enforce the appropriate use of public space, that people are moved to places where they can get support services and not just be moved along to nothing," Courtice said.
"We need to use this as an opportunity to provide supports to people and not have it feel punitive, but really like we're trying to balance the concerns of businesses and neighbourhoods with the real need for people who are using substances on the street to get access to services."
Police will hopefully balance the rights of people using drugs with the rights of people to enjoy public spaces and for businesses to thrive. "Confiscating drugs should be a very last resort for police."
Kevin Morrison
General manager, Old East Village business improvement area
"Since I've been here for the last year and a half, there's been a hands-off approach to open drug use and it seems that not only are we ignoring it but we're enabling it, so that has to stop. People don't feel safe on their sidewalks or on the streets," Morrison said.
"I think the first step is to confiscate the drugs. Take the drugs away, make them uncomfortable. Where are they going to go? I don't now, but you can't be on the sidewalks. By moving them along and making it uncomfortable, they don't have the drugs anymore, they have to go through the hassle of getting drugs again."
Those whose drugs have been taken away might be more agitated, but it might help them move toward asking for treatment, Morrison said.
Melissa Parrott
"I work downtown. It's really tough to see people struggling every single day," Parrott said. "I don't want people to be pushed aside. We don't like to see drug use around the library, where people bring their kids, where they walk their dogs; having all the litter is disturbing, but it's also disturbing to see police moving people along who are just eating a sandwich, just trying to survive."
There has to be a place for people to go, she added. "Do they have a place to go? That's my main concern. We need more services, somewhere safe to consume the drugs. Safe supply and a safe place to use, that's what we need."
Michelle Nicholls
Downtown resident
"Weed is legal, but anything else than that, they should be cracking down on. The police chief has said they won't arrest immediately; they'll move people along and give stern warnings twice. You can definitely see the drug use problem here downtown. I think if people know that they'll get a ticket eventually, that would be great. Arresting everyone won't make any sense, we already have a really clogged justice system."
Mark Dencev
Owner, Richmond Tavern
"What I'd really like to see is some sort of a zone where commercial businesses and tourism are really considered. I think it's super important to be very compassionate with the individuals that are using. I understand how difficult it is for them. There are not a lot of safe places for them to go. But when you're standing in the open, in doorways, you're not only impeding businesses, but you're setting a real obstacle for the reputation of downtown. It makes people feel not safe to come downtown."
A zero-tolerance zone where people loitering or using drugs would be immediately ushered out could be the solution, Dencev said.
"If you don't listen, then you're going to get a ticket, a fine, arrested, whatever. But if you're doing what you're doing outside of that zone, nobody is going to bother you about it. That way, businesses are protected."
Beat police and foot patrol officers know the names of the people who use drugs in their areas, and seem to care about them, Dencev added. "There's not enough tools in their toolbox and not enough resources to back them up. They're just shuffling people along to the next empty doorway, and that's not a solution. You need a property for safe injections, some sort of an area that would be more supportive for these individuals, just not in the middle of downtown when we're trying to do business."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
a day ago
Killer of London, Ont., Muslim family appeals convictions, challenging use of manifesto at trial
Headlines Latest News Podcasts (new window) Convicted killer Nathaniel Veltman addresses his sentencing hearing in Ontario Superior Court in London on Jan. 24, 2024. Photo: (Pam Davies/CBC) Posted: June 6, 2025 8:54 PM Word of Nathaniel Veltman's appeal comes on 4th anniversary of attack on Afzaal family. Warning: This story contains distressing details. A London, Ont., man convicted of killing four members of a Muslim family and severely injuring a fifth member in a hate-motivated attack on June 6, 2021, is appealing on three grounds, including that the judge should not have allowed the jury to consider his white nationalist manifesto. A Windsor jury found Nathaniel Veltman guilty in November 2023 of four counts of first-degree murder and one count of attempted murder. Three months later, then Superior Court Justice Renee Pomerance ruled his actions amounted to a textbook case of terrorism as defined under Canadian law. He was sentenced on Jan. 24, 2024. Friday's news of the appeal comes on the fourth anniversary (new window) of the killing of Yumnah Afzaal, 15, her parents — Madiha Salman, 44, an engineer, and Salman Afzaal, 46, a physiotherapist — and family matriarch Talat Afzaal, 74, a teacher and artist. The youngest family member, a boy, survived. Veltman drove his pickup truck into the family as they were taking an evening stroll on June 6, 2021. Appeal sought on 3 grounds I appreciate that the community was horrified by this offence and the remaining members of the family were devastated by this offence. I respect that, and I feel very badly for both the family and for the community, Veltman's appeal lawyer, Stephen Whitzman, told CBC News. Mr. Veltman, of course, has a right to exercise his full legal rights, including his right to an appeal, and it's my job as his lawyer to assist him in doing that, and I hope that everyone will understand that those two things can both exist together. The appeal is being sought on three grounds, based on court records obtained by CBC News: The judge erred in admitting the ideological evidence, including Veltman's white supremacist manifesto, titled "A White Awakening," which set out his political and racist views; The judge erred in admitting Veltman's statements to a police officer which were obtained via a "Charter breach," meaning he was not properly warned of his rights; The judge erred in refusing the defence application for a mistrial because of what Veltman's lawyer at the time called "inflammatory language" during the Crown's closing statement, including references to the crime scene and the grievous injuries suffered by the victims. Veltman's trial lasted 12 weeks. The jury heard evidence he was motivated by right-wing extremist and Islamophobic views, and he described himself as a white nationalist. He grew up in a strict Christian home and fell into a web of online hate during the COVID-19 pandemic, the trial heard. WATCH | CBC's coverage of the judge's 2023 ruling in the Muslim attack case: Début du widget Widget. Passer le widget ? Fin du widget Widget. Retourner au début du widget ? Afzaal family's murder 'textbook' terrorism, judge rules 1 year agoDuration2:21A judge in London, Ont., ruled the actions of the man who ran down a Muslim family with his truck in 2021, killing four people, were a 'textbook example of terrorist motive and intent.' Nathaniel Veltman was already sentenced to life in prison for murdering four members of the Afzaal family. Veltman testified in his own defence and said he took magic mushrooms a day before the killing in order to escape the hell of his mind. The killing galvanized London and Canadian society to create laws and groups that would combat Islamophobia. Community reflects on 4 years since Afzaal family killed (new window) As it has on every anniversary of the killing, the community gathered Friday to reflect on the family, who became known as Our London Family, and to recognize the impact of the tragedy. Kate Dubinski (new window) · CBC News Environment Canada says air quality in the city is 'very high risk' as of noon Friday. One Canadian Economy bill crafted to strengthen Canada's economy, sovereignty in face of Trump's tariffs. Bill C-2 gives power to pause, cancel and suspend immigration documents. Distribution sites have been plagued by deaths, reports of violence in last 2 weeks. Canada hosting high-level gathering in Alberta in just over a week. 10 hours ago International
2 days ago
Immigration minister defends sweeping new powers in border bill
Immigration Minister Lena Metlege Diab is defending controversial new measures in the Strong Borders Act, such as giving her office the power to cancel immigration documents en masse and placing time limits for asylum seekers to make their applications. There's a lot of applications in the system. We need to act fairly, and treat people appropriately who really do need to claim asylum and who really do need to be protected to stay in Canada, Diab told CBC News. We need to be more efficient in doing that. At the same time, Canadians demand that we have a system that works for everyone. Introduced in the House of Commons on Tuesday, Bill C-2, the Strong Borders Act, is meant to protect Canadian sovereignty, strengthen the border and keep Canadians safe, according to the federal government. The bill would make dozens of amendments to existing laws. Its proposed changes to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act would force asylum seekers entering the country, including students and temporary residents, to make claims within a year. Immigration Minister Lena Metlege Diab said mass cancellations of immigration documents would not be done without careful consideration by cabinet. Photo: CBC / Mark Crosby The new law would also require irregular border crossers, people who enter Canada between official ports of entry, to make an asylum claim within 14 days of arriving in Canada. And it would speed up voluntary departures by making removal orders effective the same day an asylum claim is withdrawn. Groups such as the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers are raising concerns about these measures. There are a few categories of people who may end up making a claim after they've been in Canada for more than one year for fully legitimate reasons, said Adam Sadinsky, the group's advocacy co-chair. He cited examples such as changes in government in someone's country of origin, the breakout of conflict or their human rights advocacy in Canada placing a target on them. They may now be in danger returning back home in a way that they weren't when they first arrived, he said. Federal government data shows some 39,445 asylum claimants processed by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada and the Canada Border Services Agency between January and April. (new window) Sadinsky said if the government's motivations are about clearing backlogs, it may be creating another problem. Asylum seekers who find their application rejected by the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada can file appeals to the Refugee Appeal Division. However, shutting them out of the asylum route after a year could make them turn to the Federal Court of Canada for recourse instead, a body that has been public (new window) about its own courtrooms facing severe delays with immigration cases. It's a lot more work for the court, Sadinsky said, when people start getting removal dates from Canada and they have to ask the court for motions for stays of removal from Canada. Sadinsky suggested the government could have reduced backlogs by issuing blanket approvals for would-be asylum seekers from countries where Canada recognizes there is an imminent danger to sending them back, such as Taliban-controlled Afghanistan. WATCH: Public safety minister says border bill will give law enforcement better tools to deal with crime Début du widget Widget. Passer le widget ? Fin du widget Widget. Retourner au début du widget ? Public safety minister says border bill will give law enforcement better tools to deal with crime Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree said Bill C-2, the Strong Borders Act, will 'keep our borders secure, combat transnational organized crime, stop the flow of illegal fentanyl and crack down on money laundering,' as well as 'enhance the integrity and fairness of our immigration system.' Speaking to journalists on Wednesday, Justice Minister Sean Fraser said the government needed to act, though he recognized courts are facing efficiency problems. We need to be able to do two things at once, he said about changing the asylum system and reducing court backlogs. Reached for comment, the office of the chief justice of the Federal Court said in a statement it would simply hope that any potential impact on the court's workload would be taken into account, citing a previous amendment to immigration law under Stephen Harper's Conservative government in 2010 that included four new court positions. Mass cancellation powers The Migrant Rights Network, an advocacy group, said it is alarmed about the government giving itself the ability to cancel previously issued immigration documents in large groups. What this is, is setting up of a mass deportation machine, said its spokesperson Syed Hussan. Just go out and say we're walking away from the Geneva Convention. Diab said any mass cancellation decisions would be taken by the whole cabinet, not just her office, and they would not be done lightly. These are in exceptional circumstances, when you're talking about mass cancellation or suspension, she said. For example, when COVID happened, we literally had applications coming in, and the system had no authority to suspend or cancel those applications … we could have health risks again. We could have security risks. Bill C-2 is now moving through Parliament. The legislation would normally be studied by parliamentary committee next, though neither Diab nor Gary Anandasangaree, the public safety minister, could say which committee would pick it up. Committees have not been named yet for this sitting and it is unclear if they will before Parliament wraps up for the summer at the end of June. The Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers said it intends to write a letter outlining its concerns to the federal government, and would hope to present at committee when the moment arrives. Raffy Boudjikanian (new window) · CBC News ·
CBC
2 days ago
- CBC
A talk with the woman who will be leading Charlottetown's police force as of June 16th
Jennifer McCarron will soon be the first woman to ever lead Charlottetown Police Services, as its current chief moves over to municipal management ranks. McCarron, who takes over as acting chief on June 16, sat down to talk with Louise Martin of CBC News: Compass.
