Funding reduced for bill that would create grant program for fair associations
Apr. 2—BISMARCK — The funding was cut in half for a bill that would help county fair associations in North Dakota with infrastructure projects.
The Senate Appropriations Committee gave a do-pass recommendation on Friday, March 28, to an amended version of House Bill 1591 — sponsored by Reps. Mitch Ostlie and Bernie Satrom and Sens. Cole Conley and Terry Wanzek, all R-Jamestown — that would create a grant program for county agriculture fair associations. There are 33 county agriculture fair associations in North Dakota.
Wanzek said the funding for the bill was reduced from $3 million to $1.5 million because the state general fund is $300 million over a balanced budget for the next biennium.
"Every dollar counts," he said.
HB 1591 goes back to the House where the amended version can be approved. If the amended bill isn't approved, the House and the Senate would each appoint three members for a conference committee who would try to come to an agreement on the bill's final language.
"By then, we will have a better idea," Wanzek said, referring to potentially appropriate $3 million to HB 1591. "Maybe we'll have the budget balanced. The steps or efforts made in all the other numerous bills and budgets, maybe we'll have it balanced and can afford to add it back."
HB 1591 would create a matching grant program and appropriate $1.5 million to the agriculture commissioner to provide grants to county agriculture fair associations for the planning, design and construction of infrastructure projects. No more than $100,000 can be awarded to a county agriculture fair association.
Wanzek said discussions were held to lower the maximum dollar amount that could be awarded to a county agriculture fair association.
"We rebelled against that a little bit," he said. "I just feel that $100,000 unfortunately doesn't go very far anymore."
He said a fair association would be completing a $200,000 project with a 1-for-1 match with the grant program.
The agriculture commissioner would be responsible for creating the guidelines to distribute the grant funds, including the requirement for a recipient to provide $1 of matching funds from nonstate sources for up to $2 of grant funding received. The matching funds may be provided in cash or in-kind contributions.
The grant program would be funded one time and ends on June 30, 2027. The bill was amended to have an emergency clause, meaning it would take effect immediately after the governor signs it into law.
"The minute this passes and is signed by the governor, they can start the program and maybe they could get their money in sooner rather than later," Wanzek said. "Maybe they could actually get the money and utilize it for this year's fair this summer."
He said there were questions on whether some smaller county fair associations could meet a dollar-for-dollar match to get the maximum $100,000.
"Some of them maybe won't be able to fully utilize the full $100,000 and might only (utilize) say $30,000, $40,000, $50,000," Wanzek said. "So there was a thought that maybe considering that it was a new idea and considering the fact that some of the smaller fairs were going to struggle to meet the match, we changed the matching requirements ... . We changed that to the discretion of the ag commissioner — it will be his department that oversees this grant — and we were going to let them develop some guidelines or rules and it had to be anywhere from 1-to-1 to 1-for-2."
He said in-kind contributions can include work donated to a fair association that can be used as a matching fund. For example, donated time by an electrician or plumber could be viewed as an in-kind match for the grant program.
Wanzek anticipates the grant program will be popular among county agriculture fair associations. If the bill is popular, he said the Legislature could look at appropriating $3 million for the program in the next legislative session in 2027.
"So many of our citizens have memories of their county fair," he said. "I think this might be an ongoing idea."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What the 'Big, Beautiful' tax bill means for municipal bonds
JPMorgan raised its forecast for municipal bond sales in 2025 to $560 billion as US lawmakers deliberate over President Trump's "big, beautiful" tax and spending bill in the Senate. Goldman Sachs Asset Management co-head of municipal fixed income Sylvia Yeh weighs in on what policy changes to the US tax code could mean for municipal bond investors, as well as valuation catalysts in comparison to Treasury yields (^TYX, ^TNX, ^FVX). Goldman Sachs manages several municipal bond ETFs (GMUB, GCAL, GMNY, GUMI). To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Catalysts here. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
TN Republicans' bill would oust officials who release 'confidential' immigration enforcement details
Top Tennessee Republican lawmakers have proposed a bill that would make it a felony and grounds for removal if public officials jeopardize the safety of federal law enforcement officers or disrupt federal immigration enforcement by revealing confidential operation details. The bill, filed by House Speaker Cameron Sexton and Senate Majority Leader Jack Johnson on June 9, comes after a weeklong operation by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Nashville in early May. The operation led to hundreds of traffic stops, in coordination with the Tennessee Highway Patrol, and nearly 200 arrests. Nashville Mayor Freddie O'Connell has been under scrutiny from state and federal Republican leaders over his response to the arrests. During the operation, O'Connell updated an existing executive order that requires city departments to report communications with federal immigration officials to the mayor's office, tightening the timeline for those reports. Even in its original version, the executive order included a provision that those communications be posted online for transparency. When O'Connell's office posted that list in late May, it originally included the names of some officials who called. Those names have since been removed from the version of the spreadsheet posted online. During the sweeps in Nashville, O'Connell also repeatedly asked federal officials to release the names and charges of the people arrested, but to no avail. Some community members, meanwhile, were outspoken in their opposition to the operation. Immigrant rights groups and other Nashvillians showed up to protest at Nashville's ICE office not long after the sweeps began on May 4. That opposition extended to further protests several weeks later, an appearance from New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker and a volunteer effort to monitor and verify ICE activity. U.S. Rep. Andy Ogles and other D.C. Republicans have since called for a federal investigation into O'Connell, which was officially initiated on May 30. Meanwhile, Sexton called for O'Connell to rescind his executive order, saying it risks the safety of federal immigration agents. "The people of Tennessee expect their elected leaders to protect law enforcement — not endanger them," Johnson said in a June 9 news release. "When a public official like Mayor O'Connell chooses political activism over public safety, especially by interfering with federal immigration enforcement, he has no business holding office in this state." Johnson said he hopes the legislation "sends a message" to O'Connell and other "blue city" leaders that may act similarly. 'Mayor O'Connell's public refusal to rescind his executive order makes the need for this legislation unmistakably clear to prevent future political defiance that undermines the rule of law and puts law enforcement at risk,' Johnson said in the release. Sexton and Johnson did not provide any examples of O'Connell's interference with immigration enforcement operations. The bill would make it a Class E felony for state or local officials to "negligently release" information that identifies officers tasked with immigration enforcement and paves the way to oust those who violate the law, according to the release. Additionally, it expands provisions under the Tennessee Public Records Act to protect undercover officers and sensitive enforcement activity and beefs up penalties for unauthorized disclosures of protected law enforcement information. The bill is backed by top Senate Republicans, including Lt. Gov. Randy McNally, Speaker Pro Tempore Ferrell Haile, Republican Caucus Chair Ken Yager and Finance Committee Chair Bo Watson. It is set to be taken up in the 2026 legislative session. O'Connell's office had not responded to The Tennessean's request for comment by 11 a.m. on June 10. The move by Tennessee Republicans comes a few days after U.S. Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tennessee, introduced legislation to make it illegal to 'dox' federal law enforcement officials. She said the bill is a direct response to the spreadsheet published by O'Connell's office detailing recent communications between city departments with federal immigration agents. Blackburn filed the Protecting Law Enforcement From Doxxing Act on June 4, explicitly naming O'Connell as the impetus. That bill would make it illegal to 'publish the name of a federal law enforcement officer with the intent to obstruct a criminal investigation or immigration operation.' An individual found guilty of doing so would face a fine and imprisonment of five years. In their joint news release on June 9, Sexton and Johnson praised Blackburn's efforts and say their proposed legislation complements her proposal. "Tennessee has always stood with law enforcement and we will not allow politically motivated actors to put officers' lives in danger simply to score political points with the far left," Sexton said in the release. "Tennessee will not become California, and Nashville will not become LA or San Francisco on our watch." Typically, "doxxing" refers to the act of publicly providing personally identifiable information about an individual or organization, usually via the internet, such as their home addresses, private contact information and names of family members. As for the public availability of law enforcement officers' names, they are not typically considered private information. This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: TN bill would punish officials who reveal immigration enforcement details
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Newsom should be 'tarred and feathered' for defying Trump, Speaker Johnson says
Newsom should be 'tarred and feathered' for defying Trump, Speaker Johnson says 'I'm not gonna give you legal analysis on whether Gavin Newsom should be arrested. But he ought to be tarred and feathered,' Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters in the U.S. Capitol. Show Caption Hide Caption Los Angeles residents take pride in their city amid ICE protests USA TODAY spoke with Los Angeles residents about recent ICE raids and protests. House Speaker Mike Johnson is piling onto the Republican attacks aimed at California Gov. Gavin Newsom, telling reporters on June 10 that the state Democrat should be 'tarred and feathered' for challenging President Donald Trump over immigration enforcement. 'That's not my lane. I'm not gonna give you legal analysis on whether Gavin Newsom should be arrested. But he ought to be tarred and feathered,' Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, said in the U.S. Capitol during his weekly news conference. On June 9, Trump said "it would be a great thing" if his border czar Tom Homan arrested Newsom. The governor has challenged Trump's decision to call the California National Guard to Los Angeles to quell protests over immigration enforcement. Trump has also ordered 700 Marines be sent to the nation's second-largest city. In his news conference, Johnson said Newsom is keeping the Trump administration from implementing federal law. "He's standing in the way of the administration and the carrying out of federal law. He is applauding the bad guys and standing in the way of the good guys. He is a participant, an accomplice in our federal law enforcement agents being not just disrespected, but assaulted," Johnson said. "This is a serious problem." Newsom quickly responded on social media. 'Good to know we're skipping the arrest and going straight for the 1700's style forms of punishment. A fitting threat given the (Republicans) want to bring our country back to the 18th Century.' Johnson on Newsom lawsuit: 'What a joke' Johnson also criticized Newsom for filing a lawsuit against Trump for sending the California National Guard to Los Angeles over his objections. "What a joke," Johnson said. "Do your job, man." The House speaker also said protests can quickly get out of hand in large cities. "If local and state officials are unwilling or unable to do their job, the president of the United States will do his and we support that fully," Johnson said. The last time a president called in the National Guard over the objections of the state governor was in 1965 when President Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to escort civil rights marchers participating in the Selma-Montgomery March in Alabama.
