I only wear black clothing because I have huge sweat marks under my armpits and it's affecting my confidence – help!
NOW the sun is out, your SPF should be too.
Did you know we are recommended to use two shot glasses worth of suncream to cover our body?
It might seem excessive, but no patch should be left uncovered.
In fact, it's the little areas – the tops of the ears, back of the hands, tip of the nose – that are high-risk spots for skin cancer.
Melanoma skin cancer has been increasing in frequency.
Cancer Research UK analysis shows rates rose by almost a third between 2009 and 2019.
But 86 per cent of cases are preventable by protecting skin from UV rays.
You can reduce risk by applying suncream but also wearing a hat and staying in the shade . . . in the UK as well as holiday hotspots.
Reapply suncream every few hours to protect your skin.
Five or more sunburns more than doubles your risk of developing potentially deadly melanoma, warns the Skin Cancer Foundation.
Here's what readers have been asking me this week . . .
SWEAT MARKS THE PITS
Q: FOR years, I've had huge sweat marks under my armpits.
It's affecting my confidence because I mainly wear black clothing that shows it up less, when I would love to wear different colours.
I have tried everything and nothing seems to work.
Please help.
A: The medical word for excessive sweating is hyperhidrosis and it affects at least one per cent of people.
It can be an embarrassing condition but is not an illness – rather it's the extreme end of the spectrum of normal sweating.
Armpits are a common place for it to occur, as well as on the hands, feet or face.
The symptoms tend to be prominent in the daytime most days but absent at night.
More rarely there can be an underlying cause or disease causing the sweating.
But this would normally be obvious because there would be other symptoms, or an unusual pattern of sweating more at night.
While it is not dangerous to health, hyperhidrosis can terribly affect a person's life.
Aluminium chloride (20 per cent) is advised as a first treatment. It is available from the pharmacy without prescription.
The correct way to use it is by applying it at night just before sleep, then washing it off in the morning.
Apply every one to two days, until symptoms improve.
Following this, use as required, which may be up to every six weeks.
A major downside of aluminium chloride is that it can cause irritation.
To reduce risk of this, use an emollient to moisturise the skin, and gentle soap for washing (or use emollient as a soap substitute).
If irritation does happen you can reduce the frequency to maybe just twice a week, and use a one-per-cent hydrocortisone steroid cream, which again can be bought directly from the pharmacy.
By day, use an antiperspirant rather than a deodorant. The former reduces sweat, but the latter masks odour.
Other treatments include iontophoresis, which uses a low-voltage electric current to calm the sweat glands; it is a little impractical for armpits but can work when using specially designed pads.
And Botox injections into the armpit skin can give relief from excessive sweating for six to nine months, but this can be expensive and may lead to compensatory sweating elsewhere.
The International Hyperhidrosis Society (sweathelp.org) can be a useful resource.
Q: I AM a woman who is 74 years young.
I had a hysterectomy at age 47 and since then have suffered with ongoing UTI s.
4
I had my bladder stretched ten years ago which did help for two years, but the problem is back.
Three years ago I got referred to another consultant and had a bladder camera check, plus a scan, which didn't find anything.
I was put on Hiprex, 1g, for six months but it didn't work.
Then I was put on nitrofurantoin, 50mg, for six months.
One every night did work but apparently I cannot stay on them as they could make my stomach bleed.
I read that there is a uromone vaccine I could possibly try, but how do I get it?
In the past I've had numerous antibiotics, and have started to have a probiotic every morning to help my gut.
Please help.
A: There are various types of UTI vaccine being developed to treat recurrent UTIs.
They include ones that can be swallowed, injected, applied to the vagina and sprayed under the tongue.
All work by training the body's natural immune system to fight off a UTI before it can take hold.
In the UK, UTI vaccines are not currently licensed for routine use but the hope is they may provide a potential alternative to antibiotics for recurrent UTIs in the near future.
I find it interesting that your symptoms started when you had the hysterectomy.
Were your ovaries removed as well as the womb?
If so this would have put you into immediate menopause and I do wonder how much your symptoms may be helped by using topical oestrogen.
This means using a tablet, pessary, cream, gel or ring that you insert into your vagina, which can help with urinary symptoms (including recurrent UTIs) linked to lack of oestrogen.
Whilst this is a type of HRT, it does not have any of the risks associated with systemic HRT, so there is no reason not to give it a try.
Another suggestion would be D-Mannose, which is an over-the-counter treatment that can be used if the infection is caused by the E.coli bacteria.
Research suggests success rates of this treatment can be as high as 45 per cent at six months, but care needs to be taken in those who have or are at risk of diabetes, as D-Mannose is a sugar.
How can I relieve kneecap pain?
Q: I AM an 85-year-old man and worked in the marble and granite industry all my life.
I consider myself fortunate to have had no illnesses at all.
4
But three years ago I went to my GP with a painful kneecap, which caused me to fall.
I was sent for physio and tried different exercises, to no avail.
Finally, I asked about an injection but was told they don't always work.
I also asked about an op but was told there is a two-year wait, and that by then I might not be fit enough for surgery.
I was given co-codamol and a gel to apply – all of which is doing no good.
I have now resorted to wearing a knee brace, which helps a little. But is there anything else I can try?
A: Try to get referred back to the musculoskeletal team at the hospital for more information about these two potential treatments.
If surgery could help, I'd opt to get on the list and work towards improving your fitness to prepare for the surgery.
And yes, it is true that steroid injections don't always work, but sometimes they do.
So I'd be saying 'let's try it' because you might be one of the ones it does work for.
It could give you the relief you need to get moving more – which brings me on to what you can do for yourself, and that is exercise.
This is the number one therapy for osteoarthritis.
Exercise can strengthen the muscles around the knee, and alleviate symptoms, but I understand that this may seem a little counter-intuitive if a joint is painful.
So use painkillers and don't be afraid to gradually increase movement.
Studies have shown conclusively that improving strength can alleviate symptoms, even if you need to use painkillers.
In some areas of the UK there are exercise programmes such as Escape Pain (escape-pain.org) designed to help lessen pain and rehabilitate.
Things like cycling and swimming are also beneficial for pain.
Exercise can be done at home and the NHS website has some useful videos.
BRUSHING WITH DANGER
HALF of us go to bed without brushing our teeth at least once a week, a survey found.
The Oral Health Foundation warns millions are at risk of tooth rot due to laziness.
4
One in three fail to brush 'a few times a week', with that figure rising to 43 per cent for under-25s.
The OHF said it increases the chance of tooth decay as most people say they eat sugary snacks before bed.
A third snack every night after dinner, of whom 68 per cent opt for sugary treats such as chocolate, sweets and biscuits.
Three quarters of adults are missing at least one tooth and almost nine in ten have fillings.
Dr Nigel Carter, chief executive of the Oral Health Foundation, says: 'The UK is becoming a nation of late-night snackers and our teeth are paying the price.
'Snacking on sugary treats every night and then skipping brushing before bed is a recipe for disaster.
'When you don't brush, sugar and bacteria stay on your teeth all night, producing acids that eat away at the enamel.
'Over time, this can lead to tooth decay, gum disease and tooth loss.
'If you do choose to snack, pick options that won't harm your teeth.
'Savoury choices such as cheese, nuts or breadsticks are much better for your oral health.
' Brushing your teeth before bed is essential. It's your last line of defence against tooth decay.'
FAT LINK TO SCALY SKIN
BELLY fat increases your risk of the skin condition psoriasis, a study warns.
Psoriasis, which affects one in 50 people, causes scaly patches of skin usually around the scalp, knees and elbows.
Researchers at King's College London analysed data from over 330,000 Brits, including more than 9,000 people with psoriasis.
They found that abdominal fat was strongly linked to the likelihood of having the condition, particularly for women.
Study author Dr Ravi Ramessur said: 'Our research shows that where fat is stored in the body matters when it comes to psoriasis risk.
'Central fat, especially around the waist, seems to play a key role.
"This has important implications for how we identify individuals who may be more likely to develop psoriasis or experience more severe disease, and how we approach prevention and treatment strategies.'
Psoriasis typically begins in a person's 20s or 50s.
It is thought that a problem with the immune system causes the skin cells to replace faster than they should.
Experts reckon Ozempic-style fat jabs, such as Wegovy and Mounjaro, also known as GLP-1 receptor agonists, may help people with psoriasis.
Dr Joel Gelfand, from the University of Pennsylvania, said: 'The strong relationship between psoriasis and obesity, and the emerging promise of GLP-1 RAs, is a call to action for clinical trials.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
37 minutes ago
- BBC News
Swapped at birth: Why dad never looked like his parents
Matthew's dad had brown eyes and black hair. His grandparents had piercing blue was a running joke in his family that "dad looked nothing like his parents", the teacher from southern England turned out there was a very good reason for father had been swapped at birth in hospital nearly 80 years ago. He died late last year before learning the truth of his family - not his real name - contacted the BBC after we reported on the case of Susan, who received compensation from an NHS trust after a home DNA test revealed she had been accidentally switched for another baby in the News is now aware of five cases of babies swapped by mistake in maternity wards from the late 1940s to the say they expect more people to come forward driven by the increase in cheap genetic testing. 'The old joke might be true after all' During the pandemic, Matthew started looking for answers to niggling questions about his family history. He sent off a saliva sample in the post to be genealogy company entered his record into its vast online database, allowing him to view other users whose DNA closely matched his own."Half of the names I'd just never heard of," he says. "I thought, 'That's weird', and called my wife to tell her the old family joke might be true after all."Matthew then asked his dad to submit his own DNA sample, which confirmed he was even more closely related to the same group of mysterious family started exchanging messages with two women who the site suggested were his father's cousins. All were confused about how they could possibly be together, they eventually tracked down birth records from 1946, months after the end of World War documents showed that one day after his father was apparently born, another baby boy had been registered at the same hospital in east boy had the same relatively unusual surname that appeared on the mystery branch of the family tree, a link later confirmed by birth certificates obtained by was a lightbulb moment."I realised straight away what must have happened," he says. "The only explanation that made sense was that both babies got muddled up in hospital."Matthew and the two women managed to construct a brand new family tree based on all of his DNA matches."I love a puzzle and I love understanding the past," he says. "I'm quite obsessive anyway, so I got into trying to reverse engineer what had happened." An era before wristbands Before World War Two, most babies in the UK were born at home, or in nursing homes, attended by midwives and the family started to change as the country prepared for the launch of the NHS in 1948, and very gradually, more babies were delivered in hospital, where newborns were typically removed for periods to be cared for in nurseries."The baby would be taken away between feeds so that the mother could rest, and the baby could be watched by either a nursery nurse or midwife," says Terri Coates, a retired lecturer in midwifery, and former clinical adviser on BBC series Call The Midwife."It may sound paternalistic, but midwives believed they were looking after mums and babies incredibly well."It was common for new mothers to be kept in hospital for between five and seven days, far longer than identify newborns in the nursery, a card would be tied to the end of the cot with the baby's name, mother's name, the date and time of birth, and the baby's weight."Where cots rather than babies were labelled, accidents could easily happen", says Ms Coates, who trained as a nurse herself in the 1970s and a midwife in 1981."If there were two or more members of staff in the nursery feeding babies, for example, a baby could easily be put down in the wrong cot."By 1956, hospital births were becoming more common, and midwifery textbooks were recommending that a "wrist name-tape" or "string of lettered china beads" should be attached directly to the newborn.A decade later, by the mid-1960s, it was rare for babies to be removed from the delivery room without being individually labelled. Stories of babies being accidentally switched in hospital were very rare at the time, though more are now coming to light thanks to the boom in genetic testing and ancestry day after Jan Daly was born at a hospital in north London in 1951, her mother immediately complained that the baby she had been given was not hers."She was really stressed and crying, but the nurses assured her she was wrong and the doctor was called in to try to calm her," Jan staff only backed down when her mum told them she'd had a fast, unassisted delivery, and pointed out the clear forceps marks on the baby's head"I feel for the other mother who had been happily feeding me for two days and then had to give up one baby for another," she says."There was never any apology, it was just 'one of those silly errors', but the trauma affected my mother for a long time." Never finding out Matthew's father, an insurance agent from the Home Counties, was a keen amateur cyclist who spent his life following the local racing lived alone in retirement and over the last decade his health had been deteriorating. Matthew thought long and hard about telling him the truth about his family history but, in the end, decided against it. "I just felt my dad doesn't need this," he says. "He had lived 78 years in a type of ignorance, so it didn't feel right to share it with him."Matthew's father died last year without ever knowing he'd been celebrating his birthday a day early for the past eight then, Matthew has driven to the West Country to meet his dad's genetic first cousin and her daughter for all got on well, he says, sharing old photos and "filling in missing bits of family history".But Matthew has decided not to contact the man his father must have been swapped with as a baby, or his children – in part because they have not taken DNA tests themselves."If you do a test by sending your saliva off, then there's an implicit understanding that you might find something that's a bit of a surprise," Matthew says."Whereas with people who haven't, I'm still not sure if it's the right thing to reach out to them - I just don't think it's right to drop that bombshell."
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE EXPOSED: How restaurants are lying to you about their hygiene ratings. STEVE BOGGAN'S investigation reveals the shocking truth about those green stickers - and exactly what the owners had to say when confronted
Are you from food hygiene? It was an odd question to be asked, but 46-year-old restaurateur Sameh Houeidi seemed anxious to know. I was looking at the official hygiene rating sticker on the window of his Lebanese restaurant near Aldgate in London.
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Starmer goes all in on NHS with PM set to hand health service £30bn spending boost at expense of other public services
Sir Keir Starmer will pump money into the NHS at the expense of other public services. The government is putting all its eggs in one basket as it lines up the Department for Health for a £30billion cash boost at next week's spending review. However, health chiefs have warned the prime minister's promise to 'turbocharge delivery' could lead to difficult compromises elsewhere in services from the police to councils. It comes after the party's unexpected victory in the Hamilton, Larkhall & Stonehouse by-election - though as the threat of Nigel Farage 's Reform UK still looms large. The Department for Health will be handed an increase of around £200billion to its budget by 2028 - a £17billion rise in real terms. Its day-to-day budget is set to increase by 2.8 per cent in real terms annually over the three-year spending review period. Sir Keir has also pledged to have 92 per cent of NHS patients treated within 18 weeks by the next election, a target that has remained unmet for a decade. Currently, under 60 per cent are seen within this time with waiting lists rising to 7.4million last month. There are even fears NHS bosses may not hit an interim goal of 65 per cent next year. Chancellor Rachel Reeves' prioritisation of health has forced cuts in other departments and prompted protestations from other cabinet members like Yvette Cooper, the home secretary and Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister and housing secretary. Both have warned Ms Reeves the cuts will put some of the government's crime and housing targets at risk amid 'robust negotiations'. But the chancellor has maintained 'not every department will get everything they want'. Overall, the health budget, which stood at £178billion as Labour took office, will exceed £230billion by the next election. The increase means health is set to account for 41 per cent of all day-to-day departmental spending - up from 39 per cent. Ben Zaranko, of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said Ms Reeves's cash boost was 'a serious, meaningful increase in health funding'. But Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, warned the funding increase 'is not going to enable us to achieve recovery and reform' without big changes to the way the health service treats patients. He said the government's plan to withhold the budget for infrastructure simultaneously would also make 'combining recovery and reform' impossible.
