
Volkswagen wants to build cars in Egypt to sell across Africa
• For more financial news, go to the News24 Business front page.
Volkswagen is considering producing cars in Egypt, part of plans to tap new African markets as it grapples with weaker demand at home.
'We are very interested in Egypt as a production hub and hopefully we can announce a business case anytime soon,' Volkswagen Group Africa's managing director, Martina Biene, said in an interview.
Under the possible moves, Europe's largest carmaker could first establish an assembly unit by using existing facilities. A potential next step would be to build a local factory in the Middle East's most populous nation, Biene said.
VW is cutting production capacity and jobs in Germany due to increasing costs, weaker markets in Europe and the rise of cheaper Chinese competitors. Sister brands Audi and Porsche are also shedding workers to reduce costs.
The deliberations come as Egypt strives to attract foreign investment and boost local manufacturing and exports after emerging from a grueling two-year economic crisis. The auto industry could be a key driver, with the government estimating local demand at more than $8 billion per year over the next decade.
Egypt's domestic market and its proximity to consumers in the rest of the Middle East and Africa may be among the draws for the location.
That makes it different from Morocco, currently Africa's leading passenger-car manufacturer and largest exporter, Biene said.
In Morocco, the 'car business is very much focused on exporting to Europe,' she said. 'We're currently not looking for expanding our footprint with plants to export to Europe, because we've just closed plants in Europe.'
VW, which plans to trim German production capacity by more than 700 000 units and cut 35 000 jobs by 2030, has traditionally struggled to compete in cost-sensitive markets like Africa, India or Southeast Asia against leaner rivals such as Toyota or Hyundai.
The company currently has a full-fledged manufacturing plant in South Africa and assembly facilities in Ghana, Rwanda and Kenya. It targets operating as many as five production facilities across Africa over the next 10 to 15 years, with each producing different models and exporting to other markets on the continent.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This All-American EV Maker Is Charging Germany $3.5 Billion for Access to Its Tech
Rivian is a relatively young American company that builds electric vehicles. A key part of Rivian's business model is to sell its U.S. designed technology to others. In fact, Rivian has entered into a valuable partnership with Germany's Volkswagen. 10 stocks we like better than Rivian Automotive › Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ: RIVN) is a high-tech auto start-up that builds all-electric trucks and delivery vans. It has made a huge amount of progress with its business as it looks to become a sustainably profitable company. That said, it still has a long way to go before it gets to that point -- which is why the $3.5 billion it is charging Germany's Volkswagen for access to its tech is so important. Here's what you need to know. As noted, Rivian is a U.S. automaker focused on electric vehicles, or EVs. It has honed in on a niche within the industry, as it only makes trucks and delivery vehicles, which are basically just a different kind of truck. It has a prominent partnership with Amazon, which has used Rivian trucks to support its expanding delivery efforts. That is basically just a traditional customer relationship since Amazon is simply buying delivery vehicles. Still, the Amazon partnership has been very important. It provided Rivian with a reliable customer for its products at a time when it was just beginning to ramp up its production capabilities. It now has the capacity to produce around 50,000 EVs a year, which means it is running at scale. In fact, the effort in 2024 and 2025 has focused around streamlining production to improve profitability. Its factory produces both consumer vehicles and delivery vehicles, but the Amazon relationship was a huge help. And it highlights one of Rivian's key goals -- selling its products to other companies. In the case of Amazon, that was a more typical customer relationship, but Rivian's aspirations include selling its technology to other companies, too. This is where Germany's Volkswagen comes into the story. It has a long-term partnership with Rivian in which it is providing the upstart company with funding. Volkswagen has pumped cash into Rivian on multiple occasions as Rivian has continued to hit important development milestones. For example, Rivian "unlocked" $1 billion in cash from the German auto giant in the first quarter of 2025. That cash isn't expected to fully hit the balance sheet until the end of June 2025, but it will be an important infusion of funds as Rivian continues to invest in its business. To put a number on how important Volkswagen's capital infusion will be, Rivian burned through around $600 million in cash in 2025's first quarter. While Rivian has around $7 billion in cash on its balance sheet, that pile of money won't last long if it keeps spending like it has been. It needs to have a ready source of additional capital. Volkswagen is happy to provide that cash so long as Rivian keeps advancing its technology and business. Assuming Rivian remains on track, there's another $2.5 billion available from the German car maker. Coupled with expectations for loans of up to $6.6 billion from the U.S. government, Rivian should have ample capital to keep spending on its business for years to come. But the Volkswagen deal isn't just about the cash since Rivian is basically fostering a relationship with a company that could become a core, long-term technology customer as well. To be fair, Volkswagen isn't doing anything out of the kindness of its heart. It likely has high hopes for the technology in which it is investing. But that's the point for Rivian, too. It has high hopes that it develops a customer relationship that will help it become a sustainably profitable, and perhaps even growing, company. And that's all built on Rivian's U.S.-built innovation. The stock isn't risk free, so only more aggressive investors will likely find Rivian attractive. But given the success it has achieved and the partners it has lined up, it looks like this upstart EV company could have a very bright future over the long term. Before you buy stock in Rivian Automotive, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Rivian Automotive wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $656,825!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $865,550!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Reuben Gregg Brewer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This All-American EV Maker Is Charging Germany $3.5 Billion for Access to Its Tech was originally published by The Motley Fool


New York Times
39 minutes ago
- New York Times
Red Sea Passage Remains a No-Go for Shipping Despite U.S. Action
The largest commercial shipping companies continue to avoid the Red Sea and Suez Canal, despite a recent cease-fire agreement between the United States and Houthis intended to make the trade lanes safer. The cease-fire, which began May 6, ended a U.S. campaign that involved over 1,100 strikes against the Houthis in Yemen and became a source of embarrassment for the Trump administration after group chats about the strikes inadvertently became public. The Pentagon had planned on a monthslong bombardment, but President Trump ended it after about 50 days. 'If the intention was to restore freedom of navigation, which is what they stated it was, then the results speak for themselves: The shipping industry has not gone back,' said Richard Meade, editor in chief of Lloyd's List, a shipping publication. Ship traffic through the Red Sea is down by around three-fifths since 2023 when the Houthis started targeting ships there in solidarity with Hamas in its war with Israel in Gaza, Mr. Meade said. Fearing that their vessels would be struck, big shipping companies avoided the Red Sea and the Suez Canal, taking a much longer route around the southern tip of Africa to travel between Asia and Europe. The Houthis have said they are still at war with Israel and will attack vessels bound for the country. And though the Houthis have not attacked a commercial vessel since December, shipping companies say they worry that their vessels may be hit, deliberately or mistakenly, and have no plans to sail the southern part of the Red Sea anytime soon. 'We're pretty far from the threshold,' said Vincent Clerc, the chief executive of A.P. Moller-Maersk, a large shipping line based in Copenhagen. Speaking soon after the cease-fire in May, he said the Red Sea would have to remain safe for the foreseeable future before the company's vessels returned. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


Fox News
39 minutes ago
- Fox News
Hamas working to 'sabotage' Trump-backed aid group with 'fake news': Israeli official
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a U.S. and Israeli-backed group, has been the subject of backlash since before it began distributing aid last month. Since the beginning of its operations there have been reports of violent incidents near distribution sites. Recently, the IDF admitted that troops shot "suspects" who failed to heed orders to back away from the soldiers. One of the most vocal critics of GHF has been the United Nations, with U.N. Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator Tom Fletcher urging the world to let his agency handle the situation. However, Israeli officials have pushed back on the U.N. narrative, saying that GHF is distributing aid without letting Hamas benefit. "Hamas is doing everything that it can to sabotage this effort to distribute aid directly to the people," Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spokesperson Oren Marmorstein told Fox News Digital. He also said that the terror group is "extremely afraid" that if the GHF is successful, it will "lose its grip" on the population of Gaza. Marmorstein blamed Hamas for spreading "fake news" and "fake information" to take down the GHF. On Wednesday, the U.S. vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution that called for an immediate ceasefire, the return of all hostages and the lifting of all restrictions on humanitarian aid entering the Strip. Israel has repeatedly asserted that without limitations on aid entering Gaza, Hamas would be able to enrich itself and keep control over the area. In remarks ahead of the veto, U.S. Chargé d'Affaires Dorothy Shea criticized the resolution, saying it failed to "acknowledge the disastrous shortcomings of the prior method of aid delivery, which allowed Hamas to enrich itself at the expense of Palestinians, and failed to get food and water to those who needed it most." She also urged U.N. member states to support GHF "to help it safely deliver aid without it being diverted by Hamas." Shea is not alone in her criticism of the U.N.'s approach to GHF. Israeli U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon recently accused the international body of employing "mafia-like" tactics against NGOs that worked with GHF. "Without any discussion, without due process, the U.N. removed those NGOs from the shared aid database. That database is the central system for tracking aid deliveries into Gaza," Danon told the Security Council on May 28. "This is the gravest violation of the U.N.'s own principles. It is extortion of well-meaning NGOs that refuse to kiss the ring." The GHF closed its distribution sites on Wednesday, saying it was working to bolster security and would reopen on Thursday. However, the reopening was delayed because of maintenance work. The sites eventually resumed aid distribution later on Thursday.