Australia's Liberal-National coalition splits after election thrashing
SYDNEY — Australia's conservative Liberal-National coalition — the nation's main opposition political party — has split after a partnership lasting almost 80 years.
The move marks a seismic change in the country's political landscape and comes just weeks after a federal election that saw Labor win a second term in a landslide victory.
Nationals leader David Littleproud on Tuesday said his party was not re-entering a coalition agreement, amid policy disagreements with the Liberal Party as it goes on a journey of "rediscovery" following the empathic loss.
Littleproud added that the Coalition has been broken and repaired before, and he hoped that — with time — the parties could reconcile again.
The Liberal Party — which has the second largest number of seats in parliament — will remain the formal opposition party, though now in their own right. This means the Nationals will not hold any opposition roles.
"Whilst we have enormous respect for David Littleproud and his team, it is disappointing that the National Party has taken the decision to leave the Coalition," newly elected Liberal leader Sussan Ley said, hours after the shock announcement.Ley said the founding principle of the Coalition had long been "shared values", but said the Nationals had refused to sign a deal without commitments to "specific policies".The split comes after days of post-election talks between the two parties about their future, with Littleproud's party — which mainly represents regional communities and leans more conservative than the Liberals — failing to reach an agreement with their long-time political ally.A key issue that had strained their relationship with the Liberals was climate and energy, with sects of the National Party still opposed to net-zero emissions goals, and wedded to a nuclear power proposal which proved controversial at the election.Littleproud also pointed to regional infrastructure spending and policies to improve supermarket competition as points of conflict.Describing it as "one of the hardest political decisions of his life", Littleproud said he had a "respectful conversation" with Ley to inform her of the split on Tuesday morning."What this is about is taking a deep breath and saying to the Australian people, this is time apart [for] us to be better, [to] focus on them.""I gave [Ley] the commitment that I'll work with her every day to help to try to rebuild the relationship to the point we can re-enter a coalition before the next election."However, he said the National Party would contest the next election solo if unity could not be achieved.The Liberal-National partnership, which in its current form dates back to the 1940s, has broken down and been re-established several times over the decades. The last time the Coalition split was almost four decades ago, in 1987.All except one of the 15 electorates the Liberal-National coalition lost at the election were ceded by the Liberals, who saw big swings against them right around the nation.Support for the Liberals nosedived in more moderate areas, particularly in cities, which analysts largely put down to then-leader Peter Dutton's polarising persona and some Trump-like policies. Ley, his successor, has vowed to bring the party back to the centre-right. — BBC
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
2 days ago
- Saudi Gazette
US reviewing Aukus submarine pact as part of 'America First' agenda
WASHINGTON — The US has launched a review of its multi-billion dollar submarine deal with the UK and Australia, saying the security pact must fit its "America First" agenda. Under the trilateral pact, believed to be aimed at countering China, Australia is to get its first nuclear-powered subs from the US, before the allies create a new fleet by sharing cutting-edge tech. Both Australia and the UK - which did its own review last year - have played down news of the US probe, saying it is natural for a new administration to reassess. The move comes as both Australia and the UK face pressure from the White House to lift military spending, demands heeded by Downing Street but largely resisted by Canberra. The Aukus agreement - worth £176bn ($239bn; A$368bn) - was signed in 2021, when all three countries involved had different leaders. A US defense official told the BBC the pact was being reviewed "as part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the President's America First agenda". "As [US Defence] Secretary [Pete] Hegseth has made clear, this means ensuring the highest readiness of our servicemembers [and] that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defense," the defense official said. The US has been pushing allies to start spending at least 3% of GDP on defense as soon as possible. The UK has agreed to spend 2.5% of GDP on its defense by 2028, and 3% by the next parliament, while Australia has also said it will lift funding, but not to the 3.5% that the US wants. The review will be headed up by Elbridge Colby, who has previously been critical of Aukus, in a speech last year questioning why the US would give away "this crown jewel asset when we most need it". Defense Minister Richard Marles, speaking to local Australian media on Thursday morning local time, said he was optimistic the deal would continue. "I'm very confident this is going to happen," he told ABC Radio Melbourne. "You just need to look at the map to understand that Australia absolutely needs to have a long-range submarine capability." Some in Australia have been lobbying for the country to develop a more self-reliant defense strategy, but Marles said it was important to "stick to a plan" - a reference to the previous government's controversial cancellation of a submarine deal with France in favor of Aukus. An Australian government spokesperson told the BBC it was "natural" that the new administration would "examine" the agreement, adding the UK had also recently finished a review of the security pact between the long-standing allies. There is "clear and consistent" support for the deal across the "full political spectrum" in the US, they said, adding Australia looked forward to "continuing our close cooperation with the Trump Administration on this historic project". A UK defense spokesperson told the BBC it was "understandable" for a new administration to look at the deal, "just as the UK did last year". Aukus is a "landmark security and defense partnership with two of our closest allies", the spokesperson said, and "one of the most strategically important partnerships in decades, supporting peace and security in the Indo-Pacific and Euro-Atlantic". Jennifer Kavanagh, from American thinktank Defense Priorities, told the BBC that the US was "absolutely right to take another look at this deal" as its submarine capacities were already stretched. "The US cannot meet its own demand for these nuclear-powered submarines," she said. The other concern the US might have is whether Australia would use the submarines they buy in the way the US wants them to, she said, particularly if conflict erupts over Taiwan. Dr Kavanagh said the review might see the security pact shift its focus away from providing submarines to sharing other long-range weapons technology. However, if the US were to pull out of the deal, China would "celebrate" as they have long criticized the deal, Dr Kavanagh added. For Australia, the deal represents a major upgrade to its military capabilities. The country becomes just the second after the UK to receive Washington's elite nuclear propulsion technology. Such submarines will be able to operate further and faster than the country's existing diesel-engine fleet and Australia would also be able to carry out long-range strikes against enemies for the first time. It is a big deal for the US to share what is often called the "crown jewels" of its defence technology. But arming Australia has historically been viewed by Washington and Downing Street as essential to preserving peace in a region they themselves aren't a part of. From 2027, the pact will allow both the US and UK to base a small number of nuclear submarines in Perth, Western Australia. Canberra will also buy three second-hand Virginia-class submarines from the US at a yet-to-be-determined date in the early 2030s - with options to purchase two more. After that, the plan is to design and build an entirely new nuclear-powered submarine model for the UK and Australian navies. This attack craft will be built in Britain and Australia to a British design, but use technology from all three countries. The security alliance has repeatedly drawn criticism from China, with the foreign ministry in Beijing saying it risked creating an arms race. — BBC
Asharq Al-Awsat
5 days ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Iraq Reiterates Need for Int'l Coalition Forces to Remain
Iraq's security and defense committee announced on Sunday that 'the need still stands' for the US-led anti-ISIS international coalition to remain in the country. It made its announcement days after Defense Minister Thabet al-Abbasi made similar remarks. In televised statements, he stressed that the international troops were still needed in Syria, adding that 'Iraq and Syria's security are indivisible.' Security and military coordination with the coalition continues, he said. Baghdad has not received any official notice about the withdrawal of the forces from Syria or Iraq, he revealed. Iraq had in 2024 held three rounds of dialogue with the United States about organizing the presence of the coalition after the completion of the pullout of remaining American forces. Pro-Iran factions in Iraq, which had for years demanded the withdrawal, have so far not commented on the latest statements about the coalition. Abbasi added that the American and coalition forces were necessary in Syria to maintain the fight against ISIS remnants, which continue to be a cross-border threat. The US Defense Department recently said that American troop movement from northern and eastern Syria to more secure locations in Iraq was part of a calculated, safe and professional redeployment plan aimed at consolidating the successes against ISIS and cementing regional stability. It does not mean the end of the coalition's mission in Syria, it added. A Pentagon official said local partners remain in the field in Syria and are an effective force against ISIS. The US will continue to empower those partners in performing most of their remaining counter-terrorism duties, including guarding ISIS detainees, he went on to say. ISIS is seeking to exploit any instability in the area, but the US efforts to deter its resurgence cannot be underestimated. The coalition remains committed to achieving the permanent defeat of ISIS in Syria and Iraq, he vowed. Member of the security and defense committee Yasser Iskander Watout said on Sunday that Iraq needs major logistic and aerial support since the means at its disposal were not enough to control borders with neighbors. The continued deployment of the international coalition forces is 'necessary and realistic', he said. The Interior Ministry and border and security forces have secured the border with Syria, but members of the committee said the need remains for aerial support to bolster stability in the area, he revealed. Watout agreed with Abbasi on the need for the international forces to remain given that it boasts air forces that have effectively secured Iraq's skies. He noted that recent government contracts for the purchase of 14 modern jets 'were not enough to cover all our needs.' The coalition currently has 2,500 forces deployed in Iraq to counter ISIS and offer Iraqi forces logistic support. Pro-Iran factions that have long been opposed to the international troops have not commented on the recent statements on their continued deployment given the Israeli threats against Tehran and US President Donald Trump's urging of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against carrying out attacks against the factions themselves.
Arab News
5 days ago
- Arab News
Israeli army ‘boards' Freedom Flotilla Coalition's Gaza-bound ship, group says
CAIRO: The Freedom Flotilla Coalition said early on Monday that the Israeli military had 'boarded' the Gaza-bound charity ship the Madleen. Connections have been lost on the ship, the coalition added in a post on Telegram.
