logo
Mass. lawmakers reach deal on $425 million shelter bill, could soon send it to Governor Healey

Mass. lawmakers reach deal on $425 million shelter bill, could soon send it to Governor Healey

Boston Globe25-02-2025

It also seeks to cut the number of families
allowed in the system from 7,500 to 4,000 beginning Dec. 31, and keeping the new limit in place through 2026.
Advertisement
As of last week, 5,704 families were staying in emergency shelters across the state, according to
Of those, the state was housing roughly 2,150 in hotels and motels, a practice Healey has
Healey administration officials project the shelter system will cost the state more than $1 billion this fiscal year, and warned legislators that it would run out of money at the end of January. The $425 million infusion is intended to keep the system funded through the end of June.
While advocates said they are grateful that lawmakers committed the funding needed to continue the program, they are also concerned that the limitations on the program will put an extra strain on some of the state's neediest families.
Advertisement
There was also little room for public input, said Kelly Turley, associate director for the Massachusetts Coalition for the Homeless, though she hopes that changes as lawmakers debate other changes that could impact the shelter system, including the budget plan for the fiscal year that begins in July.
'We hope to make sure that the voices of families directly participating in the program, providers, advocates, and community groups that are on the front lines also are able to weigh in,' Turley said. 'There is a lot of uncertainty overall with the program.'
The soaring cost of running the shelter system reflects the parallel migrant and housing crises gripping Massachusetts, which have greatly exacerbated the need for emergency housing in the state.
The bill also seeks to beef up how the state vets those entering shelters, including requiring every adult applicant to disclose any criminal convictions or pending charges for 'serious crimes.' It would also mandate that the state obtain criminal records for each applicant before placing them into emergency housing.
Those suggested changes come as officials
Under the proposal, applicants who do not disclose criminal convictions or charges 'shall not be eligible for benefits and any existing benefits shall be terminated.' It also calls for the Healey administration to create rules limiting or excluding from the system
those convicted of or facing charges for serious crimes.
Healey recently began requiring additional background checks of adults in emergency shelters using the Criminal Offender Record Information, or CORI, system, and implemented a new policy last month for the family of someone convicted of a felony to be moved into more permanent housing. The background check change, however,
Advertisement
Healey last month said she was also tapping former Boston police commissioner Edward Davis to lead a review of the security protocols for the emergency assistance program. A Healey spokesperson said Tuesday that Davis submitted a report, and that officials were reviewing it. Her office did not release a copy.
The legislation the House passed Tuesday would make a series of other changes. It would require families to prove they are eligible for shelter and have
Applicants would also need to show 'an intent to remain' in the state, including by providing documents showing they're receiving benefits under MassHealth, the state's Medicaid program, or other 'public benefits.'
Republican lawmakers had sought to tighten the rules further, including setting a six- or 12-month residency requirement for those in the shelter system. But Democratic leaders warned that setting a specific duration on residency would be unconstitutional.
The bill would funnel the $425 million infusion from the state's escrow account, which was built with with money previous budget surpluses. State Senator Michael Rodrigues, the chamber's budget chief, said earlier this month that $174 million will be left in the account after the money to prop up the shelter system is dispersed.
Advertisement
Matt Stout can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Healey touts state tuition savings, criticizes federal cuts to Pell Grants
Healey touts state tuition savings, criticizes federal cuts to Pell Grants

Boston Globe

time2 days ago

  • Boston Globe

Healey touts state tuition savings, criticizes federal cuts to Pell Grants

Overall, MASSGrant Plus Expansion program saved more than 34,000 Massachusetts students an estimated $110 million in the 2023-2024 academic year, the statement said. More than 7,730 middle income students saved an average of $3,856 each, according to data from the state Department of Higher Education, the statement said. Advertisement In the same statement, Healey urged the US Senate to reject Pell Grant cuts included in the federal budget reconciliation bill recently passed by Republicans in the U.S. House and supported by President Trump. The proposed cuts and eligibility restrictions would results in 42,000 Massachusetts students at public institutions losing $57 million in funding each year, according to Healey's statement said. 'Massachusetts is home to the best schools in the country, but we need to make sure that they are affordable for all of our students,' Healey's statement said. 'That's why I took action to increase financial aid at our public colleges and universities, which has already lowered costs for tens of thousands of students.' The drastic cuts proposed to the Pell Grant program would 'roll back the progress we have made and increase costs,' Healey said. Advertisement 'This is bad for our students and bad for our economy, as it would hold back our next generation of workers from being able to afford to go to school,' she said. Healey announced $62 million in new state funding to expand the MASSGrant program during a ceremony at Salem State University in November 2023. The new funding covered the full costs of tuition and mandatory instructional fees for Pell Grant-eligible students, and as much as half for middle-income students. Middle-income students are those whose families earn between $73,000 and $100,000 annually in adjusted gross income. The program was retroactive to the start of the fall 2023 semester for Massachusetts students at the states public institutions, including its 15 community colleges, nine state universities, and four University of Massachusetts undergraduate campuses. Funding for the expansion of the program also drew on $84 million Healey and the legislature had set earmarked for financial aid expansion in the FY24 budget, Healey's office said at the time. 'The dramatic enrollment increases our community colleges have seen over the last two years make it clear that free community college and expanded financial aid is a game changer for students in Massachusetts,' Luis Pedraja, chair of the Community College Council of Presidents, and president of Quinsigamond Community College said in the statement. 'The proposed Pell eligibility changes would be devastating to our students' ability to afford higher education and the community college presidents in Massachusetts urge the Senate to reject this ill-advised change,' Pedraja said. Education Secretary Patrick Tutwiler said he feared the impacts proposed cuts could have on students who struggle to afford college. Advertisement 'Low-income students deserve to go to college just as much as their higher income peers, and these changes are going to take us backwards – increasing dropout rates and leaving students saddled with more debt and no degree," Tutwiler said in the statement. Tonya Alanez can be reached at

Mass. lets criminals go, ICE arrests innocent people. They both need to change.
Mass. lets criminals go, ICE arrests innocent people. They both need to change.

Boston Globe

time3 days ago

  • Boston Globe

Mass. lets criminals go, ICE arrests innocent people. They both need to change.

Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Cases like Lopez's show that sometimes, federal authorities have a legitimate gripe with the state's progressive policies. Because of a 2017 Supreme Judicial Court decision, there are instances when the state releases dangerous criminals instead of handing them over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Advertisement But the Trump administration is also overstating how much Massachusetts' policies, as bad as they can be, are to blame for its mounting arrests of noncriminals. Both sides need to give a little bit: Massachusetts should be willing to help in cases where ICE wants to arrest a convicted criminal like Lopez. The federal government has the right to deport people who are in this country illegally, and the state should help when it comes to violent criminals. Advertisement What the federal government doesn't have the right to do is compel local law enforcement to go after law-abiding, peaceable immigrants — whether they're here illegally or not. And it shouldn't be targeting noncriminals, either — or using local sanctuary policies as a pretext for the recent arrests of people with no criminal records. Over the past month, ICE has arrested 'If sanctuary cities would change their policies and turn these violent criminal aliens over to us into our custody instead of releasing them into the public, we would not have to go out to the communities and do this,' Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons said during an ICE The state's policies date to 2017, when the Supreme Judicial Court ruled in Lunn v. Commonwealth that the Legislature would have to specifically authorize court officers to honor requests from immigration authorities to hold deportable immigrants. So far, the Democratic-led Legislature has not done so, and it passed up different bills that would allow law enforcement to cooperate on detainers for immigrants who are here illegally and have committed heinous crimes. Inaction on Lunn has drawn scrutiny from conservatives and even a member of Healey's Cabinet. For Worcester County Sheriff Lew Evangelidis, for example, law enforcement's inability to coordinate with federal immigration authorities means that some criminal migrants can be released back into the community. 'Right now, there's no ability to notify ICE and hold that person for [ICE] to make a determination whether they wish to take them into custody and then provide them the due process that they get in the federal system,' he told me. Advertisement Meanwhile, Healey's secretary of Public Safety and Security, Terrence Reidy, has In a statement, Healey's office said it does cooperate with ICE to some extent, such as by notifying ICE when a criminal in state custody is scheduled to be released. But that leaves loopholes for cases like Lopez's, which result in ICE having to rearrest a criminal. There were no collateral arrests when ICE tracked down Lopez because they were banned under the Biden administration — but there could be if a similar arrest were made now. Still, the Trump administration is exaggerating the connection between sanctuary policies and collateral arrests. Cases where criminals like Lopez were released in spite of detainers may have fueled some collateral arrests in the past month. But the Department of Homeland Security has failed to give a detailed breakdown so it's hard to know just how many. In a Advertisement Meanwhile, some of ICE's higher profile examples of collateral arrest seem to have nothing to do with Lunn. Like the case of the 18-year-old Milford student, Marcelo Gomes da Silva, who was arrested on his way to volleyball practice in an operation meant for his father. He was But so far there It isn't crazy for the Trump administration to criticize Massachusetts policies that can and have allowed convicted criminal migrants to be released into the community. In fact, most Americans would agree — a recent University of Massachusetts Amherst But that poll also found that most people Carine Hajjar is a Globe Opinion writer. She can be reached at

Mass. education secretary addresses graduation policy changes in Holyoke
Mass. education secretary addresses graduation policy changes in Holyoke

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Mass. education secretary addresses graduation policy changes in Holyoke

HOLYOKE, Mass. (WWLP) – Earning a high school diploma in Massachusetts looks a lot different now. This comes in response to ballot question number 2, part of November 5th's state election. Healey calls for Job Corps reopening Patrick Tutwiler, The Massachusetts Secretary of Education, was in Holyoke on Thursday. He heard out the concerns from educators and parents on the new graduation requirements. The graduating classes of 2026 and 2027 will be required to complete specific courses to receive a diploma. 'What we're doing now is taking the input, researching to understand how we want to shift and sort of reform the high school experience, and in the form of graduation requirements,' Tutwiler states. Students are still required to take the MCAS exam. However, their scores will not be used as a requirement to graduate. WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store