How campaigners are fighting for Scotland to get back into EU
A delegation featuring representatives from campaign groups Yes for EU and Europe for Scotland as well as ex-MEPs Alyn Smith and Heather Anderson visited the European Parliament earlier this month to meet with six MEPs as concern grows for UK security post-Brexit in the era of Donald Trump.
Andrea Pisauro, political coordinator for Europe for Scotland, said the MEPs they met were 'very supportive' of Scotland and were even open to working on a resolution in the years to come to outline the Parliament's position on EU enlargement and Scotland joining the EU in the event of independence.
It is part of a long-term goal to build up Scotland's links with MEPs and keep awareness of the injustice Scotland faced in the aftermath of the Brexit vote alive, with some also keen to look at getting Scotland back into the Erasmus scheme prior to independence.
David Spacey, of Yes for EU, told The National he left the Belgian capital buoyed by the conversations he had had and the positive attitude of Europeans towards Scotland.
READ MORE: Report on currency in independent Scotland will give 'definitive answer'
He said: 'I approached the day with a bit of a feeling of sadness, heading off to Brussels and the heart of the Parliament, and knowing we're not part of it anymore.
'But that changed as I met the others on the steps of the Parliament and we were doing a photo opportunity with the Saltire. This Spanish man came up to us and said 'are you guys from Scotland? We love Scotland, when are you coming back?'.
'Although that was just a member of the public, that summed up the mood of the entire day. That was the spirit and vibe we got from the MEPs we were speaking to as well.
'The door is very much open – open to dialogue, open to us joining, open to a closer relationship in any shape or form.'
The delegation met with Italian MEP Brando Benifei, part of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats, alongside several MEPs from the Greens/European Free Alliance group – Austria's Thomas Waitz, Par Holmgren of Sweden, Catalonian MEP Diana Riba i Giner, Vicent Marza from Valencia and Terry Reintke of Germany.
The event was organised ahead of Europe Day in May, with this year being the 75th anniversary of the Schumann Declaration which proposed the creation of a European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC). The ECSC was the first of a series of supranational European institutions that would ultimately become today's European Union.
(Image: Europe for Scotland) But Spacey said he is keen to make it an annual event and get the message out there that the only thing stopping Scotland from joining the EU is the country becoming independent.
READ MORE: Brussels is holding the EU door open for Scotland
'We think this should become an annual event, built around Europe Day on May 9 and linkages between Scotland and Europe,' he said.
'There was also some talk about inviting MEPs to come and visit Scotland, either as a delegation or as a series of visits and joining them up with Scottish ministers on devolved matters.
'I think we need to speak about how we get this message out across Scotland, that the only thing stopping from Scotland from joining the EU in quite a rapid fashion is the small matter of our independence.
'I don't want people to forget that injustice [Scotland faced]. I have two grandchildren and I find it absolutely heartbreaking that they will both have less opportunity to study and travel and work across the continent than I have had.
'That's just not on and in a time when both geopolitics and domestic politics, there are many voices trying to persuade us to cosy up to Trump, I think it is really important that we point out Europe is on our doorstep, they share our values, they welcome us.'
READ MORE: MEPs pledge to support independent Scotland joining EU
Pisauro said many of the politicians were acutely aware of Scotland being treated unjustly through the Brexit process after the vast majority of Scots voted to stay in the European Union and were dragged out against their will.
He said a few were keen to look at the issue of getting Scotland back into the Erasmus programme to enable students to more easily study on the continent.
Campaigners were also looking to explore whether MEPs felt it would take Scotland a long time to join the EU as an independent country, but he said Reintke told him she did not forsee this while others they met confirmed they were confident their nations would not veto Scotland joining the bloc.
Pisauro said: 'Terry mentioned that she couldn't forsee it would be a long process at all because there is a degree of convergence already with the laws and the fact it had been part of the EU already as part of the UK.
'Unanimously they said there would be no veto from their countries.'
Pisauro added he felt it was important to work with MEPs to 'keep the light on' for Scotland, especially in the face of Trump.
'We had quite a few comment from people who had been following the Brexit process over the years and they knew Scotland went through an unjust process,' he said.
'A couple of MEPs were scared by Farage topping the polls and there is a level of concern for the political dynamics, I think particularly in England.
'In many ways, we think it's a disastrous there isn't a Scottish voice in Europe so citizens from Scotland and Europe need to supply that voice and we need to keep that issue alive.
'We think it's important to keep the light on and remembering the injustice of Brexit. We think it's very important in the face of Trump to stand up for European unity and democracy.'
Yes for EU will be sharing more from their trip to Brussels during an event at Augustine United Church in Edinburgh on Friday, May 9.
To find out more click here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Between ‘rollover UK' and ‘retaliatory China': will EU hardball secure trade deal with US?
In Brussels' corridors of power, quiet optimism is growing that the EU's hardball strategy to secure a US trade deal is working. While Britain quickly moved to try to cushion the impact of Donald Trump's tariffs with a deal agreed last month – and US-Chinese relations are a tit-for-tat situation – the EU has taken a different stance. 'We are positioning ourselves between 'rollover UK' and 'retaliatory China',' said a Brussels source. The stakes are not just the £706bn in transatlantic trade between the EU and US but the fallout from what diplomats and businesses say is a dangerous assault on the global rules-based system that governs western democracy. 'The only thing that appeals to Trump is power. Amid all the nausea and uncertainty here, there is a significant chance the EU will go the whole way and not do a deal,' said a diplomat in the Belgian capital. 'If the EU doesn't stand up to Trump or demand the rigours of rules, the question will be: what is left of the international rules based system?' the source added, noting the risk to employment rights, free speech, social welfare and public care. The EU's steadfast strategy is high-risk, and has weeks to play out before the 90-day pause in Trump's threat to impose 20% tariffs on all EU imports ends in July. He has already slapped a 10% tariff on all exports, with more on autos and steel, which this week went to 50%. 'If in the end, if we are the only ones on the pitch, people will start to say we should have been more like the Chinese,' said one EU official, with demands for retaliation expected to arise 'very quickly from member states'. The biggest pothole in what threatens to be a bumpy road ahead may be a Nato summit on 24 June when Trump, who has shown visceral antipathy towards the EU, may find fault in what he considers freeloading allies. Right now, EU member states are united in their resolve not to capitulate in the face of his demands, which include the removal of non-tariff barriers such as food standards. 'What the US is doing has brought us together, and there's a sense of urgency of that cooperation within the 27 that is quite important,' says one diplomat. There is even a growing acceptance that US tariffs of more than 10% are a long-term reality. 'Ideally less than 10%, so it doesn't look like we have rolled over,' says one Brussels official. Before Trump took office for the second time the average tariff on US imports in the EU was about 2.5%. The EU's chief negotiator, Maroš Šefčovič, said on multiple occasions this week that he was 'optimistic' a deal would be done, but back at base, trade war preparations continue. 'We are keeping the gun on the shelf. We don't want to use it, but we want them to know it is there,' said one diplomat. Šefčovič said on Friday he had held another call with the US secretary of commerce, Howard Lutnick. 'Our time and effort fully invested, as delivering forward-looking solutions remains a top EU priority. Staying in permanent contact,' he wrote on X. Meanwhile, twin talks took place this week in Paris at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and in Washington with a team of EU officials led by Tomas Baert, trade adviser to the European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen. Those talks helped 'clean the slate, clear the table', Šefčovič told a conference organised by the European Policy Centre, a thinktank, on Thursday in Brussels. He added that he had also discussed the continued threat of sectoral tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors with the US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris. Šefčovič said his message was that the US and the EU had mutual interests in re-industrialisation on both sides of the Atlantic, and in minimising China's unstoppable rise in key sectors such as electric vehicles and steel. 'Any obstacle in the middle of the Atlantic would simply make them less competitive and more vulnerable. This is the diplomatic, political but also very technical discussions we are having,' he said. Up to now negotiations have been somewhat hampered by the parallel universe occupied by the US president, and White House and EU officials. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Last month, Trump, out of the blue, threatened and then unthreatened to slap a 50% tariff on all EU imports, claiming Brussels was dragging its feet 'to put it mildly'. 'This came as a surprise to Maroš, because he had been in talks since February,' said one source. 'But because this is an imperial court, it is the emperor who will decide when talks are happening.' The volatility in the transatlantic relationship on European business is unprecedented. 'I have been here 10 years and I have never seen this level of nervousness, not during the pandemic, not after the invasion of Ukraine,' said a director at one trade group representing dozens of multinationals in Brussels, who declined to be named. Luisa Santos, the deputy director general at Confederation of Business Europe, which represents 42 national business federations, said trade would, like water, find its course but investment could prove the collateral damage. 'The whole basis of trade is WTO [World Trade Organization] rules,' she said. 'We agreed on the rules and they were accepted the consequences. Now the rule is the power game: 'I will impose what I think is best for me, and the bigger players with more power determine the rules and that is a huge change.' Santos added: 'I think the biggest shock in Europe is that we were supposed to be the traditional allies. But now we are basically put on the same basket as China.' Kyle Martin, the vice-president of European affairs at the General Aviation Manufacturers Association, whose members include Boeing and Airbus, said tariffs would end a 45-year-old US-EU agreement that aviation construction, which relies on a global supply chain, was duty-free. A Boeing 787 gets its front fuselage from Italy, its wings from Japan and doors from France, with assembly at home in Seattle, he pointed out. 'I don't see this having a positive [outcome] for either Boeing or Airbus or any other manufacturer. Everyone will be impacted because everyone's got an interconnected supply chain.' But while negotiations with the US continue, new EU agreements with India, Thailand, the Philippines, Indonesia, South Africa and Australia are also on the cards. Ultimately it is the profound shift in the world order that is bothering many in Brussels. The US was behaving 'like a very unevolved state', said one EU source, like a developing country that relied on customs duties for national revenue in the absence of income tax, corporate tax and VAT. 'Maybe this is what Trump wants, a smaller, leaner weaker state where everybody has to pay for themselves,' they said.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Spain could block Gibraltar's removal from EU money laundering list
Spanish conservatives are seeking to stop Gibraltar being removed from an EU list of jurisdictions with lax money laundering and terror financing controls. The centre-Right People's Party (PP) believes keeping the British Overseas Territory on the list is vital to maintaining pressure in negotiations over its future. The populist Vox party will also join an attempt to block Gibraltar's removal because of the party's long-standing support for Spain's sovereignty claim over the Rock, which was ceded by the Spanish king to Britain in 1713. A Vox source told The Telegraph: 'We will, of course, maintain the same position we have consistently held on Gibraltar in every vote. In our view, Gibraltar is a territory unlawfully colonised by the United Kingdom and does not meet the necessary conditions. 'Therefore, we firmly reject any proposal to remove it from the list of territories concerning capital movements.' Inclusion on the EU's 'grey list' comes as a reputational blow and introduces red tape that makes it less appealing to do business with. Gibraltar is on the list with countries including Afghanistan, Burkina Faso, Iran, North Korea and Yemen. The European Commission has proposed removing the Rock, but requires a majority vote in the European Parliament to confirm the decision. Eurocrats failed in a previous attempt to tweak the list, with conservative and socialist politicians forming an unlikely alliance to quash the move. Earlier this year, Right-wing MEPs voted against the changes because of Gibraltar's proposed removal, while their Left-wing counterparts opposed it because of a recommendation to remove the United Arab Emirates. The People's Party urged the Spanish government to intervene to prevent Gibraltar being removed from the EU list in January. It said that the Rock 'continues to be a territory that is too lax with respect to its commitments to combat money laundering and terrorist financing'. The PP also argued that under no circumstances should Gibraltar be removed before a deal was struck between Brussels and the UK on the post-Brexit relationship with the Rock. Its politicians are the second-largest national delegation in the centre-Right European People's Party (EPP) and hold powerful influence over the direction of its voting strategies. 'Sufficiently comprehensive' efforts Commission officials believe that the Spanish opposition could be overcome with a recommendation to add Russia to the list of countries. They have previously said Gibraltar's efforts to counter illicit finance and money laundering are 'sufficiently comprehensive' in order to be removed from the list. The Rock was originally included on the grey list because of concerns over regulations for its gambling industry. It was added in 2023, as negotiations between the UK, Spain and the EU were carried out over the territory's post-Brexit future. The talks have repeatedly stalled over sensitive sovereignty issues, including Madrid's wish for Spanish border police to operate security checks at Gibraltar's airport and seaport. There is strong support for Ukraine among the EU parliament's EPP, and vetoing the changes to the list because of the British overseas territory could become controversial amongst its politicians from other states. 'There is huge support for putting Russia on the list,' Markus Ferber, of the EPP, told the Financial Times. The commission's final list of recommendations is expected to be published next week, after a planned announcement was put on hold at the last minute this week. Moscow was originally listed in 2000 but taken off two years later after fulfilling a number of criteria set to reassure the EU.
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Quicker queues at EU passport checks? Simon Calder's assessment of claims that millions of Brits will win access to e-gates
British travellers to Europe have never had it so good: that is the narrative from the government ever since the UK-EU 'reset'. Ministers from Sir Kier Starmer downwards have been happy for holidaymakers to infer that they will have a better experience at European Union borders this summer – and that the UK government deserves credit for improving our travelling lives. Much of that optimism is based on British citizens being able use passport e-gates. But what is the reality? Some background: after the 2016 decision to leave the European Union, Boris Johnson's government negotiated for the 'Venezuela outcome' as far as British travellers are concerned. We chose to became 'third-country nationals' – a designation proudly shared with many others, including Venezuelans. The practical consequences for British holidaymakers crossing borders were clear, because the UK helped create the European rules. Previously only one check was necessary when travelling between the UK and the Schengen area (the rest of the EU minus Ireland, plus Iceland, Norway and Switzerland): that the passport was valid and that it belonged to the holder. E-gates are brilliant at this. They compare the information encoded in a passport with the traveller's face to verify that the document belongs to that individual. They are also linked to a central database to confirm the document's validity. The post-Brexit changes that the UK requested, and to which Brussels agreed, include: Having our passports stamped on the way in and out of Europe Giving up access to the fast track for citizens of the EU and wider Schengen area Having border guards check we have not outstayed our 90-day welcome Each individual border transaction therefore takes much more time, leading to extremely long queues if border resources are thin. The most recent half-term was miserable for thousands of families, whether flying in to the Spanish island of Tenerife or flying out of Faro in Portugal. New arrivals and homeward-bound passengers experienced two-hour waits at times. This was gruelling for new arrivals – and expensive for some departing travellers, who missed their flights despite having arrived in good time at the airport. Faro airport, at least, will improve – with British travellers now able to use e-gates. But that is only part of the story. These are the key UK government claims, and my assessment of each. 'Millions more Brits arriving in the Algarve are set to benefit from e-gates ahead of the summer holidays' Source: Cabinet Office press release. Assessment: Configuring e-gates at the Portuguese airport to connect to UK government systems will speed things up a bit for many British passengers. Border staff will no longer need to verify the traveller's identity. All good, then? Not quite. Families with young children will still need to queue to see an official. And after passing through the e-gate, every British passport must be stamped by a human border guard. In theory he or she should also check that the traveller has not been in the Schengen area for more than 90 days out of the past 180 days. The claims for Faro airport get increasingly ambitious: '[E-gate access] will speed up journeys for the approximately 10 million British travellers who use the airport each year' Source: Prime minister 's official spokesperson. Assessment: Complete tosh. Around 2.5 million UK citizens visit Portugal in a typical year. Counting flying in and out, that is 5 million border crossings – covering Lisbon, Porto and Madeira airports as well as Faro, plus those who arrive by land and sea. But let us generously assume that half of those British visitors are using Faro airport. That is still one-quarter of the figure given by No 10. I have told the Cabinet Office this, and asked to see its working. Now let us look at some wider assertions … 'British holidaymakers will be able to use more e-gates in Europe, ending the dreaded queues at border control' Source: Government announcement. Assessment: The first part of this claim is demonstrably true. Besides Faro allowing UK visitors to go through e-gates, many other European authorities are moving in that direction because, as mentioned, it is an extremely efficient way of handling part of the border bureaucracy. Each EU nation makes its own decisions on how to operate its borders. Some are choosing to introduce e-gates for third-country nationals in order to accelerate the arrival and departure process. The second part of the assertion is fanciful. While 'dreaded' is not quantified, it is reasonable to say anything longer than a half-an-hour is unwelcome. There will doubtless be squeezes in arrivals halls over the summer that result in hour-long queues. At Tenerife South airport, at times in summer nine inbound flights from the UK are scheduled within a single half-hour. If they keep to schedule, there will be a sudden influx of over 1,600 people – the vast majority of whom have British, rather than EU, passports. Resourcing to allow swift processing for peaks such as that would be unreasonably expensive for border authorities. 'The Prime Minister has been clear that there should be no reason why European countries cannot go further and faster on this now' Source: Foreign Office minister Baroness Chapman of Darlington, speaking in the House of Lords. That's a big claim. European countries may well have good reasons for not going 'further and faster' on rolling out e-gates for British holidaymakers. They may wish to commit money and effort to things that will benefit their citizens, rather than helping the UK clear up one of the many messes brought about by the British decision to leave the EU.
