5 Top Home-Related Scams To Avoid On April Fools' Day — And Year-Round
San Diego is one of the nation's top home solar markets and scams abound in the industry!
'Scan your favorite newspapers or news websites this April 1, and chances are you'll see some headlines that look suspicious. Read further, and you'll probably find that some of those stories are complete hoaxes. After all, it's April Fools' Day,' comments the Library of Commerce Magazine on its blog. While the post dates the annual observance of trickery to Renaissance Europe, today's hoaxes often use modern technology and mind games. And too often, the very unfunny outcomes harm homeowners, homebuyers and home sellers. Here are five of the latest home-home related scams.
Criminals are impersonating property owners to illegally sell their property. Typically, they're choosing properties that are unoccupied and potentially even undeveloped land. This means, it can be months or years before the crime is detected. That could occur at a painful or traumatic time for the seller, perhaps due to a job loss or family death.
According to Matt Troiani, National Association of REALTORS Senior Counsel and Director of Legal Affairs, 'The scammers may be getting more sophisticated in using technology, including AI, to identify properties to fraudulently sell and to impersonate sellers.'
Tips: NAR has a tip sheet on its website for spotting red flags and recommended practices. Red flags include property significantly below market rate, cash requirements, no for sale sign at the property, among others. Tips include requesting proof of ownership, verifying the seller's identity and contact information, using a notary at closing, among others.
'One of the more common scams we hear about involves storm-chasing,' shares Angi Hicks, co-founder of home service platform Angi, (formerly Angie's List). After a major storm, these individuals go door-to-door offering to inspect your roof and make repairs. They often request a sizable deposit upfront — or even full payment — then either do subpar work or vanish entirely.' When I lived in Florida, locals called these scam artists, 'Chuck in a truck,' because they would cruise through hurricane-ravaged areas offering quick repairs.
This can also happen with other natural disasters. Team Rubicon, a veteran-founded emergency support nonprofit, reports that scammers are already showing up at fire-scourged homesites in the Los Angeles area.
Tips: Hicks suggests researching any contractor you choose to have work on your home, checking their credentials and licensing. Ask friends and neighbors for referrals. Review contracts carefully and never pay in full upfront. Get everything in writing! California's Department of Insurance has a robust web page of additional tips, resources and a hotline for wildfire-impacted homeowners.
Hicks cites this as the costliest home repair scam she's encountered. Here's how it works, she explains: 'A contractor might approach you offering an incredible deal in exchange for using your home as a showroom for potential clients. It sounds like a win-win—but it rarely is. They rush through renovations, often cutting corners in ways that aren't immediately obvious. Everything may look great at first glance, but beneath the surface it's a different story. Bathrooms might have incorrectly installed ventilation, which can cause mold, improperly sloped shower drains allow for standing water, and tile jobs that crumble months later.'
Tips: 'If a deal seems too good to be true, it probably is,' Hicks comments. 'Always vet your contractor thoroughly — check licenses, read reviews, and ask for recent referrals. And don't be afraid to ask detailed questions throughout the project. A legitimate pro will be happy to walk you through the process.'
'A fairly new and dangerous threat has arisen for homeowners who have fallen behind on their mortgage payments and may be at risk of foreclosure – opportunistic companies,' writes the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation on its Consumer Resource Center site. 'They often refer to themselves as a 'foreclosure consultant' or 'mortgage consultant,' and market themselves as a 'foreclosure service', 'foreclosure rescue agency' or 'loan modification company.' They count on homeowners being vulnerable and desperate,' the FDIC warns. They say they can help a homeowner keep their home, refinance or modify a mortgage, repair their credit or postpone foreclosure. 'In reality, these 'options' are intended to convince you to take the wrong steps so they can take your money and possibly your home.' These strategies come in different packages and can come victims' way by phone or email. They charge outrageous fees, make unfulfillable promises and offer services someone can easily do themselves for free. 'In the end, you are worse off than before, because you have little or no time to save your home, or seek other assistance,' it advises.
Tips: The FDIC offers multiple warning signs of a mortgage scam, including upfront fee demand, unsolicited offers, suggestions to stop making mortgage payments and end contact with your lender, instructions to transfer ownership and others.
'Solar energy is rising in popularity. So are the scams,' warns the Federal Trade Commission in an online Consumer Alert. 'Did a salesperson knock on your door and promise free rooftop solar panels at no cost to you? Or say you'll never have to pay another electricity bill because government programs, grants, or rebates cover your solar installation? It's likely a scam. While there are some government-funded solar programs for households that qualify, 'going solar' isn't free. Honest businesses will tell you exactly how much it'll cost to get and install solar panels.'
San Diego-based energy consultant Rebecca Ely is seeing scams like these in her top residential solar market. Echoing the FTC, she reports that homeowners are being told that they can get solar for free from the government. (I see these ads all of the time on social media. Do you?) It's not true, she declares. 'There are programs where you pay nothing out of pocket and you do not have a loan against you, otherwise known as a Power Purchase Agreement, or 'PPA.' similar to a lease with a better buyout option.' This is essentially renting the equipment, which the solar provider maintains and owns. 'The homeowner simply pays a lower rate for power, a fixed monthly bill,' she notes. The provider keeps the tax benefits and, in many cases, charges the homeowner an annual escalator, (i.e., rent increase). 'So no, it is not free and the government is not paying for these systems,' Ely comments. In many PPAs, the homeowner is paying more over a long lease than they would if they'd paid cash for the panels. Sometimes, she says, solar consultants undersize systems to make a quote look appealing, but the homeowner ends up underserved and unhappy down the road.
A related solar scam the energy consultant cites is solar consultants claiming they work directly with the local power company. 'We are two entirely separate entities. I often hear, 'I went solar with SDG&E' [San Diego Gas & Electric]. No one went solar with SGD&E,' she confirms.
Tips: 'A homeowner needs to consider more than price,' Ely cautions: Ask 'What does that price include?' It is extremely important to check reviews and have a trustworthy, experienced consultant review everything closely.' She also suggests working with an independent, unbiased and experienced broker. 'You want someone who will warn you of all and any potential cons.'
Millions of Americans are scammed each year. When it comes to your home — or a home you're considering purchasing — a scam can be devastating and, in the case of shoddy repairs or remodels, dangerous. Buyer beware today and year-round!
***Interviews were conducted by email between March 31 and April 1, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
How Long Did Mom and Dad Save for Their Down Payment?
With each new generation of home buyers, housing prices rise — and so does the time it takes to save enough money. Between 1970 and 1985, a typical American family could save 10 percent of their income for about five years and accumulate a 20 percent down payment on a median-priced existing single-family home, according to a New York Times analysis of income and housing-price data from the U.S. Census Bureau and the National Association of Realtors. The analysis used the census definition of family income, which includes income of family members 15 or older living in the household, but not other members of the household, such as roommates. As of 2023, the year representing the most recent census data for income, it would take nearly eight years, the data shows. A major reason for the discrepancy is that home prices have increased at a faster rate than family income. And in recent years, a shortage of homes has led to greater price increases. In 2023, the median sale price of an existing single-family home ($394,100) was about four times more than the median family income ($100,800). That gap is nearly twice as wide as it was in 1970, the data shows, meaning that many American families — even those with above median earnings — will struggle to keep up with prices. It's important to remember that the gap may be a lot wider depending on where you live. In New York City, for example, the median home price according to Zillow is $872,667. According to the census, the median family income is $90,619. At those levels, it would take a family 19 years to save up a 20 percent down payment. Loans that allow lower down payments exist for some, including first-time buyers and veterans, but qualified borrowers still need to manage the resulting higher monthly payments. Reaching 20 percent of the purchase price can be helped by salary increases or depositing money into high-interest savings accounts. Earning 5 percent interest can cut the time it takes to save for a down payment by a year. But it would still take two to three years longer than it did 40 or 50 years ago. Saving For a Home The rise in median home prices has outpaced that of median earnings, so saving for a down payment takes a lot longer than it used to. Median family income Median sale price of existing homes Years of saving Year 2023 2020 2015 2010 2005 2000 1995 1990 1985 1980 1975 1970 $100,800 $84,350 $70,700 $60,240 $56,190 $50,730 $40,610 $35,350 $27,740 $21,020 $13,720 $9,867 $394,100 $300,200 $223,900 $173,100 $219,000 $147,300 $117,000 $97,300 $75,500 $62,200 $35,300 $23,000 7.8 7.1 6.3 5.7 7.8 5.8 5.8 5.5 5.4 5.9 5.1 4.7 Median family income Median sale price of existing homes Years of saving Year 2023 2020 2015 2010 2005 2000 1995 1990 1985 1980 1975 1970 $100,800 $84,350 $70,700 $60,240 $56,190 $50,730 $40,610 $35,350 $27,740 $21,020 $13,720 $9,867 $394,100 $300,200 $223,900 $173,100 $219,000 $147,300 $117,000 $97,300 $75,500 $62,200 $35,300 $23,000 7.8 7.1 6.3 5.7 7.8 5.8 5.8 5.5 5.4 5.9 5.1 4.7 Sources: U.S. Census Bureau; National Association of Realtors By The New York Times
New York Post
15 hours ago
- New York Post
Here's how much wealthier homeowners are than renters
The best investment on Earth is … earth. So much so that homeowners are a whopping 43 times wealthier than renters, according to a 2025 estimate from the Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer Finances, as reported by The data revealed that US homeowners are enjoying a median net worth of $430,000. By comparison, renters are holding onto pocket change, with just $10,000 to the name of the median tenant. Advertisement 5 Homeowners' wealth has grown by 45% since 2019. Antonioguillem – 5 The net worth of America's renters has stalled. Blacqbook – The issue of the wealth gap between owners and renters was highlighted last week in Washington, DC at the 2026 REALTORS Legislative Meetings. Advertisement Lawrence Yun, the chief economist at the National Association of Realtors, told conference attendees that property owners saw their wealth grow by an estimated 45% since 2019. That's 9 percentage points higher than renters, who've found their bank accounts stalling. The wealth of the median renter actually shrunk by $400 since 2022. Real estate is popularly seen as one of the best investments anyone can make, and the truth of this sentiment has played out over the past several years of rapid price appreciation, reported. 5 Skyrocketing home values significantly enriched homeowners in recent years. Davide Angelini – Advertisement 5 Homeownership is an excellent long-term investment, and renters know it. Alex – 5 Economic pressures are making homeowners a rarity. Zamrznuti tonovi – Hannah Jones, the company's senior economic research analyst, explained how homeowners have been substantially enriched over the last five years. 'Rapid price appreciation also gave existing homeowners the opportunity to cash in on home equity and level up into a larger or more desirable home, while renters were not able to take advantage of recent housing market dynamics in the same way,' Jones told the outlet. Advertisement For most renters, leases are a necessity rather than a choice, with just 15% of those surveyed reporting that they prefer renting over homeownership. Yet declining housing affordability is keeping renters under the auspices of landlords. A recent analysis of census data found that renters are outnumbering homeowners in a growing number of New Jersey suburbs. Eager homebuyers are still hamstrung, in part, by high interest rates and high home costs. While it's still possible to snag a home under $300,000 in some metros, young people are largely falling behind as homeowners. The newest Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer Finances, a triennial financial survey of thousands of families, is currently underway. The final results, expected in mid to late 2026, will reveal fresh insights into how the tumultuous economy of the past three years has impacted the wallets — and living conditions — of Americans.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Federal appeals court wrestles with Trump effort to fight hush money conviction
A federal appeals court in New York wrangled Wednesday with President Donald Trump's claim that his hush money conviction should be reviewed by federal courts and seemed open to the idea that the Supreme Court's landmark immunity decision may weigh in the president's favor. 'It seems to me that we got a very big case that created a whole new world of presidential immunity,' US Circuit Judge Myrna Pérez, who was nominated to the bench by President Joe Biden, said at one point during oral arguments. 'The boundaries are not clear at this point.' At issue is whether Trump can move his state court case on 34 counts of falsifying business records to federal court, where he hopes to argue that prosecutors violated the Supreme Court's immunity decision last year by using certain evidence against him, including testimony from former White House Communications Director Hope Hicks. 'The scope of a federal constitutional immunity for the president of the United States should be decided by this court and the Supreme Court, not by New York state courts,' said Jeffrey Wall, a former acting US solicitor general who is representing Trump in the case. 'Everything about this cries out for federal court.' The Supreme Court's decision last year granted Trump immunity from criminal prosecution for his official acts and barred prosecutors from attempting to enter evidence about them, even if they are pursuing alleged crimes involving that president's private conduct. Without that prohibition on evidence, the Supreme Court reasoned, a prosecutor could 'eviscerate the immunity' the court recognized by allowing a jury to second-guess a president's official acts. And so, the underlying question is whether prosecutors crossed that line by including the testimony from Hicks and former executive assistant Madeleine Westerhout, as well as a series of social media posts Trump authored during his first term criticizing the hush money case. The three-judge panel of the New York-based 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals, all appointed by Democratic presidents, asked probing questions of both sides and it wasn't clear after more than an hour of arguments how they would decide the case. The judges pressed the attorney representing Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg on why the Supreme Court's decision last year didn't preclude the evidence at issue in the case. 'The Supreme Court used very broad language in talking about evidentiary immunity,' noted Circuit Judge Susan Carney. Bragg's office has countered that it's too late for federal courts to intervene. That's because Trump was already convicted and sentenced. Prosecutors have also argued that the evidence at issue wasn't the kind the Supreme Court was referring to. Hicks may have been a White House official when she testified, they said, but she was speaking about actions Trump took in a private capacity. 'The fact that we are now past the point of sentencing would be a compelling reason to find no 'good cause' for removal,' said Steven Wu, who was representing Bragg. Federal officials facing prosecution in state courts may move their cases to federal court in many circumstances under a 19th century law designed to ensure states don't attempt to prosecute them for conduct performed 'under color' of a US office or agency. A federal government worker, for instance, might seek to have a case moved to federal court if they are sued after getting into a car accident while driving on the job. Wu analogized Trump's argument to a postal worker who commits a crime on the weekend and then confesses to his boss at work on Monday. The confession, even though it happened in a post office, doesn't suddenly convert the content of the conversation to an official US Postal Service action. 'The criminal charges were private and unofficial conduct,' Wu said. Trump was ultimately sentenced in January without penalty. He had been accused of falsifying a payment to his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, to cover up a $130,000 payment Cohen made to adult-film star Stormy Daniels to keep her from speaking out before the 2016 election about an alleged affair with Trump. (Trump has denied the affair.) US District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, nominated to the bench by President Bill Clinton, denied Trump's request to move the case to federal court – keeping his appeals instead in New York courts. Trump, who frequently complained about the New York trial court judge in his case, Juan Merchan, has said he wants his case heard in an 'unbiased federal forum.'
