Sinn Féin urges minister to ‘defer' GAEC 2 for another year
The Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine has been urged to 'defer' the implementation of the good agricultural and environmental condition (GAEC 2) for another year because of the level of uncertainty surrounding it at this time.
The Sinn Féin spokesperson on agriculture, Martin Kenny, detailed today (Tuesday, May 6) that he has personally written to Minister Martin Heydon in relation to farmers' concerns around GAEC 2.
The Sligo-Leitrim TD said: 'I have written to the minister for agriculture requesting that he defer the implementation of GAEC 2 for another year until he provides more clarity to farmers on what land falls under GAEC 2 and what implications it will have for farmers in the future.
'GAEC 2 proposals were approved last week by the EU, which determine what restrictions will be placed on farmers under GAEC 2 however farmers have been left in the dark as the proposals have not been published'.
GAEC 2
GAEC 2– one of several GAEC rules that govern conditionality for payments under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) – is described as a baseline requirement for the protection of carbon-rich soils, including peatlands and wetland.
The controversial standard for the protection of wetlands and peatlands under CAP conditionality is officially in force according to the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM).
The standard entered into operation in Ireland following final approval by the European Commission on April 30.
But according to Deputy Kenny, farmers are not clear about what they are required to deliver under the standard and what it will mean for their farm.
'Farmers are currently completing their Basic Income Support for Sustainability (BISS) applications and are being asked to tick a box to say they will comply with GAEC 2 even though the majority of them are not aware if their land will be classed as peatland under GAEC 2 as they haven't been provided maps.
'Nor do they know what they are agreeing to comply with or what impact it could have on their farm into the future,' Deputy Kenny added.
He said he had met with members of various farming organisations who have expressed 'serious concerns' about how GAEC 2 will play out in Ireland.
'I would urge the minister to take this issue seriously and defer GAEC 2 for another year even if it is going to incur a financial penalty.
'At the moment farmers are being asked to accept the unknown which is not acceptable,' Deputy Kenny added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
5 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Macron in Greenland to 'show French, EU solidarity'
French President Emmanuel Macron said as he arrived in Greenland that his visit aimed to show the solidarity of France and the European Union over the Arctic island's "sovereignty" and "territorial integrity". US President Donald Trump has said he wants the United States to take over the minerals-rich and strategically-located Arctic island for reasons of national and international security, and has not ruled out the use of force to do so. Greenland is a self-governing part of the Kingdom of Denmark with the right to declare independence. Both the Greenland and Danish governments say it is not for sale and only Greenlanders can determine their future. US Vice President JD Vance visited a US military base there in March. President Macron, the first foreign leader to visit Greenland since Mr Trump's explicit threats to "get" the island, was invited by the prime ministers of Greenland and Denmark. He has said his visit is meant to prevent any "preying" on the territory. "France has stood by us since the first statements about taking our land emerged. "This support is both necessary and gratifying," Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen wrote on Facebook days ahead of Mr Macron's visit. Asked if President Macron would deliver an explicit message to the United States during his visit, an adviser to Mr Macron told reporters: "The trip is a signal in itself," without mentioning Donald Trump. Earlier, speaking on RTL radio, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said: "Greenland is a European territory and it is normal that Europe and notably France show their interest." According to an IFOP poll for published yesterday, 77% of the French and 56% of Americans disapprove of an annexation of Greenland by the US and 43% of the French would approve using French military power to prevent a US invasion. Mr Macron is visiting the capital Nuuk, as well as a hydropower station funded by the EU and a glacier, and discuss Arctic security and climate change with his hosts. Though Denmark is an EU member, Greenland is outside the EU. The French adviser said the visit would be an opportunity to discuss how to give Greenland's association partnership with the EU a "new dimension". Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen made several visits to Paris after Mr Trump's threats to seek French and European backing, and has placed orders for French-made surface-to-air missiles, in a shift of focus for Copenhagen. Enlisting the EU's only nuclear power is a way for Denmark, long one of the US's most loyal allies in Europe, to project a form of hard power towards a suddenly more aggressive United States, said Florian Vidal of the Paris-based IFRI think tank. "The Trump administration's more aggressive posture is a shock that makes the French vision of Europe, one that is more autonomous, appear more reasonable for Denmark," he said. "From a Nordic point of view, France is a military power that counts," he added.
The Irish Sun
7 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Football could introduce new transfer rule to let players buy out their contracts in radical move that would slash fees
MASSIVE transfer fees could soon become a thing of the past — with players' chiefs wanting stars to have freedom to break their contracts for a fixed compensation payment. The international players' union FifPro has accused Fifa of dragging its feet over new transfer rules after the 5 A major case involving ex-Chelsea star Lassana Diarra could make massive transfer fees a thing of the past Credit: Getty 5 The ruling from the European Court means inflated transfer fees could be a thing of the past Credit: EPA 5 The likes of Alexander Isak would be able to buy out their contract rather than being marooned while clubs argue over a transfer fee Credit: Alamy Major agents claimed the October ruling was the But now FifPro has told stars and their lawyers to be FifPro legal chief Alexandra Gomez Bruinewoud said: 'Every worker should have the right to end a contractual relationship. READ MORE IN FOOTBALL 'Knowing how much you will have to pay as compensation is part of that right. 'Also, the fact you leave your job should not prevent you from being hired in another job, which is what was happening in football.' Even the giants of the game may be forced into a major rethink by the repercussions of a row sparked in Moscow a decade ago. Former Most read in Football BEST ONLINE CASINOS - TOP SITES IN THE UK Yet Diarra's win at the European Court of Justice looks increasingly likely to significantly change the way the transfer market works. If FifPro is right, the result will be for all players to have the right to break their contracts. Transfer fees could be SCRAPPED forever after Lassana Diarra wins landmark court case against Fifa It would see players worth £100m on the open market suddenly available for a fraction of that sum. Of course, any new regulations will not be introduced this summer. Fifa rushed through a series of temporary transfer regulations, with dire warnings of the 'collapse' of the transfer market unleashing 'chaos'. But FifPro remains unconvinced the latest moves from Zurich meet the demands of EU law. One insider explained: 'This could be the last few years of the inflated transfer fees we have all seen. 'The European Court has said that football must operate within EU law. 5 'Football is the outlier. There's no other industry — other than maybe thoroughbred horses — where you see employees change hands for millions of pounds and it is time for the game to be brought in step.' Gomez Bruinewoud added: 'The judges in the Diarra case explained why the system was against EU law. 'I'm not afraid to say the same Fifa rules are probably also against most national labour laws.' Top players will benefit from higher wages and longer deals, though with budgets finite, that would mean less cash and shorter deals for players further down the pecking order — and limited job security in the lower tiers. Prem club bosses also fear the consequences, arguing the effective abolition of fees would blow up the entire footballing pyramid as money would no longer 'trickle down'. It is likely that, as with the Jean-Marc Bosman courtroom saga that turned European football on its head 30 years ago, it will need another player to be the test case to break the current system. But it seems that challenge is a matter of time from being made. And with the players' union backing, the most fundamental change the game has ever seen. 5
Irish Independent
18 hours ago
- Irish Independent
The Sunday Independent's View: Innocents pay the price for Middle East power games
Micheál Martin and Simon Harris have been among the most acerbic critics of Benjamin Netanyahu's right-wing government, but followed other EU leaders in falling short of outright condemnation, settling instead for carefully-worded calls for restraint and dialogue. There could scarcely be a starker illustration of Iran's diplomatic isolation. Irish leaders might not directly support strikes, but nor can they be seen to be batting for the ayatollahs, whose own poisonous ideology has contributed to keeping the region permanently teetering on the brink. Israel's argument has always been that the West faces the same enemies as it does; Israel just happens to be surrounded by them. Being confronted with this uncomfortable realpolitik was always the risk from burning diplomatic bridges with Israel, as the Irish Government has done lately. If it came down to a wider war between Israel and Iran, Western leaders were bound to stand on the side of the former. France has already pledged to defend Israel from Iranian retaliation. To acknowledge as much is not to say Israel was right to target Iran. No one knows how close Iran is — or was, before last week, at least — to developing nuclear capabilities. It has been rumoured to be nudging closer to that goal for many years. However, advanced or not as its nuclear ambitions may be, it is not in the interests of the world that it achieves them. At the same time, Israel's recklessness cannot be accepted as normal either. The problem with such actions is that at some point someone is going to get hurt — innocents usually, who have little to do with the political tensions for which they always pay the price. The best hope is that Iran, having symbolically hit back, quickly climbs down President Trump will be criticised for backing the attack on Iran, even as his own lack of influence with Israeli hardliners is humiliatingly exposed. The truth is that every US president would probably have done the same. If Trump can be taken to task for anything, it is calling for the people of Iran to overthrow the regime that has ruled the country since 1979 (Libya has hardly been a model of stability since the Western-led coalition deposed Colonel Gaddafi). Attempts to topple Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad similarly led in turn to all-out civil war and the emboldening of Islamic State. Another war in the Middle East would undoubtedly lead to millions more fleeing the region in search of a safe haven in Europe, where tensions over mass immigration are already dangerously inflamed. The best hope is that Iran, having symbolically hit back at the wave of attacks by Israel, quickly climbs down. The Iranian people, if the ayatollahs even care about them at this stage, have nothing to gain from war, and less still from widening it to include the US. Tehran is already weak. The reality of power in the region inevitably means defiance invites disaster. Israel has refrained from attacking Iran's oil refineries, which would plunge the country's fragile economy into crisis. They may not hold off for long if the tit-for-tat of missiles escalates. The world can only pray that Mr Trump was telling the truth when he promised US voters in November that the era of America getting involved in foreign wars had come to an end.
