Opinion- How the attacks on Iran are part of a much bigger global struggle
There are so many things to say in the wake of the US bombing of three key Iranian nuclear facilities that it is easy to get lost in the gripping details. So for now, let me try to step back and explore the global, regional and local forces shaping this story. What's really going on here?
It is a very, very big drama, and it is not confined to the Middle East.
To my mind, Vladimir Putin's war of Ukraine in 2022, with the sole aim of wiping its democracy off the map and absorbing it into Russia, and the attacks on Israel in 2023 by Hamas and friendly nations in Lebanon, Yemen and Iraq were manifestations of a global struggle between the forces of inclusion and the forces of resistance.
That is a struggle between countries and leaders who see the world and their nations benefiting from more trade, more cooperation against global threats and more decent, if not democratic, governance — versus regimes whose leaders thrive on resisting those trends because conflict enables them to keep their people down, their armies strong and their thieving of their treasuries easy.
The forces of inclusion had steadily been growing stronger. Ukraine in 2022 was getting closer to joining the European Union. This would have been the biggest expansion of a whole and free Europe since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, because it would have added to the West a huge agricultural, technological and military power and left Russia more isolated — and looking more out of step to its own people — than ever.
At the very same time, the Biden administration was making rapid headway on a deal for the US to forge a security alliance with Saudi Arabia. In return, Saudi Arabia would normalise relations with Israel, and Israel would begin talks with the Palestinians on possible statehood. This would have been the biggest expansion of an integrated Middle East since the Camp David peace treaty between Egypt and Israel in 1979.
In short, Ukraine looked poised to join the West, and Israel looked poised to join the East.
So what happened? Putin attacked Ukraine to stop the first movement, and Hamas and Iran and others attacked Israel to stop the second.
As such, my first question in the aftermath of Sunday morning's strike on Iran is: Does President Trump understand whose side of this global struggle Putin is on? Iran and Russia are close allies for a reason. Iran has been providing Russia with the drones it has used to more effectively kill Ukrainian soldiers and civilians. I do not ask Trump to drop a bomb on Russia, but I do ask him to provide Ukraine with the military, economic and diplomatic support it needs to resist Russia - every bit as much as the US is doing for Israel to defeat Hamas and Iran.
China has always had a foot in each camp. Its economy depends on a healthy and growing world of inclusion, but its political leadership has also maintained strong ties to the world of resistance. So Beijing plays in both leagues - buying oil from Iran but always worried that if Iran got a nuclear bomb, it might one day give a copy to fighters from Xinjiang.
That said, China's oil purchases from Iran are a crucial part of this story. Those purchases are Tehran's biggest source of external income. As my colleague Keith Bradsher reported from Shanghai, oil sales to China are today 6 per cent of Iran's economy and equal to about half of government spending. - The New York Times
Thomas L Friedman
The writer is an American political commentator and author
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
an hour ago
- Observer
Spain PM alleges 'genocide' in Gaza as rescuers say 56 killed
GAZA CITY: Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez on Thursday became the most prominent European leader to describe the situation in Gaza as a "genocide", as rescuers in the war-ravaged Palestinian territory said Israeli forces killed 56 people. After more than 20 months of devastating conflict, rights groups say Gaza's population of more than two million face famine-like conditions. Israel began allowing supplies to trickle in at the end of May following a blockade of more than two months, but distribution has been marred by chaotic scenes and near-daily reports of Israeli forces firing on those waiting to collect rations. Israel meanwhile is pressing its bombardment of the territory, in a military offensive it says is aimed at defeating Hamas -- whose unprecedented October 2023 attack on Israel triggered the war. Spain's Sanchez said Gaza was in a "catastrophic situation of genocide" and urged the European Union to immediately suspend its cooperation deal with Israel. The comments represent the strongest condemnation to date by Sanchez, an outspoken critic of Israel's offensive who is one of the first European leaders, and the most senior, to use the term "genocide" to describe the situation in Gaza. Speaking ahead of an EU summit in Brussels, Sanchez mentioned an EU report which found "indications" Israel was breaching its rights obligations under the cooperation deal, which forms the basis for trade ties. A mourner reacts during the funeral of Palestinians who were killed in an Israeli air strike earlier in the day, in Deir Al Balah, central Gaza Strip. - Reuters The text cited Israel's blockade of humanitarian aid for the Palestinian territory, the high number of civilian casualties, attacks on journalists and the massive displacement and destruction caused by the war. The spokesman for Gaza's civil defence agency, Mahmud Bassal, said Israeli forces killed 56 people on Thursday, including six who were waiting for aid in two separate locations. The Israeli military said its troops had "fired warning shots" in order to prevent "suspects from approaching them" near the Netzarim corridor in central Gaza, where Palestinians gather each night for rations. Israel's military campaign has killed at least 56,259 people, also mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in Gaza. The United Nations considers its figures reliable. Footage from a hospital in central Gaza on Wednesday showed Palestinians sobbing over bloodied body bags containing their loved ones who had been killed in an Israeli strike. "They (killed) the father, mother and brothers, only two girls survived. One of them is a baby girl aged one year and two months and the other one is five years old," one mourner said. Beyond daily bombardment, Gaza's health ministry says that since late May, nearly 550 people have been killed near aid centres while seeking scarce supplies. The United Nations has condemned the 'weaponisation of food' in Gaza, and slammed a US- and Israeli-backed body that has largely replaced established humanitarian organisations there. The privately run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation was brought into the territory in late May, but its operations have been marred by chaotic scenes, deaths and neutrality concerns. - AFP
Observer
an hour ago
- Observer
Iran n-bomb? More likely
Israel and the United States have dealt punishing blows to Iran's nuclear infrastructure. 'Operation Rising Lion' and 'Operation Midnight Hammer' have been portrayed as precision strikes that will stop the Islamic Republic's nuclear programme in its tracks. But whatever the bombings might have achieved tactically, they risk forfeiting strategically, as Iran is now more convinced than ever that nuclear weapons are the only way to deter future aggression and ensure the regime's survival. Iran was once brought to the negotiating table through a carefully calibrated mix of pressure and incentives. Despite its imperfections, that approach worked. In 2015, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action was agreed, with Iran agreeing to limit its nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief and other concessions. But — at Israel's urging and despite Iran's apparent compliance — Donald Trump abandoned the JCPOA during his first term as president, destroying whatever mutual trust had been built over the course of 20 months of painstaking diplomacy. Now, despite pursuing new nuclear negotiations with Iran, the US has joined Israel in abandoning strategic patience in favor of spasmodic force. Some argue that Iran invited the attacks by deceiving the international community, stoking regional conflicts, and enriching uranium to levels well beyond those needed for any civilian application. These are legitimate complaints. Even the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), in a report released just before Israel's campaign began, raised concerns about Iran's compliance with its international obligations. Indeed, an analysis of this report by the Institute for Science and International Security argued that 'Iran can convert its current stock of 60 per cent enriched uranium into 233 kg of [weapon-grade uranium] in three weeks at the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FFEP), enough for 9 nuclear weapons.' That conclusion may well have lit a fire under the Trump administration. But the IAEA also concluded that it had 'no credible indications of an ongoing, undeclared structured nuclear programme' in Iran, while underscoring the urgency of reaching a nuclear deal. 'Iran,' the agency warned, 'is the only non-nuclear-weapon state in the world that is producing and accumulating uranium enriched to 60 per cent' — just a short technical step away from the 90 per cent purity needed for weapons-grade material. Even so, US and Israeli decision-makers green-lit attacks on Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan — facilities that are subject to IAEA safeguards and monitored under Iran's Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) commitments. With that, they unravelled the legal and verification framework that exists precisely to prevent weaponisation. Beyond undermining the authority of the IAEA and its inspection regime, the attacks violated the NPT's principle of peaceful nuclear use (Article IV) and breached international law, including the United Nations Charter. The US, a nuclear superpower with a record of catastrophic wars aimed at regime change, and Israel, a clandestine nuclear-armed state that refuses to sign the NPT, have thus sent an unmistakable message: only the weak follow rules, and only the strong are safe. In fact, as long as you have nuclear weapons, you can violate international law at will. This is true not only for major powers, but also for smaller states. Pakistan, for example, nurtures cross-border terrorism and exports proxy war with impunity, threatening nuclear retaliation for anyone who crosses it. This poses a more acute threat to regional peace than Iran's hypothetical bomb, but the US remains silent. This hypocrisy is deeply rooted. It was the US, after all, that aided and abetted Pakistan's covert pursuit of the bomb. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, successive US administrations ignored mounting evidence that Pakistan was secretly enriching uranium and building nuclear weapons – and continued funneling billions of dollars in aid to the country. The result is a fragile state armed with an 'Islamic bomb.' Today, with diplomacy derailed, inspections discredited, coercion normalised, and double standards embraced, what tools remain to convince Iran that remaining non-nuclear is wise and strategically viable? After years of debate over the value of a nuclear deterrent — with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei even issuing religious edicts against nuclear weapons — Iranian decision-makers are almost certain to decide that there is no other way to keep the country safe from attack. Iran now has every incentive to exit — or at least limit — the IAEA framework and race toward nuclear breakout. Just as Saddam Hussein took his nuclear programme underground following Israel's 1981 bombing of Iraq's IAEA-monitored Osirak reactor, Iran is likely to reject transparency and oversight in favor of secrecy and ambiguity. That would not be some dramatic act of defiance, but rather a rational response to a serious — even existential — threat. And it is not just Iran. If powerful states can bomb safeguarded nuclear facilities with impunity, why should any country put its faith in the global nonproliferation regime? Any government that wants to avoid the fate of Saddam's Iraq or Muammar el Qaddafi's Libya (or, for that matter, democratic Ukraine), will seek to acquire the bomb – or at least come close enough to keep adversaries guessing. The only viable path to nonproliferation is and always will be diplomacy, not destruction. Military strikes might slow down a nuclear programme, but they cannot impose long-term restraint — especially when they are carried out by powers that flout the very rules they claim to be enforcing. In the end, Operation Rising Lion and Operation Midnight Hammer may be remembered not as preemptive strikes against Iran's nuclear breakout, but as catalysts for it. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2025. By Brahma Chellaney A Professor Emeritus of Strategic Studies at the New Delhi-based Center for Policy Research and Fellow at the Robert Bosch Academy in Berlin
Observer
an hour ago
- Observer
Iran one step closer to cutting cooperation with IAEA
TEHRAN: Iran has taken one further step towards cutting off its cooperation with the United Nations' atomic watchdog, as Tehran takes stock in the aftermath of its brief war with Israel. The Guardian Council, a key supervisory body, on Thursday approved the temporary suspension of cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), state news agency IRNA reported, a day after the measure was passed in parliament. According to the resolution, Iran will not allow IAEA inspectors into the country until the "safety" of its nuclear facilities is guaranteed. Tehran is also asking the IAEA to condemn the attacks by the US and Israel on Iran's nuclear facilities. Without ongoing cooperation with the IAEA, which is mandated to monitor nuclear facilities in countries around the world, there is little prospect of negotiations with the US resuming. US President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that there would be new talks with Iran next week - a comment that has not brought any official response from Tehran so far. Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Thursday that Israel was hit hard by the conflict, in his first public comments since a ceasefire came into force earlier this week. "Despite all the fanfares and claims, the Zionist regime was nearly destroyed and crushed under the blows of the Islamic Republic," Khamenei said in a video message cited by IRNA. An excavator is used to clear the rubble in front of a building recently hit in Israeli strikes in Tehran following a ceasefire with Israel that ended 12 days of fighting. - AFP Iran had also achieved "victory over the American regime," he said, arguing that the US had failed to achieve its objectives. He praised "the extraordinary unity and solidarity of the Iranian people." Iran suffered major attacks on its nuclear and military facilities during the war which began on June 13, as well as losing many top scientists and military leaders in Israeli strikes. The US also intervened on Israel's behalf with a strike on Iranian nuclear sites at the weekend. Some two dozen people were killed in Israel. The Iranian authorities say over 600 people were killed in Iran. The status of Iran's nuclear programme is uncertain after the US strikes. Despite the ceasefire with Israel, Iranian airspace remains largely closed. The closure will be extended until 2 pm (1030 GMT) on Friday, IRNA reported, citing a ministry spokesman. Some exceptions were allowed for the eastern part of the country, but the country's main international hub in the capital remains closed. Authorities warn of continued Israeli activity Iran's intelligence services remain on high alert, despite the ceasefire with Israel, according to official reports. "The cessation of hostile military operations does not mean the end of (Israel's) malicious and hostile actions," the state news agency Tasnim reported. The actions include gathering intelligence about the country, spreading misinformation and weakening national unity, the report said. Suspicious cases must therefore be reported under all circumstances, it added. - dpa
