logo
What we know about the man police believe bombed a Palm Springs fertility clinic

What we know about the man police believe bombed a Palm Springs fertility clinic

CNN19-05-2025

Federal agencies
Maternal healthFacebookTweetLink
Follow
Before the man police believe detonated a large explosive that blasted through a fertility clinic in the California desert community of Palm Springs on Saturday, people who knew Guy Edward Bartkus should have alerted authorities about his warning signs, the city's police chief said.
'There were people in chat rooms, there were people who were connected to him, who had to have known, in my opinion, that he was up to nefarious deeds,' Palm Springs Police Chief Andy Mills told CNN, adding, 'That should have been brought forward.'
Mills said the investigation has determined Bartkus, 25, 'was chatting with people in online groups, in online forums, as well as posting stuff on YouTube where he was experimenting with different types of explosive materials. That should have been reported.'
With Bartkus having been killed in the bombing, sources say authorities are trying to determine a possible motive based on his prolific online presence and through a search of his residence about an hour northeast of Palm Springs.
'The subject had nihilistic ideations,' Akil Davis, the FBI's assistant director in charge of the Los Angeles field office, said at a Sunday news conference.
According to FBI research of past violent actors, nihilistic ideation refers to a 'preoccupation with themes of violence, hopelessness, despair, pessimism, hatred, isolation, loneliness, or an 'end-of-the-world' philosophy,' said retired senior FBI profiler Dr. Mary Ellen O'Toole. 'Nihilistic ideation is a very pessimistic view of the world.'
The FBI's insight into Bartkus' views comes from their discovery of his writings, including a suspected manifesto, sources said.
One law enforcement source said authorities are also aware of a rambling audio recording posted online that could be associated with the incident, in which a man describes his intention to attack an in vitro fertilization clinic.
In the oftentimes incoherent audio message, the speaker discusses various grievances about his life and criticizes IVF while referring to himself as 'anti-life.' He said the government should not restrict an individual's 'right to die,' and babies should not be permitted to be born without their prior consent.
Experts are quick to point out that trying to attach logic to heinous acts of violence is often an unsatisfying endeavor.
For example, O'Toole says the attacker's suspected view about consent by the unborn 'is not logical and has no basis in reality.'
In addition to being nihilistic, she said grievances expressed by violent offenders can also be 'shallow, illogical and nonsensical, because they are a blending — a hodgepodge of different types of superficial information the offender found online or read about — in a very superficial way.'
O'Toole says, 'most offenders who write manifestos do not conduct deep scientific dives into the information they use to create their personal themes or life-philosophies. They stitch together unrelated, unscientific, and often illogical ideas that simply appeal to them and bolster their justification for their lethal behavior.'
In the FBI's latest public update on the Palm Springs bombing, Davis, who leads the bureau's Los Angeles division, said, 'This was a targeted attack against the IVF facility.'
Davis said Bartkus also attempted to live stream the bombing, although it remains unclear whether he was successful in broadcasting the incident.
Live streaming a suicidal act of violence is what the New York Police Department has referred to as 'dying live,' said John Miller, CNN Chief Law Enforcement and Intelligence Analyst who previously oversaw counterterrorism operations for the NYPD.
Intelligence analysts see the public showcasing of an attack as a way for a perpetrator to not only gain attention, but to also control the narrative of their own life and its final moments.
'When people tell their life story, they never cast themselves as the villain, or the enemy or the failure,' he said. 'They cast themselves as the hero or at least the victim who is dying for a more meaningful purpose than simply suicide.'
While investigators continue to dig into Bartkus' past, those who knew him said he previously took interest in flammable material.
In an interview with The New York Times, the suspect's father, Richard Bartkus, said his son would tinker with model rockets, stink bombs, and smoke bombs, but not actual explosives.
The elder Bartkus said his son accidentally burned down the family home in 2009 while playing with matches.
Richard Bartkus, who said he had not seen his son in a decade, told the Times the suspect in the attack 'wasn't dumb,' adding, 'But he wasn't a leader. He was a follower. If somebody came along and said this was a good idea, he'd probably go along with it.'
As authorities continue to dig into the suspected attacker's past, one major question for law enforcement remains: Did he have any outside help or inspiration to bomb the clinic?
Mills, the Palm Springs police chief, told CNN Monday he was 'very confident' Guy Edward Bartkus acted alone at the scene of the explosion that rocked the fertility clinic, but added, 'we want to make sure that, through social media, that others did not help him in any way.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Proud Boys members file federal lawsuit over 'illegal' tactics in Jan. 6 prosecutions
Proud Boys members file federal lawsuit over 'illegal' tactics in Jan. 6 prosecutions

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Proud Boys members file federal lawsuit over 'illegal' tactics in Jan. 6 prosecutions

Five members of the Proud Boys are suing the U.S. government and certain employees in the FBI and Department of Justice for $100 million over their Jan. 6 prosecutions. Enrique Tarrio, Zachary Rehl, Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs and Dominic Pezzola allege in the lawsuit the FBI and DOJ violated their constitutional rights with their prosecution over what prosecutors said was their planning of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. In a document filed in a Florida federal court and obtained by Fox News Digital, the men claim "egregious and systemic abuse of the legal system and the United States Constitution to punish and oppress political allies of President Trump, by any and all means necessary, legal, or illegal. "Through the use of evidence tampering, witness intimidation, violations of attorney-client privilege, and placing spies to report on trial strategy, the government got its fondest wish of imprisoning the J6 Defendants, the modern equivalent of placing one's enemies' heads on a spike outside the town wall as a warning to any who would think to challenge the status quo." Outgoing Us Capitol Police Chief Criticizes Trump Pardons For Jan. 6 Defendants Fox News Digital has reached out to the U.S. Department of Justice for comment. Read On The Fox News App Four of the five men were convicted of seditious conspiracy after the attack, and Tarrio faced the harshest punishment — 22 years for planning the attack — of any of the Jan. 6 defendants, according to The Wall Street Journal. Nordean was sentenced to 18 years, Biggs was sentenced to 17 years and Rehl was sentenced to 15 years. Pezzola was found guilty of conspiracy to obstruct Congress and sentenced to 10 years in prison. However, President Donald Trump pardoned or commuted the sentences of nearly all the defendants after he took office this year, including Tarrio, Rehl, Nordean, Biggs and Pezzola. Trump Administration Agrees To Pay Ashli Babbitt's Family $5 Million All the men except Tarrio were at the U.S. Capitol Jan. 6, according to the Journal. Tarrio had been barred from entering Washington, D.C., because of a previous arrest, The Washington Post reported. "Now that the Plaintiffs are vindicated, free, and able to once again exercise their rights as American citizens, they bring this action against their tormentors for violations of their Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment Rights … as well as the common law tort of malicious prosecution and false imprisonment," the suit adds. Prosecutors said Pezzola was seen on video using a police riot shield to commit the first breach of the U.S. Capitol Jan. 6. Prosecutors alleged the men were charged under a "novel theory of criminal conspiracy called the 'tool theory,'" according to the suit. "Despite the legal jiggery-pokery employed by the government to obscure the fact, the Plaintiffs were essentially convicted of 'stochastic terrorism,' a leftist bugbear used to describe rhetoric offensive to them that they claim provokes violent acts." The men also claimed in the lawsuit that the government didn't have probable cause to raid their article source: Proud Boys members file federal lawsuit over 'illegal' tactics in Jan. 6 prosecutions

'Under Rule of Chaos:' Hernandez on Garcia Facing Charges
'Under Rule of Chaos:' Hernandez on Garcia Facing Charges

Bloomberg

time33 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

'Under Rule of Chaos:' Hernandez on Garcia Facing Charges

Zeke Hernandez, Associate Professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, discusses Kilmar Abrego Garcia being brought back to the United States to face criminal charges and whether or not he will get due process. He also shares his thoughts on President Trump's recent travel ban and the back-to-back drop in foreign-born workers in the US labor force. Zeke Hernandez speaks with Kailey Leinz and Joe Mathieu on the late edition of Bloomberg's "Balance of Power." (Source: Bloomberg)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store