logo
Managing Crohn's After Surgery: Expert Insights

Managing Crohn's After Surgery: Expert Insights

Medscape22-05-2025

This transcript has been edited for clarity.
Hello. My name is Robert Battat. I am an associate professor of medicine at the University of Montreal and a gastroenterologist. I'm also the director of the Center for Clinical Excellence and Translational Research in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases at the University of Montreal Hospital Center.
Today, we're going to be talking about postoperative care in Crohn's disease. The most common surgery that is performed is an ileocolonic resection or an ileocecal resection with primary ileocolic anastomosis.
The first question that we want to ask is, who needs an operation? As effective therapies have entered into the market, there has been less need for surgery overall, but there's a greater need for surgery, particularly, in patients with Crohn's disease who have strictures.
The two typical profiles of patients who are going to undergo surgery are patients who have severe stricturing disease at the onset, or selected patients who have nonstricturing Crohn's disease, but either because of patient preference or for other reasons that you may not want to try to treat the condition medically, surgery is attempted as a first option, which is reasonable in selected cases.
Once a patient undergoes surgery, this is a critical period because patients have lost bowel, and according to clinical trials where they've tested drugs — particularly in the PREVENT trial, which tested the efficacy of infliximab vs placebo for prevention of recurrence — we saw that 60% of patients who received placebo had recurrence 6 months after the operation, as was indicated on a colonoscopy. We're seeing similar data in the recent REPREVIO trial, which tested the efficacy of vedolizumab vs placebo.
If you give nothing overall, in the general postoperative Crohn's population, approximately 60%-65% of patients will have lesions, which can be seen on a colonoscopy. It doesn't mean that you're going to have symptoms. That's an important point — that patients, often, after surgery will not feel the recurrence, but definitely the recurrence will have happened.
Being vigilant is very important for that reason. We have data that show that one of the most important things that you can do for a patient after surgery, even before thinking about another treatment, is planning to do a colonoscopy 6 months postoperatively.
There was a randomized clinical trial called the POCER trial, which compared two treatment approaches. One treatment arm was based on doing a colonoscopy postoperatively and another treatment arm was based on standard of care. The treatment arm that used colonoscopy postoperatively had lower recurrence rates and better long-term outcomes just by the act of 'looking' early [with colonoscopy] and acting early if there was a recurrence than when a colonoscopy was done further out. We saw that just doing a colonoscopy early on was associated with lower rates of recurrence in the long run.
When I have a patient who has a surgery, the first thing I'm thinking is, well, I have to look or [do a colonoscopy] 6-8 months after the surgery is done. That's nonnegotiable for all patients, unless there's some reason that I should not do the procedure for safety reasons.
The other question that comes up is, 'Do I give the patient a postoperative prophylactic medication?' In my practice, because I tend to see higher-risk patients, I tend to give most patients prophylaxis against recurrence. However, there are ways that you can manage the use of prophylaxis because there are some patients who may not end up needing a medicine after surgery.
The most recent data come from a large, multicenter international Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetics Consortium cohort based out of Toronto showing that the highest risk factors for recurrence are being male, smoking, and having had previous surgeries. Those are three factors that are highly associated with recurrence. Interestingly, having fistulae in multiple cohorts was not [a risk factor]. For people who have those previously noted risk factors, those are patients for whom you definitely would want to try to give prophylaxis.
A protective factor against recurrence is obviously treatment. What are the treatments that we give? There are older data on immunomodulators, such as azathioprine or 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) molecules, and although there is some mixed evidence for prevention of recurrence with these drugs, the main agents that are used in 2025 are biologic agents.
The two biologic agents with the most robust data are infliximab, from the PREVENT trial that we previously described, and vedolizumab. Both agents were effective in preventing postoperative endoscopic recurrence. Both agents work, and I think the proof of concept really is that most biologic agents are likely to work. If you want to rely on only the highest level of evidence, those two agents are the most well studied.
In terms of other considerations for postoperative Crohn's disease patients, there are some data for antibiotics. However, particularly for metronidazole, the issue is that giving it long term is not only not associated with long-term prevention with recurrence but also is associated with side effects such as neuropathy.
You also want to start to think about non–IBD-related issues, such as vaccinations and absorption. If you have ileal resection, which is the most common site of resection, you do want to be ensuring that B12 levels in the blood are adequate, particularly if you've had more than 20 cm of ileum removed.
Often, patients will get diarrhea and knowing that there are other causes of diarrhea is important. It can be the Crohn's disease; however, it could also be bile salt diarrhea or bile acid diarrhea, and so that should be on the differential diagnosis.
The last thing I'd like to point out is that a useful tool to differentiate symptoms of Crohn's from other entities is the fecal calprotectin level. Fecal calprotectin indicates whether there is intestinal inflammation. Typically, I use it at 3 months postoperatively to risk-stratify patients. I use a value of 150 µg/g; if it's less than 150 µg/g, I assume it not to be postoperative recurrence causing the symptoms, but more likely bile salt diarrhea. If it is elevated, it may prompt an ileal colonoscopy to try to optimize therapy.
Thank you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Diabetes Status May Not Affect Outcomes of Preventive PCI
Diabetes Status May Not Affect Outcomes of Preventive PCI

Medscape

timea day ago

  • Medscape

Diabetes Status May Not Affect Outcomes of Preventive PCI

The PREVENT trial found preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) combined with optimal medical therapy was more effective than medical therapy alone in reducing major adverse cardiac events in patients with non–flow-limiting vulnerable plaques. The new analysis found patients with non–flow-limiting vulnerable plaques had similar 2-year cardiac outcomes regardless of diabetes status, but those who received preventive PCI combined with optimal medical therapy had lower rates of cardiac events than those who received medical therapy alone. METHODOLOGY: The post hoc analysis of the PREVENT data compared the clinical outcomes of preventive PCI plus optimal medical therapy and medical therapy alone in patients with (n = 490) or without (n = 1116) diabetes. Plaques were defined as non–flow-limiting when the fractional flow reserve was > 0.80; vulnerable plaques were identified using intracoronary imaging. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable or progressive angina at 2 years after randomization; the median follow-up duration was 4.3 years. TAKEAWAY: At 2 years, the incidence of the composite primary endpoint was not significantly different between patients with diabetes and those without the condition (1.8% and 1.9%, respectively; P = .956). = .956). The composite primary endpoint occurred less frequently with preventive PCI than with optimal medical therapy alone for both patients with diabetes (0% vs 3.7%; log-rank P = .003) and those without diabetes (0.5% vs 3.2%; log-rank P < .001). = .003) and those without diabetes (0.5% vs 3.2%; log-rank < .001). The reduced incidence of the primary endpoint with preventive PCI was mainly driven by reduced rates of ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization and hospitalizations for unstable or progressive angina in both patients with diabetes and those without the disorder. IN PRACTICE: 'These findings support that preventive PCI…irrespective of diabetes status, in patients with non–flow-limiting vulnerable coronary plaques,' the researchers wrote. Vulnerable plaques 'may be guilty by association but may not be the sole culprit behind residual cardiovascular risk,' wrote Diana A. Gorog, MD, PhD, of Imperial College London, London, England, in an editorial accompanying the journal article. Such plaques 'may be just one marker of a vulnerable patient, but not the only determinant of risk. Perhaps we need to find better ways of identifying the vulnerable patient, rather than focusing solely on vulnerable plaques,' Gorog added. SOURCE: This study was led by Min Chul Kim of Chonnam National University Hospital in Gwangju, South Korea. It was originally presented at American College of Cardiology (ACC) Scientific Session 2024 and was published online on May 29, 2025, in European Heart Journal . LIMITATIONS: The clinical outcomes were exploratory as the study was powered only for the composite primary endpoint, with event rates lower than anticipated. The researchers did not differentiate between type 1 and type 2 diabetes, which might have limited the generalizability of the findings. Intravascular imaging at follow-up was not performed routinely. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by the CardioVascular Research Foundation, Abbott, Yuhan Corp, CAH-Cordis, Philips, and Infraredx. Several authors reported receiving research grants, consulting fees, and honoraria from various pharmaceutical and healthcare companies, including the funding agencies.

Joe Rogan among the fans of revolutionary anti-aging peptide
Joe Rogan among the fans of revolutionary anti-aging peptide

New York Post

timea day ago

  • New York Post

Joe Rogan among the fans of revolutionary anti-aging peptide

Highway to heal? An experimental peptide is in the spotlight for its potential to promote tissue repair, reduce inflammation and protect gut health. Count podcast host Joe Rogan, 57, among the fans of BPC-157 — he reported that it cleared up his elbow tendonitis in just two weeks. Biohackers hope its regenerative and anti-inflammatory powers lead to longer, healthier lives. 5 Podcast host Joe Rogan said BPC-157 cleared up his elbow tendonitis in just two weeks. Youtube / The Joe Rogan Experience 'The people who have tried it say it is life-changing,' Dr. Michael Aziz, an internist in New York and author of 'The Ageless Revolution,' told The Post. 'So is BPC-157 going to revolutionize physical therapy?' he mused. 'We hope the research comes soon.' Here's a look at the science behind the emerging therapy. What is BPC-157? BPC-157 is the short name for Body Protection Compound 157. It's comprised of 15 amino acids and derived from a naturally occurring protein in human stomach juice. Dr. Christian Muller, a sports medicine physician with Northwell Health Orthopedics in Westchester, said BPC-157 was discovered in the early '90s during research into substances that could protect the body from harm. 5 BPC-157 is in the spotlight for its potential to promote tissue repair, reduce inflammation and protect gut health. Amazon How it exactly works in the body is not fully understood. 'Research suggests BPC-157 may work by enhancing the formation of new blood vessels, which improves blood flow and nutrient delivery to injured tissues, accelerating healing,' Aziz said. 'It also influences the expression of various growth factors, such as growth hormone receptors, which are crucial for tissue repair and regeneration,' he added. Inside the potential benefits The Food and Drug Administration has not approved BPC-157, as much of the research has been conducted in animals. 'There are few, extremely limited studies on humans,' Muller told The Post. 'One study showed that knee injections with BPC-157 helped with arthritis pain in 11 out of 12 subjects, but the study did not use verified survey tools to obtain reliable answers regarding efficacy.' 5 BPC-157 may be able to help with recovery after a knee injury. Dragana Gordic – BPC-157 is being explored for: Tissue repair Healing of muscle, tendon, ligament and skin wounds Collagen production Neuroinflammation Nerve regeneration Arthritis Gastric ulcers Inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis) Leaky gut syndrome Irritable bowel syndrome 'Had a recent knee surgery? Had an injury at the gym and your doctor suggested physical therapy for six months? Not so fast. BPC-157 can help,' Aziz said. How much should you take? Dr. Pooja Gidwani, a double board-certified internal and obesity medicine physician based in L.A., noted that there are no standard doses because human data is limited. She suggested that oral forms of BPC-157 may be helpful for gut issues, while injections are typically preferred for systemic healing, such as joint or tendon recovery. She has 'nuanced conversations' with patients eager to try it. 5 How BPC-157 exactly works in the body is not fully understood. Research suggests that it may accelerate healing by enhancing the formation of new blood vessels. Sanhanat – 'We begin with an open, informed discussion about the current evidence — what's promising and what's unknown,' Gidwani told The Post. 'For some patients dealing with chronic gut issues, tendon injuries or post-operative healing challenges,' she continued, 'we discuss where the science currently stands and make a collaborative decision based on goals, risk tolerance and alternatives.' Some researchers recommend cycling it to prevent side effects. Andrew Huberman, a neuroscientist and professor of neurobiology and ophthalmology, suggests limiting BPC-157 usage to eight weeks and taking an eight-week break — or more. 'My concern about taking BPC157 continuously: it promotes vascular growth, and if you have a small tumor, it will vascularize that tumor as well. Not good,' Huberman tweeted in April. And beware if you purchase capsules online. 'Many times it is fake or not safe,' Aziz advised. Behind the possible downsides 'There are potential safety concerns, but given the lack of human data, they are not truly known,' Muller said. 'Since BPC-157 has been shown to be biologically active in several complex body processes,' he added, 'there can be a multitude of unknown potential dangers across several organ systems.' 5 New blood vessel growth may help promote healing, but it could also fuel tumors. phonlamaiphoto – Since it can cause uncontrolled growth of new blood vessels, people with a history of cancer or concerns about tumors should approach BPC-157 with caution. Because it has been shown to interact with growth hormone pathways, Aziz warned of potential hormonal disruption with extended use. It's also on the World Anti-Doping Agency's prohibited list for professional athletes because of its unproven claims and possible health risks. Scientists hope to learn more about it soon. 'Peptides like BPC-157 are part of an exciting frontier in longevity and regenerative medicine — but they're still evolving,' Gidwani said. 'It's not about hype — it's about understanding the potential while also respecting the limitations of what we know.'

Intestinal Ultrasound Wins in Early Crohn's Prognosis
Intestinal Ultrasound Wins in Early Crohn's Prognosis

Medscape

time2 days ago

  • Medscape

Intestinal Ultrasound Wins in Early Crohn's Prognosis

Findings on intestinal ultrasound (IUS) are useful for predicting remission in recent-onset Crohn's disease (CD), a prospective, population-based cohort of newly diagnosed patients in Denmark reported. Adding to the growing body of evidence on the utility of this noninvasive imaging tool in monitoring disease activity in the newly diagnosed, the multicenter study published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology characterized ultrasonographic features at diagnosis and evaluated IUS's prognostic value. Existing literature has focused on patients with long-standing disease. Investigators led by first author Gorm R. Madsen, MD, PhD, of the Copenhagen Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children, Adolescents and Adults at Copenhagen University Hospital, observed continued improvement in most IUS parameters throughout the first year. 'Our findings thereby emphasize the role of IUS in improving patient management, and its use in patient risk stratification already at diagnosis,' the investigators wrote. Some 38% of patients reached ultrasonic transmural remission within 3 months of diagnosis, an achievement associated with higher rates of sustained steroid-free clinical remission and reduced need for treatment escalation. 'Ultrasonic transmural remission is achievable early in Crohn's disease and is associated with favorable outcomes, underscoring the value of intestinal ultrasound in early disease management,' the researchers wrote. Study Details While IUS is increasingly recognized for monitoring CD, little was known about its prognostic value early in the disease course. 'We aimed to determine whether sonographic inflammation at diagnosis — and particularly the achievement pftransmural remission after 3 months — could predict future outcomes,' Madsen told Medscape Medical News . 'This is important, as early identification of patients at risk of surgery or treatment escalation may help guide therapy decisions more effectively.' From May 2021 to April 2023, 201 patients (mean age, 35 years; 54.2% men) with new adult-onset CD were followed by IUS and monitored with symptomatic, biochemical, and endoscopic evaluations. After 3 months, transmural remission was achieved more often by patients with colonic disease, and no associations were found between sonographic inflammation at diagnosis and diagnostic delay. 'We were positively surprised. Nearly 40% of newly diagnosed Crohn's patients achieved transmural remission within 3 months — a higher proportion than seen in earlier studies, which mostly focused on long-standing or trial-selected populations,' Madsen said. 'It was also striking how strongly early IUS findings predicted the need for surgery, outperforming endoscopy and biomarkers.' In other findings, transmural remission at 3 months was significantly associated with steroid-free clinical remission at both 3 months and all subsequent follow-ups within the first year. It was also linked to a lower risk for treatment escalation during the follow-up through to 12 months: 26% vs 53% ( P =.003). At 12 months, 41% had achieved transmural remission. Higher baseline body mass index significantly reduced the likelihood of 12-month transmural remission. For overweight, the odds ratio (OR) was 0.34 (95% CI, 0.12-0.94), while for obesity, the OR was 0.16 (95% CI, 0.04-0.73). The International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score in the terminal ileum at diagnosis emerged as the best predictor of ileocecal resection during the first year, with an optimal threshold of 63 (area under the curve, 0.92; sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 73%). The use of IUS has expanded considerably in the past 3 years, and in 2024, the American Gastroenterological Association updated its clinical practice guidance on the role of this modality in inflammatory bowel disease. IUS is noninvasive, radiation-free, inexpensive, and doable at the bedside with immediate results, Madsen said. 'For patients, this means less anxiety and discomfort. For healthcare systems, it enables faster clinical decisions, reduced need for endoscopy or MRI, and closer disease monitoring, particularly valuable in treat-to-target strategies.' In terms of limitations, however, IUS is operator-dependent and consistent training is crucial, he added. 'Certain anatomical regions, particularly the proximal small bowel, can be more challenging to evaluate. Additionally, while IUS is highly effective for assessing inflammatory activity, it becomes more difficult to accurately assess disease involvement when inflammation extends beyond approximately 20 cm of the small bowel.' Key Insights Commenting on the Danish study from a US perspective, Anna L. Silverman, MD, a gastroenterology fellow at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York City, agreed the findings in adult patients with newly diagnosed, rather than long-standing, CD contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting IUS's applicability for both treatment monitoring and prognosis. 'By focusing on early-stage CD, the study provides clearer insights into initial disease activity and response to therapy, reinforcing the value of this noninvasive, point-of-care modality,' she told Medscape Medical News . 'These findings enhance our understanding of IUS as a tool to help guide early management decisions in CD.' Ashwin Ananthakrishnan, MBBS, MPH, director of the Crohn's and Colitis Center at Massachusetts General Hospital and an associate professor at Harvard Medical School, both in Boston, concurred that this is an important study. 'It includes newly diagnosed patients — so a very 'clean' cohort in terms of not being influenced by confounders,' he told Medscape Medical News . 'We don't fully know yet the best treatment target in CD, and this study highlights the importance of early transmural healing in determining outcomes at 1 year,' he noted. In addition, the study highlighted a convenient tool that can increasingly be applied at point of care in the United States. 'Colonoscopy at 3 months is not practical and has low patient acceptability, so using IUS in this circumstance would have value and impact.' Ananthakrishnan pointed to several unanswered questions, however. 'Are there patients who may not have healing early but may take some extra time to achieve transmural remission, and if so, what are their outcomes? What is the best timepoint for transmural healing assessment? What is the incremental value of measuring it at 3 vs 6 months?' In addition, he wondered, how much is the added value of IUS over clinical symptoms and/or markers such as calprotectin and C-reactive protein? 'In the subset of patients with clinical and transmural remission, there was no difference in endoscopic outcomes at 1 year, so this is an unanswered question,' Ananthakrishnan said. This study was funded by an unrestricted grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store