Cabinet to discuss introducing three new terrorist offences
Ireland will introduce three new terrorist offences under plans to be discussed by Cabinet on Tuesday morning.
Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan will discuss the publication of the Criminal Justice (Terrorist Offences) (Amendment) Bill 2025 when Ministers meet in Government Buildings.
The Terrorist Offences Bill will allow for the prosecution of a broader range of terrorist activities in light of the evolving nature of terrorism, sources said on Monday evening.
The Bill provides for the addition of three new terrorist offences which are directed at what was branded the 'foreign terrorist fighter phenomenon'.
This will make receiving training for terrorism, travelling for the purpose of terrorism and organising or facilitating travelling for the purpose of terrorism criminal offences.
It will also permit courts to treat the fact that the offence was committed against a child as an aggravating factor when sentencing a person for recruiting or providing training.
It is understood that these changes will bring Ireland's counter-terrorism laws into line with other EU member states and will facilitate Ireland's participation in enhanced counter-terrorism networks across the EU.
This will give An Garda Síochána the ability to tap into those networks to respond to both domestic and cross-border terrorist threats.
Elsewhere, Tánaiste Simon Harris will tell Cabinet that he is concerned about the EU's list of potential retaliatory tariffs on the US.
The EU last month produced a list of counter tariffs it will impose on the US if President Donald Trump does not row back on proposed measures.
He initially announced 20% tariffs on goods entering the US from the EU but then implemented a 90-day pause and said a 10% tariff would apply.
President Trump then announced that a 50 per cent tariff would apply from June 1 after he suggested that negotiations with the EU were 'going nowhere'.
However, he reinstated the 90-day pause following a phone call with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. It expires on July 8.
At this morning's Cabinet meeting, the Tánaiste will tell his colleagues that Ireland has particular concerns about the list of proposed countermeasures in relation to the aviation, the medtech and agrifood sectors.
These concerns are being conveyed to the Commission, including in a letter from the Tánaiste to EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič sent ahead of the closure of the EU's public consultation period today.
The Tánaiste's letter will state that the countermeasures should not harm EU businesses and consumers more than the US, that the EU should be mindful to avoid unnecessarily escalating trade tensions and that the impact of measures must also not be implemented disproportionately, either on any one Member State, one sector or one individual company.
Where possible, Mr Harris wrote, the EU should try to avoid imposing unnecessary costs on EU companies.
The Tánaiste will tell colleagues that discussions on a possible trade deal between the EU and the US are advancing with technical talks taking place in Washington DC in recent days. If no solution is reached, the EU will implement its countermeasures on July 14.
The Tánaiste will seek Cabinet approval for a plan designed to retain and incentivise highly skilled specialists in the Air Corps.
Under the proposals, a Service Commitment Scheme, currently used by Air Corps pilots, will be extended to Air Traffic Control personnel.
Elsewhere, new college places in the health, disability and education sectors will be created under a plan being brought by Higher Education Minister James Lawless, Health Minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill and Children's Minister Norma Foley.
This funding will support the creation of 461 additional annual places in these priority professions each year from now on, with the majority of new places commencing in 2025.
This immediate expansion will include Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, Speech and Language Therapy, Radiation Therapy, Radiography, Podiatry, Social Work, Medical Science, and Dietetics.
Minister for Education Helen McEntee will update Cabinet on progress being made in providing new special education classes for the 2025/26 school year.
She has asked for all timelines for the 2026/27 school year to ensure better planning and ensure that children are accepted into new special classes much earlier.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Agriland
4 hours ago
- Agriland
NI beef and lamb export markets ‘more critical than ever'
Beef and lamb exports are of major significance to Northern Ireland's overall economy. according to Livestock and Meat Commission (LMC) chief executive, Colin Smith. And he considers the scale of this enterprise even more significant. The LMC representative pointed out that Northern Ireland – with a population of approximately two million people – produces enough food to feed five times that number, underscoring the vital importance of export markets to the region's agri-food economy. Smith said: 'At the core of this output is the production of Farm Quality Assured beef and lamb. 'Identifying and securing high-value markets for red meat is more critical than ever, especially in light of significant political and economic developments over the past three years.' 'These include a change of UK government and the negotiation of key trade agreements with major global players such as the US, EU, Australia, New Zealand, and India. 'The evolving international trade landscape, combined with fluctuating global tariffs, presents increasing complexity for red meat exporters.' According to Smith, the navigation of these challenges will be essential to ensuring long-term profitability and sustainability for Northern Ireland's red meat sector. He fully recognises the need for Northern Ireland's beef and lamb sectors to be fully cognisant of all these factors. But there is also a political dimension to all of this, which could be of an even more fundamentally significant. Reflecting on the evolving political landscape, Smith commented on the impact of recent UK government decisions. 'The new Labour government has now been in office for a year. And during that time, it appears to have prioritised food security over food self-sufficiency. 'This shift in focus has raised concerns within the farming community.' Smith claimed that support for Labour among farmers 'is clearly waning', which he said was down to 'the government's recent handling of agricultural issues'. 'Inheritance tax reforms are just one example and many within the sector feel farming has been sacrificed at the expense of other interests – particularly in trade negotiations such as those with the US,' he said. Beef and lamb export markets In the view of the LMC CEO, these developments underscore growing tensions between policy direction and the needs of UK agriculture at a time when global competitiveness is more vital than ever. The aforementioned agreements follow on from free trade deals with Australia and New Zealand arrived at by the previous Conservative governments. When fully operational, these arrangements could provide beef export quotas of 170,000t and 60,000t annually for the respective countries. Smith said: 'But that's not the end of the story. The EU continues to progress a trade deal with the Mercosur block which could see almost 100,000t of beef from South American countries coming into Europe on an annual basis. 'This may not impact directly on the UK beef market. But it could have a very significant indirect effect.' So the question then arises: what happens to the significant tonnages of UK beef that are currently exported to the EU in the wake of the Mercosur deal's full implementation? 'The prospect of significantly reduced beef export trading levels from the UK to Europe is a very real one in these circumstances,' said Smith. But even in the here and now the commission's chief executive is concerned about imported beef making its way on to UK supermarket shelves. He explained: 'UK supermarkets are the most significant purchasers of farm quality beef and lamb produced in Northern Ireland. 'It is crucially important that this commitment to Northern Ireland's red meat sector is maintained into the future.'
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Jozef Puska's sisters-in-law could not have known about murder when they burned clothes, court hears
Jozef Puska's sisters-in-law could not have known and did not believe he murdered Ashling Murphy when they burned the clothes he was wearing at the time he murdered the schoolteacher, defence lawyers have told the Central Criminal Court . Lawyers for Jozefina Grundzova (32) and Viera Gaziova (40) delivered their closing speeches to a jury on Tuesday afternoon. The two women are on trial with their husbands, Marek Puska (36) and Lubomir Puska jnr (38). Jozef Puska, a brother of Marek and Lubomir jnr, murdered Ms Murphy (23) on January 12th, 2022 by stabbing her on the canal towpath outside Tullamore, Co Offaly. Marek and Lubomir jnr are on trial accused of withholding information relating to the murder while Ms Grundzova and Ms Gaziova are accused of impeding Puska's apprehension or prosecution by burning his clothes. READ MORE All accused have pleaded not guilty to all charges. They were all living with Puska, his partner Lucia, and 14 children at Lynally Grove, Mucklagh, Co Offaly when the offences are alleged to have occurred. The trial heard that in a statement to gardaí, Ms Gaziova said that on the night of the murder, Lubomir jnr and Marek spoke to Puska in his bedroom and afterwards, Lubomir jnr told her that Puska had 'confessed that he killed a girl'. Paul Murray SC, for Ms Grundzova, on Tuesday told the jury that for his client to be guilty, the jury must be satisfied that she knew what Puska had done when she helped Ms Gaziova to burn the clothes. Counsel told the jury that 'hindsight is a wonderful thing' but they must look at the circumstances in the Puska household in the immediate aftermath of the murder. When his client burned Puska's clothes, she did not have any of the evidence that would later prove his guilt, Mr Murray said. The nub of the prosecution case, counsel said, is that Ms Grundzova knew or believed Puska to be guilty of the murder at a time when gardaí had arrested a different person. Mr Murray asked the jury to return a verdict of not guilty. Prosecutor Anne Marie Lawlor SC previously told the jury that all the accused knew what Puska had done shortly after 9.30pm on the night of the murder. She said Jozef told Lubomir jnr and Marek, who then relayed it to the others in the house. Ms Lawlor said the only reason for the withholding of evidence or burning of clothes was that they didn't want Puska to be apprehended or prosecuted for murder. Damien Colgan SC, for Ms Gaziova, told the jury that the 'crux of the case' is whether his client knew that Puska had stabbed Ms Murphy. Her view at that time, Mr Colgan said, was that Puska had been the victim of an assault. When she was told what Puska had said he did, she didn't believe it because she 'didn't believe Jozef was capable of killing anybody'. Kathleen Leader SC, for Lubomir jnr, said her client delayed but did not withhold information. She said he had a reasonable excuse for the delay and asked the jury to consider the 'natural sense of protection for his younger brother'. She said it is understandable he was reluctant to accept his brother had 'committed a truly horrific murder'. Ms Leader said that by January 18th, Lubomir jnr was 'squarely supporting the prosecution', telling them everything he knew. Ms Leader said the law does not require people to be 'superhuman' as she asked the jury to acquit her client. Ms Justice Caroline Biggs has begun her charge to the jury and will continue tomorrow.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
US woman awoke in Boston hotel to ‘somebody on top' raping her, jury in Dublin firefighter trial told
The Boston woman who claims she was raped by a Dublin firefighter told a US court she woke up in a hotel room to find 'somebody on top of her' raping her. The 29-year-old attorney testified for a second day in the trial of Terence Crosbie (39) in Suffolk superior courthouse in Boston on Tuesday. She claimed she was raped by Mr Crosbie, who was visiting the US city with the Dublin Fire Brigade, while his colleague slept in a shared hotel room. Mr Crosbie (39) was arrested on rape charges over St Patrick's Day weekend last year. He denies the charges and has pleaded not guilty. READ MORE His accuser previously testified to meeting Liam O'Brien at The Black Rose bar on March 14th, 2024. Mr O'Brien and Mr Crosbie had flown into Boston with their fire brigade colleagues to march in Boston's St Patrick's Day parade. The complainant testified on Tuesday that she didn't know Mr O'Brien was sharing a room when she returned with him from the bar to the Omni Parker House hotel after an evening of dancing. She testified that she and Mr O'Brien had consensual sex and then she went to the bathroom. When she came back from the bathroom, she said Mr O'Brien was asleep 'taking up the majority of the bed' and was snoring loudly, so she slept in the other bed, getting under the covers naked with the bathroom light still on. She told the court in tears that she 'woke up to somebody on top of me' and they were raping her. 'This person was taller than Liam and was not bald and I could hear Liam snoring,' she said. The trial had previously heard that Mr O'Brien, unlike Mr Crosbie, was bald. She testified that Mr O'Brien snored 'continuously' throughout the alleged assault. She testified that the man, later identified as Mr Crosbie, also disparaged Mr O'Brien while assaulting her. She claimed that while Mr Crosbie was having sex with her, he said: 'I know you want this; [Mr O'Brien] can't even do this for you – what a loser.' 'What are you doing?' she said she asked Mr Crosbie when she realised what was happening. 'I also did say: 'Stop!'' she told the court. She said she felt Mr Crosbie's weight on top of her and tried to get away, eventually managing to manoeuvre her legs off the side of the bed and break free. She testified that Mr Crosbie continued to follow her around the hotel room, trying to kiss her. She said she was able to collect her clothes and went to the bathroom. Mr Crosbie tried to get in and 'was jiggling the handle' after she locked the door, she told the court. She then left the hotel and texted a friend at 2:18am about the alleged assault , according to testimony. 'I hate everyone,' she wrote. 'What the f**k is wrong with people.' She told her friend that she woke up and a guy was having sex with her, 'telling me I wanted it and telling me how pathetic it was that his friend couldn't give that', the court heard. She then walked home and took an Uber taxi to a hospital. On cross-examination by Mr Crosbie's defence team, she was asked about her level of intoxication, psychiatric medication and alleged discrepancies in her accounts to medical staff, law enforcement and the grand jury. Defence attorney Daniel C Reilly asserted that she walked rather than ran out of the hotel, as stated previously. The woman replied that this was a 'figure of speech'. Mr Reilly questioned the complainant repeatedly about her accounts of the lighting in the hotel room and noted that her testimony did not include details about the defendant's birthmarks or tattoos. 'But again, you didn't notice any body marks or tattoos,' Mr Reilly said. 'I was trying not to look,' the complainant said. The trial continues in Boston.
