This CarPlay Adapter for Apple Dominates Amazon, and It's Almost Free Today
Do you drive a car with Apple CarPlay built-in? Or maybe your car is a little too old to have it automatically activated already. Whatever the case may be, perhaps you just need a way to turn it on so you can stop plugging your phone in. Dealing with tangled cables, worn-out ports, or just forgetting the cords or hooking your phone up can be annoying. So why deal with it if you don't have to?
Run to Amazon right now to get the JDG Wireless CarPlay Adapter for just $40, down from its usual price of $70. That's $30 off and a discount of 43%.
See at Amazon
Your songs, your maps, your calls on the go
This small plug-and-play device connects to your car's USB port and turns your wired CarPlay system into a fully wireless one so you can stop having to mess with all the cords and connections. It's super easy to use, too. Just plug it in, pair it with your iPhone via Bluetooth, and you're good to go. Once you've set it up the first time, it reconnects automatically every time you start your car too, so you don't have to keep doing it over and over.
It works with over 800 car models that already support Apple CarPlay, and it supports iPhones running iOS 10 and up. That covers a wide range of vehicles and devices, so chances are, if you've got CarPlay already, this will work without any issues. And you can have others in your car hook up to it as well via Bluetooth, so if you want your friends to choose music or use one of their apps, or one of many other use cases, you're both good to go.
You also get both USB-A and USB-C cable options in the box, which makes the adapter compatible with pretty much any vehicle that supports CarPlay through a wired USB connection. And you can just tuck away the adapter where it doesn't take up any room, too. It doesn't require any modifications to your car, too. Because no one wants to have to deal with all that just to be able to use a feature on their phone.
Here's the deal. You can get this adapter for just $40, but you're going to have to act fast if you want it for 43% off. Head over to Amazon and add it to your cart, and maybe get two. It's going to make your life a lot more convenient.
See at Amazon
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
33 minutes ago
- Forbes
Fusion Energy May Be The Key To World Hegemony
What would it take for the United States to lose its hegemony to a rising power like China? Right now, America appears to be ahead economically and militarily. However, there is a stark difference between America's national strategy (insofar as one exists) and China's. The US under President Trump calls for regression. It seeks to restore a manufacturing economy that peaked in the 1950s—like an elderly man trying to restore hair where it hasn't grown for decades. It is doubling down on domestic oil, gas and coal. Through tariffs, disparagement of NATO and aggression towards allies like Canada and Denmark, the administration has alienated partners that long supported a US-led world order. China, meanwhile, has a tremendous lead in developing the economy of the future. It has a near monopoly on rare earth minerals, which are needed for electronics, renewable energy systems, defense technologies and more. China leads in solar, wind and batteries, the energy systems growing at the fastest rate. It is ahead in electric vehicles, industrial robotics and drones as well. It probably has achieved parity in artificial intelligence and may surpass the US soon. If China were to take Taiwan, it would control the global market for advanced chip manufacturing. In the background, but probably most importantly, China may be on track to commercialize fusion energy before the US or its disgruntled allies. Unlike the US, China has no domestic energy industry with vocal lobbyists (and purchasable politicians) to slow progress. It is funding fusion as a national strategy while private fusion companies in the West are at the mercy of investors that, for the most part, chase low risk and quick returns. Fusion promises cheap, plentiful, baseload energy without carbon emissions. AI, data centers and industrial robotics powered by fusion would produce goods and services at much lower costs than value chains dependent on fossil-fired electricity. Militaries built on swarms of small, cheap, electronic drones and robots—powered by small, distributed fusion facilities deep underground, safe from attack—would have an edge over competitors using large, expensive, petroleum-powered vehicles with vulnerable supply chains. I cannot overstate the ramifications of China developing fusion first. As an analogy, imagine if Japan and Germany had uncovered vast reserves of oil at home in the 1920s. American and Soviet oil gave the Allies a strategic advantage over the Axis powers. Had the situation been reversed, World War II could have ended differently. While private fusion companies in the West have raised about $8 billion total, China is investing at least $1.5 annually into fusion projects—double what the US government spends. Japanese and German investments in fusion don't even come close. Canada, for the record, has no fusion funding strategy. Moreover, the government of British Columbia, home of industry leader General Fusion, seems not to understand the value of this crown asset.* On all fronts nuclear, China is leaping ahead. In April, its scientists added fresh fuel to an operational thorium molten salt reactor—a first. The thorium reserves found in Inner Mongolia, an autonomous region of China, could theoretically meet Chinese energy demand for thousands of years. The kicker: this reactor design originated in the US. As project lead Xu Hongjie put it, 'The US left its research publicly available, waiting for the right successor. We were that successor." Moreover, in January, China's Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) sustained a fusion reaction for 1,066 seconds, setting a new record. Its Burning Plasma Experimental Superconducting Tokamak (BEST) fusion reactor could come online by 2027 and is expected to produce five times the amount of energy it consumes. When BEST announces this milestone, Western fusion companies may be announcing that they've run out of funding. To China, fusion is not a startup project—it's a matter of national interest and security. Its scientists are patenting more fusion-related technologies than any other single country and graduating more doctorates in fusion-related fields. And because China is the top refiner and exporter of the critical minerals needed in fusion reactors (e.g., for magnets), no external force is going to slow their progress. In the meantime, China has a cheap gas station next door—Russia—supplying all the fossil fuels China could need in exchange for support in its war with Ukraine. That support includes critical minerals needed by Russian arms manufacturers. Is fusion energy, along with other Chinese-dominated technologies, enough to end US hegemony? In 1988, historian Paul Kennedy published The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, a book that tried to explain the relative success (and failure) of powerful states. According to Kennedy, their rise and fall '…shows a very significant correlation over the longer term between productive and revenue-raising capacities on the one hand and military strength on the other.' Essentially, states must balance economic prosperity with strategy. Technological breakthroughs are vital to both. Innovation creates wealth, which enables the state to invest in defense and win wars. While underinvestment in defense leaves the state vulnerable to other powers, overextension and overspending on defense can run an economy into the ground, leaving it unable to sustain a strong military. Now, picture a great power—China—with a military to rival the US and fusion reactors that provide virtually unlimited energy. Imagine the clout China would have in establishing ports, military bases and consumer markets around the world if it could license that fusion technology. A China that exceeds the US in energy, industry, intelligence, mobility and defense is positioned to usurp it. Of course, China could bungle its advantage. Authoritarian regimes have a habit of mismanaging internal dissent, falsifying reality and making preventable mistakes. The rise of China is inevitable, but the self-inflicted decline of the US and its allies isn't. Rather, it's a choice reflecting how societies invest their resources and envision their future. *Disclosure: The author is an investor in General Fusion and sits on its board of directors.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Apple or Disney Stock a Better Buy?
Apple and Disney are both huge players in the entertainment sector. The question is, when it comes to Apple vs. Disney stock, which is the smarter investment? This guide will walk you through the ins and outs of both and whether or not you should buy Apple or Disney. Find Out: Read Next: Apple has consistently outperformed Disney in terms of revenue and profit margins. As of recent earnings reports, Apple boasts higher revenue figures, driven primarily by even its relatively soft iPhone sales, the services segment and expanding product ecosystem. Here are some key considerations when it comes to investing in Apple stock: Stock price: $203.64 Market cap: $3.01 trillion 52-week high: $260.10 52-week low: $169.21 Dividend yield: 0.51% Discover More: Disney has faced some headwinds lately, particularly in its streaming division and theme park operations. While its streaming service, Disney+, has gained traction, the company's financials have struggled to maintain profitability in its direct-to-consumer segment. Here are things you should consider as an investor: Stock price: $113.91 Market cap: $203.06 billion 52-week high: $118.63 52-week low: $80.10 Dividend yield: 0.88% For investors and stockbrokers seeking stability, strong cash flow and a proven growth trajectory, Apple appears to be the better overall buy. Its financial strength, diverse revenue sources and ability to innovate make it a compelling choice. However, for those willing to take on more risk in hopes of a turnaround story, Disney could present a long-term value opportunity if its streaming and entertainment segments regain and keep momentum. When comparing Apple and Disney stock, there are a few main factors to consider. Apple's growth strategy revolves around innovation, subscription-based services, and emerging markets. With new product launches for everything from MacBook Air M4 and iPhone 16s and expansion into artificial intelligence, Apple is well-positioned to sustain its revenue growth and remain a strong buy because of how it has been performing. Furthermore, its substantial cash reserves allow for aggressive stock buybacks and dividend payouts, making it an attractive investment. Disney's long-term growth potential hinges on its content dominance and the recovery of its theme parks. While the company owns valuable intellectual property, including Marvel, Star Wars and Pixar, competition in the streaming industry remains fierce. Still, analysts project an average stock price target of about $130 in 2025. The success of Disney+ and other streaming ventures will play a crucial role in the company's future performance, but its stock still comes in with a buy recommendation. Neither of these stocks could be considered a bad buy, but factor in your risk tolerance before investing in one company's stock over the other. That said, if you can only invest in one of these companies, Apple is considered more reliable and currently a better value than Disney. Yes, in general, Apple stock (AAPL) is often considered a stronger investment compared to Disney stock (DIS), especially for those seeking stability and proven growth. In many analysts' opinions, Apple's strong financial performance, diverse revenue streams and consistent innovation have led to significant returns for investors, whereas Disney stock may be undervalued due to relying on the Walt Disney Company's theme park attendance and box office performance. Editor's note: Company stock information is accurate as of Jun 3, 2025, and is subject to change. More From GOBankingRates Here's the Minimum Salary Required To Be Considered Upper Class in 2025 This article originally appeared on Is Apple or Disney Stock a Better Buy?
Geek Wire
41 minutes ago
- Geek Wire
Tech Moves: Dating giants add Seattle tech vets to boards; SeekOut and Slalom name new leaders
Tech Moves covers notable hires, promotions and personnel changes in the Pacific NW tech community. Submissions: tips@ Bala Vishwanath. (LinkedIn Photo) — Bala Vishwanath is now chief marketing officer for SeekOut, a Bellevue, Wash., startup that sells recruiting software. Vishwanath, a computer and electrical engineer by training, has a held variety of leadership roles, including CMO for CoreStack; head of marketing at Edifecs and Roundglass Living; and CEO of Nimbic. He is also the author of 'First70: The B2B Go-to-Market Advantage.' Founded in 2017, SeekOut's software is used by more than 1,000 companies to help with recruiting. It pulls data on millions of potential candidates from a myriad of sources, including GitHub and published papers. 'My mission is simple: help every talent leader understand the incredible opportunities this transformation creates and how they can lead the way in their industry,' Vishwanath said on LinkedIn. SeekOut reached a billion-dollar valuation in 2022 but later went through layoffs in recent years as tech companies navigated the economic downturn — Chad Cohen, Zillow's former chief financial officer, joined the board of directors for Grindr and will also serve as chair of the audit committee for the social media and dating company, which bills itself as the 'global gayborhood in your pocket.' Cohen is also CEO and founding partner of Seattle's Scala Advisors. He was previously CFO for Adaptive Biotechnologies and held executive titles for Capella Space, a satellite-based earth observation company. '[Cohen's] broad experience and deep expertise in helping grow successful public companies will be an invaluable asset to Grindr,' said CEO George Arison, in a statement. — Another longtime Seattle tech vet, former Zulily CEO Darrell Cavens, recently joined the board of another dating giant: Match Group. Cavens was CTO at Blue Nile before leading online retailer Zulily for more than eight years. He's also on the board of Vouched, Brooks Running, Rad Power Bikes and Tapestry. In February, former Zillow CEO Spencer Rascoff was named CEO of Dallas-based Match Group, which oversees a portfolio of leading dating apps including Tinder, Hinge, OkCupid and Pairs. Don Rogers. (LinkedIn Photo) — Business and tech consulting company Slalom appointed Don Rogers to lead its manufacturing industry practice, which includes working with customers to develop strategies for improving manufacturing safety, efficiency and product quality. The Seattle company provides tech-related services to clients including Allstate, Hyatt, Microsoft, REI and others. It has 53 offices in 12 countries. Rogers, who is based in St. Louis, Miss., joins Slalom from the technology integration company World Wide Technology, where he founded and led its manufacturing industry practice. Garth Fort. (LinkedIn Photo) — Garth Fort has joined LogicMonitor as chief product officer. Fort was at Microsoft for more than two decades, ending in 2017. More recent past roles include general manager for Amazon Web Services; CPO at Splunk, which was acquired by Cisco; and he co-founded Fort5, which provided strategic advice to technology companies. LogicMonitor, which was last valued at more than $2.4 billion, provides technology for data center operations. 'The team is building something powerful at the intersection of agentic AI and IT observability,' Fort said on LinkedIn, 'and I'm thrilled to help lead that charge.' — Dave Goto is now chief marketing officer for Ozlo, an audio technology and manufacturing company selling 'sleepbuds' to aid with sleep. Goto, who is based in Seattle, previously worked at Oura, lululemon and Red Bull. — Seattle data storage company Qumulo announced that Kelly Battles and Bob Gleichauf have joined its board of directors. Battles has served as chief financial officer for multiple companies, including Quora and Bracket Computing. Gleichauf was chief technologist for In-Q-Tel and CTO of the Security Business Group at Cisco, among other roles. — Kestra Medical Technologies elected Conor Hanley to its board. The Kirkland, Wash., company sells wearable devices to detect and respond to sudden cardiac arrest. It went public in March. Hanley is CEO of FIRE1 (Foundry Innovation & Research 1), which is developing technology that monitors for heart failure. — Tyler Phillipi, former chief product officer for Seattle-area EV startup FlexCharging, is now CEO of OptiGrid. The company is building battery-integrated DC fast chargers, which allows for energy to be stored onsite, reducing the need for electrical grid upgrades. FlexCharging was acquired by Accurant International and now operates as FlexEnergi. — Lainie del Rosario has been promoted to the role of chief information officer for Sound Physicians. Del Rosario has been with the Federal Way, Wash., healthcare company for more than 16 years. Sound Physicians is a medical group including physicians, nurses and other providers practicing in more than 400 hospitals nationwide.
