logo
Paloma Faith insists SHE was bullied after EastEnders star Natalie Cassidy claimed singer tormented her at 'rough' London school which has a very famous history

Paloma Faith insists SHE was bullied after EastEnders star Natalie Cassidy claimed singer tormented her at 'rough' London school which has a very famous history

Daily Mail​2 days ago

Natalie Cassidy has spilled on her tough school days, claiming that her famous classmate Paloma Faith bullied her.
But in a twist to the tale, Paloma's comments about her own torment at school have emerged.
EastEnders star Natalie, 42, and singer Paloma, 43, both attended Islington Green School, with Paloma in the year above Natalie.
Writing in a 2012 tweet, Paloma insisted her school days were far from easy, insisting: 'Yes I got bullied at school. I had braces and before that, wonky teeth.'
The stars are both from around the same area, with Natalie born in Islington and Paloma raised in Hackney.
Islington Green, which has since been renamed the City of London Academy Islington, has a famous history after its choir landed the job of singing the iconic Pink Floyd line 'we don't need no education' on 1979 hit The Wall.
From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new Showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop.
Fast forward two decades and the school was once again in the headlines when in 1995 Tony Blair rejected the local comprehensive for his son Euan, who instead received his secondary education at London Oratory in Hammersmith.
Two years later, after Blair was elected Prime Minister, the school was placed in special measures.
Natalie thought back to her school days on her podcast Life With Nat when her bad experience with Paloma came up.
She claimed: 'Paloma Faith, she bullied me at school. She went to Islington Green and was in the year above me. We've spoken about it and she has said sorry about that. Gutted.'
Paloma, who has a degree in contemporary dance and once worked as a magician's assistant, has previously called Islington Green 'very, very rough,' adding that 'the police were there every day; there was a lot of violence.'
But in spite of classmate Natalie's comments and her bullying, Paloma has called herself 'a pacifist,' explaining how her school's 'tough environment helped me develop a strong sense of self. I had to learn to stick to my guns and be stubborn.'
She has also spoken positvely about her 'incredible' teachers, gushing in an interview with The Standard: 'They were very encouraging to me. I was put in the Hackney Gazette because it was a failing school and I got all As at GCSE.'
She has pointed out though that whilst she was inspired by the creative nature of her school, she didn't receive any formal music training, declaring: 'I did it all myself. I had no famous parents, no stage school, no BRIT School.'
'I didn't have lessons, ever, I just copied records.'
After completing her A Levels at City and Islington College, Paloma went on to study for a degree in contemporary dance in Leeds before receiveing an MA in theatre directing at Central Saint Martins College of Art and Design.
She juggled a huge array of part time jobs during her studies including as a sales assistant at Agent Provocateur, a singer in a burlesque cabaret and a magician's assistant.
Natalie meanwhile landed the role of Sonia Fowler whilst still at school, auditioning when she was just 10.
Alongside her studies at Islington Green, Natalie took acting classes at Anna Scher Theatre School, where she was spotted doing improvisations by EastEnders' writer and director Tony McHale and casting advisor Jane Deitch.
Natalie has played Sonia on and off since 1993 but she will soon exit the soap as part of the 40th-anniversary celebrations.
Announcing the news, Natalie explained that turning 42 this year made her feel it was time to 'be brave' and explore new opportunities.
'You don't want to get to 70 and think, "I never tried that"' she said.
Natalie also expressed her deep love for the show, saying: 'I've loved this programme with all my heart. I started at ten, it's in my bones, it's in my heart.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kaye Adams admits 'change is hard' after devastating Loose Women cuts
Kaye Adams admits 'change is hard' after devastating Loose Women cuts

Daily Mirror

time9 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Kaye Adams admits 'change is hard' after devastating Loose Women cuts

Kaye Adams has spoken for the first time after it was announced ITV are planning a major shake-up to their schedules, meaning Loose Women won't air all year round Kaye Adams had "sleepless nights" after hearing Loose Women is being cut by ITV. It was announced last month that the network had planned a major shake-up. Some of the network's biggest programmes, including Loose, Good Morning Britain, and Lorraine, will be affected, while This Morning remains untouched. While Lorraine and Loose currently air all year round, they will now be cut and broadcast for just 30 weeks. ‌ Lorraine has suffered another blow, with her show being cut by half an hour while Good Morning Britain is extended. Now, Kaye has revealed that the dramatic news came "out of the blue" for her in a bombshell admission. ‌ The 62-year-old also admits she has no idea what will happen with her job or her fellow panellists in the wake of the dramatic cuts."To be perfectly honest, we have no idea at this point, what's going to happen," Kaye said. She went on to reveal that she didn't "anticipate" the news. Speaking on her How To Be 60 podcast with Karen MacKenzie, Kay continued: "I didn't anticipate it, which is probably stupid in retrospect, you get into a sort of rhythm of life. I had a couple of sleepless nights, I have to say, because it's just like the rug's been pulled from under your feet – what has been familiar. "It's going to have an impact. Lots of people will lose their jobs completely which is terrible, it's a huge change." But despite the shake-up, the broadcaster is trying to remain positive. She explained that it would allow her to "make some changes." Currently, Kaye travels to London from Glasgow on a regular basis and often takes the sleeper train. She went on to add: "But I gave myself a talking to and I listened to my own advice for once – change is hard, but it can be good. The past is a trap, don't fear the future – I'm telling myself all these things. And I think maybe this is the nudge that I needed to make some changes in my life and I'll just have to go with it." Prior to the news, Kaye revealed she had been planning on downsizing and moving into a smaller home, but now jokes that she may find herself in a one-bedroom flat. "And now I've lost my job, I might be in a one-bedroom flat somewhere," she commented. ‌ Kaye, however, isn't the first Loose panellist to open up about the cuts. Actress Nadia Sawalha, who has appeared on the show since its launch in 1999, recently admitted she is self-employed so could be "let go tomorrow." Some of the panellists work on a freelance basis, while others are on a PAYE contract with the network. Speaking to her husband Mark Adderley on their joint YouTube page, the former EastEnders star said: "Do you know what, at the moment, all of us on screen are in work and are proud of what we do. ‌ "But behind the scenes, there are people that are really suffering, and what you don't realise is when you attack the show, you attack them, because you never see all the army of people behind the scenes and how hard they work." Nadia became visibly emotional as she struggled to contain her upset. While holding back tears, she said: "So to all my friends and colleagues behind the scenes who have just got a huge shock out of the blue, I'm so sorry." She added that she "just can't bear it," and urged people to "be f***ing kind to people." She explained that due to being self-employed, she risks being let go "tomorrow" or "in five years." She became tearful as she explained that dozens of people will be "made redundant out of the blue" and has seen people walking around "numb with shock."

Influencers are killing the radio DJ – and it's got to stop
Influencers are killing the radio DJ – and it's got to stop

Telegraph

time15 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Influencers are killing the radio DJ – and it's got to stop

At the end of last year, the death of DJ Johnnie Walker reminded us of something lost. I don't mean simply that we had lost a terrific broadcaster, but that his death marked the end of an era. Walker, a trooper, had presented his show until nearly the end of his life, despite being desperately ill. You could argue that working was, for him, a necessary distraction, but you also got the sense that he was doing it for the listeners. Among Walker's gifts as a presenter was his ability to share his musical passions: he was not some gushy and unrigorous fanboy, but a discerning expert who knew exactly how to distil his knowledge. Knowledge, though, is now a dirty word. The musical nous of DJs, not to mention the broadcasting skills of those who have trained on degree courses or learnt their craft on the job (often in now-denuded local radio), seems to matter less than marketability and the building of the brand. All hail, then, the rise of the social influencer DJ. Except this, to me, goes against the spirit of radio – and it seems that a lot of people agree. At the end of last week, there was a certain amount of outrage when it was announced that former Made in Chelsea cast member Sophie Habboo would join her husband and fellow Made in Chelsea alumnus Jamie Laing on Radio 1 's Going Home show. According to The Sun, social media was ablaze. One post proclaimed: 'There is something really gross, about two such privileged and independently wealthy (the Laings) given access to prime time national radio shows over people who have trained and studied for years in media.' Another pleaded: 'Please get some good DJs back in the drive time slot. It's getting embarrassing.' The BBC's decision to recruit Habboo is obvious enough, and the same is true of 25-year-old influencer GK Barry, who was recruited by Radio 1 recently. Their impact is extraordinary: their tentacles are able to reach the young and impressionable, and they offer cross-platform marketing (for example promoting their wares to their millions of followers). It also makes sense that radio bosses would be looking to the podcasting space for lucrative new hires: both Habboo and Laing co-host one of the UK's most popular podcasts, NewlyWeds, while GK Barry hosts the top-charting podcast Saving Grace. These stars have proven to be charismatic on a mic and have a highly transferable audience at their fingertips. What's more, I imagine that they offer a boon to commercial stations' advertising departments whose clients want to be associated with the lifestyle cult these influencers develop around them. In a way, this is nothing new. DJs were the original influencers, prescribing their tastes to audiences and thus shaping the buying habits of the public and making or breaking emerging artists. This is linked to the idea of the DJ as a personality, something that developed in Britain from the late 1960s, first with the introduction of Radio 1 and then the growth of commercial radio. This was the era when Noel Edmonds, Tony Blackburn and, alas, Jimmy Savile were treated like gods, and their fame was sometimes greater than the pop stars whose discs they spun. This era is now irrevocably tainted for obvious reasons, but you cannot deny that it also gave us some of the most extraordinarily talented DJs of all time: Annie Nightingale, John Peel, Terry Wogan and Kenny Everett. The last two of these prove that being a good radio broadcaster is not always down to musical knowledge or taste. Here were personalities, and in the case of Everett, a personality who took the seemingly sober task of being a disc jockey and turned it into something that would not look out of place among the surrealists. In an era where radio conversation is often dominated by cliché, a unique and strange voice such as Everett's is sorely needed. But we also need the musos. When I was growing up, my taste was moulded by DJs such as Peel, Dave Fanning on Virgin and, especially Steve Lamacq and Jo Whiley on Radio 1's Evening Session – a pair without ego who, thanks to their carefully controlled enthusiasm, provided the best music education I could have wished for. Hüsker Dü, the Sugarcubes, Belly, the Auteurs…bands who aren't much discussed today, but whose music has aged incredibly well. Lamacq is now on BBC 6 Music, a station that is treated, quite rightly, like a national treasure (remember the public outcry following former director-general Mark Thompson's strategy review in 2010 which deemed its independent thought and extensive and unusual playlist surplus to requirements?). But DJs like Lamacq are an increasing rarity – a former NME journalist who got his break on pirate radio, a voice who you knew had done his time scouring the pubs and clubs of the nation in search of musical excellence. It's hard to imagine Jamie Laing and Sophie Habboo doing the same. I don't necessarily mind the use of celebrities when it comes to presenting, and sometimes the results are surprising. I remember a few raised eyebrows when Alan Titchmarsh was appointed to Radio 2, but he was revelatory, a soothing son of the soil who not only offered authority, but also knew when to listen. The death of radio has been greatly exaggerated. The latest Rajar figures shows that Britain's biggest radio stations – Heart and Radio 2 – still attract audiences of 13.4 million and 13.1 million listeners, while a record number of people who actually listened to radio in the UK was reported to have risen to more than 50 million last year, apparently the biggest increase in 75 years. This is a cause for celebration, but it should also offer the opportunity to take stock, and think about what makes the medium great – and that's not the witterings of an influencer who is a brand ambassador for fake cheese.

TEAMSHEET: Can YOU name the Chelsea team that beat Man United 5-0 in 1999? Or pick YOUR team and guess their starting XI
TEAMSHEET: Can YOU name the Chelsea team that beat Man United 5-0 in 1999? Or pick YOUR team and guess their starting XI

Daily Mail​

time17 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

TEAMSHEET: Can YOU name the Chelsea team that beat Man United 5-0 in 1999? Or pick YOUR team and guess their starting XI

Welcome back to Teamsheet... Mail Sport's original football memory game with a twist that gives you the chance to test your football knowledge against your mates. Today, we're taking you back to the 1999-2000 campaign for the clash between Chelsea and Man United - where Gianluca Vialli's side ran riot at Stamford Bridge. Sir Alex Ferguson 's Red Devils would go on to clinch the Premier League title but, today, we want to see whether you can name the Chelsea line-up from the day. It's just for fun, so see how you fare and share your Teamsheet score... full instructions on how to play are at the bottom of the article and in the game itself. And you can also pick any team you like and guess their starting XI. Best of luck! HOW TO PLAY The aim of the game is to score as few points as possible! If you guess a player at the first attempt you score one point - so the lowest score for guessing every player at the first attempt is 11. Guess a correct letter in the right position, and it'll turn green. Guess a correct letter but in the wrong position, and it'll turn yellow. You have six guesses for each player - and if you fail, we'll reveal their identity for 11 points! You can also ask for a free letter, but it costs you a point. So play on to see if you'll score the best possible total of 11 - or fail on every player and score 121.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store