logo
Minister says AI ‘does lie' but defends Government amid copyright row

Minister says AI ‘does lie' but defends Government amid copyright row

Peter Kyle acknowledged the technology was 'not flawless' as he insisted the Government would 'never sell downstream' the rights of artists in the UK.
He also said he had 'mistakenly' said his preferred option on AI and copyright was requiring rights-holders to 'opt out' of their material being used by tech companies, and had since 'gone back to the drawing board'.
Ministers have faced a backlash from major figures in the creative industries over their approach to copyright, with Sir Elton John this week describing the situation as an 'existential issue.'
The Government is locked in a standoff with the House of Lords, which has demanded artists to be offered immediate copyright protection as an amendment to the Data (Use and Access) Bill.
Peers have attempted to change the legislation by adding a commitment to introduce transparency requirements aimed at ensuring rights-holders are able to see when their work has been used and by whom.
Asked about the risk of AI producing unreliable information, Mr Kyle said 'people need to understand that AI is not flawless, and that AI does lie because it's based on human characteristics'.
'Now it is getting more precise as we move forward. It's getting more powerful as we move forward,' he told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips.
'But as with every single technology that comes into society, you can only safely use it and wisely use it by understanding how it works.'
He added: 'We are going to legislate for AI going forward and we're going to balance it with the same legislation that we'll bring in to modernise the copyright legislation as well.'
The Government has said it will address copyright issues as a whole after the more than 11,500 responses to its consultation on the impact of AI have been reviewed, rather than in what it has branded 'piecemeal' legislation.
ADVERTISEMENT
Learn more
Among the proposals had been a suggestion that tech companies could be given free access to British music, films, books in order to train AI models without permission or payment, with artists required to 'opt-out' if they do not want their work to be used.
Asked about the prospect of an opt-out clause, Mr Kyle told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme: 'I always had on the table from the outset an opt-out clause.
'But I mistakenly said this was my preferred option that had more prominence than perhaps some of the creatives wanted it to have, and I've now sort of gone back to the drawing board on that, because I am listening to what people want.'
Last month hundreds of stars including Sir Elton, Sir Paul McCartney and Kate Bush signed a joint letter to Sir Keir Starmer urging the Prime Minister to introduce safeguards against work being plundered for free.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Katie Price becomes first star to trademark AI version of herself as she brings back iconic alter-ego in six figure deal
Katie Price becomes first star to trademark AI version of herself as she brings back iconic alter-ego in six figure deal

The Irish Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Irish Sun

Katie Price becomes first star to trademark AI version of herself as she brings back iconic alter-ego in six figure deal

KATIE Price has become the first British star to trademark her own artificial intelligence image — and is bringing back Jordan. 3 Katie Price has signed a six-figure deal with an American AI firm to resurrect her 1990s alter ego Jordan 3 Katie told The Sun: 'The Jordan days were the best days of my life' Credit: Getty 3 OhChat has produced a walking, talking, 3D version of the model As part of the deal, she was given 30 phrases to say so that the company, OhChat, could produce a walking, talking, 3D version of the pneumatic model. They include 'I like going horse riding,' and 'this week for dinner I've got beef burgers'. Katie told The Sun: 'The 'This AI move is so clever. It's a genius move. read more on katie price "It's also a way for me to feel like her again. " 'I love it and they've really captured my voice and personality — you see me moving and everything. "It's scarily weird but fascinating.' Most read in Celebrity The Sun gave Katie her big break in 1996 when she appeared as Jordan on Page 3. From then on she Katie Price sparks concern with her skinny frame as she performs on stage in tiny bodysuit She has since kept reinventing her look, reportedly having a further Katie has been teasing today's launch of her digital twin with a daily countdown on social media for the last few days. She said: 'I couldn't be more excited to bring back the iconic Jordan, someone who I hold near and dear to my heart, and who my fans have been asking to see again. 'From my digital twin's styling to its tone of voice, I wanted to be involved every step of the way to create the most authentic experience possible for my fans. 'Jordan is back, and my fans will absolutely love this.' Last night a source said: 'This is a brilliant, game-changing bit of business from Katie. 'By using AI, she can quite effectively go back in time and bring back Jordan. 'She owns her own copyright but has done a deal which means her image can be used for anything from TV shows to Only Fans — and she doesn't have to do anything, it's all done for her. 'It's incredibly canny. Carmen Electra has done it Stateside and she stands to make millions. 'The plan is to do a photo shoot, Kate standing next to Jordan, and then she's been approached to do a TV special whereby she interviews her younger self. "It's all really exciting, if a bit surreal.' Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme - Sun Club.

Suzanne Harrington: The narrative of helpless man stolen by pushy woman is being wheeled out again
Suzanne Harrington: The narrative of helpless man stolen by pushy woman is being wheeled out again

Irish Examiner

timean hour ago

  • Irish Examiner

Suzanne Harrington: The narrative of helpless man stolen by pushy woman is being wheeled out again

What do Yoko Ono, Meghan Markle and Nicola Peltz have in common? Apart from being: (a) minted; (b) female, and (c) married to past and present versions of British royalty? Hint — it's to do with (c). First Yoko, then Meghan, now Nicola. Each has been accused of abducting their British spouse and trafficking them to the US, where they were/ are being held in diamond-encrusted captivity, 'controlled' by their conniving lady wives. Not literally. Not like Jeffrey Epstein — more of an emotional trafficking, with each of the three hapless husbands going seven shades of Patty Hearst, professing love for their captors as the British tabloids continue to go through cycles of performative apoplexy with side bars of conjecture, 'insiders' and 'sources'. Older readers will remember how Yoko broke up The Beatles, while the more contemporaneous recognise how Meghan Markle broke up the British royal family. And now Nicola Peltz is breaking up Britain's other royal family, the Golden Spice Balls dynasty. Nicola who? For those still stubbornly refusing to spend their lives online keeping up with the far grander lives of American billionaire heiresses, this column is here to fill in your blanks. Nicola Peltz is married to Brooklyn Beckham, first born of David and Victoria. Brooklyn — named after the geographical location his mother first discovered she was pregnant with him (imagine if she'd been in Merthyr Tydfil) — is currently married to Ms Peltz and engaged in a 'feud' with Brand Beckham, conducted via cryptic Instagram posts and a marked absence from his dad's 50th birthday shenanigans. Beckham Jnr appears to have, as they say in Leytonstone, the right hump. So how is this Beckham internecine situation the fault of his American billionaire heiress wife? You may well ask. Just as Prince Harry, having married another wealthy American, had the right hump with the Windsors, British tabloids found it more convenient to blame Ms Markle for her husband's distancing himself from his family of origin. This raised two questions — how dare Ms Markle fill Harry's head with Californian nonsense about being happy, and what kind of royal would choose Californian sunshine over a lifetime of unveiling statues in the rain and asking people if they'd come far. Rather than accept that John Lennon no longer wanted to be a Beatle, or that Harry Windsor no longer wanted to be a prince, nor can the UK media get its head around how young Brooklyn, vendor of hot sauce, taker of blurry elephant photos, and poster baby of nepo, no longer wants to be a brand ambassador for the family firm. A bit of woman-blaming is therefore required. Hence the acreage devoted to alleged antipathy between Ms Peltz and Mummy Beckham, because bitchfights make clickbait. Meghan Markle had an entire palace media ecosystem to grapple with, while Yoko Ono endured the double whammy of being a woman and a foreigner who nicked a national treasure and spirited him away to New York and a life of radical creativity. Obviously Brooklyn Beckham, with his terrible photos and daft tatts, is far from a Beatle or a prince — but that's not stopping the narrative of helpless man stolen by a pushy woman being wheeled out again. Meanwhile, if you want to read about actual trafficking, follow the trials of Sean Combs or Andrew Tate.

Young people and AI
Young people and AI

Irish Times

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Young people and AI

Sir, – In one of his first speeches as pope, Leo XIV outlined his priorities for his papacy. Interestingly, one of these is the challenges posed by artificial intelligence (AI). The pope believes that AI is a threat to 'humanity, justice and labour'. He said that this was one of the key reasons for him choosing the name Leo XIV. He had spoken previously about the impact of the industrial revolution on workers' rights. We are now arguably going through another 'industrial revolution' of sorts. Before, it was concerns that machines would replace people and take their jobs. Now it's the same but with AI. We adapted before and we can adapt again; not by trying to beat AI by being robots but by fully embracing our humanity – the qualities that set us apart from AI, qualities like our emotions, our ability to connect and build strong, trusting relationships and our ability to empathise. READ MORE If we are fully human, if we stop trying to beat AI at its own game, AI can never truly replace us, never truly do away with the need for real, human people in the workforce and in society. As a young person, I'm often asked the question, 'what do you want to be when you grow up?' Whatever answer I give, the response is usually: 'Oh, that job will be done away it; AI will be doing it in the future.' But I remain hopeful, faithful that I will be needed in society. And that AI can't replace humans if we are truly human, fully ourselves. – Yours, etc, TESS LIFFEY, Birr, Co Offaly.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store