Fox's Jennifer Griffin: Info Hegseth sent ‘classified' and meant only for secure channels
Fox News's Chief National Security Correspondent Jennifer Griffin said she surveyed current and former defense officials on Wednesday who said Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth shared 'classified' information via the Signal group chat with President Trump's cabinet members and The Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg, who was mistakenly added to the message thread.
'What Hegseth shared two hours ahead of the strikes were time sensitive 'attack orders' or 'operational plans' with actual timing of the strikes and mention of F18s, MQ9 Reapers and Tomahawks,' Griffin wrote in a Wednesday post on X.
'This information is typically sent through classified channels to the commanders in the field as 'secret, no forn' message. In other words the information is 'classified' and should not be shared through insecure channels,' she added.
Griffin's discussion with past defense officials revealed that the information shared about the U.S. strike on the Houthis in Yemen could have put American lives at risk.
''Attack orders' or 'attack sequence' puts the joint force directly and immediately at risk, according to former senior defense official #1. 'It allows the enemy to move the target and increase lethal actions against US forces,'' the journalist wrote.
'This kind of real time operational information is more sensitive than 'war plans,' which makes this lapse more egregious, according to two former senior US defense officials.'
The Trump administration, including Hegseth and national security adviser Mike Waltz, have both shared multiple statements alleging that the information was not classified.
'No names. No targets. No locations. No units. No routes. No sources. No methods. And no classified information,' Hegseth wrote in a Wednesday post on X.
Griffin's sources said Hegseth could technically 'retroactively' declassify information but highlighted his refusal to call the messages war plans is 'pure semantics' and interviewees noted that if the information was given to the wrong person, the Signal chat could have provided a warning about the attack to foreign adversaries.
''If you are revealing who is going to be attacked (Houthis – the name of the text chain), it still gives the enemy warning. When you release the time of the attack – all of that is always 'classified,'' a former senior US defense official told the Fox News reporter.
President Trump said he would ask Hegseth to review what information should be considered classified, while White House officials have tapped Elon Musk to investigate how Goldberg was added to the Signal chat.
The Trump administration also faces a lawsuit initiated by the group American Oversight.
Plaintiffs claim officials violated their obligations under the Federal Records Act to preserve information related to national security as the Signal chat settings were set to disappear after a certain number of weeks.
U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg will preside over the case. He's the same judge who was assigned to President Trump's Venezuelan deportation case where he blocked the Republican administration from invoking the Alien Enemies Act.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'When He Least Expects It': Michael Cohen Warns Elon Musk Of Trump's Revenge
Michael Cohen, former longtime personal attorney to Donald Trump, on Sunday warned Elon Musk that the president isn't done with him yet. 'They're going to really go after Elon Musk like nobody has seen, ever, in this country because they can,' he said on MSNBC on Saturday. 'And one thing Elon doesn't understand is this political guerrilla warfare that they're going to conduct against him.' Cohen warned that Trump can use the power of government to target Musk's companies and even his citizenship. Musk and Trump last week had a spectacularly public falling out, and over the weekend the president slammed his one-time pal as 'very disrespectful' and warned him of 'serious consequences' if he supported Democrats. Cohen said that while Trump has also downplayed the feud, the president is likely already plotting against the billionaire behind the scenes. 'I just wish him well,' Trump said on Friday. 'No he doesn't,' Cohen said. 'Because while Elon Musk is taking a step back thinking Trump is taking a step back, what Trump is actually doing is weaponizing the Department of Justice through his attorney general and other people, and they are gonna drop the hammer on him out of nowhere when he least expects it. That's the playbook.' See more of his conversation with MSNBC's Ali Velshi below:
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump branded 'unlawful' over handling of LA riots
Police clashed with demonstrators after a third day of protests in Los Angeles against Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. Gavin Newsom, the governor of California, branded the US president's deployment of the National Guard in the city as "unlawful" and "purposely inflammatory". Demonstrators have been protesting since Friday against the Trump administration's immigration raids, which last month aimed to detain as many as 3,000 people per day. Police in LA have said the downtown location is now an "unlawful assembly" area, while there have been reports of looting and vehicles have been set on fire. Trump posted on his Truth Social platform that things are "looking really bad in LA" and said: "Bring in the troops!" Read more from our media partners below or click the headlines to skip ahead > How Trump's immigration crackdown sparked LA uprising > Downtown LA is a scene of pandemonium and lawlessness > Trump orders law enforcement to 'liberate' LA from 'migrant invasion' > LA protesters, enraged by Trump, flood the streets > British photographer hit by non-lethal bullets during LA protests It began with co-ordinated raids on locations throughout Los Angeles on Friday. Immigration officials, backed by heavily armed FBI officers with assault weapons and body armour, stormed a clothing factory and at least two other locations in Latino areas of the city, trying to make good on orders to ramp-up the pace of deportations. The raids were the trigger for two days of clashes between protesters and federal officers in Los Angeles, where fires flared and fireworks exploded, prompting Donald Trump to order 2,000 National Guard troops onto the streets of the city. Read the full story from The Telegraph A shirtless man waving a Mexican flag stands atop a burning car in the heart of Los Angeles, as another man throws a traffic cone into the flames and some play drums and shout chants in opposition to immigration officials. The downtown district of one of America's biggest cities was a scene of pandemonium and lawlessness as protests, which had previously been mainly peaceful, turned ugly. Read the full story from Sky News Donald Trump has vowed to 'liberate Los Angeles from the migrant invasion,' amid violent clashes between members of the state national guard and anti-immigration enforcement protesters. The president took to Truth Social on Sunday, where he promised that 'the illegals will be expelled' and that the city would be 'set free,' as troops confronted demonstrators on the streets of downtown LA – using tear gas and 'less lethal munitions' to disperse crowds. Read the full story from The Independent Thousands of Angelenos enraged by Donald Trump's decision to commandeer their state national guard swamped the downtown streets on Sunday, bringing a major freeway to a standstill. But the national guard, hemmed in by the protesters and by dozens of Los Angeles police cruisers, played almost no role in any of it. A vocal, boisterous but largely peaceful sea of protesters engulfed the north-eastern corner of downtown Los Angeles around city hall and the federal courthouse. Read the full story from The Guardian A British news photographer has undergone emergency surgery after being hit by non-lethal rounds during protests in Los Angeles. Nick Stern was documenting a stand-off between anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) protesters and police outside a Home Depot in Paramount, a city in LA county and a location known as a hiring spot for day labourers, when a 14mm 'sponge bullet' tore into his thigh. Read the full story from PA Media
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump Accused Of Inciting Violence With Chilling New Rhyme
President Donald Trump drew accusations of inciting violence after he recited a rhyme to reporters on Sunday. Trump claimed that people who are protesting the federal immigration raids that are being carried out by his administration are now spitting on agents. Spitting 'and worse' is 'their new thing,' the president claimed, offering no evidence to back up the assertion. Then he said, 'They spit, we hit.' 'And I told them, nobody's going to spit on our police officers, nobody's going to spit on our military, which they do, it's a common thing,' he added. If they spit in the face, 'they get hit very hard,' Trump warned. Trump: When they spit at people— they spit, that's their new thing—when that happens, I have a little statement: they spit, we hit.., if that happens, they get hit very hard — Acyn (@Acyn) June 8, 2025 Critics on social media suggested Trump's remark gave the go-ahead for police brutality and the excessive use of force. Others recalled the pardons that Trump dished out to hundreds of his supporters who had been convicted for their involvement in the deadly and violent U.S. Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, during which law enforcement officers were attacked. Trump drew similar ire in 2020 when, amid the protests of the police killing of George Floyd, he warned, 'When the looting starts, the shooting starts.' @POTUS They did far worse than spitting on Jan. 6. — ModerateRepublican (@Modr8_1104) June 8, 2025 Sounds like an excessive use of force. One that will surely be taken up with the courts via lawsuits. — Vince Wilson (@VinceWilsonShow) June 8, 2025 'Unless you attacked police on Jan 6 then you get to go free and we'll pay you millions in taxpayer dollars' — Jhoff10 (@Jhoff10) June 8, 2025 If you spit on a police officer that does not give the police officer the right to beat the crap out of you. It does, however, give the officer the right to arrest you. — Denison Barb (@DenisonBarbs) June 8, 2025 Cruelty isn't a policy, it's a warning sign. 'They spit, we hit' isn't leadership, it's incitement. Brutality, dehumanization, and escalation are the ethos of authoritarian regimes. This is far from law and order. It's about power through fear. And we must resist this evil. — Evaristus Odinikaeze (@odinikaeze) June 8, 2025 Karoline Leavitt Squirms Over Maria Bartiromo's Blunt Question About Elon Musk Marjorie Taylor Greene's 'Lesson For Us All' Leaves Seth Meyers Absolutely Floored German Leader Politely Shuts Down Trump's Hot Take On D-Day