logo
How do you re-home a rhino by helicopter? Upside down

How do you re-home a rhino by helicopter? Upside down

BBC News29-03-2025

Moving endangered rhinos to new areas is a vital part of their conservation. War-torn helicopters from the Vietnam war are airlifting the creatures to safety.
Zipping through the skies over South Africa, a 1,300kg (2,865lbs) horned herbivore is dangling by its feet from a helicopter. It may be a shocking sight to behold but, within the last decade, the use of helicopters in rhinoceros conservation has been gaining momentum in South Africa, Namibia and Botswana.
Black rhinos are critically endangered, according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). However, thanks to conservation efforts, their numbers are on the rise. Today, black rhinos have a population of roughly 6,500 – up from the 1990s' low point of less than 2,500, when poaching and habitat loss drove the species to the edge of extinction.
Black rhinos are moved around for three reasons, says Ursina Rusch, population manager for the WWF South Africa Black Rhino Range Expansion Project. First, to protect them from poaching. Secondly, for monitoring purposes – rhino researchers often take the opportunity to insert satellite GPS telemetry into the rhinos' horns. And, thirdly, to ensure their genetic population is as diverse as possible. The species mostly exists within protected pockets on public and private reserves, so translocation is one of the only available methods to increase their range.
"If we don't translocate rhinos and create new populations, they will inbreed enough that they crash, or run out of resources and stop breeding," says Rusch. Black rhino population growth rates are density dependent. This means if a rhino community is too crowded, the females will start having longer intercalving periods – the time between the birth of one calf and the next – and so produce fewer calves, an evolutionary response and adaptation to resource management.
While the transport of animals for population regrowth and genetic diversity isn't new, the regular use of helicopters in this fight is. Beginning in the 1990s but refining methods since the 2010s, helicopters have "revolutionised the world of rhino conservation", says Rusch. Her WWF project has translocated around 270 rhinos, of which about 160 have been airlifted.
Leaning from an airborne helicopter, a veterinarian "darts the rhino in the bum" with immobilising drugs, typically targeting youngsters or dominant bulls that need to be removed to prevent inbreeding, says Rusch. Rhino immobilisation typically involves a potent opioid and a tranquilliser.
The anatomy of the rhino means it is, remarkably, able to breathe comfortably upside down
Whereas before veterinarians would have spent 20 minutes on-foot tracking a half-way-sedated rhino, the helicopter team now saves precious time by aerially tracking the rhino – and within four minutes, the rhino falls unconscious, says Rusch. By the time the rhino goes down, the ground team and the helicopter team spring into action: quickly approaching the rhino for processing. They take biological samples and measurements and insert microchips for monitoring.
Next, the crew ties big, soft straps around the rhino's four ankles. The straps connect to a single rope which is hooked to the underside of the helicopter.
Then the move happens. The helicopter airlifts the rhino, which dangles below, to a central location – generally an open field – where ground crews are waiting, says Rusch.
Historically, the rhino would have been woken up from the immobilising drug and walked into a crate, before being hoisted onto the back of a truck headed for a conservancy. But these road trips could be stressful for the rhino passengers; they're awake for the journey (albeit, sometimes, anaesthetised) and standing in a crate, which can cause muscle or horn damage – or even occlude their airways, which can be fatal. Moreover, the limited road network in the region and difficult terrain made it hard to reach the remote final locations using ground transport.
This is where airlifting comes in. The health risks of crate travel and lack of roads – for instance, in Namibia's Kunene region – mean that nowadays, helicopters are increasingly used for the translocation of rhinos, explains Robin Radcliffe, associate professor of wildlife and conservation medicine at Cornell University, in Ithaca, New York. Conservationists "really only consider slinging" as a solution when the capture or release site is inaccessible by road, he says, or when slinging significantly cuts down on transport time.
In Rusch's experience, researchers and conservationists employ two main helicopters to transport black rhinos: the Airbus AS350 Astar and the UH1-H Huey.
The Airbus AS350 Astar, nicknamed the "Squirrel," has been used since 2021, says Rusch. This helicopter is small, cost-effective and readily available in South Africa, she adds.
UH1-H Hueys, on the other hand, are designed for lifting large loads. Famously used during the Vietnam War, some of these "iconic helicopters" still exhibit bullet hole patches and floor installations for mounted gun covers, says Rusch. Nowadays, these military-grade helicopters – complete with windows under the cockpit so the pilot can see the ground below – are valuable for civilians in firefighting and rhino conservation.
"The Hueys' blades have a unique flap – they really slap the air," Rusch says. "That was the sound soldiers in the Vietnam war wanted to hear, feeling that relief of someone rescuing them." The Huey – made famous by Hollywood films including Apocalypse Now, Platoon and Full Metal Jacket – has become synonymous with the Vietnam War and provided close heliborne support to US soldiers, evacuating the wounded and the dead.
The fateful twist of using a machine of war to save lives is not lost on the conservationists who fly in the helicopters. "Ironically, in the 80s, helicopters were used by some poachers to kill rhinos," says Radcliffe. "The fact that helicopters are now being used to save them is a wonderful example of conservation." Translocation is one of the most valuable tools of rhino conservation, he adds.
WWF's Black Rhino Range Expansion Project has 18 project sites, with over 400 black rhinos spread across the site, making up 15% of all black rhinos in South Africa, says Rusch. "Really none of this would be possible without helicopters, both in terms of darting and transferring rhinos out of inaccessible areas," she says.
Radcliffe's team, which partnered with Namibia's government, pioneered the netless, slinging method of moving rhinos upside down under a helicopter. In 2021, Radcliffe and his colleagues won an Ig Nobel Prize – an award satirising the Nobel Prize given to "research that makes people laugh and then think" – for their work on hanging black rhino upside down.
BRREP WWF
As the opioid used reduces the rhinos' blood oxygen levels, it's all the more crucial to determine which flight position is best for breathing. Before settling on the upside-down position, Radcliffe and his fellow researchers tried laying the flying rhinos on boards tethered to the helicopter, which wasn't aerodynamic as the board caused excess swaying in mid-air, says Radcliffe.
Then, his team tested rhinos in nets, which "aerodynamically worked a bit better, but still wasn't ideal". The net's positioning compromised the rhino's breathing. Plus, the net's metal frame added considerable weight and required even more ground personnel to place the rhinos into the net, "which defeated the purpose of having a quick and efficient transport method", explained Radcliffe.
Airborne inversion is the safest option, says Radcliffe. The anatomy of the rhino means it is, remarkably, able to breathe comfortably upside down, Radcliffe says. Hanging by their legs, the weight and build of rhinos allow them to extend their head and neck downwards, straightening the spine. Also, a "safer, smoother flight" occurs because the rhino horn acts as a "tail feather or wind vane," reducing the risk of spinning. "The great thing about lifting the rhinos upside down by their feet is that they're aerodynamic themselves," says Radcliffe.
While the image of an upside-down rhino may initially seem "cruel", the rhino's well-being is always "paramount" before, during and after the 10-30 minutes of airborne time, says Rusch. "The rhino is constantly under supervision of experienced veterinarians and pilots, who can tell if the rhino is comfortable or straining," she says.
Nonetheless, conservation is not without some cost. Helicopter-use creates air and noise pollution. "In a perfect world we'd have a zero-carbon footprint," says Radcliffe. "But we, as humans, are obligated to make a concerted effort to save species like the rhinoceros. They are in serious decline, not because of normal ecological processes, but because of our own actions."
Rhinos have existed for 50 million years and fossil evidence indicates that there were once upwards of 150 rhino species. Now there are five.
"I don't want to tell my grandchildren that we did have rhinos when I was growing up, but they're no longer here because humans poached them and destroyed their habitat," says Radcliffe.
More like this:
• The rhino that became a conservation icon
• Elephants hate bees – here's why that's good news for Kenyan farmers
• How a million kilometres of invisible borders are harming wildlife
Slowly but surely, helicopters are making a difference. Thirty years ago, the black rhino population in Kunene, in the north-west of Namibia, was depleted, explains Radcliffe. However, in 2010, Namibia's first rhino airlift has allowed these animals to return to the region. Due to the impassable, vast mountain ranges in the region, the airlift allowed the introduction of rhinos into areas that otherwise would have been beyond reach. Scientists, like Radcliffe, are committed to continually studying and honing these heli-moves, and they plan to incorporate emerging technologies such as drones and satellites into rhino conservation too.
Radcliffe envisions that in the future, this innovative method of rhino conservation could even be applied to the rainforest environments of Indonesia, where Sumatran rhinos are critically endangered. And beyond rhino, the technique of lifting large ungulates – or large mammals with hooves – upside down has also been applied to other species such as elephants and some endangered antelope, Radcliffe adds.
In the meantime, according to Rusch, South Africa's translocated rhinos seem to be thriving – grazing and breeding in their new homes.
"You get to know the rhinos, their individualities, their personalities," says Rusch. "They get released on the other side, and then you get to watch these populations grow – from first to second to third-generation offspring."
--
For essential climate news and hopeful developments to your inbox, sign up to the Future Earth newsletter, while The Essential List delivers a handpicked selection of features and insights twice a week.
For more science, technology, environment and health stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook, X and Instagram.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ethiopia pushes for domestic AI; S. Africa clears path for Starlink
Ethiopia pushes for domestic AI; S. Africa clears path for Starlink

Coin Geek

time2 days ago

  • Coin Geek

Ethiopia pushes for domestic AI; S. Africa clears path for Starlink

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed has called on African nations to develop homegrown artificial intelligence (AI) to propel the region's development. In his keynote address at the Ethiopian Technology Expo, Ahmed stated that Africa must shape its own technological destiny with AI after decades of adhering to Western standards. 'Africa must not be a passive recipient of AI tools developed elsewhere. We must become innovators and owners of our future, ensuring that no one is left behind in this transformation,' he stated. Ahmed is the latest to call for local AI solutions in Africa, a region whose needs are rarely addressed by Western technology. AI could exacerbate the divide even further; a United Nations report last month revealed that over 120 countries, mostly in the global south, have been left out of the global AI development, which could widen economic inequalities. 'With a clear strategic vision and bold investment, Africa can guide the development of AI on its own terms—anchored in ethical frameworks, inclusion, and sustainability,' Ahmed stated. He added that AI could usher in a new era 'that holds the promise of inclusive prosperity for our continent, driven by homegrown innovations in AI.' Africans must not rely on foreign solutions, which rarely account for the region's nuanced challenges and its diversity. Africa's AI development has been limited by poor infrastructure. A separate UN report revealed that only 5% of the region's AI developers have access to the computing power they would require to build AI applications. Starlink setting foot in South Africa Elsewhere, South Africa is set to amend a law that requires telecom firms to be at least 30% black-owned to enable Elon Musk's Starlink to operate in the country. The decision, announced on Tuesday, comes at a time when tensions between Africa's most industrialized nation and the United States are at a boiling point. U.S. President Donald Trump and Musk have accused the South African government of orchestrating a genocide against white residents, a claim that the African nation has refuted, and which one court has dismissed as 'clearly imagined and not real.' Still, Trump has persisted, and last week, the U.S. welcomed the first batch of South Africans as refugees. Trump and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa are set to have a meeting this week in Washington, and the decision to amend the black ownership law is seen as an effort to smooth things over before the crucial meeting. 'We're not doing it for Musk' The law being amended—known as the Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) law—was introduced in the '90s as South Africa abandoned apartheid, which had significantly disadvantaged the black majority. It requires companies in some industries, such as IT, telecoms, and automotive, to be at least 30% owned by black entrepreneurs. Starlink, where Musk has 79% control, was to set up operations in South Africa last year after successful debuts in 20 other African nations. However, it didn't meet the BEE threshold, and since then, Musk has ramped up criticism against the Ramaphosa government. The X and Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) CEO was born in Pretoria, the South African capital, but relocated to Canada at 17. 'I am in a situation where I was born in South Africa, but cannot get a license to operate Starlink because I am not Black,' he told Bloomberg this week. The South African government has finally bowed to the pressure and will amend the BEE law, allowing Starlink to set up in the country, home to 61 million people. Experts say the timing of the move suggests that Ramaphosa is using it to appease Trump ahead of their meeting. However, the South African government has denied the allegations, claiming it's 'part of a broader strategy to create an enabling environment for international investment and expand digital connectivity across South Africa.' The move is part of the government's medium-term plans, the Department of Communications and Digital Technologies told media outlets. However, some in the country's political landscape remain opposed to Starlink's entry. Economic Freedom Fighters, the top opposition party, says the move is unconstitutional and 'exposes Ramaphosa as willing to compromise on our sovereignty to massage the inflated ego of Elon Musk and Donald Trump,' the party's spokesperson, Sinawo Thambo stated. 'These powers are governed by national legislation and independent regulators, not the whims of one man desperate for foreign approval,' he added. The party has vowed to fight against the move 'in the courts, and on the streets.' In order for artificial intelligence (AI) to work right within the law and thrive in the face of growing challenges, it needs to integrate an enterprise blockchain system that ensures data input quality and ownership—allowing it to keep data safe while also guaranteeing the immutability of data. Check out CoinGeek's coverage on this emerging tech to learn more why Enterprise blockchain will be the backbone of AI . Watch: Bitcoin Retrospective and a Focus on the Future of the Internet with Mike Hearn title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">

Cutting off rhinos' horns is a contentious last resort to stop poaching. A new study found it works
Cutting off rhinos' horns is a contentious last resort to stop poaching. A new study found it works

The Independent

time3 days ago

  • The Independent

Cutting off rhinos' horns is a contentious last resort to stop poaching. A new study found it works

Cutting off the horns of sedated rhinos with a chainsaw has been viewed by wildlife conservationists in Africa for more than 30 years as a necessary evil to save the iconic endangered species from poaching. They hoped the drastic action was working, but evidence was scarce. Now, a study published Thursday in the academic journal Science has found that dehorning rhinos has led to a large reduction in poaching in game reserves in and around the Kruger National Park in northern South Africa — an area that's home to 25% of the world's rhinos and is especially vulnerable to poaching. The results of the seven-year study that ended in 2023 are seen as long-awaited evidence that removing rhinos' horns — which needs to be done every one to two years because they grow back — helps them survive, even if the animals lose part of their makeup. Consistently reduced poaching The conclusions seem obvious. Lucrative illegal markets in parts of southeast Asia and China crave rhino horns for use in traditional medicines, and removing the rhinos' horns take away what poachers are after. But Tim Kuiper, a biodiversity scientist at South Africa's Nelson Mandela University and the lead author of the study, said it was new to have long-term data from multiple sites on dehorning rhinos. He said the study, conducted between January 2017 and December 2023, focused on 11 reserves in the Kruger area and compared data from eight that dehorned their rhinos against the three that didn't. It also analyzed data from the reserves before and after they dehorned their rhinos. The study showed that dehorning consistently reduced poaching, Kuiper said. It found that the dehorning of more than 2,000 rhinos resulted in a 78% reduction in poaching in those eight reserves, providing some confirmation that such an invasive intervention was worth it. 'It is a big part of what a rhino is, having a horn,' Kuiper said. 'So having to remove it is kind of a necessary evil, if I can put it that way. But it's very effective. There's no doubt it saved hundreds of rhinos' lives.' South Africa has the largest numbers of black and white rhinos. Namibia, Zimbabwe and Kenya also have significant populations. There are around 17,500 white rhinos and 6,500 black rhinos left in the world, with black rhino numbers reduced from 70,000 in 1970 to less than 2,500 by the time poaching reached a crisis point in the mid-1990s, according to the Save the Rhino organization. Dehorning was not always accepted Dehorning rhinos started in southern Africa as early as 1989. It has not been accepted without question. There has been opposition from animal rights activists but also questions from conservationists over what impact it has on a rhino's wellbeing, and what a future might look like with more hornless rhinos. Vanessa Duthe, a rhino researcher in South Africa not involved in the study, said rhinos use their horns to defend themselves against predators, to compete for territory and, in the case of black rhinos, to look for food. There is also evidence that dehorned rhinos adjust their movements to live in smaller ranges, she said. She said conservationists don't know the full impacts of dehorning, but research had found it had no adverse effect on rhinos' breeding rates or mortality rates. 'What we do know is that the benefits of dehorning by far outweigh any ecological cost that we're aware of today,' Duthe said. She said dehorning a rhino now takes around 10 minutes and the process causes minimum distress. Blindfolds and earmuffs are put on sedated rhinos during dehorning, which also provides an opportunity to microchip rhinos and collect samples that aid research. Only one part of the battle Conservationists agree that dehorning alone will not end rhino poaching and Kuiper said he saw it as a short-to-mid-term solution. Other efforts like more effective law enforcement and better support for game rangers on the frontline are key. While South Africa has helped pull rhinos back from the threat of extinction, more than 400 rhinos a year are still killed by poachers in the country. The dehorning study was a collaboration between scientists from three South African universities, Oxford University in England and game reserve managers and rangers. It also involved the South African National Parks department, the World Wildlife Fund and the Rhino Recovery Fund. ___

Dehorning rhinos reduces poaching by 80%, study finds
Dehorning rhinos reduces poaching by 80%, study finds

The Guardian

time3 days ago

  • The Guardian

Dehorning rhinos reduces poaching by 80%, study finds

Cutting the horns off rhinos causes a large reduction in poaching, according to a new study, which raises questions about the effectiveness of expensive anti-poaching techniques used to protect the African mammals. Poaching for horn is a significant threat to the world's five rhino species. The substance, which is similar to human fingernails, is commonly used for traditional medicine in China, Vietnam and other Asian countries. Dealers in the hidden market will pay tens of thousands of dollars for the horns, which are falsely believed to be effective at treating fevers, pain and a low sex drive in traditional medicine. But new research in the journal Science has highlighted ways to better protect the animals from illegal hunters. An assessment of rhino protection methods in the Greater Kruger region of South Africa – home to a quarter of the continent's rhinos – found that removing horns reduced poaching by nearly 80% between 2017 and 2023. In a collaboration between scientists, conservationists and government officials, the research found no statistical evidence that traditional anti-poaching interventions – such as rangers, detection cameras, dog tracking and helicopters – caused significant reductions in rhino poaching, despite their multimillion-dollar cost, even though they were successful at detecting hundreds of poachers. 'Dehorning rhinos to reduce incentives for poaching was found to achieve a 78% reduction in poaching using just 1.2% of the overall rhino protection budget,' said Dr Tim Kuiper of Nelson Mandela University, a lead author of the study. 'We might need to rethink our goals. Do we just want to arrest poachers? It doesn't appear to be making a massive difference to reducing rhino poaching.' To dehorn a rhino, workers sedate the animal, apply a blindfold and earplugs, and cut off the horn with a power saw. The horn will gradually regrow – an average rhino needs to be dehorned every 1.5 to two years. The process poses a very low risk to the animal and does not hurt it. 'The headline result is that dehorning stood out for its effectiveness. We are cautious to say that the other interventions are not working. They worked when measured by whether they were detecting poachers. But detecting and arresting a load of poachers doesn't necessarily bend the curve on rhino poaching,' Kuiper said. In South Africa, rhino poaching remains high, with 103 killed in the first three months of 2025. Last year, 420 were lost. In recent decades, rhino populations have collapsed in Asia and Africa due to poaching and habitat loss, continuing falls driven by European colonial hunters. But the researchers behind the project, representing the University of Cape Town, Nelson Mandela University, University of Stellenbosch and the University of Oxford and other conservation institutions, cautioned that dehorning rhinos was not a magic bullet. A significant stump of horn mass remains on the rhino after dehorning, and some poachers were still prepared to kill rhinos for this section. Sharon Haussmann, a pioneer in rhino conservation in South Africa and co-author on the paper, played a leading role in coordinating conservation efforts in the study area. She died unexpectedly at the weekend and Kuiper wanted to highlight the collaboration between different sectors that are often mistrustful of each other in her memory. 'Is a rhino still a rhino without its horn? That's a bigger question,' said Kuiper. One study of black rhinos indicated that while poaching rates decreased, dehorned animals became more timid and covered much smaller ranges. Researchers believe that horn is used to establish territories and dehorned rhinos were unable to do this after the procedure. 'We wouldn't like to keep dehorning them for the next 100 years,' Kuiper said. 'Ideally we would like to address the drivers of poaching. But it is better than the impacts of poaching' Find more age of extinction coverage here, and follow the biodiversity reporters Phoebe Weston and Patrick Greenfield in the Guardian app for more nature coverage

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store