Port of Oakland attempts another airport renaming to "Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport"
SF seeks to stop Oakland airport from using new "San Francisco Bay" name
SF seeks to stop Oakland airport from using new "San Francisco Bay" name
SF seeks to stop Oakland airport from using new "San Francisco Bay" name
The Port of Oakland is taking another stab at incorporating "San Francisco Bay" into the official name of Oakland's airport after a court blocked its previous attempt.
On Friday, the port announced it would seek to adopt the name "Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport," which it said in a press release "reflects its strong Oakland and East Bay identity and its convenient role as a gateway to the entire San Francisco Bay Area." The port said the airport renaming is part of an effort to increase air travel and boost economic activity within Oakland and the East Bay region.
Oakland International Airport
KPIX
In April 2024, the port announced it would change the name of "Metropolitan Oakland International Airport" to "San Francisco Bay Oakland International Airport," noting at the time that many out-of-town passengers were not aware of Oakland's location in relation to the rest of the Bay Area.
The San Francisco city attorney filed suit over the name change, arguing that it infringed on the San Francisco International Airport/SFO trademark. The port filed a countersuit, saying San Francisco's lawsuit was "prematurely" filed.
In September 2024, San Francisco sought an injunction against the renaming, arguing the change had caused confusion among visitors. A month later, a judge blocked Oakland's use of "San Francisco Bay" in its name in advertising, marketing, or other airport services until the lawsuit between the two cities was resolved.
The port said the new name configuration now places "Oakland" at the forefront of the OAK brand while informing travelers that Oakland can be a logical starting point for travelers to the region.
"We are proud to be a central gateway to the Bay Area, and we're proud to embrace a name that reflects both our local roots and regional reach," said Craig Simon, the Port of Oakland's director of aviation. "'Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport' does both, putting Oakland first and highlighting our central location in the Bay Area for all visitors."
On Friday, a spokesperson for the San Francisco City Attorney's Office said the office was considering its response to the new renaming.
"We are just learning about this development and will assess any next steps to ensure San Francisco International Airport's trademark is protected," spokesperson Jen Kwart said.
The Board of Port Commissioners will consider adopting the new name at its July 10 meeting. As in the previous renaming attempt, the airport's three-letter OAK code and "I Fly OAK" branding would remain the same.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
12 minutes ago
- CNN
Senate barrels toward weekend vote on Trump agenda as GOP support still in limbo
President Donald Trump's push to pass his massive agenda in the Senate is hanging by thread as GOP leaders barrel toward a critical vote this weekend that, as of Friday night, is still short of the support to pass. Just hours after Senate Majority Leader John Thune informed senators they would take a critical first vote on Saturday, a key GOP centrist senator warned he would vote against proceeding to the package unless there are major changes – and several other holdouts are uncertain on how they'll land. That warning shot came from Sen. Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican who is up for reelection next November and has been one of the most vocal critics of the Medicaid cuts used to help pay for Trump's tax cuts and spending cuts package. Speaking to reporters Friday, Tillis again raised concerns over the bill's 'fundamentals' and cuts to Medicaid and suggested his vote wouldn't change unless the measure 'transforms radically overnight.' Losing Tillis on Saturday's expected procedural vote – which will be closely watched by Trump – would be a major blow to Senate GOP leaders, who can only afford to lose three Republican votes to advance the bill. Thune and GOP leaders have spent months building to this moment, racing to draft the bill as quickly as possible in an effort to ensure Trump's agenda is on his desk by the Fourth of July. If the bill fails its first procedural vote on Saturday, GOP leaders will have to retool the package, amounting to a huge setback for Trump. And it's not just about that Independence Day timeline: GOP leaders fear that any delay in passing Trump's agenda would embolden the party's critics to seek more changes – which could lead their fragile coalition to fall apart. Already, outspoken fiscal hawk Sen. Rand Paul is planning to vote against it over the plan's inclusion of a $5 trillion debt-limit increase. And Tillis is not the only Republican threatening to oppose the bill over the proposed cuts to Medicaid. Sens. Josh Hawley, Lisa Murkowski, Jerry Moran and Susan Collins have all made similar remarks as they've worked with leadership to trim those provisions. But simply restoring that Medicaid funding may not be enough to win Thune those votes on the floor – it could also cost him votes among Senate GOP hardliners. Sen. Ron Johnson has railed on how the bill is projected to balloon the budget deficit, and another fiscal hawk, Sen. Mike Lee, has suggested he and Johnson along with Sen. Rick Scott could vote as a bloc on Saturday. None have yet to say how they'll vote on the key initial procedural vote Saturday. If all goes to plan, Senate leaders will land the 51 GOP votes to formally begin debating Trump's agenda and then tee up one of the chamber's storied traditions: a series of round-the-clock amendment votes known as vote-a-rama. Democrats will use this overnight session to push on any number of GOP weak points on the bill, particularly Medicaid and other safety net programs. The Senate could then vote on final passage sometime in the middle of the night Saturday or Sunday morning. And if successful, the House would return mid-week to take up the bill with the hope of Trump signing it at the White House on July 4. One of the biggest hurdles for Republicans is the race to rewrite text in compliance with the Senate's complex budget rules, which are governed by the nonpartisan parliamentarian. In recent days, the parliamentarian has ruled against key GOP provisions – from the so-called provider tax, which helps states fund their Medicaid programs to some provisions of a government spectrum auction. That forces the Senate GOP to dial back those provisions, or else Trump's bill would be subject to a Democratic filibuster. Several Republicans said Friday night they need to see the final bill text – which has not been released – before judging whether they would open debate on the sweeping measure. 'I don't have the bill, how can I vote on something I don't know' what's in it, Johnson said. Hawley, who has been deeply concerned about Medicaid cuts, also said the vote hinges on what's in the bill: 'Got to see the text.' Senate GOP leaders hope to release a mostly final version of the bill Friday night or Saturday morning, but the full version may not be ready before the anticipated Saturday vote to open debate, since the Senate Finance Committee is still furiously working to make sure its language complies with the budget rules. The Finance provisions are key because of both tax and health provisions – specifically, Medicaid. 'I still don't have final language from Finance yet, which obviously is of tremendous concern to me given the Medicaid provisions,' Collins said. Multiple GOP senators dismissed concerns about speeding ahead with the vote without final text in hand. 'We discussed this thing ad nauseam,' Ohio Sen. Bernie Moreno said, estimating that Republicans have met on this bill for 'thousands' of hours so far this year. 'The final tax is not out. But we know where we are going.' Sen. Eric Schmitt of Missouri added: 'When you have legislation like this, you're going to have things you need to work through until the very end.' This story has been updated with additional details.
CBS News
14 minutes ago
- CBS News
Berkeley City Council approves zoning change to encourage "middle housing"
In a unanimous vote Thursday night, the Berkeley City Council approved a zoning change designed to make it easier to build small apartment buildings across much of the city—part of a broader effort to address the region's ongoing housing affordability crisis. Dubbed the Middle Housing Ordinance, the new policy streamlines the permitting process for residential buildings such as duplexes, triplexes, and three-story multi-family homes. City officials and housing advocates said the change could increase housing options for middle-income residents who have been increasingly priced out of the market. "These types of units will get a streamlined, 'by-right' approval," said District 1 Councilmember Rashi Kesarwani, who championed the policy. "So if [a project meets] the development standards, they don't go above three stories, and they have setbacks and open space, they can get approved over the counter." The new zoning rules, however, will not apply to the Berkeley Hills, where fire-risk concerns have limited development. Supporters of the ordinance argued that increasing housing supply is essential for reducing costs and giving younger and middle-class residents a foothold in the city's expensive real estate market. "I could not afford one of these houses," said Andrea Horbinski, a renter in the Berkeley Hills with a Ph.D. "And I don't think that is going to change. So hopefully, [developers will] build different housing, new housing, smaller size that I could afford." Horbinski was one of the residents who spoke in favor of the ordinance at the council meeting. "The more the merrier," she said. "The more housing there is, the more prices will come down, the more things will be more affordable for more people." Berkeley's real estate market remains one of the priciest in the region. According to the Bay East Association of Realtors, of the 66 single-family homes sold last month in Berkeley, the median price was $1,812,500. "With what we're projecting, in terms of 50 to 100 homes per year, that's an incremental change," Kesarwani said. "So it'll give us the opportunity to adapt and adjust." Still, not everyone is on board. Some residents fear the zoning change could alter the character of Berkeley's neighborhoods and put added strain on infrastructure. "Why Berkeley, which is already so densely populated and already so hard to get around in?" asked longtime resident Clifford Fred. "It just doesn't make any sense to me." Fred said he's concerned about traffic congestion and limited parking. "Older people who don't have driveways, people need their parking spaces," he said. "I don't think it's selfish for people to have parking spaces near their home." Opponents also criticized the ordinance for not including specific requirements for affordable housing units. But supporters like Horbinski remain hopeful that smaller, lower-cost units will eventually make ownership more attainable. "I think eventually I'll be able to get to a place where I could have a condo or a unit in one of these sort of missing-middle type places," she said. The zoning change is expected to take effect in November. Berkeley follows in the footsteps of Sacramento, which passed a similar measure last year. Santa Rosa is reportedly considering a comparable proposal.
Fox News
16 minutes ago
- Fox News
Portland's WNBA expansion team fires team president just two months into tenure: report
The WNBA's Portland franchise reportedly fired its president, Inky Son, just three weeks before the team is expected to launch its brand. Son's dismissal came as a result of significant "growing pains" and a "rocky" rollout, The Oregonian reported Friday. On June 20, the WNBA Portland X account posted the date of July 15, saying a countdown was on, potentially alluding to the announcement of the team's official name. The WNBA did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment about Son's reported dismissal. Son was hired April 1 as the first employee of the WNBA's Portland franchise. Prior to joining Portland, Son was the chief administrative officer for the National Basketball Players Association. "This is an amazing opportunity to help bring back a WNBA franchise to Portland, a city that loves basketball and has already shown itself to be supportive of women's sports," Son said in a statement when she was hired. "I am honored to be in a position like this to further the women's game, and I look forward to creating a winning environment for our future players, our staff and the fans of Portland." Mike Whitehead, managing director of RAJ Sports, the parent company of the Portland WNBA franchise, expressed confidence in Son after she was hired. "As the very first employee of the organization, Inky will lay the groundwork for our future growth, and we are confident her leadership will drive the franchise to new heights, creating a lasting impact both in Portland and across the WNBA," Whitehead said in a statement in April after Son was hired. Son's responsibilities were to oversee all aspects of the business, including marketing, ticket and sponsorship sales, community relations, finance, legal and human resources. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
