Chagos Islands deal must be ratified to secure Diego Garcia, peers say
Mauritius is 'likely' to resume its campaign to secure a binding judgment on sovereignty against Britain unless the agreement is rubber-stamped, the House of Lords International Agreements Community (HLIAC) warned.
In a report published on Wednesday, the peers concluded that the Government 'cannot ignore' the risk of an 'adverse ruling' putting the UK's right to run a joint UK-US base in jeopardy.
The deal signed last month after long-running negotiations returns sovereignty of the archipelago to Mauritius, but will see Britain lease back the military site on Diego Garcia, the largest of the islands.
It follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice which said the islands should be handed over to Mauritius.
Critics argue it comes at too high a cost to the taxpayer, which is expected to run to billions of pounds, and that the retention of the base will interfere withh Chagossians right to resettle.
Islanders were expelled from the archipelago between 1965 and 1973 to make way for the military site and have not been allowed to return.
Chairman of HLIAC Lord Goldsmith said that 'like all treaties, the agreement reflects a compromise' and highlighted that there was no guarantee it would be extended after the initial 99-year term agreed between the two countries.
'However, the UK cannot ignore the advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) which found that the Chagos Archipelago had been unlawfully detached from Mauritius at the time of its independence in the 1960s,' he said.
'If the agreement is not ratified there would be a greater risk from the adverse ruling of an international court to the future of the military base.'
As well as establishing a £40 million fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay Mauritius at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms.
The deal also includes provisions preventing development on the rest of the archipelago without the UK's consent, which the Government has argued will prevent countries such as China setting up their own facilities.
The agreement has also been backed by the United States.
The Foreign Office has been contacted for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Glastonbury founder Michael Eavis defends letting controversial rappers Kneecap play festival telling critics to 'go somewhere else' - and activists Palestine Action are also on the bill
Glastonbury founder Sir Michael Eavis has told critics of the festival's political leanings to 'go somewhere else' after criticism of its decision to allow Kneecap to perform. The 89-year-old spoke out as the event ignored demands to pull the Irish republican rappers from the bill after one of the trio was charged with a terror offence. The Belfast group are due to play the West Holts Stage on Saturday afternoon, 10 days after Liam Og O hAnnaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, appeared in court accused of supporting a proscribed terrorist organisation. He was charged last month after allegedly displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah at a gig in November last year and has been bailed until August. Both Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and opposition leader Kemi Badenoch called for them to be pulled from the bill after his appearance in court. It has also emerged that a member of Palestine Action will speak at an event at the festival in Somerset amid moves to proscribe them as a terrorist group. Francesca Nadin will speak at an event in the Speaker's Forum in the Green Futures Field this afternoon alongside Green Party peer Jenny Jones for a discussion called 'what protest is possible'. Asked if the event still stands for something, Sir Michael told Glastonbury Free Press, the festival's resident newspaper: 'Oh heaven's above, yes, of course it does. 'And I think the people that come here are into all those things. People that don't agree with the politics of the event can go somewhere else!' Kneecap's performance is due to be livestreamed by the BBC, prompting Mrs Badenoch to demand it not air 'propaganda'. Following his court appearance, Chara said: 'For anybody going to Glastonbury, you can see us there at 4pm on the Saturday. 'If you can't be there we'll be on the BBC, if anybody watches the BBC.' Yvette Cooper confirmed the move to proscribe Palestine Action after it vandalised two planes inside RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire last Friday. The incident is being investigated by counter-terror police. The ban under terror laws will make it a criminal offence to belong to or support the group, and will be punishable by up to 14 years in prison. A Palestine Action spokesperson said they would be seeking a legal challenge to the 'unhinged reaction'. A draft order will be laid in Parliament next Monday, and if approved after debates by MPs and peers, the ban could come into force by Friday. The festival has always had a political element to it with stages such as Left Field and Green Fields' Speakers Forum welcoming politicians, pundits and celebrities to speak on topics that range from feminism to fascism. Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn performed there in 2017. And this year the Green Party will hold it's first leadership hustings there. This year's event will see headline performances from British rock/pop band The 1975, veteran singer Neil Young and his band the Chrome Hearts, and US pop star Olivia Rodrigo. More than 200,000 people are expected to descend on the fields of Pilton, with ticket-holders advised to prepare for mainly warm weather. Sir Michael, who has used a wheelchair to get around the festival in recent years, said he still gets 'really excited' for the five-day celebration of performing arts and music, though he can 'no longer run around like I used to'. He told the paper: 'I still take a lot of pleasure from all of it. I'm enjoying every day. 'And Emily is doing so well. I'm just feeling really safe with the show being in her hands.' Festivalgoers experienced lashings of rain when they arrived to Pilton on Thursday morning, but the rest of the day should be 'largely pleasant', according to the Met Office. Performing in the coveted Sunday teatime legends slot this year is Sir Rod Stewart, who previously said he will be joined by his former Faces band member Ronnie Wood, as well as some other guests. His performance is to come after the Maggie May singer postponed a string of concerts in the US, due to take place this month, while he recovered from flu. Earlier in the month, in an appearance on the Sidetracked podcast, Emily Eavis outlined the changes that have been made to this year's festival and said music area Shangri-La is 'going full trees and green space' which is 'completely the opposite to anything they've done in the past'. She also said the festival, which has capacity for 210,000 people, has sold 'a few thousand less tickets' this year in a bid to avoid overcrowding. Among the acts expected to draw large crowds this year is alternative pop star Charli XCX, who will perform songs from her genre-defining sixth studio album Brat.
Western Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Reynolds: Port Talbot plant does not meet US rules to get steel tariff exemption
The steel industry faces uncertainty over the US-UK trade deal finalised this month, which slashed tariffs on aerospace and auto sectors, but left levies on steel standing at 25% rather than falling to zero as originally agreed. Negotiations are ongoing to secure the outstanding tariff agreements. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds (Jordan Pettitt/PA) The executive order signed by Mr Trump suggests the US wants assurances on the supply chains for steel intended for export, as well as on the 'nature of ownership' of production facilities. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has insisted the ownership structure of the British Steel plant in Scunthorpe does not need to change to complete the deal with the US. 'The issue with the implementation of the steel agreement is the melt and pour rules, which is the US interpretation of rules of origin around steel,' Mr Reynolds told reporters. He said that applies to the Port Talbot plant, where semi-finished products come into the UK and then go to the mills for processing to keep the business going. 'That doesn't meet their existing implementation of that in the US.' The British Steel plant is controlled directly by the Government, but is still owned by Chinese firm Jingye. Negotiations are ongoing to secure the outstanding tariff agreements (PA) Asked if British Steel's ownership was part of US trade talks, he said it 'comes up in the context of the US (being) very supportive of what we did' to take control of the plant. 'On British Steel, we have to resolve issues of ownership separate to issues around US trade,' he said. The ownership is something that needs to be resolved 'regardless' of the US talks. The Government plans to class Britain's steel and energy sectors as 'nationally important' to UK security under new procurement rules.
Telegraph
39 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Softly, softly schools fuel bad behaviour
Teaching assistant Katherine Hall* has witnessed behaviour in primary schools that has shocked her: pupils turning over desks, climbing on furniture, assaulting their peers and hurling equipment across the class. But what disheartens her most is the lack of action to tackle and change such behaviour when it first manifests as lower-level disruption. 'While most children fall into line, some struggle to adjust to the environment. Instead of teaching them how to adapt and exercising teacher authority when necessary, those poorly behaved children learn they will not receive meaningful consequences for unacceptable and anti-social conduct so they never learn to adapt,' she says. 'Little 'situations' keep getting managed and accommodated,' she continues. 'Then eventually, the child explodes and something bad happens and they get suspended and on and on it goes.' The approach – with labels such as 'child-centred', 'trauma-led' or 'restorative' education – relies on prioritising children's feelings. It means that, rather than nipping poor behaviour in the bud as soon as children start school, it becomes ingrained, says the 45-year-old. The end result is disastrous for pupils. As they get further up the school, and the nature of the misdemeanours become more serious, they are being kicked out. Recent data from the Department of Education shows that suspensions and expulsions at state primary schools are soaring – rising from 22,694 in the spring term 2018/19 to 30,831 at the same point in 2023/24. More than half of exclusions are driven by 'persistent disruptive behaviour'. Other shocking categories include use or threat of use of a weapon, physical assault, damage to property, sexual misconduct, bullying, verbal abuse and inappropriate use of IT, social media or online tech. Some 77 primary pupils – that's four to 11-year-olds – were suspended for behaviour related to drugs and alcohol. The factors behind the rise in this troubling behaviour are myriad and complex. Many on the Left blame the impact of poverty – primary pupils on free school meals are four times more likely to be excluded than other pupils. Others point to family breakdowns; the Department for Education figures show that children from groups with higher proportions of households led by a married couple, such as Asian and African families, have lower exclusion rates than their white and Caribbean-heritage classmates. According to the Centre for Social Justice, children suffering from the consequences of family breakdown are 50 per cent more likely to have behavioural difficulties, anxiety or depression, fail at school, and struggle with relationships. At the same time, pupils are more distracted than they have ever been. According to a 2023 Ofcom report, more than half of eight to 11-year-olds across the UK own a mobile phone. Children's concentration levels have fallen off a cliff, reducing their ability to cope with anything requiring effort and focus in class. Few of them are reading books, preferring instead a diet of three-second TikTok clips, warp-speed gaming or even porn, with half of children being exposed to explicit content by the age of 13, according to a study for the Children's Commissioner for England. Then there is the rise of 'gentle parenting'. While definitions vary, this type of parenting focuses on guiding children's behaviour through empathy and rewards rather than discipline, and has been slammed by Katharine Birbalsingh, head teacher of Michaela Community School in London, who argues that a lack of boundaries can be harmful and stunt development. Also in the mix is the seemingly exponential rise in the number of children with special educational needs (SEN). One of the fastest-growing categories is the catch-all of social, emotional, and behavioural difficulties (SEBD). Schools have to make 'reasonable adjustments', such as special 'sensory' areas, headphones to block out noise, time-outs and reduced timetables. Suspension rates among SEN pupils, with or without a formal diagnosis, are significantly higher than average. At the first sign of behavioural issues, school and parents are in hot pursuit of a diagnosis of some kind, spurred on by social media. The new flavour of the month on parenting sites is rejection sensitive dysphoria (RSD), a term used to describe 'intense emotional reactions to perceived or actual rejection or criticism'. It can manifest as 'emotional dysregulation, low self-esteem and difficulty managing relationships' and is frequently linked to ADHD. It troubles Hall that the approach to children who have 'mislearnt' behaviour is to look for a diagnosis that might take years to secure, if ever, rather than immediately explore how to change the behaviour and train pupils to adapt to more social, formal settings. 'Where I think the line is being blurred is that the misbehaving children are not necessarily SEN,' she says. 'Any child that is running around and refusing to stay put is assumed to need an assessment. Yes, possibly something is going on. But a child's inability to focus and do what they are told is almost immediately filed under the heading of neurodiversity or ADHD. And the behaviour then becomes something that they are deemed not to have any control over.' For Hall, the tragedy is that many of these children will never get 'a formal diagnosis of anything because they don't qualify and will just always be that troublesome child because no-one has set them boundaries'. Indulging bad behaviour Let down as toddlers by parents who struggle to set clear expectations of behaviour or employ effective parenting techniques, some children are then failed by schools which adhere to the principle that 'all behaviour is a form of communication'. The ill-defined concept of 'wellbeing' is superseding the core purpose of education, Hall warns. And in this environment, showing displeasure at a child's behaviour, whether by a stern look, a raised voice or a sanction, is heresy – as is simply telling pupils what to do and expecting them to do it. When bad behaviour is indulged and there are no apparent consequences, other pupils take note. 'Other kids see this as preferential treatment,' says Hall. 'Then everyone thinks that they have a choice: 'if I'm in a good mood I'll stay at this desk, but if I'm bored or annoyed, it doesn't matter if I kick off'. It is actually confusing for children.' At the older end of primary school, behaviour can become violent; while the teacher pretends they are not alarmed and frightened classmates look on. One former teaching assistant from Sussex describes how she was hit, kicked, bitten and sworn at by primary age pupils in the course of her work. She quit when she realised that 'this isn't going to stop'. Matters are made worse, not better, by attempts to teach young children 'emotional literacy' in personal, social and health education (PSHE) lessons. 'It is teachers acting as amateur therapists,' says Hall. 'Saying to children 'This is what anger looks like, this is sadness' is not the same as helping them to manage or 'self-regulate' their feelings, but we assume it is. We teach that all feelings are valid but we know that, in fact, our feelings might be unhelpful, wrong, misplaced or fleeting. What we are doing in classrooms is woolly and ill-thought-out.' What you will never hear, adds Hall, is a teacher saying 'let's put aside our feelings and concentrate on learning'. Therapeutic education The UK's largest teaching union, the National Education Union (NEU), advocates for therapeutic education – a holistic approach to learning that addresses not only academic needs but also emotional and social development. At its core is the belief that everyone is, to some extent, shaped or harmed by their childhood – and that what was once considered a treatment for mental health problems can, in fact, be nurturing for all. In an NEU toolkit for teachers, it says that behaviour management should start with asking 'What has happened to you?' rather than 'What have you done?'. This approach, it claims, creates safe learning environments, and addresses the challenges of student mental health. Its influence on government policy is clear. New guidance proposed by the Department for Education advises teachers, when dealing with violent pupils, to pause and consider whether the children have 'experienced adverse life events or past traumas or neglect,' or may have undiagnosed medical conditions, before resorting to restraint or isolation. To preserve the 'dignity' of out-of-control pupils, staff are also encouraged to think twice before intervening 'in front of their peers.' But some in education have concerns about the efficacy of the therapeutic approach. According to David Didau, a former English teacher and the author of What If Everything You Knew About Education Is Wrong?, the aims of therapeutic education appear antithetical to those of academic education. 'Our preoccupation with therapy and wellbeing makes the normal, abnormal and far from teaching resilience, it seems to make us all more fragile and unhealthily aware of our vulnerability,' he writes. 'It teaches us that we're damaged and that we need professional help to undo this damage.' As Tom Bennett, the Government's lead behaviour adviser puts it, the teacher can become 'a children's entertainer to a room full of child Napoleons, terrified of upsetting their child-emperors'. 'Restorative practice feels right; it appeals to our sense that, with enough discussion, everyone will realise they should do the right thing,' he says. 'But I am weary of working with schools that have leaned so hard into restorative practice they fell over, and need to be rebooted because behaviour is so chaotic.' Hall is far from an advocate of the ultra-strict discipline regimes that lead to silent classrooms, but she points out that in unruly lessons, it is often the autistic child who loses out most. Another casualty of staff time spent sitting in sensory tents or kicking a ball with a child who has acted out are the pupils who need extra academic support – often those from disadvantaged backgrounds. Teaching assistants who are assigned to police the non-SEN 'problem child' have less time to tutor small groups who need extra input to bring them up to the expected level. 'I don't know what the answer is, but my instinctive feeling is that when schools start pandering and going from a position of 'I'm in charge' to negotiating with pupils, the game is lost,' says Hall. 'Children who push against boundaries and go on low-level power trips need discipline more than others, not less. All the child-centred approach achieves is to reinforce unacceptable behaviour and the irony is that it ends up with those children being kicked out of school.'
