
For a single mom worried about keeping her kids fed, weathering inflation means wasting nothing
The thoughts come quickly for Bianca Panelosa – make toilet paper and napkins from old rags, dilute juice and milk for cereal, ask the kids to eat less. The single mother of three, with a fourth on the way, waits in the cold predawn hours outside a food fair in north Houston, brainstorming ways to make ends meet so she can feed her children.
'I'm just trying to work it out,' says Panelosa. 'I'm still thinking.'
Panelosa remembers how she beat the odds before: surviving domestic violence and escaping homelessness after a divorce – which forced her to move back in with her parents. This time, it's tariff wars and rising prices at a time when she can't work.
Two of her children have disabilities. 11-year-old Adan is autistic and has Down syndrome. 6-year-old Andy can't walk upright. Her youngest, 3-year-old Naomy, helps 34-year-old Panelosa tend to her brothers.
The cold wind whistles and another thought flashes – boil tap water to drink instead of using bottled water. She's done it before; she'll do it again to help stretch the $400 she receives in SNAP food stamps every month – which is already not enough.
Cracks are beginning to show in the US economy and President Donald Trump's on-again, off-again threats of tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada are causing confusion for farmers and businesses. Government statistics show consumer spending is down and food prices are going up, all of which can make it harder to afford groceries.
'Buy less, eat less,' says Maria Martha De Leon, a 72-year-old grandmother on a fixed income, of her plans to cope. She arrived at 4:30 a.m. to stake her claim for free food.
Bundled up and sitting in a folding chair, De Leon's face is barely visible behind the scarf tightly wrapped around her head. In the back of her mind: the joy of cooking for her five grandchildren who love eating her soups and rice.
As day breaks, the line now wraps around the building. Many stand with coolers and grocery carts – hoping the bounty they'll receive is worth the wait.
More than 47 million people in the US, including 7.2 million children, lived in homes without enough food for a healthy life in 2023, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) says. More of these 'food insecure' households are in Texas than any other state.
The need for free food appears to be increasing. The Houston Food Bank says there was a 22% increase in distribution in January 2025 compared with the same month last year.
Brian Greene, Houston Food Bank CEO, fears it will get worse. An economic downturn would bring the 'possibility, if not the probability, of a significant increase in need and not having the resources to deal with that,' Greene tells CNN inside the group's 300,000-square foot warehouse filled with rows of food stacked several levels high.
'Food insecurity isn't really about food. Food insecurity is about people not having enough income to meet all their expenses,' explains Greene. 'It's just that food tends to be the most flexible expense.'
As beeping forklifts move pallets of fresh produce from cold storage to waiting 18-wheel trailers, Greene describes a possible nightmare scenario if there are cuts to SNAP, job losses, and disruptions to the USDA's emergency food assistance programs.
'We are getting a lot of concern, a lot of fear coming from neighbors asking us what's going to happen and how will we be able to respond,' says Greene. 'Unfortunately, we do not at this time have good answers.'
An increase in demand coupled with a food supply reduction could be devastating.
'There is no way we could make up the difference,' says Greene.
Greene remembers a time during Trump's first term when there was a US-Canada dairy dispute which resulted in food banks receiving a huge surplus of American-produced milk. It's one of the side effects of tariffs – if they are unable to be sold outside the US, harvests are more likely to be donated. But that's not the kind of boost Greene wants.
'We ended up distributing about 25 tractor trailer loads of milk per week for about a six-month period,' Greene says of a 2017 trade battle with Canada over dairy products. But it's not a windfall he hopes for. 'It's both temporary and again, the scale of it can sound huge until you consider how small it is compared to the overall economy.'
The Houston Food Bank says 49% of its distributed food comes from American farmers, either directly from farmers or through USDA programs. The remainder comes from retailers, wholesalers, and manufacturers. We saw multiple one-ton sacks of Canadian-grown pinto beans and dozens of various Mexican-grown fruits and vegetables – a sign cross-border policies could impact supply.
'We actually do pull a lot of produce from Mexico,' says Greene. If there are interruptions in produce coming from south of the border, the organization's ability to serve could be impacted. But so far, the Houston Food Bank says, there's been no supply chain interruptions.
While inventory remains steady at the Houston Food Bank, demand has increased. Houston non-profit BakerRipley said there was a 13% increase in attendees from February to March in at least one of its food fairs.
'We hear they're not getting food stamps, they lost their job, they're ill, (and) they don't have transportation,' says Rosalva Hernandez, BakerRipley's manager of community development, standing in a room filled with people waiting for food.
During February's food fair, 912 adults and children received supplies, in March that number jumped to 1,030.
Hernandez wipes away tears as she watches volunteers hand out fresh produce and bread to familiar faces. She grew up in this community. Her parents live 5 minutes away.
'These are my people. They're my neighbors,' she says. 'This is my family.'
The organization has budgeted for 250 people to be served, but if more turn up Hernandez says she will ask them to wait to see what is left.
This day, the Houston Food Bank's 18-wheeler arrives with 1,910 heads of broccoli, 793 loaves of bread, 960 bananas, 924 heads of cabbage, 1,676 tomatoes, 1,200 onions, and 20 big sacks filled with 5-pound bags of potatoes. No proteins arrive this time, which sometimes includes peanut butter.
The sun is up when Panelosa's number is called. She circles the semitruck as volunteers hand her bag after bag of vegetables. She smiles as she realizes she can make mashed potatoes as requested by her son Andy.
She formulates the dinner menu in her mind as she drives away: fried fish, white rice, mashed potatoes, broccoli, carrots, bread, sliced tomatoes and banana-flavored water. She just needs to buy catfish at the grocery store.
At home, she opens her refrigerator and cupboards to show us all the items she receives from food banks she visits around the area. Cream cheese, mushrooms, butter, jelly, juice, tuna, canned chicken and salmon, beans, fruit cups, and eggs.
Worried about tariffs, she's stocking up food from food banks and consuming items based on their expiration dates – what's about to expire is eaten first. Her mantra: waste nothing. And she's grateful for her parents, her children, and her resiliency – which means getting creative when faced with adversity.
It's that creative spirit that has her thinking about turning old clothes into toilet paper and napkins if things get tougher. Bianca says there's no shame in being poor and caring for family.
'I'm not embarrassed,' she says.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
26 minutes ago
- Newsweek
America's Most - And Least
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The United States' most and least independent states have been revealed in a new study. The rankings, compiled by the personal finance company WalletHub, reveal that the five most independent states are Utah, Colorado, Virginia, Idaho and Hawaii. In contrast, the least independent states are Louisiana, Kentucky, Mississippi, West Virginia and Alaska. The findings compared the 50 states based on five sources of dependency: consumer finances, the government, the job market, international trade, and personal vices. Why It Matters The findings come amid the threat of major benefits cuts as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which has been passed by House Republicans and is currently under consideration in the Senate. The bill in its current form calls for a reduction in federal funding for Medicaid by $863 billion and for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistant Program (SNAP) by $295 billion over 10 years. The bill could significantly alter to what extent states are able to rely on the federal government for support over numerous years. What To Know WalletHub's analysis revealed that Utah is the most independent state due to its low unemployment rate of 3.2 percent, meaning a low percentage of people rely on unemployment income. It has the second-highest median income in the U.S. (over $88,000) and the second-lowest share of people in poverty. Utah also has very few people who receive government benefits, including only 5.3 percent of people who receive SNAP or foods stamps, and 1.6 percent who receive public assistance income. The state also has the lowest share of recorded binge drinking or smoking across the U.S. Colorado is the second-most independent state, in part due to the good money management of its residents. Only 16 percent of Coloradans spend more money than they make, the second-lowest percentage in the U.S, according to the findings. Colorado also has a very low percentage of jobs supported by exported goods, with exports to other countries making up a very low percentage of its GDP. Virginia is the third-most independent state, in part due its low unemployment rate of just 3.1 percent and the highest median income in the country. Only 9.9 percent of Virginians are living in poverty. The state also has the third-lowest share of binge drinkers, along with low rates of smoking and opioid use. In contrast, the states that are most dependent on the government are Alaska, West Virginia, New Mexico, Mississippi and Kentucky. The states with the highest vice dependencies are Mississippi, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana and Tennessee. And the states that are most financially dependent are Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma and New Mexico. What People Are Saying Kenneth F. Warren, political science professor emeritus at Saint Louis University, told WalletHub: "Financial independence for most adults will come from holding down permanent jobs with guaranteed incomes and benefits. Approaching a bank for a loan for a house purchase will likely prove problematic for those chasing gig jobs since future earnings are difficult to predict." Dewey M. Clayton, political science professor at the University of Louisville, told WalletHub: "Some states do not generate as much income as others, and they receive more tax dollars than they send to Washington because they are poorer. This allows the federal government to assist states in providing poorer states with the necessary funding for goods and services for their citizens... the national government has the responsibility of ensuring the well-being of all its citizens, irrespective of their income."


New York Times
3 hours ago
- New York Times
Trump Administration Live Updates: Senate Republicans Push Ahead With Plan to Cut Food Stamps
Economists have found the Republicans' signature legislation is likely to deliver great benefits to the rich while taking away benefits like food aid from the poor. Senate Republicans said on Thursday that they would forge ahead with a plan to slash federal food assistance to the poor, after they devised a workaround that would allow them to cut the program to help pay for their sprawling package of tax cuts. The proposal, which would force states to shoulder new costs for providing food stamps, is part of a larger set of changes targeting federal safety-net programs that may result in millions of lower-income Americans losing access to aid. For decades, the federal government has shouldered the primary financial burden for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or S.N.A.P., which provides about 42 million low-income Americans on average with monthly food benefits. Its supporters say the payments are essential, with roughly one in seven Americans reporting inconsistent access to food in 2023, government data show. But Republicans insist S.N.A.P. is riddled with waste, fraud and abuse, and they have sought to scale back its benefits as part of the package of tax cuts they are crafting with the input and support of President Trump. The House version of that measure, which party lawmakers adopted in May, aimed to impose new work requirements on recipients while seeing states finance a potentially significant portion of the program. A similar push in the Senate quickly ran into procedural roadblocks, after the chamber's parliamentarian ruled last week that the proposal to cut S.N.A.P. did not comport with the special budgetary rules that allow Republicans to fast-track their domestic policy legislation. That, in effect, meant it could not be included in the bill. But Senate Republicans said on Thursday that they had retooled some of the mechanics of their plan, ultimately earning the parliamentarian's approval. Much as before, the new approach would shift a percentage of the cost of providing S.N.A.P. benefits to the states based on the percentage of erroneous payments they report in a given fiscal year. But Republicans primarily tweaked how that rate of payment would be computed under the system, which would take effect in 2028. Republicans did not release the full details of the changes. Senator John Boozman, a Republican from Arkansas who leads the chamber's agriculture committee, said in a statement that the new plan 'encourages states to adopt better practices, reduce error rates, be better stewards of taxpayer dollars, and prioritize the resources for those who truly need it.' Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, the top Democrat on the panel, said in a statement that the proposal would 'cut food assistance for millions of Americans to give tax breaks to billionaires.' The battle over S.N.A.P. nonetheless has emerged as a significant political touchstone for Republicans, as economists have found that the party's signature legislation is likely to deliver great benefits to the rich while taking away from the poor. Both Mr. Trump and his Republican allies in Congress have rejected these findings, and some of the party's most conservative lawmakers have sought even steeper cuts to federal programs, including Medicaid, though some of their proposals have faced their own roadblocks with the Senate's rule-keepers. Studying the House version of the bill, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office previously found that the full suite of Republican changes to S.N.A.P. might save $285 billion over the next 9 years, offsetting a small fraction of a bill that is expected to add more than $3 trillion to the federal debt over that period. But analysts also determined that the state funding requirement, if implemented, could result in the reduction or elimination of benefits for 1.3 million poor Americans in an average month. Some states could even opt to stop offering S.N.A.P. entirely if their budgets could not afford the new expense, the report found. The Congressional Budget Office has yet to produce a fiscal analysis of the Senate bill. Earlier this week, Gov. Josh Stein of North Carolina, a Democrat, led 23 states in urging Republicans in Congress to preserve existing federal funding for food stamps, warning that their states may not be able to cover additional costs. 'Cuts to S.N.A.P. will mean that millions of Americans won't get the food they need for their families,' they wrote. 'And it will result in too many Americans forced to survive rather than thrive.'


New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump administration pushes back on NJ town moving to seize 175-year-old family farm via eminent domain
A longtime family farm in Cranbury, New Jersey, is at risk of being seized by the town through eminent domain. The situation with the farm owned by brothers Christopher and Andy Henry, which has been in their family for 175 years, recently drew notice from US Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins. Rollins said on X last week that she was 'looking into this situation immediately,' adding, 'We must protect family farms at all costs. 'Whether the Maudes, the Henrys or others whom we will soon announce, the Biden-style government takeover of our family farms is over,' she wrote in a subsequent June 17 post. 'While this particular case is a city eminent domain issue, we @usda are exploring every legal option to help.' Rollins also said she had been 'on the phone' with Andy Henry. The farm is under threat of seizure by Cranbury Township after a town committee signed off on a measure that would pave the way for eminent domain seizure, reported. Cranbury Township is looking at possibly building state-mandated affordable housing on a large portion of the farm's land, according to the outlet. The Henry brothers have reportedly been fighting to prevent the seizure of the farm for months. 5 Christopher and Andy Henry's family has owned the farm for 175 years. Henry family The family farm, which is now leased out for cattle farming, has belonged to Christopher and Andy Henry for over a dozen years. They have poured $200,000 into the property and declined offers of up to $30 million made by developers in that time, reported. While advocating to keep their farm, the Henry brothers have said its proximity to warehouses would not make it a good spot to construct affordable housing and that there are better sites elsewhere. 5 Cranbury is a small town located in Middlesex County. Google Earth 5 The farm is currently leased out for cattle farming. Fox News Their attorney, Timothy Dugan, has also argued the move contradicts the town's work to preserve agricultural land in the area. FOX Business reached out to Cranbury Mayor Lisa Knierim and Dugan for comment. Andy Henry told FOX Business correspondent Jeff Flock that the town's move 'totally shocked us.' Officials have indicated a fair market price would be offered to the Henry family in the event of eminent domain, per 5 Andy Henry told Fox Business that the town's move 'totally shocked us.' Fox News Asked about that, Andy Henry told Flock his family 'don't even want to sell it' but said the town 'would offer us a lot less than a warehouse developer would.' Knierim is seeking an eminent domain takeover of the farm because it would stave off developers pursuing expensive 'builder's remedy lawsuits,' according She has also said no one 'is in favor of eminent domain' or 'wants to see a farm disappear' in the past, reported. 5 US Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins pushed back on the town trying to take the farm. @SecRollins/X Andy Henry told Flock that Rollins 'said she'd make a few calls' when she spoke with him. 'She did acknowledge that this is not a federal issue, but she's trying to help in any way she could,' he said. Cranbury Township is located in north-central New Jersey. The town itself is home to several thousand people, with Middlesex County, the county it falls within, having a larger population of over 890,000.