Tens of thousands flee Gaza City after Israel warns of major offensive
Tens of thousands of Palestinians were fleeing eastern parts of Gaza City in the north of the territory on Sunday after Israel warned of a major offensive.
The messages on social media from the Israel Defense Forces warned of 'military operations [that] will escalate, intensify, and extend westward to the city centre to destroy the capabilities of terrorist organisations' and directed those living in several crowded neighbourhoods to al-Mawasi, a coastal area much further south that is already overcrowded and has very limited facilities.
Witnesses described scenes of chaos as entire families tried to pack their remaining belongings, tents and meagre stocks of foods on to donkey carts, bicycles, improvised pickup trucks and cars.
Huge numbers of Palestinians displaced from homes or camps to the north of Gaza City moved there after renewed Israeli operations and clashes with Hamas since a fragile ceasefire collapsed in March.
The warnings from Israel came after days of Israeli airstrikes and shelling across Gaza that have killed hundreds.
Gaza's civil defence agency said 23 Palestinians had been killed on Sunday by Israeli strikes, including at least three children.
Mahmoud Bassal, a spokesperson for the agency, said two children were killed in a strike on their home in Zaytun, just to the east of Gaza City, in the early morning.
A resident in nearby Jabaliya, Ahmed Arar, 60, said his family's house had been destroyed after they received a warning it would be bombed from a person identifying himself as an Israeli army officer.
The Israeli military said it was not able to comment on the reported incidents but said it was fighting 'to dismantle Hamas military capabilities'.
The 20-month war in Gaza was triggered by Hamas's 7 October 2023 attack, during which militants killed 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducted 250.
Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed at least 56,500 people in Gaza, again mostly civilians.
The Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, said on Sunday that his country's 'victory' over Iran in their 12-day war had created 'opportunities', including for freeing hostages held in Gaza.
'Many opportunities have opened up now following this victory. First of all, to rescue the hostages,' Netanyahu said. 'Of course, we will also have to solve the Gaza issue, to defeat Hamas, but I estimate that we will achieve both goals.'
Sign up to First Thing
Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
The main group representing hostages' families welcomed 'the fact that after 20 months, the return of the hostages has finally been designated as the top priority by the prime minister'.
Meanwhile there has been rising concern over how food is being distributed in Gaza. Hundreds of desperate Palestinians have been killed over the past month as they make their way to distribution sites and after gathering at points where they expect convoys of aid trucks will be forced to stop, local hospitals and officials have said.
After claiming victory in the war against Iran that ended with a ceasefire on Tuesday, the Israeli military said it was focusing on the 'primary front' in Gaza, where Palestinian militants still hold 50 hostages, of whom more than half are thought to be dead.
Donald Trump used social media on Sunday to call for a swift end to the war in Gaza. 'Make the deal in Gaza, get the hostages back,' the US president posted on his Truth Social platform.
Indirect negotiations between Israel and Hamas, brokered by Qatar and Egypt, are continuing but without obvious sign of any breakthrough. Many analysts say only direct pressure from Trump or Netanyahu will bring about a new ceasefire as neither Israel nor Hamas currently look likely to make the necessary concessions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
42 minutes ago
- Sky News
Government accused of 'stark' contradiction over position on Gaza genocide allegations
The government has won a long-running legal challenge about its decision to continue allowing the sale of spare parts for F-35 fighter jets to Israel, while suspending other arms licences over concerns about international humanitarian law in Gaza. But a key part of its case has highlighted mixed messaging about its position on the risk of genocide in Gaza - and intensified calls for ministers to publish their own assessment on the issue. PM braced for pivotal vote - politics latest Lawyers acting for the government told judges "the evidence available does not support a finding of genocide" and "the government assessment was that…there was no serious risk of genocide occurring". Therefore, they argued, continuing to supply the F-35 components did not put the UK at risk of breaching the Genocide Convention. This assessment has never been published or justified by ministers in parliament, despite numerous questions on the issue. Some MPs argue its very existence contrasts with the position repeatedly expressed by ministers in parliament - that the UK is unable to give a view on allegations of genocide in Gaza, because the question is one for the international courts. For example, just last week Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner told PMQs "it is a long-standing principle that genocide is determined by competent international courts and not by governments". 0:42 'The UK cannot sit on our hands' Green MP Ellie Chowns said: "The government insists only an international court can judge whether genocide is occurring in Gaza, yet have somehow also concluded there is 'no serious risk of genocide' in Gaza - and despite my urging, refuse to publish the risk assessments which lead to this decision. "Full transparency on these risk assessments should not be optional; it is essential for holding the government to account and stopping further atrocity. "While Labour tie themselves in knots contradicting each other, families are starving, hospitals lie in ruins, and children are dying. "The UK cannot sit on our hands waiting for an international court verdict when our legal duty under the Genocide Convention compels us to prevent genocide from occurring, not merely seek justice after the fact." 'Why are these assessments being made?' "This contradiction at the heart of the government's position is stark," said Zarah Sultana MP, an outspoken critic of Labour's approach to the conflict in Gaza, who now sits as an independent after losing the party whip last summer. "Ministers say it's not for them to determine genocide, that only international courts can do so. Yet internal 'genocide assessments' have clearly been made and used to justify continuing arms exports to Israel. "If they have no view, why are these assessments being made? And if they do, why refuse to share them with parliament? This Labour government, in opposition, demanded the Tories publish their assessments. Now in office, they've refused to do the same." 8:04 Judges at the High Court ultimately ruled the case was over such a "sensitive and political issue" it should be a matter for the government, "which is democratically accountable to parliament and ultimately to the electorate, not the court". Dearbhla Minogue, a senior lawyer at the Global Legal Action Network, and a solicitor for Al-Haq, the Palestinian human rights group which brought the case, said: "This should not be interpreted as an endorsement of the government, but rather a restrained approach to the separation of powers. "The government's disgraceful assessment that there is no risk of genocide has therefore evaded scrutiny in the courts, and as far as we know it still stands." What is the government's position? Government lawyers argued the decision not to ban the export of F-35 parts was due to advice from Defence Secretary John Healey, who said a suspension would impact the whole F-35 programme and have a "profound impact on international peace and security". The UK supplies F-35 component parts as a member of an international defence programme which produces and maintains the fighter jets. As a customer of that programme, Israel can order from the pool of spare parts. Labour MP Richard Burgon said the ruling puts the government under pressure to clarify its position. "This court ruling is very clear: only the government and parliament can decide if F-35 fighter jet parts - that can end up in Israel - should be sold," he said. "So the government can no longer pass the buck: it can stop these exports, or it can be complicit in Israel's genocide in Gaza. "On many issues they say it's not for the government to decide, but it's one for the international courts. This washing of hands will no longer work." 0:55 Israel has consistently rejected any allegations of genocide. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu branded a recent UN report on the issue biased and antisemitic. "Instead of focusing on the crimes against humanity and war crimes committed by the Hamas terrorist organisation… the United Nations once again chooses to attack the state of Israel with false accusations," he said in a statement. 3:06 The UK government has not responded to requests for comment over its contrasting messaging to parliament and the courts over allegations of genocide. But in response to the judgement, a spokesperson said: "The court has upheld this government's thorough and lawful decision-making on this matter. "This shows that the UK operates one of the most robust export control regimes in the world. We will continue to keep our defence export licensing under careful and continual review. "On day one of this Government, the foreign secretary ordered a review into Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law (IHL). "The review concluded that there was a clear risk that UK exports for the IDF (Israel Defence Forces) in the Gaza conflict might be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of IHL.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Israeli airstrike on popular Gaza beachside cafe leaves at least 30 dead
At least 30 people including women, children and a local journalist were killed on 30 June in an Israeli airstrike on a beachfront cafe in Gaza City, medics have said. Israeli missiles killed at least 60 people across Gaza in some of the heaviest attacks in weeks as Israeli officials were due in Washington for a new ceasefire push by Donald Trump. Israeli tanks pushed into the eastern areas of Zeitoun suburb in Gaza City and shelled several areas in the north, while aircraft bombed at least four schools after ordering hundreds of families sheltering inside to leave, residents said
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Iranian cyberattacks remain a threat despite ceasefire, US officials warn
A ceasefire between Iran and Israel has not ended the threat of cyberattacks from hacking groups supportive of Tehran, the FBI and federal cybersecurity officials warned Monday. In a public bulletin, the authorities warned that hacking groups affiliated with or supportive of Tehran may still seek to disrupt or disable critical infrastructure systems in the U.S. such as utilities, transportation and economic hubs. Hackers may also target defense contractors or other American companies with ties to Israel, the agencies said. 'Despite a declared ceasefire and ongoing negotiations towards a permanent solution, Iranian-affiliated cyber actors and hacktivist groups may still conduct malicious cyber activity,' the agencies warned. The warning of continued cyberthreats after a halt to conventional warfare reflects the often opaque nature of cyber conflict. Hacking groups may have only loose ties to a nation state, and may seek to retaliate as an alternative to traditional military action. The bulletin outlined recommendations, including the use of regular software updates and strong password management systems to shore up digital defenses. Hackers backing Tehran have targeted U.S. banks, defense contractors and energy companies following American strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities — but so far have not caused widespread disruptions. While it lacks the technical abilities of China or Russia, Iran has long used its more limited capabilities to steal secrets, score political points or frighten opponents. Analysts have tied some of these activities to groups working on behalf of Iran's military and intelligence agencies. But in other instances, the groups appear to act independently.
