Pharaoh's owner's attorneys argue he has right to jailhouse interviews
BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) — Attorneys for the convicted owner of Pharaoh's Gentlemen's Club, Peter Gerace, said the government's effort to block him from doing jailhouse interviews would be an 'unwarranted restraint' on his First Amendment rights.
On Feb. 3, federal prosecutors requested a gag order on Gerace after learning he requested interviews with reporters at the Chautauqua County Jail, where he remains in custody.
Their government's concerns focused on three issues: Gerace could violate a protective order that safeguards sensitive information, he allegedly planned to discuss matters about the presiding judge and prosecutors, and he could use the media to 'threaten or harass victims and witnesses' or use coded messages for nefarious purposes.
Prosecutors said a jailhouse interview with Gerace would pose an 'unacceptable risk to the sordid history of witness retaliation and obstruction committed by, and at the behest of, Gerace.'
But Gerace's lawyers mostly disagreed.
Eric Soehnlein and Mark Foti, Gerace's attorneys, said he has a First Amendment right to speak with the media as long as he follows United States Marshal Service (USMS) policies, and avoids violating a protective order that safeguards sensitive information.
The USMS policy requires either Gerace or the reporter to get permission from various people, including the presiding judge, the federal prosecutors, his attorneys, and the Chautauqua County jail.
'To the extent the government identifies legitimate concerns regarding Gerace's potential statements to the media, the proposed gag order does nothing to legitimately address those concerns,' Gerace's attorneys said in their response filed Tuesday.
On Dec. 27, 2024, a jury convicted Gerace on eight of nine charges, including sex and drug trafficking, maintaining Pharaoh's as a drug-involved business, and two counts of witness tampering. He faces a maximum sentence of life in prison.
Specifically, the jury found the evidence indicated Gerace exploited drug-addicted exotic dancers to traffic them to friends and affluent customers, allowed rampant drug dealing at the club, and ignored heavy drug use among employees and patrons. The jury also found Gerace guilty of bribing former DEA agent Joseph Bongiovanni, a childhood friend, in exchange for inside information that shielded Gerace and associates from law enforcement investigations for at least a decade.
On Oct. 10, a separate jury convicted Bongiovanni on seven of 11 charges, including conspiracy to defraud the United States and distribute drugs, and four counts of obstruction of justice. He faces up to 20 years in prison. But the jury did not convict Bongiovanni of accepting bribes.
Gerace's attorneys said it is unclear what the media wants to discuss with Gerace, but prosecutors made assumptions about what they believe he might talk about.
'The government may not like the content of the speech, but the speech itself is permissible. It cannot be lawfully restrained,' his attorneys said.
News 4 Investigates had a brief phone conversation with Gerace prior to the request for the gag order. He said he wanted to discuss testimony from witnesses, alleged ethical transgressions by prosecutors, government funds provided to some witnesses for rent and other expenses, and potential sentencing deals some hoped for by testifying.
For example, Gerace's former cellmate, Kevin Hughes, had a 'cooperation agreement' with the government.
On Dec. 10, Hughes testified he agreed to share details of conversations he had with Gerace in the hope of getting a reduced sentence.
Hughes also testified Gerace talked about sex parties at his Clarence home, referenced a dancer who overdosed, and told him, 'You'd be surprised what they'd do for a little bit of product.'
The trial included lengthy debate over whether Hughes and another inmate should be allowed to testify. Gerace's attorneys implied the inmates intentionally sought information from Gerace at the behest of federal prosecutors.
Ultimately, the judge allowed both inmates to testify.
Hughes pleaded guilty in May 2022 to narcotics conspiracy by assisting a drug-trafficking operation. State troopers searched his car and seized more than 19 pounds of methamphetamine, 7 pounds of fentanyl, 5 pounds of cocaine, and cannabis products. He faced between 20 years and life in prison.
Almost a month after Gerace's conviction, U.S. District Court Judge John Sinatra sentenced Hughes to time served (17 months) and two years of supervised probation.
Gerace's attorneys said the government cannot restrain him from making comments about witnesses who testified against him, because 'the government chose to elicit witness testimony in open court, and the witnesses chose to testify in open court — whether it be for pecuniary gain or for benefits in their own cases.'
Prosecutors have until Friday night to respond. Thereafter, U.S. District Court Judge Lawrence Vilardo could schedule oral arguments or render a decision.
Dan Telvock is an award-winning investigative producer and reporter who has been part of the News 4 team since 2018. See more of his work here and follow him on Twitter.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
L.A. D.A. and Sheriff file new charges against violent protesters
Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman and Sheriff Robert Luna announced a wave of criminal charges Tuesday against men and women accused of violent acts during recent protests in downtown L.A. The charges underscore a sharp distinction officials are drawing between peaceful demonstrators and those engaging in illegal behavior under the guise of protest. 'We will fiercely protect the rights of Angelenos to peacefully assemble,' Hochman said in a news conference to announce the charges. 'But once someone crosses into violence, destruction, or assault, they are no longer a protester – they are a criminal.' Hochman indicated prosecutors expect 'dozens and dozens of additional cases' to be filed in the weeks ahead as authorities review video and social media evidence. He highlighted five cases during the announcement, with charges ranging from assault on officers to burglary, vandalism, and weapons possession: Juan Rodriguez of Gardena is charged with felony assault and resisting arrest for allegedly distributing and throwing commercial-grade fireworks at police, injuring at least one officer. He faces more than six years in prison. Luis and Georgina Ruíz-Roberyaro are accused of driving motorcycles into officers at a skirmish line, causing injuries. Each could face six years and four months in prison. Tammy Paulk and Raven Mitchell face felony burglary and grand theft charges after allegedly looting a Nike store on South Broadway. Ulysses Sanchez, a convicted felon and alleged 'third-striker,' is accused of reckless driving and weapons possession. He faces 25 years to life in prison if convicted. Christopher Gonzalez and Jocelyn Johnson are charged with felony conspiracy and vandalism after allegedly defacing an apartment complex and the Hall of Justice. Luna emphasized law enforcement's readiness and resolve. 'We have no tolerance for anarchists who come to create chaos. If you hurt our officers, destroy property, or assault others, you will be prosecuted,' he said. Luna also noted the support of the U.S. Attorney for possible federal charges. Both officials reiterated that the vast majority of L.A. residents and protesters remained peaceful. Hochman added that investigators are reviewing social media and video evidence, warning that arrests will continue. 'If you committed a crime and think you got away with it — think again,' he said. For those who wish to express their views peacefully, both leaders affirmed their full support for First Amendment rights. 'But violence will never be tolerated,' Luna said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


The Hill
40 minutes ago
- The Hill
Leavitt slams ‘stupid question' about Trump's threat to protesters
The White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt slammed a question from a reporter on Wednesday when asked if President Trump would support having 'peaceful' protestors at the Saturday military parade in Washington, D.C. 'So if there were peaceful protests on Saturday for the military parade, President Trump would allow that,' NOTUS' Jasmine Wright asked on Wednesday during the White House press briefing. 'Of course the president supports peaceful protests. What a stupid question,' Leavitt said in response. Moments prior, Wright had mentioned Trump's warning to potential protestors who were planning to be at the massive Army parade in the nation's capital, saying they would be met with 'very big force.' 'If there's any protester wants to come out, they will be met with very big force. For those people that want to protest, they will be met with very big force. And I haven't even heard about a protest,' Trump said on Tuesday. Wright asked Leavitt if she could 'clarify what kind of protest President Trump does support or find acceptable.' 'President absolutely supports peaceful protests. He supports the First Amendment. He supports the right of Americans to make their voices heard,' the White House press secretary said. 'He does not support violence of any kind. He does not support assaulting law enforcement officers who are simply trying to do their jobs,' Leavitt added, referring to the ongoing protests in Los Angeles. The protests in the City of Agents began after Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids at several businesses. The demonstrations spread around the federal buildings where those detained are believed to be held. In response, Trump deployed the National Guard troops and the Marines to help halt the protests, decisions that were opposed by Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D) and California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D). 'It's very clear for the president what he supports and what he does not. Unfortunately for Democrats, that line has not been clear and they've allowed this unrest and this violence to continue, and the President has had to step in,' Leavitt said on Wednesday.


San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Families file suit challenging Arkansas law that requires Ten Commandments be posted in classrooms
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — Seven Arkansas families filed a lawsuit Wednesday challenging an upcoming state requirement that public school classrooms have posted copies of the Ten Commandments, saying the new law will violate their constitutional rights. The federal lawsuit challenges a measure Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed into law earlier this year, similar to a requirement enacted by Louisiana and one that Texas' governor has said he'll sign. The Arkansas law takes effect in August and requires the Ten Commandments to be prominently displayed in public school classrooms and libraries. 'Permanently posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom and library — rendering them unavoidable — unconstitutionally pressures students into religious observance, veneration, and adoption of the state's favored religious scripture,' the lawsuit said. The suit was filed on behalf of the families by the American Civil Liberties Union, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State and the Freedom from Religion Foundation. The lawsuit names four school districts in northwest Arkansas — Fayetteville, Bentonville, Siloam Springs and Springdale — as defendants. A spokesperson for Fayetteville schools said the district would not comment on pending litigation, while the other three districts did not immediately respond to requests for comment. A spokesperson for Attorney General Tim Griffin said his office was reviewing the lawsuit and considering options. Attorneys for the families, who are Jewish, Unitarian Universalist or nonreligious, said they planned to ask the federal judge in Fayetteville for a preliminary injunction blocking the law's enforcement. The attorneys say the law violates longstanding Supreme Court precedent and the families' First Amendment rights. 'By imposing a Christian-centric translation of the Ten Commandments on our children for nearly every hour of every day of their public-school education, this law will infringe on our rights as parents and create an unwelcoming and religiously coercive school environment for our children," Samantha Stinson, one of the plaintiffs, said in a news release. Louisiana was the first state to enact such a requirement, and a federal judge blocked the measure before it was to take effect Jan 1. Proponents of Louisiana's law say that ruling only applies to the five school boards listed in the suit, but The Associated Press is unaware of any posters being displayed in schools as the litigation continues.