New Mexico State will opt into House vs. NCAA settlement, acting AD Amber Burdge says
New Mexico State will opt into the House vs. NCAA settlement, which sets forth a new multi-billion dollar revenue-sharing agreement that allows schools to compensate student-athletes directly, acting athletic director Amber Burdge confirmed to the Las Cruces Sun-News on Friday.
Schools across the country had a deadline of March 1 to choose whether or not to opt into the agreement, made in May 2024, which Judge Claudia Wilken of the United States District Court for Northern District of California granted preliminary approval of on Oct. 7, 2024. A final approval hearing is scheduled for April 7, 2025, and it's widely expected Wilken will officially approve the settlement.
Burdge was approached for comment on whether or not NM State would opt into the settlement on Friday morning, and a university athletics spokesman provided this statement via email on her behalf on Friday evening:
"NM State is proud to opt in to the terms of the House v. NCAA settlement, as this is the right decision for our institution and, most importantly, our student-athletes," Burdge said in her statement to the Sun-News. "Their hard work, dedication, and contributions to our university deserve to be recognized and supported in meaningful ways.
"This decision strengthens our commitment to providing the best possible experience for our student-athletes on and off the field by ensuring they have the resources and opportunities they need to thrive. As the landscape of collegiate athletics continues to evolve, we are embracing progress in a way that reinforces our investment in student-athlete success while positioning NM State Athletics to remain competitive at the highest level."
More: NMSU can't survive offensive barrage from Weston, Middle Tennessee in 5th CUSA home loss
More: NMSU acting AD Amber Burdge outlines goals, ambitions for Aggie sports
The House vs. NCAA settlement outlines name, image and likeness payment methods for current and former student-athletes. For former student-athletes, it amounts to damages totaling $2.78 billion over the next 10 years at approximately $277 million annually. Group of Five schools like NM State are responsible for approximately 10% of the NCAA's total damages.
The settlement is a culmination of an ongoing legal battle since 2020, when then-collegiate athletes Grant House and Sedona Prince sued the NCAA and the then-Power Five Conferences — the ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12 and SEC — for NIL damages and an injunction to force the NCAA to remove restrictions on revenue-sharing from broadcast television rights.
In addition to the $2.78 billion in back payments over 10 years, all parties agreed to the creation of a revenue-sharing model for power conferences. Power conference schools were required to opt-in, while other schools and conferences — like NM State and Conference USA — were given the option to join the new structure.
For current student-athletes, the settlement mandates NIL deals not established through the university and valued at $600 or more must be reported to a third-party clearinghouse to ensure compliance with market value standards. The settlement also implements roster caps for sports, such as 105 players for football and 15 for basketball.
The settlement's terms, if approved, will come into effect at the start of the 2025-26 academic year on July 1.
Burdge told the Sun-News that NM State is still working out the exact details of how the university will distribute revenue to its student-athletes.
Schools are allowed to pay a maximum of $20.5 million to student-athletes, mirroring an estimated share of 22% of annual revenue generated by Power Four schools. A model outlined in the House settlement details how the $20.5 million can be given to athletes, including 75% to football players, 15% to men's basketball players, 5% to women's basketball players and the remaining 10% to all other athletes. This accounts for $13.5 million for football, $2.7 million and $900,000 for women's basketball players.
However, NM State is unlikely to give $20.5 million to its athletes due to its financial situation within athletics. USA TODAY reported NM State's athletics revenue at $30,350,192 for the 2021-22 fiscal year, while data from the Equity in Athletics Data Analysis shows NM State's revenue as $35,828,331 for the 2022-23 fiscal year.
Burdge informed the Sun-News that the exact totals of what will be given to student-athletes and teams will be worked out in the coming months. She also said the total amount given to all student-athletes and how many scholarships the university can add for the next academic year has not been determined yet.
The settlement marks a fundamental shift in how schools will approach NIL-related matters, and ones that NM State's new NIL leaders will have take on. A-Mountain Sports, NM State's official NIL collective, recently gained new leaders last November in Paul Smith, Luke Smith and Jordan Banegas. The trio replaced Paul Grindstaff, who joined Vanderbilt's Anchor Impact NIL collective in October.
The House settlement is also a driving factor behind the NM State's $137 million endowment request for women's sports. Former NM State athletic director Mario Moccia told the Sun-News back in October about his belief that women's sports could get left behind due to the settlement, and the endowment request was a proactive move to make sure female Aggie athletes would be taken care of. Concerns over women's sports funding and making sure the settlement complies with Title IX have posed an obstacle for approval.
"There's just a fear with a school like ours that is really living paycheck to paycheck... that women's sports might get left behind," Moccia told the Sun-News in October 2024. "We wanted to be a little proactive."
This article originally appeared on Las Cruces Sun-News: Acting AD Burdge says NMSU will opt into House vs. NCAA settlement

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
See how players qualified for the US Open at Oakmont
(The Associated Press) (The Associated Press) OAKMONT, Pa. (AP) — The field for the 125th U.S. Open on June 12-15 at Oakmont Country Club. Players listed only in the first category for which they are eligible: U.S. Open champions (10 years) Bryson DeChambeau, Wyndham Clark, Matt Fitzpatrick, Jon Rahm, Gary Woodland, Brooks Koepka, Dustin Johnson, Jordan Spieth. Advertisement Top 10 and ties from the 2024 U.S. Open Rory McIlroy, Patrick Cantlay, Tony Finau, Matthieu Pavon, Hideki Matsuyama, Russell Henley, Xander Schauffele, Sam Burns, Corey Conners, Davis Thompson. 2024 U.S. Senior Open champion Richard Bland. 2024 U.S. Amateur champion and runner-up a-Jose Luis Ballester, a-Noah Kent. 2024 U.S. Junior Amateur champion a-Trevor Gutschewski. 2024 U.S. Mid-Amateur champion a-Evan Beck. Masters champions (5 years) Scottie Scheffler. PGA champions (5 years) Justin Thomas, Phil Mickelson. British Open champions (5 years) Brian Harman, Cameron Smith, Collin Morikawa. 2024 Tour Championship field Advertisement Adam Scott, Sungjae Im, Shane Lowry, Viktor Hovland, Taylor Pendrith, Ludvig Aberg, Robert MacIntyre, Tommy Fleetwood, Keegan Bradley, Byeong Hun An, Aaron Rai, Akshay Bhatia, Chris Kirk, Sepp Straka, Christiaan Bezuidenhout, Tom Hoge. Points leader from the 2024 Korn Ferry Tour (regular season and postseason combined) Matt McCarty. The top 60 players from the May 19 world golf ranking Maverick McNealy, Harris English, Justin Rose, Tyrrell Hatton, Daniel Berger, J.J. Spaun, Min Woo Lee, Thomas Detry, Jason Day, J.T. Poston, Andrew Novak, Lucas Glover, Denny McCarthy, Nick Taylor, Stephan Jaeger, Tom Kim, Max Greyserman, Mackenzie Hughes, Jhonattan Vegas, Nico Echavarria, Ben Griffin, Davis Riley, Michael Kim, Patrick Reed, Nick Dunlap, Si Woo Kim, Joe Highsmith. Advertisement Top 5 in the FedEx Cup on May 19 not already exempt Jacob Bridgeman, Ryan Gerard, Sam Stevens, Brian Campbell, Cam Davis. Top 2 players from 2024 Race to Dubai not otherwise exempt on May 19 Rasmus Hojgaard, Thriston Lawrence. Top player in the 2025 Race to Dubai, not otherwise exempt, on May 19 Laurie Canter. The top player not already exempt from the leading three players in the LIV Golf standings on May 19 Joaquin Niemann. 2025 NCAA champion a-Michael La Sasso. 2025 Latin American Amateur champion a-Justin Hastings. The top 60 players from the June 9 world golf ranking Ryan Fox, Cameron Young, Bud Cauley. Advertisement Sectional qualifying-Japan Yuta Sugiura, Scott Vincent, Jinichiro Kozuma, Riki Kawamoto. Sectional qualifying-England Jordan Smith, Joakim Lagergren, Guido Migliozzi, Frederic LaCroix, Sam Bairstow, Edoardo Molinari, James Kruyswijk, Andrea Pavan, Matthew Jordan. Sectional qualifying Rasmus Neergaard-Petersen, James Hahn, Adam Schenk, a-Lance Simpson, a-Cameron Tankersley, Carlos Ortiz, Johnny Keefer, Doug Ghim, Erik van Rooyen, Lanto Griffin, Justin Lower, Eric Cole, Zac Blair, Chris Gotterup, Roberto Diaz, a-Ben James, Kevin Velo, Niklas Norgaard, Matt Wallace, Thorbjorn Olesen, Mark Hubbard, Victor Perez, Emiliano Grillo, Takumi Kanaya, Ryan McCormick, Trevor Cone, Bryan Lee, Marc Leishman, Zach Bauchou, Alistair Docherty, Chandler Blanchet, Alvaro Ortiz, Emilio Gonzalez, Trent Phillips, a-Tyler Weaver, a-Jackson Koivun, Will Chandler, a-Preston Summerhays, Justin Hicks. Advertisement Local and sectional qualifying Harrison Ott, Grant Haefner, George Duangmanee, Max Moldovan, James Nicholas, George Kneiser, a-Mason Howell, Jackson Buchanan, a-Matt Vogt, Brady Calkins, Riley Lewis, a-Zachery Pollo, Joey Herrera, Philip Barbaree Jr., a-Frankie Harris, Austen Truslow, Chase Johnson. ___ Eligible but withdrawn Tiger Woods, Billy Horschel, Sahith Theegala. ___ AP golf: The Associated Press
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
How the NCAA House Ruling Could Reshape UNC Basketball
How the NCAA House Ruling Could Reshape UNC Basketball originally appeared on Athlon Sports. It was only recently that North Carolina basketball made headlines for its jaw-dropping $14 million NIL investment. This was a bold, unapologetic declaration that the Tar Heels were all-in on winning in the new era of college athletics. Advertisement Now, the rules have changed. With the formal approval of the House v. NCAA settlement on Friday night, UNC's strategy may be headed for a sudden and dramatic shift. The landmark decision not only ends years of litigation over athlete compensation but institutes a new framework that directly impacts how powerhouse programs like North Carolina do business. At the heart of it: a $20.5 million revenue-sharing cap that schools must now work within to fund all sports. And while outside NIL deals will still be allowed, the days of uncapped internal payouts, like the $14 million reportedly earmarked for Tar Heel hoops are likely numbered. So what does this mean for Carolina? Advertisement First, the math gets tighter. With football still a major university priority under new leadership, including front office veteran Bill Belichick, UNC will need to divvy up its share of the revenue cap carefully. Allocating most of it to men's basketball risks starving its football program at a time when it's chasing relevance in a competitive ACC landscape. Second, scrutiny rises. Under the new model, all NIL deals over $600 must pass through a clearinghouse to ensure they reflect fair market value and serve a legitimate business purpose. That oversight will test the creativity and legality of every booster-backed opportunity. Still, don't count UNC out. The Tar Heels boast a national brand, an NBA pipeline, and a roster of former players turned moguls ready to support current athletes through legitimate NIL opportunities. Those advantages don't disappear under the House ruling, they just need to be leveraged with precision. UNC head coach Hubert Davis in discussion with a referee.© Bob Donnan-USA TODAY Sports With a top-15 recruiting class inbound, transfers like 7-foot Arizona product Henri Veesaar, and international guard Luka Bogavac joining the fold, UNC remains a destination. But sustaining that momentum under tighter financial and regulatory conditions will require smarter spending, shrewder deals, and a more integrated athletic department than ever before. Advertisement The College Sports Commission, helmed by former MLB executive Bryan Seeley will enforce the new cap and audit programs that exceed it. That means every dollar spent in Chapel Hill now comes with risk. The Tar Heels helped define college basketball's past. Whether they can dominate its future will depend not just on their talent—but on their ability to adapt. Related: Former Top NBA Pick Speaks Out on NIL's Impact on Culture Related: EA Sports to Use Pay-for-Play Incentives for College Teams This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 8, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Louisiana hikes sports gambling tax to subsidize college athletics
The LSU baseball team celebrates after winning the College World Series against Florida, 18-4, on June 26, 2023, at Charles Schwab Field in Omaha, Nebraska. (Jacob Reeder/LSU Sports Information) Louisiana legislators have approved a plan to give most college athletic programs in Louisiana nearly $2 million in state tax revenue annually. House Bill 639 by Rep. Neil Riser, R-Columbia, cleared the Senate on a 35-3 vote Sunday, after previously passing the House 74-15. Gov. Jeff Landry is expected to sign it into law. Riser's bill would increase the tax on sports gambling in Louisiana from 15% to 21.5%. One-fourth of that revenue would go to the Supporting Programs, Opportunities, Resources and Teams (SPORT) Fund to benefit student-athletes at Louisiana's public universities that compete at the NCAA Division I level — UL Lafayette, UL Monroe, Louisiana Tech, LSU, Grambling, McNeese, Nicholls, Northwestern State, Southeastern, Southern and the University of New Orleans. Under the new tax rate, Louisiana would receive about $77 million annually from sports gambling, with about $20 million dedicated to the new fund. Each school would get approximately $1.7 million annually. The money could be used for new scholarships, insurance, medical coverage, facility enhancements, litigation settlement fees and Alston awards, which are education-related awards universities give to college athletes. The $1.7 million allocation is a small drop in the bucket for LSU, which has an athletics budget of over $200 million. But it would be a significant lifeline for schools such as Southern, Nicholls and ULM, which each spend less than $20 million a year on their sports program. The proposed increase in sports gambling taxes has bipartisan support, with both sides saying the revenue should be used to offset the 'social ills' of gambling. The higher rate would generate more money for addiction programs. But the decision to dedicate some of the revenue to college athletics at a time when the state is under budget constraints troubles some progressives. 'Legalized mobile gambling has created or exacerbated many social and cultural problems, including addiction, bankruptcies and even increases in domestic violence,' said Peter Robins-Brown, executive director of Louisiana Progress, an advocacy group for working-class and marginalized communities. 'New tax revenue should be used first and foremost to address some of those problems before we talk about spending more money on college sports.' Currently, the state's split for sports gambling tax revenue calls for 25% to go toward early childhood education, 10% to local governments, 3% to gambling addiction programs and the rest to other priorities and the state general fund. Under Riser's bill, childhood education, local governments and addiction recovery would retain their existing share of tax proceeds. In addition to the 25% for college athletics, another 3% would be dedicated to the Louisiana Postsecondary Inclusive Education Fund to finance programs for students with disabilities. The rest goes into the state general fund for a variety of government needs. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE