
America Must Remember That We All Belong
The first Trump administration unleashed a relentless assault on immigrant communities. Then came the pandemic, hitting communities of color and immigrant families the hardest. We spent years rebuilding — each moment testing us, threatening the safety of those we serve. But the past few weeks feel different. Just as we began to find our footing five years on, we've been thrust back into a crisis like no other.
At the core of this fight is a fundamental question: Who belongs in America? The policies being enacted right now tell us that we who build and sustain this country do not belong. That immigrants do not belong. That queer people, people of color, children, and women do not belong. That our communities, which have been here for generations, that have built families, businesses, and movements on this soil — are here under sufferance, and that our freedom disrupts the white, patriarchal order of things.
As executive directors and leaders of 10 immigrant rights organizations in New York City — spanning advocacy, social and health services, and critical community programs — we are witnessing a systematic dismantling of the protections and supports that have long been lifelines for our communities. With funding cuts threatening these essential services and increasing threats against our communities, the situation has become dire. Just outside our office doors, ICE agents walk the streets, deterring our community members from seeking the help they desperately need. They are increasingly met with walls — both literal and figurative.
'
We refuse to accept policies that strip our communities of their dignity and their rights to freedom and security.
'
A new brand of dehumanization is spreading across America, and it is terrifying. A wave of executive orders is directly targeting all members of our beloved communities — not just those who are undocumented or have limited documentation status, but also those who are living in poverty, queer people, people of color, women, and children. Federal policy changes — including executive orders on immigration enforcement, on gender ideology, and those terminating DEI programs — are chipping away at hard-won rights and resources for immigrant communities. Orders like executive Order 14159, which denies public benefits like Temporary Assistance For Needy Families (TANF), Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Medicaid, and housing assistance to undocumented individuals, leaving survivors with nowhere to turn for basic necessities.
But, in 2025, we refuse to accept this vision. We refuse to accept policies that strip our communities of their dignity and their rights to freedom and security. We are alarmed not only by what our organizations are facing but by the broader trajectory of our country. Though we write this anonymously, aware of the scrutiny and risks our organizations may face, we believe it is imperative to speak out.
With the stroke of a pen, decades of progress in protecting immigrant communities, people of color, LGBTQIA+ individuals, survivors of gender-based violence, those with diverse abilities, women and children are being swiftly unraveled. ICE raids are sweeping across New York City, targeting those who have fled harm, many of whom are living in temporary housing. Caregivers are afraid to send their children to school because they might be targeted by ICE. Food pantries and community healthcare centers are seeing a sudden drop in participants because people would rather go hungry and risk their health than risk deportation. Because one's immigration status can be weaponized against them, survivors of gender-based violence will go into further hiding, forced to make an impossible choice: endure abuse or face deportation. The Laken Riley Act mandates detention for undocumented individuals charged with theft-related crimes, a policy that disproportionately impacts immigrant survivors by providing abusers and landlords with yet another tool to threaten and control them through the fear of ICE involvement and deportation.
As we continue to fight, we feel deeply abandoned by philanthropy and government alike. Many foundations are taking a "wait and see" approach, hesitant to make investments in organizations that work on diversity, equity, and inclusion. Individual donors tell us they appreciate our work but fear being placed on a government watch list if they make a gift. Without solid investments from philanthropy — whether institutional or individual — our work will cease to exist.
'
Let us move toward an America that lives up to the promise that all of us belong — not one we've necessarily known, but one we've long fought for.
'
Let us move toward an America that lives up to the promise that all of us belong — not one we've necessarily known, but one we've long fought for. An America where policy is no longer wielded as a weapon against its people, but shaped by the values of liberation and justice. The America that acknowledges the trauma our communities have carried for generations and seeks to break cycles of violence instead of reinforcing them.
To get there, we need action. We need sanctuary policies that truly keep people safe. We need funding for organizations like ours, who are doing the frontline work to ensure that communities can thrive.
The exhaustion so many of us feel right now is real but we as leaders cannot afford to retreat into fatigue. We cannot blindly believe that because we survived the first Trump administration, we will survive this one. This time, the policies are more strategic, more ruthless, and more systematically implemented. This time, they are designed to eliminate the very organizations that have fought to protect the fabric of America. And we need all of us to show up — to fight against these policies, to protect one another, and to refuse to be silenced.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

15 minutes ago
Critical US-Iran nuclear talks on shaky ground
The future of high-stakes negotiations over Iran's nuclear program remains shrouded in uncertainty as the U.S. and Iran publicly clash over the terms of an interim agreement proposed by the Trump administration that is intended to pave the way for a longer-lasting deal. Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, slammed that proposal during an address on Wednesday, saying it "contradicts our principle of power by 100%" and vowing that Iran would not agree to stop enriching uranium on its own soil, calling it "a key tool in the nuclear program." The Iranian foreign minister, Seyed Abbas Araghchi, succinctly underscored Iran's terms in a post on X shortly after the Ayatollah's speech, writing "no enrichment, no deal." Iran's stance contrasts sharply with that of President Donald Trump, which he emphasized on his social media platform on Monday. "Under our potential Agreement -- WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!" Trump wrote on Truth Social. While the president and his Cabinet officials have repeatedly said Iran would be required to end enrichment activities under the terms of a deal, U.S. officials say that the initial interim proposal -- which is only intended to be a stepping stone to a broader agreement -- did not prohibit Iran from enriching uranium at low levels while a long-term solution to fuel Iran's civilian nuclear energy program could be established. Trump's post appeared to contradict the position staked out by his negotiators, and although Iran has not yet formally responded to the interim proposal, it remained unclear on Wednesday whether the U.S. would stand by all the terms in its initial offer. Whether delegations from Iran and the U.S. would meet for a sixth round of nuclear negotiations also remained unclear, although a U.S. official said a possible meeting in the coming days was under discussion. After holding a phone call with Russian leader Vladimir Putin on Wednesday, Trump signaled that he would look to Moscow to play a greater role in negotiations with Iran. "President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "It is my opinion that Iran has been slowwalking their decision on this very important matter, and we will need a definitive answer in a very short period of time!" But optimism among both U.S. and Iranian officials appears to have cooled in recent days. An Iranian official, who spoke with ABC News on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive negotiations, said that the U.S.' proposed terms are "unreasonable, greedy and unconventional." "The U.S. constantly changes its positions, which has led to a growing accumulation of mistrust regarding its intentions and heightened uncertainty about its will and seriousness to fulfil commitments, assuming any agreement is even to be formed," they told ABC News. "This document is not even open to be reviewed or responded to," the official added. Iran is pushing for relief from sanctions that have badly damaged the national economy. This week, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said Tehran needs guarantees regarding the "real end of the sanctions." That would include details on "how and through what mechanism" they would be lifted, Baghaei said, in remarks carried by the official IRNA news agency. Araghchi and Khamenei were downbeat on the U.S. proposal in comments this week. The document has "many ambiguities and questions," the Iranian foreign minister said in a Telegram post on Tuesday. "Many issues in this proposal are not clear," he added.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump signs proclamation to ban travel from 12 countries
President Donald Trump signed a proclamation Wednesday evening to ban travel from several countries to the US, citing security risks. The ban will fully restrict entry of nationals from 12 countries: Afghanistan; Myanmar, also known as Burma; Chad; Republic of the Congo; Equatorial Guinea; Eritrea; Haiti; Iran; Libya; Somalia; Sudan; and Yemen. People from seven countries will have partial restriction: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. The proclamation includes exceptions for lawful permanent residents, existing visa holders, certain visa categories and individuals whose entry serves US national interests. The president made the final call on signing this proclamation after the antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colorado, according to a White House official. He was considering it beforehand, but Sunday's assault put it into motion faster. The White House is touting the new president's travel ban as 'fulfilling' a campaign promise to 'protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors that want to come to our country and cause us harm.' 'President Trump is fulfilling his promise to protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors that want to come to our country and cause us harm. These commonsense restrictions are country-specific and include places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates, or fail to share identity and threat information,' White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson wrote on X. Trump said in a video posted Wednesday that new countries could be added to the travel ban as 'threats emerge around the world.' 'The list is subject to revision based on whether material improvements are made. And likewise new countries can be added as threats emerge around the world, but we will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm and nothing will stop us from keeping America safe,' the president said. The proclamation takes effect at 12:01 AM on June 9, according to the White House. Wednesday's proclamation comes less than five months after the president was inaugurated into office for his second term. On his first day in office, he issued an executive order directing cabinet members, including the secretary of state, to compile a list of countries 'for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries.' In his first term, Trump barred travelers from seven majority-Muslim nations from coming to the US, a policy that saw court challenges before President Joe Biden repealed it when he took office in 2021. The barring of nationals from Afghanistan could impact Afghans who worked alongside the US during its two decades of war there. Tens of thousands of Afghans have already been caught in limbo due to other Trump administration executive orders suspending the US refugee admissions program and the suspension of foreign aid funding for flights of Afghan Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) holders. This story and headline have been updated with additional information.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
President Trump signs travel ban targeting 12 countries with 'hostile attitudes' to the US
President Trump has signed an order banning people from 12 countries from entering the US. He said Sunday's had shown "the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come as temporary visitors and overstay their visas". "We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm," he said in a video statement. The countries affected are: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The White House said they posed a "very high risk" to the US and had poor screening and vetting to identify dangerous individuals. People from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will also face partial restrictions. Mr Trump's proclamation said America must ensure people entering don't have "hostile attitudes toward its citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles" - and don't support terror groups. The move echoes a controversial executive order enacted eight years ago during his first term, when he banned people from predominately Muslim countries. The countries initially targeted then were Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. said on Thursday that policy was a "key part of preventing major foreign terror attacks on American soil". His new list adds more countries, but notably removes Syria after Mr Trump met the country's leader recently on a trip to the Middle East. Athletes and their coaches competing in the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Olympics, both of which are taking place in the US, will be exempt. Permanent US residents and existing visa holders are also among those unaffected. The list was put together after the president asked homeland security officials and the director of national intelligence to compile a report on countries whose citizens could pose a threat to the US. The ban takes effect from 9 June but countries could be removed or added. The proclamation states it will be reviewed within 90 days, and every 180 days after, to decide if it should be "continued, terminated, modified, or supplemented". "These commonsense restrictions are country-specific and include places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates, or fail to share identity and threat information," said White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson. President Trump's first travel restrictions in 2017 were criticised by opponents and human rights groups as a "Muslim ban". It led to some chaotic scenes, including tourists, students and business travellers prevented from boarding planes - or held at US airports when they landed. Mr Trump denied it was Islamophobic despite calling for a ban on Muslims entering America in his first presidential campaign. It faced legal challenges and was modified until the Supreme Court upheld a third version of it in June 2018, with judges calling it "squarely within the scope of presidential authority".