logo
Oakland continues encampment sweeps, heading to East 12th Street site next

Oakland continues encampment sweeps, heading to East 12th Street site next

CBS News08-05-2025

People living in Oakland's East 12th Street encampment are warned about an upcoming sweep by the cit
People living in Oakland's East 12th Street encampment are warned about an upcoming sweep by the cit
People living in Oakland's East 12th Street encampment are warned about an upcoming sweep by the cit
OAKLAND — Oakland Officials are continuing to clear some of the city's largest homeless encampments.
Next week, the city will begin dismantling the site on East 12th Street near Fruitvale Avenue, but for some, it's become their safe haven.
"It is home," said a man who lives there. "It is the same thing, really, just a little smaller."
The man didn't want to share his name. He just found out he'll have to move.
"They just put this here today, the 7th," he said, pointing to the date on the sign.
On poles throughout East 12th Street, pink papers relay a "7-day notice to vacate illegal encampments."
It goes on to say the City of Oakland has deemed the site uninhabitable and public works will begin clearing the site on May 14.
"It's not the first time," he explained about his experience. "I just moved over here because they did that down to us on 66th by San Leandro about six months ago."
Leajay Harper with Wood Street Commons, a homeless advocacy group made up of formerly unhoused people, said this is becoming more common.
"What they're doing is they're sweeping people and they're sweeping people and then they're having to move and they're sweeping them again," said Harper.
Representatives from the City of Oakland said the transition is already underway. The city purchased the Extended Stay America Hotel in North Oakland using $7 million in state funding, and unhoused residents are already moving in.
The city said outreach workers have been visiting the area around the 12th Street encampment and have identified 79 core residents who will be offered housing. Harper argues it's not an accurate number.
"There are more than 189 residents who live there," said Harper about numbers tallied by other advocates for unhoused people. "The city is only recognizing that there are 79, and even with those 79 there still isn't enough space for all those people. So that's the thing, where are all those other people going to go?"
CBS News Bay Area asked people at the encampment if they had heard about the possibility of temporary housing.
"That's what they say," said a man living there. "They don't always do what they say they're going to do."
He said personally he hasn't been approached by an outreach worker at this location. He has lived in his RV for almost six years. He said some others have been living on the street much longer.
They're prepared to move, but things are getting more difficult.
"I always think ahead in case something like this happens," he said. "There's other places around, but they're closing a lot of them down."
Now, he has to start packing and find another new place to call home before next week.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

One killed, six hurt in three daylight shootings, D.C. police say
One killed, six hurt in three daylight shootings, D.C. police say

Washington Post

time44 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

One killed, six hurt in three daylight shootings, D.C. police say

A man was killed and six other people wounded Monday in three daylight shootings in the District, police said. The slaying was the city's third in two days. Monday's killing came during an outbreak of gunfire around noon outside a store on busy Mount Olivet Road NE, Executive Assistant Police Chief Andre Wright said. He gave no information about any specific motive in that or the other two shootings, which all occurred within a two-hour span. But, based on Wright's account, the incident on Mount Olivet resembled a targeted shooting. Three men were standing outside the store in the 1200 block of Mount Olivet, Wright said, when a black sedan pulled up and three men got out. All were dressed in black, he said. They fired at the men in front of the store, he said. Then they got back into the sedan and left. In addition to the man who was killed, the two other men who had been outside the store were both hit. They were taken to hospitals. A woman who later sought hospital treatment was thought by police to have been a fourth person hit in the same incident. Community concern about the attack was understandable, Wright said. But he pledged 'to get to the bottom of this.' Homicides in the District have evoked concerns not only in the city's neighborhoods, but also among federal officials. The level of homicides in D.C. this year is about the same as last year at this time. However, the level of all violent crime this year is substantially less than last year's, according to police statistics. Before Monday's quadruple shooting on Mount Olivet, Wright said, one man was shot around 10 a.m. in the 1700 block of Benning Road NE, and two men were shot about an hour and a half after that, about two blocks away, in the 1500 block of Benning. It was not immediately known whether any of the shootings was connected. But Tom Lynch, a police spokesman, said Monday night that investigators suspected two of them may be linked: the Mount Olivet Road shooting and the second of the Benning Road shootings. All of the three sites are within a mile of each other. At a news briefing on the three incidents, Wright indicated that police viewed personal disputes as underlying many shootings in the District. 'You still have people in the community who fail to understand how to resolve conflicts,' he said, and 'in the heat of argument, 'they introduce a firearm.' On Sunday, in the first of the day's two homicides, Jonathan Fuentes-Ferrufino, 27, of Northwest was found fatally stabbed about 12:30 a.m. in the 4100 block of 7th Street NW, police said, and an arrest was made. In the second, Brandon Tolson, 21, of Northeast was fatally shot just before 3 a.m. in the 1400 block of S Street NW, police said.

The Pardon Power Is Helping Trump Realize His Dreams
The Pardon Power Is Helping Trump Realize His Dreams

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

The Pardon Power Is Helping Trump Realize His Dreams

More than any previous president, Donald Trump has systematically deployed his authority to grant pardons to reward loyalists, assure appointees and associates that they can violate the law with impunity and reduce prosecutorial pressure on allies to testify against him. Legal scholars are outspoken in their criticism of Trump's use of the pardon power. Rachel Barkow, a law professor at N.Y.U., described Trump's goals by email: The use of the pardon power is part of his effort to put the country on an authoritarian path. Instead of administering the pardon power evenhandedly with a regular process that is available equally to all, he is rewarding his partisan allies. It is the carrot for supporters, and he uses the stick of weaponizing prosecutions and investigations against his partisan enemies. Of the more than 1,600 pardons and commutations Trump has issued, only a tiny fraction fit the traditional purpose of addressing a miscarriage of justice, excessive sentencing for nonviolent crimes and prosecutorial overreach. Trump, Barkow wrote, is clearly sending a message that he will support people who support him — that's why Ed Martin, the current pardon attorney, tweeted 'No MAGA left behind.' Trump is trying to create a narrative that prosecutors are unfairly weaponizing the law by targeting people with financial fraud and corruption charges, which is what he says happened to him. In the vast majority of cases so far, Trump granted pardons to those who have committed crimes in support of his claim that the 2020 election was stolen — the Jan. 6 insurrectionists — and to a smaller number of those convicted of the kind of crimes Democrats accuse the president of committing, especially bribery and financial fraud. Frank Bowman III, a law professor emeritus at the University of Missouri and former special counsel to the U.S. Sentencing Commission, argued in an email that: No president before Trump has simply abandoned the principle that pardons are to be used for the public good, either to achieve just outcomes in individual cases, to remedy defects in criminal justice policy, or to heal the wounds of domestic unrest or civil or foreign wars by extending mercy to the defeated or forgiveness to those who broke the law in opposing the nation's will. Bowman shares Barkow's view that Trump is intent on acquiring authoritarian powers: 'Trump's abuses of the pardon power are merely one component of an integrated program of destroying legal constraints on Trump's drive for absolute political power and even greater personal wealth.' In an essay published in Slate in April, 'The Biggest Political Scandal of Trump's Term Has Gone Completely Ignored,' Bowman argued that Trump's twin ambitions are to be a dictator and to become ever more fabulously wealthy. Thus, in addition to using state power to crush his perceived enemies, he wants to be able to accept or extort political favors, both monetary and intangible, that keep him in office and centralize authority in his person. As part of this strategy, Bowman continued, Trump is now openly deploying pardons as a reward for political favors — huge financial contributions in the case of Trevor Milton, and questionable testimony against political enemies in the cases of Jason Galanis and Devon Archer. These cases, in Bowman's view, should be understood as merely one component of a coordinated effort to neuter both criminal and civil mechanisms for detecting, regulating, and punishing financial crime and public corruption — or at least financial crime and public corruption committed by Trump and his allies. Bowman wrote in his email that Trump's pardons generally fit into the following categories: Pardons 'dangled,' to use the phrase from Watergate, and later awarded, to associates who could implicate Trump in conduct either impeachable or criminally prosecutable. This class of pardons was employed at the end of Trump I and included pardons to Steve Bannon, Paul Manafort, Roger Stone and Michael Flynn. Pardons to Trump's violent supporters from Jan. 6. Pardons granted as rewards either for financial contributions to Trump or his political operations or for political support of other kinds by the defendant or his family. 'Pre-emptive self-exoneration' or 'refining criminality pardons: Trump has issued multiple pardons to defendants convicted of bribery and high-value financial crimes, notably fraud and crypto. When explanations are forthcoming, they tend to be either that the defendants were railroaded by deep state liberal prosecutors or that the crimes were not so much crimes as technical violations of excessive government constraints on benign business practices. Many of the law professors I contacted for this column cited two other hallmarks of Trump's pardons. First, many of the crimes that Trump expunges are similar to the crimes Democrats accuse him of. Second, Trump is signaling through his pardons that appointees who break the law in furtherance of his agenda will themselves be pardoned if indicted and convicted — or to forestall indictments in the first place. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store