logo
Missouri Senate passes bill exempting certain health insurance plans from federal protections

Missouri Senate passes bill exempting certain health insurance plans from federal protections

Yahoo27-03-2025

State Sen. Kurtis Gregory shakes hands following his introduction to the Missouri Senate (Annelise Hanshaw/Missouri Independent).
The Missouri Farm Bureau would be allowed to sell health benefits plans that exclude people with pre-existing medical conditions and limit benefits to less than what's permitted by federal law for health insurers, under legislation that passed the state Senate Thursday.
Sponsored by Republican state Sen. Kurtis Gregory of Marshall, the bill would give the farm bureau a carveout to skirt the consumer protection requirements set by the Affordable Care Act, in an effort to provide affordable coverage options to members.
The bill was passed by the Senate by a vote of 24 to 6 on Thursday.
'This is not something where this organization is asking for government dollars to put this program into effect,' Gregory said during debate Tuesday. 'They want to put this on themselves. They want to help cover their members' lives.'
The Farm Bureau is a nonprofit agricultural membership organization which partners with for-profit companies to sell various kinds of insurance to its members. Anyone can join — the fee is $30 per year. Historically the group has been primarily made up of people in farming communities.
Missouri Democrats and patient advocates have staunchly opposed the proposal, raising concerns that consumers could be left with inadequate coverage and without proper protections.
'These insurance companies are for-profit companies,' state Sen. Tracy McCreery of Olivette said during Tuesday's debate. 'And I think that there needs to be some basic guardrails to make sure that there's some parameters that are consistent amongst providers.'
Ten other states have passed similar laws. This is the third year the proposal has been pursued in Missouri.
The bill characterizes the plans the Farm Bureau would offer as a 'health benefit plan' or 'contracts for health care benefits' rather than 'insurance,' to skirt state and federal regulations on insurance.
Democrats won some concessions, including requiring a written disclaimer in contracts that states the contract 'is not health insurance and is not subject to federal or state laws relating to health insurance.'
The disclaimer also states that the contract offers fewer benefits than a federally-compliant plan and may exclude coverage for preexisting conditions. It adds that the individual may qualify for federal insurance subsidies. Under the latest version of the bill, the state's Department of Commerce and Insurance must receive and review complaints from Farm Bureau members.
After hours of negotiation earlier this week, Senate Democrats finally allowed the bill to move forward, with several of their health-related priorities added as amendments as well.
Those additions include provisions that require Missouri Medicaid to cover hearing aids, which is also a freestanding bill passed by the House, expand access to treatment for sexually transmitted infections, and require insurance companies that provide birth control to provide extended supplies.
The bill now heads to the Missouri House, which has passed its own versions of the bill in recent years.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Gregory has estimated around 15,000 Farm Bureau members lack health insurance and would be the target audience to enroll in the benefit plan.
Many farmers and other members of the Farm Bureau, proponents say, are uninsured because they can't afford to buy an individual plan on the Affordable Care Act marketplace or make too much money to qualify for subsidies.
Republican state Sen. Sandy Crawford of Buffalo, who sponsored the legislation in previous years, said she's heard from farmer constituents who can't afford health insurance for several years in support of the bill.
'It's hard for them to get coverage, and health insurance costs are through the roof,' Crawford said Tuesday.
'And I think anything that we can do to help…anytime we can give them one more tool for their tool box to at least help them get covered, I think that it's a good thing,' she said.
Several farmers and agricultural organizations testified in support of the legislation at the public hearing in January.
Missouri Farm Bureau lobbyist Emily LeRoy called the bill 'simply another option to provide coverage for more people.'
The Farm Bureau would offer lower prices by reverting to the pre-ACA practice of what's called medical underwriting, carefully evaluating applicants' medical history and risk, to determine whether to cover them and at what price.
Tennessee enacted a version of the law exempting the Farm Bureau from regulation in 1993
Benjamin Sanders, representing the Farm Bureau of Tennessee, said enrollees in states with the program report high levels of satisfaction. The Farm Bureau in other states doesn't need to abide by data transparency requirements of regulated insurance companies. But the organization says internal numbers show a high retention rate.
'We are not asking for any kind of subsidies or asking to sell subsidized plans. We manage cost on the front end,' he said, referring to the practice of medical underwriting.
Emily Kalmer, a lobbyist for the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, raised concern in January that the bill 'authorizes the sale of products that could discriminate against Missourians with pre-existing conditions like cancer.'
The bill 'would leave Missourians, including cancer patients, exposed to medical and financial harms,' Kalmer said.
Experts have said it could lead to insurance companies siphoning off healthy people and driving up the cost of coverage for others, while offering limited coverage plans.
Bill would exempt Missouri Farm Bureau health insurance plans from federal rules
Other insurance companies oppose the legislation for allowing just one group to be exempt from federal rules, which they say gives the Farm Bureau an advantage over its regulated competitors.
'I don't believe it should be the policy of the state to give a market advantage to companies selling unregulated products,'Hampton Williams, general counsel for the Missouri Insurance Coalition, said in January, 'over those who are offering existing health insurance products and who are have been lawfully operating within the state statutes and regulations.'
Shannon Cooper, lobbyist for Blue Cross Blue Shield, told lawmakers at a hearing in January that insurance companies would adopt similar policies to the bill en masse if allowed, to save costs, but federal and state regulations forbid that.
'It is a rare day when the insurance industry sides with the advocate community, but we all have the same concern here,' Cooper said. 'And that is: These products sound like insurance, but they don't follow the same rules that we have to play by. '
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Protesters rally against ICE for second day in Los Angeles
Protesters rally against ICE for second day in Los Angeles

CNBC

time19 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Protesters rally against ICE for second day in Los Angeles

Federal agents in Los Angeles on Saturday faced off against demonstrators protesting immigration raids following Friday's protests that senior White House aide Stephen Miller condemned as an "insurrection" against the United States. The security agents on Saturday engaged in a tense confrontation with protesters in the Paramount area in southeast Los Angeles, where one demonstrator was seen waving a Mexican flag and some covered their mouths with respiratory masks. A live video feed showed dozens of green-uniformed security personnel with gas masks lined up on a road strewn with overturned shopping carts as small canisters exploded into gas clouds. A first round of protests kicked off on Friday night after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents conductedenforcement operationsin the city and arrested at least 44 people on alleged immigration violations. The Department of Homeland Security said in a statement that "1,000 rioters surrounded a federal law enforcement building and assaulted ICE law enforcement officers, slashed tires, defaced buildings, and taxpayer funded property." Reuters was unable to verify DHS's accounts. Miller, an immigration hardliner and the White House deputy chief of staff, wrote on X that Friday's demonstrations were "an insurrection against the laws and sovereignty of the United States." The protests pit Democratic-run Los Angeles, where census data suggests a significant portion of the population is Hispanic and foreign-born, against Trump's Republican White House, which has made cracking down on immigration a hallmark of his second term. Trump has pledged to deport record numbers of people in the country illegally and lock down the U.S.-Mexico border, with the White House setting a goal for ICE to arrest at least 3,000 migrants per day. But the sweeping immigration crackdown has also included people legally residing in the country, including some with permanent residence, and has led to legal challenges. In a statement on Saturday about the protests in Paramount, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office said: "It appeared that federal law enforcement officers were in the area, and that members of the public were gathering to protest." ICE, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Los Angeles Police Department did not respond to a request for information about the protests or potential immigration sweeps on Saturday. Television news footage earlier on Friday showed unmarked vehicles resembling military transport and vans loaded with uniformed federal agents streaming through Los Angeles streets as part of the immigration enforcement operation. The Democratic mayor of Los Angeles, Karen Bass, in a statement condemned the immigration raids. "I am deeply angered by what has taken place," Bass said. "These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city. We will not stand for this." The LAPD did not take part in the immigration enforcement. It was deployed to quell civil unrest after crowds protesting the deportation raids spray-painted anti-ICE slogans on the walls of a federal court building and gathered outside a nearby jail where some of the detainees were reportedly being held. In a statement, DHS criticized Democratic politicians including Mayor Bass, saying their anti-ICE rhetoric was contributing to violence against immigration agents. "From comparisons to the modern-day Nazi gestapo to glorifying rioters, the violent rhetoric of these sanctuary politicians is beyond the pale. This violence against ICE must end," said Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. FBI deputy director Dan Bongino posted on X that they were reviewing evidence from the protests. "We are working with the U.S. Attorney's Office to ensure the perpetrators are brought to justice," Bongino said.

Ted Cruz was with president when Musk's barrage of attacks started: ‘Trump was pissed'
Ted Cruz was with president when Musk's barrage of attacks started: ‘Trump was pissed'

New York Post

time25 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Ted Cruz was with president when Musk's barrage of attacks started: ‘Trump was pissed'

Sen. Ted Cruz was with a fuming President Trump as Elon Musk viciously attacked his former ally online Thursday — with the Texas Republican saying the spat made him feel like he was a kid in the middle of a divorce. 'I was sitting in the Oval as this unfolded. Trump was pissed. He was venting,' the Republican senator revealed on his podcast 'Verdict with Ted Cruz' Friday. 'I was sitting there, and the tweets were coming…. Elon was saying some really harsh things.' The SpaceX and Tesla billionaire went on a multi-day social media offensive against Trump, panning the president's 'big, beautiful' reconciliation bill 'disgusting' and urging Congress to kill it. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk fumed after Trump spoke out about the simmering feud. Cruz, who's friends with both former bros, called their very public break-up this week 'incredibly painful.' 'These are two men whom I know very well, they're both good friends of mine,' he said. 3 President Trump and Tesla billionaire Elon Musk came to blows on social media this week, ending their bromance. AFP via Getty Images 'I feel like the kids of a bitter divorce where you're just saying, 'I really wish mommy and daddy would stop screaming.'' 3 Ted Cruz talked about the break-up this Friday on his podcast 'Verdict with Ted Cruz.' Verdict with Ted Cruz/Facebook Trump and Musk's tiff escalated later in the week — with Trump threatening to cancel billions of dollars in government contracts to Musk's companies and Musk claiming Trump was holding out on making the Jeffrey Epstein files public because he's in them. 3 Trump and Musk's tiff escalated later in the week. Getty Images 'It just went from zero to 11 instantaneously,' said Cruz. 'These are two alpha males who are pissed off. And unfortunately, they're unloading on each other … They're angry, it's not complicated.' Cruz and his co-host commented that they thought both men are right — Trump's big beautiful budget bill has to get passed but the government has to tackle the deficit more as Musk argued. 'Unfortunately, Elon is working under the assumption that Congress actually wants to do the job and save our country,' said podcast co-host Ben Ferguson. 'And I think Trump is working under the reality that there's a lot of people in Congress that actually aren't looking out for the American people.' Musk on Saturday deleted his post about the Epstein files in a sign he was ready to throw in the towel. But Trump made it clear he wasn't interested in kissing and making up anytime soon. 'I have no intention of speaking to him,' he told NBC News.

White House slams LA ‘insurrection' as protests erupt over deportation raids
White House slams LA ‘insurrection' as protests erupt over deportation raids

The Hill

time44 minutes ago

  • The Hill

White House slams LA ‘insurrection' as protests erupt over deportation raids

The White House slammed protests in Los Angeles on Saturday after some residents expressed outrage over raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff, described demonstrations at the city's federal building as an 'insurrection.' 'An insurrection against the laws and sovereignty of the United States,' Miller wrote in a Saturday post online. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin said more than 800 protesters gathered to challenge the arrest of dozens of individuals by 'assaulting ICE enforcement officers, slashing tires, defacing buildings' on Friday. Demonstrations continued near the sites of raids on Saturday, with authorities also conducting a raid in the nearby Paramount. McLaughlin said Los Angeles Police did not respond to the incident on Friday. 'A message to the LA rioters: you will not stop us or slow us down. @ICEgov will continue to enforce the law,' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem wrote on the social media platform X Saturday. 'And if you lay a hand on a law enforcement officer, you will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,' she added. McLaughlin said there's been an uptick in assault on law enforcement officers across the country. 'Our ICE enforcement officers are facing a 413% increase in assaults against them. And we have seen, in recent days, their family members being doxxed and targeted, as well,' she wrote on Saturday. 'Make no mistake, politicians like @RepJeffries, @AOC, and @Tim_Walz are contributing to the assaults of our officers through vilification and demonization—calling ICE the modern day Nazi gestapo and calling for their doxxing,' she added. Some California Democrats said the arrests were illegal and condemned the detainment led by Trump administration officials as an 'abuse of power.' They said they were denied access to the ICE facility where immigrants were being held amid concerns about the welfare of detainees. 'That's not a misunderstanding—it's a violation of federal law,' Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.) wrote in a Saturday post on X. 'I'm demanding @Sec_Noem launch an immediate investigation. If her agency won't follow the law, she needs to answer for it,' he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store