
Calcutta High Court grants bail to murder accused citing Article 21 of Constitution over trial delay
The Calcutta High Court has granted bail to two murder accused undertrials on the ground of right to life under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution as they have been incarcerated for more than 12 years.
The two — Munna Dhali and Nabu Dhali, along with two others, are accused of murder of four persons in 2012 at Thakurpukur police station area in West Bengal's South 24 Parganas district and have been awaiting completion of trial in the case.
"Without touching the merits of the case and solely on the anvil of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, prayer for bail is allowed," Justice Suvra Ghosh said in the judgement delivered on May 15.
While one other accused Rajesh Das was granted bail on similar grounds earlier, other accused Sattar Mondal had been refused bail on the ground of gravity of the offence and earlier rejection of bail.
They were accused of murdering their employer Dipak Bhattacharya, owner of a local cable television business, his mother and two maids on September 6, 2012, at their residence at Biren Roy Road under Thakurpukur police station area.
All the four accused were arrested on September 9.
Justice Ghosh noted that the petitioners Munna Dhali and Nabu Dhali approached the court with a prayer for bail for the first time after being incarcerated for more than 12 years.
The Judge also noted that though the prosecution undertook to examine five more witnesses within the next two months from February 24 this year, there has been no further progress in trial since then.
Justice Ghosh directed that the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bonds of ₹10,000 each, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local.
She also directed accused Munna Dhali and Nabu Dhali to appear before the trial court on every date of hearing and not to intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Sharmistha Panoli granted interim bail by Calcutta High Court
The Calcutta High Court on Thursday granted interim bail to influencer Sharmistha Panoli , arrested for allegedly posting video on social media with communal comments. The court had denied bail to the student on Tuesday. Panoli, a 22-year-old Pune law student, was arrested in Gurugram by Kolkata Police on Friday night after a social media post allegedly containing derogatory remarks went viral. The video, posted on Instagram, triggered widespread backlash for allegedly insulting a religious community and the Prophet Muhammad, despite Panoli issuing an unconditional apology and removing the content. On Saturday, a Kolkata court sent Panoli to judicial custody till June 13. On May 14, she posted a video in response to a Pakistani social media user who had questioned India's stance following the Pahalgam terror attack. Live Events In the clip, she sharply criticised Bollywood celebrities for remaining silent on Operation Sindoor—a major military response following the attack. Panoli's video, initially intended as a political reaction, quickly spiralled into controversy. Several viewers, especially from Muslim communities in India and abroad, said she made offensive remarks about Islam and the Prophet Muhammad. The backlash was immediate and intense. Hashtags like #ArrestSharmistha began trending, and she reportedly received rape and death threats. Despite deleting the post and issuing an apology the following day, the situation had already escalated legally. She posted on social media on 15 May, 'I do hereby tender my UNCONDITIONAL APOLOGY. Whatever was put are my personal feelings and I never intentionally wanted to hurt anybody. So anybody is hurt, I'm sorry… Henceforth, I will be cautious in my public posts.' Multiple complaints were filed in Kolkata. Police say they attempted to serve legal notices to Panoli and her family, but she was allegedly untraceable. A senior police officer explained, 'The case pertains to an Instagram video by a woman named Sharmistha Panoli that hurt the religious sentiments of members of a particular community.' With no response to the notices, a court in Kolkata issued an arrest warrant. Panoli was detained in Gurugram and brought to Kolkata on transit remand. Police also seized her phone and laptop for forensic analysis, looking for evidence of further offensive or manipulated content. In response to criticism of the arrest, Kolkata Police stated, 'All legal procedures were duly adhered to. All attempts were made to serve notice, but she was found absconding on every occasion. Consequently, a warrant of arrest was issued by the competent court… We urge all concerned to refrain from spreading unverified or speculative content and to rely on authentic sources.'


News18
38 minutes ago
- News18
Sharmistha Panoli Case: Calcutta HC Grants Bail To Influencer, Calls Arrest 'Mechanical'
Last Updated: The 22-year-old was arrested on charges of hurting religious sentiments and promoting enmity over a video posted on Instagram Law student and social media influencer Sharmistha Panoli on Thursday was granted bail by the Calcutta High Court in connection with a case filed against her over a controversial social media post. The case, registered at the Garden Reach Police Station, led to her arrest by Kolkata Police on May 30. Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury of the Calcutta High Court granted her bail on a personal bond of Rs10,000. As part of the bail conditions, Panoli must cooperate with the ongoing investigation and will also be allowed to travel abroad for academic purposes. While delivering the order, Justice Chowdhury made sharp observations regarding the procedure followed in her arrest. He stated that the arrest warrant had been issued 'mechanically" and that the arrest order, issued by the Alipore court on 22 May 2025 at the request of the investigating officer, was not legally justified. 'The arrest warrant was issued mechanically. The arrest order issued by the Alipore court on 22 May 2025 at the behest of the investigating officer is not legally justified. The accused is a law student, and there is no need to keep her in custody for interrogation," Justice Chowdhury noted. The 22-year-old was arrested on charges of hurting religious sentiments and promoting enmity over a video posted on Instagram. Her arrest triggered widespread reactions on social media and also sparked a political row. First Published:


Indian Express
41 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Influencer Sharmishta Panoli, arrested over social media post, gets interim bail
The Calcutta High Court Thursday granted interim bail to 22-year-old social media influencer Sharmishta Panoli, arrested for hurting religious sentiments with her alleged communal posts. Panoli, a student of Symbiosis International University, Pune, has a sizeable social media following — almost 85,000 followers on X and 90,000 on Instagram. She was arrested from her Gurgaon residence on Friday afternoon. On May 14, the AIMIM's national spokesperson, Waris Pathan, had shared a video purportedly posted by her and alleged that she had insulted Islam and tried to spread communal disharmony. In his post, Pathan tagged the Home Minister and sought her arrest. On May 15, Panoli posted on X, 'I do hereby tender my unconditional apology. Whatever was put are my personal feelings and I never intentionally wanted to hurt anybody, so if anybody is hurt, I'm sorry for the same. I expect co-operation and understanding. Henceforth, I will be cautious in my public post. Again, please accept my apologies.' According to the FIR, police received a complaint at Garden Reach police station on May 14 from one Wajahat Khan.