Karen Read defense grills crash expert over $400K price tag and experimentation methods
Karen Read's defense team looked to chip away at a crash expert's credibility by pointing to eye-watering expenditures and alleged inconsistencies in experiments as the state enters the 11th hour of testimony in their case.
Read is accused of killing her then-boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, by striking him with her Lexus SUV outside a house party at 34 Fairview Road and leaving him to die in frigid temperatures shortly after midnight on Jan. 29, 2022.
The state's expected final witness, Dr. Judson Welcher, a crash reconstructionist with Texas-based Aperture LLC, held firm on his findings that Read's vehicle allegedly struck O'Keefe.
KAREN READ'S SUV REACHED '74% THROTTLE' MOMENTS BEFORE JOHN O'KEEFE'S FINAL MOVEMENTS, CRASH EXPERT TESTIFIES
"[O'Keefe's injuries are] consistent with being struck by a Lexus and also contacting a hard surface, such as frozen ground," Welcher told special prosecutor Hank Brennan.
In a sometimes-evasive line of cross-examination, Welcher often provided non-answers to defense attorney Robert Alessi's questions surrounding his modifications to a PowerPoint presentation used in Read's trial to depict Aperture's investigation.
Read On The Fox News App
"Assume the trial started approximately April 22, 2025," Alessi said. "Did you create your updated presentation before or after [it began]?"
"I don't know," Welcher replied.
Karen Read Trial Witness Faces Brutal Cross-examination Over Vehicle Data
Alessi looked to nail down a timeline of when Welcher may have made changes to the document and whether the prosecution communicated with him regarding the alterations.
Welcher eventually relented before testifying that he altered the presentation for the first time on May 13, with the most recent change occurring "like, 10 minutes ago."
"Half of that was in response to objections from the defense," Welcher said. "I had to add all the parts to where everything was. Then, when I got out here, Mr. Brennan asked me to take out references to evidence about statements that I was not allowed to present. So that would have been within the last three days. Then I've modified it a couple of times today based on rulings from the judge."
Brain Surgeon Testifies John O'keefe Died From Fall On Frozen Ground In Karen Read Trial
However, Welcher testified on cross-examination that the amendments he made to the presentation did not alter the overall document.
"I changed one slide," Welcher said. "There were 130 slides originally, or something like that. So half of the changes [were] on that day, which was one slide. I added one line to the bottom of the previous slide."
"Well then, why did you make it in the middle of trial if it wasn't significant?" Alessi asked. "Why didn't you just leave it off and then discuss it in terms of testimony?"
Expert Witness In Karen Read Murder Trial Caught With 'Errors' Inflating His Credentials
"So it ultimately was left off because it was insignificant, and I didn't need to have it," Welcher said. "The way it got presented was exactly the way it was before May 13. So it didn't change anything."
On cross-examination, Welcher revealed the district attorney's office previously agreed to pay Aperture at least $325,000 for the firm's services, along with covering the cost of the Lexus SUV used in testing.
"We're keeping [the vehicle] until the trial's over," Welcher said. "[Then] we're selling it and charging the commonwealth the difference in the price exactly."
Karen Read Scores Major Win As Judge Allows Crash Reconstruction Testimony
Aperture has been paid $44,510 for its services to date, with the state expected to pay upwards of $400,000 for around eight months of work, according to Alessi.
"Dr. Welcher was perfect on direction, but only a B- on cross-examination," retired Massachusetts Superior Court Judge and Boston College law professor Jack Lu told Fox News Digital. "He is not answering the questions from Mr. Alessi directly. He may not be intentionally being evasive, but he's no longer a near-perfect example of how an expert witness should testify."
O'Keefe's arm injuries were concurrent with being struck by the make and model of Read's vehicle, Welcher testified on direct examination. The crash expert pointed to a video showing him painting the taillight of the car before brushing up against it to mimic a collision.
Follow The Fox True Crime Team On X
Alessi looked to create doubt surrounding Welcher's findings, grilling the biomechanical engineer on the methodology behind his experiment surrounding the cause of the injury to O'Keefe's eye.
"I'm trying to make it clear," Welcher said. "We don't know his exact body position at the point of impact, nor do we know the exact position on the ground. Which is part of the reason why I haven't tried to exactly simulate this, because we don't have enough parameters to do that. So I don't have that information. I'm showing the geometry relative to someone of Mr. O'Keefe's height."
"So you don't have the information to do that properly," Alessi said. "So therefore, you can't preclude that he had a laceration to the eye from the spoiler by your own answer that you just gave, correct?"
Welcher doubled down on his investigation, asserting on the stand that Aperture's experiment was correct based on the information the firm had at the time, despite Alessi revealing the vehicle in Welcher's test was moving only two miles per hour — significantly less than the speed of Read's vehicle.
SIGN UP TO GET True-crime Newsletter
"Would you agree that you did a blue paint test with the vehicle going at two miles per hour?" Alessi asked.
"Of course," Welcher said.
"You didn't do a blue paint test with the vehicle going at 20 miles per hour, correct?" Alessi said.
"That is correct," Welcher said. "I was not going to hit myself with the Lexus at 20 miles an hour."
Wednesday marked the second day of testimony from Welcher, as the state is expected to rest its case this week.
Read pleaded not guilty and is facing the possibility of life in prison if convicted of the top charge, second-degree murder.
"The model being followed here is very good and professional," Lu said. "What you have here is a very nice judge meets a very nice lawyer," adding, "This results in a looser, less-focused cross-examination. It's working out fine here, partially because the witness is not being super evasive."Original article source: Karen Read defense grills crash expert over $400K price tag and experimentation methods
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
20 minutes ago
- Fast Company
From immigration law to business success: Navigating the challenges for foreign business in the U.S.
As a U.S. business immigration attorney and founder of Grape Law Firm PLLC, I have worked with many foreign entrepreneurs who have achieved lasting success in the United States. Establishing and scaling a company here requires time, effort, and strategic planning to navigate a complex web of immigration regulations and compliance requirements. COMMON LEGAL HURDLES IN SECURING EMPLOYEE VISAS The primary challenge faced by businesspeople is securing a legal presence in the United States. This means obtaining the appropriate visa or status for both entrepreneurs and their essential personnel. However, the process of business immigration to the U.S. is often a challenging adventure. According to the 2024 CIS Ombudsman Annual Report, from initial market entry to business expansion—and even to permanent establishment—the complexities of business immigration affect entrepreneurs at every stage of their U.S. journey. They face significant challenges in documenting the viability of their enterprises to immigration officials while managing their immigration status to meet the changing needs of the business ecosystem. NAVIGATING VISA PATHWAYS FOR BUSINESS GROWTH As business immigration attorneys, one of our primary duties is to help our clients choose the most suitable visa for their business vision and goals. The selection of the appropriate visa is the foundation on which a successful application strategy is built and is an investment in the company's long-term growth. It is imperative for entrepreneurs to understand that various options exist for starting new businesses in the United States or expanding existing operations. Each visa category has its own distinct advantages and considerations based on differing business needs. For instance, the E‑1 Treaty Trader and the E‑2 Treaty Investor visas are viable options for entrepreneurs. These visa categories cater to foreign traders and investors who are citizens of treaty countries—countries that have treaty agreements with the U.S. Traders must engage in continuous trade with the United States, and the U.S. must be their primary trading partner. Conversely, investors must make substantial investments through new or existing enterprises. Both the E‑1 and E‑2 visas can support long-term, sustainable business ventures in the United States (each is valid for up to five years and can be extended indefinitely), provided that they spur economic progress in their respective industries and investment areas. Furthermore, the L‑1 Intracompany Transferee visa is an ideal choice for international companies planning to expand to the U.S. The L‑1 visa allows foreign companies to transfer their managerial or executive employees for new office openings, thereby facilitating the establishment of operations in the United States. However, a potential downside is that the L‑1 visa requires rigorous application preparation—a thorough case file must be compiled, followed by consistently detailed documentation of organizational development and business growth metrics, especially during the first three years of operations. A CASE IN POINT One case from our L‑1 visa practice perfectly illustrates these complexities. As a seasoned professional in the scaffolding industry, our client's initial L‑1 New Office visa application succeeded through careful preparation and a comprehensive five‑year business plan. However, the real challenges emerged during the extension phase. When she sought to extend her L‑1 visa with different legal counsel, she faced a rigorous Request for Evidence (RFE) from USCIS that scrutinized every aspect of her business operations. The RFE questioned not only the structure, but also its growth trajectory and staffing decisions—common challenges that many foreign businesses face in proving the legitimacy and sustainability of their operations. The industry's unique characteristics, including its project‑based nature and specialized staffing requirements, made it particularly challenging to conform to USCIS's traditional expectations for business development. Her case is a stark reminder for prospective entrepreneurs that experienced immigration counsel can provide needed guidance throughout the ups and downs of their U.S. immigration journey. Entrepreneurs must acknowledge that deciding on the right visa type is more than an entry ticket to the United States—a visa is the key to legal rights, business investments, and financial aspirations that influence one's life in the U.S. BUILDING A FOUNDATION FOR LONG-TERM SUCCESS The U.S. business immigration ecosystem is ever-changing and demands legal acumen in business planning—integrating proactive immigration solutions from the very beginning. To achieve lasting success, entrepreneurs need expert legal guidance to navigate the complex steps of immigration and adapt to any changes or updates in the immigration system. Beyond legal counsel, success often hinges on comprehensive preparation and strategic planning. Maintaining detailed business documentation from day one proves crucial for immigration success. Successful immigrant entrepreneurs often distinguish themselves through meticulous record-keeping of business transactions, employee contracts, and market analyses that demonstrate their enterprise's viability. Early strategic planning should include developing detailed business projections, establishing clear organizational structures, and creating systems for tracking achievements and metrics. These elements strengthen visa applications and create a foundation for sustainable growth. Networking within industry associations and chambers of commerce can provide valuable insights into immigration processes and business development. Furthermore, entrepreneurs who actively participate in their industry's ecosystem often find themselves better positioned to demonstrate their legitimacy to immigration authorities. This comprehensive approach, combining thorough documentation with strategic foresight, guarantees that immigration planning aligns with business goals while maintaining strict compliance with U.S. regulations. As we look to the future, business expansion into the United States and immigration to the country will only become more interlinked. In that regard, the aforementioned success story of our entrepreneur client is an excellent example—showcasing that viewing immigration not as a hurdle but as a strategic tool is essential for success. Always remember: proper planning, combined with expert guidance, can transform potential obstacles into opportunities for growth in the American market. The key to sustainable success lies in developing a nuanced understanding of how immigration pathways can support business objectives while ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements.
Washington Post
21 minutes ago
- Washington Post
The Latest: Trump's tax cuts and tariff hikes spark concerns
President Donald Trump faces the challenge of convincing Republican senators, global investors, voters and even Elon Musk that he won't bury the federal government in debt with his multitrillion-dollar tax breaks package. The response so far from financial markets has been skeptical. Meanwhile, Trump's doubling of tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum could hit Americans in an unexpected place: grocery aisles. The announcement Friday of a staggering 50% levy on those imports stoked fear that big-ticket purchases from cars to washing machines to houses could see major price increases.
E&E News
21 minutes ago
- E&E News
Meet the youth challenging Trump on climate
Eva Lighthiser, 19, lives in Livingston, Montana, and is accustomed to milelong coal trains rumbling through town and blowing coal dust across the city. In 2023, she was a plaintiff in a youth-led lawsuit that sought to force her state to tackle climate change. Now, she's the lead challenger in Lighthiser v. Trump, a new climate lawsuit that accuses President Donald Trump of violating the Constitution by issuing a trio of executive orders that fast track fossil fuel development. 'Every place is going to be affected by this administration and it's very concerning to see what that will look like moving forward,' Lighthiser said in an interview. Advertisement The case, filed last week in the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana, argues that Trump's executive orders will worsen climate change and increase health dangers by declaring a 'national energy emergency' and directing the government to 'unleash American energy.'
