East Timor to deport ex-Philippine lawmaker wanted in 2023 killings
AI- Generated Image
Manila; East Timor has agreed to deport an Interpol-wanted Philippines murder suspect after two years of political wrangling, with the government linking the case to its aspirations to join the regional ASEAN bloc.
Former Philippines congressman Arnolfo Teves allegedly masterminded a March 2023 attack that killed then-provincial governor Roel Degamo and nine others.
Teves was detained at a driving range in Dili last year, but a Timorese court blocked his extradition. Manila's justice secretary suggested the decision may have been bought, saying it was "obvious that some people are making money out of this".
In an abrupt turnaround, East Timor late on Wednesdayannounced Teves' impending deportation, saying his continued presence represented a security risk.
"The Government hereby informs that Arnolfo Teves Jr. will be deported from Timor-Leste," it said in a statement, using the country's alternate name.
It added that East Timor's "imminent full accession" to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) had reinforced its responsibility to collaborate regionally on legal matters.
On Thursday, Manila's Department of Justice said it was preparing a team to facilitate Teves' repatriation based on deportation documents from East Timor.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Switch to UnionBank Rewards Card
UnionBank Credit Card
Undo
Ex-lawmaker Teves is the prime suspect in the murder of former Negros Oriental governor Degamo.
Degamo had been distributing aid at his home in Pamplona when six people carrying rifles and dressed in military fatigues entered the compound and opened fire on March 4, 2023.
The killings came months after Degamo was declared winner of a disputed vote, unseating Henry Teves, the ex-lawmaker's brother.
Arnolfo Teves was expelled from the House of Representatives after refusing to return to the Philippines to face murder charges.
On Wednesday, Teves' son Axl posted videos on social media of his father being dragged away by Timorese police, claiming he had been "kidnapped".
Degamo's widow Janice, meanwhile, called the arrest a "significant step toward justice".
Teves is currently being held in detention while awaiting administrative processing, a source at Dili's interior ministry told AFP.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
'She wanted to escape': How 100 witnesses, exhaustive evidence exposed VIP cover-up, led to justice in Rishikesh resort murder case
NEW DELHI: The verdict arrived like a long-awaited storm in Kotdwar's courtroom, quiet but crushing. More than two years and eight months after a 19-year-old receptionist was murdered in cold blood, the gavel finally fell. Resort owner Pulkit Arya, along with Saurabh Bhaskar and Ankit Gupta, was sentenced to life imprisonment. For those who had followed the case, one that had stunned Uttarakhand and the nation, it was a grim vindication. The verdict, delivered by the additional district and sessions judge, came after a painstaking trial involving 47 witnesses, their testimonies stretching over nearly three years. The charges were as damning as the headlines that once blazed across national media. The trio stood convicted under multiple sections of murder, destruction of evidence, criminal conspiracy, and sexual harassment. The court also found them guilty under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, lending judicial weight to early suspicions that the Vanantra Resort in Rishikesh, where the victim worked, was a front for something far darker. One witness didn't mince words, calling the resort 'a den of vice.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo The girl had only been 19, employed at a property owned by Pulkit Arya, son of a now-expelled BJP leader. In the weeks before her death, she had reached out to those she trusted. A former colleague and a close friend both later revealed she had confided in them - terrified, desperate, and deeply uneasy. She told them she was being pushed to provide 'special services' to an incoming VIP guest. 'She wanted to escape from there,' said an officer from the Special Investigation Team (SIT), which later took over the probe. But she never got the chance. On September 18, 2022, she was killed for refusing those demands. Her body surfaced six days later, dumped in the Chilla canal. The crime, horrifying in its brutality and made more incendiary by the accused's political connections, lit a fuse of public outrage. Protests broke out across the state. A high-level investigation was ordered. At the centre of it all was the SIT, led by DIG P Renuka Devi. Their investigation produced a 500-page chargesheet. The evidence was exhaustive: about 100 witness statements and 30 pieces of documentary proof. Yet, it was two voices that ultimately helped crack the case wide open - the victim's confidantes. Her friend and the ex-employee both confirmed what she had feared: the resort was not what it seemed, and she was desperate to leave. Initially, much of what was known came from WhatsApp chats with her friend, some of which were later leaked online. But investigators discovered she had also spoken to the former employee, warning them about the illegal activities at the resort and her fear of being forced to serve a powerful, unnamed VIP. Senior officers later confirmed that narco-tests were requested for the accused in hopes of identifying this shadowy figure. His name, even today, remains unknown. When the day of the verdict arrived, Pauri Garhwal's courtroom was transformed. Security was tight. Officers from nearby districts were brought in. The area around the courthouse was designated a 'zero zone' - a perimeter of 100 metres where only government staff and approved attendees were allowed entry. Outside, emotions overflowed. Soni Devi, the victim's mother, broke down as she addressed the media. 'May the criminals be sentenced to death,' she told ANI. Her words rang heavy with grief and fury, echoing the pain that first gripped Uttarakhand back in 2022 and the demand for justice that never wavered.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Went COLD TURKEY, it was devastating for them…': Donald Trump slams China for ‘violating' trade agreement with US - what went wrong this time?
Donald Trump has always called China the 'biggest abuser' on tariffs. (AI image) US President Donald Trump claims he was a 'Nice Guy' with China - that he helped China out of a 'devastating' situation when the world's second largest economy was in 'grave economic danger'. But, China 'violated' its agreement with the US, Trump has said in his latest social media post on the Truth Social. Trump's latest salvo against China comes as no surprise for experts, who have come to accept Trump's 'flip-flops' as a reality. Two weeks ago, the US and China announced reaching an agreement for a temporary 90-day reduction in their tariffs, following discussions between senior officials in Geneva. The United States decided to temporarily decrease its additional tariffs on Chinese goods from 145 percent to 30 percent. In response, Beijing implemented a corresponding reduction, bringing down its additional tariffs from 125 percent to 10 percent. US tariffs continue to be elevated, incorporating a 20 percent duty that the Trump administration recently applied to Chinese products, citing concerns about Beijing's supposed involvement in illegal drug trafficking - an allegation that China has firmly disputed. But things seem to have gone down hill again since then. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Are The Rolls-Royce Of Hearing Aids (And Under $100) Oricle Hearing Aid Learn More Undo Trump's social post reads, 'Two weeks ago China was in grave economic danger! The very high Tariffs I set made it virtually impossible for China to TRADE into the United States marketplace which is, by far, number one in the World. We went, in effect, COLD TURKEY with China, and it was devastating for them. Many factories closed and there was, to put it mildly, 'civil unrest. ' I saw what was happening and didn't like it, for them, not for us. I made a FAST DEAL with China in order to save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation, and I didn't want to see that happen. Because of this deal, everything quickly stabilized and China got back to business as usual. Everybody was happy! That is the good news!!! The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US. So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' Tit-for-tat tariffs: It's been a bumpy road Trump has always called China the 'biggest abuser' on tariffs. On April 2, also called the 'Liberation Day' by Trump, the US President announced sweeping tariffs on most major economies, with China getting hit with 34% tariffs (plus 20% existing tariff). China had retaliated strongly by raising its own tariffs and the situation had quickly escalated to a level where Trump eventually imposed 245% reciprocal tariffs on China. Also Read | Big embarrassment! Pakistan's crypto attempt to 'please' Donald Trump in a soup Trump levied huge tariffs on Chinese imports, responding to Beijing's stringent restrictions on exports of critical minerals, which are vital components in various products from smartphones and electric vehicles to aircraft engines and nuclear submarines. China controls an overwhelming 92% of the world's rare earth processing capabilities and the United States depends on Chinese supplies for approximately 70% of its rare earth compounds and metals. In the past Trump administration officials have said that China is wielding its market supremacy as a strategic tool, necessitating immediate US action. Global markets went into a tailspin following the trade war between the US and China and the 90-day truce between the world's two largest economies had brought a sense of relief - albeit fragile! So, what went wrong between the US & China this time? Trump's statement lacks details regarding China's specific violations of the Geneva, Switzerland agreement and does not outline his intended response towards Beijing. A US official informed Reuters that China appeared to be delaying the issuance of export licences for rare earth minerals. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CNBC that China had not fulfilled its Geneva commitments. He said, "The Chinese are slow-rolling their compliance, which is completely unacceptable and it has to be addressed." Greer indicated that China's supply of critical minerals, previously stopped due to Chinese trade countermeasures, had not resumed as stipulated in the Geneva agreement. Earlier, in a Fox News interview, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessen had t indicated that negotiations with China regarding trade matters were "a bit stalled." Also Read | 'Overstepped his authority…': What are the scathing observations made by US trade court in ruling against Donald Trump's tariffs? Bessent mentioned the possibility of direct involvement from President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. He also noted that a telephone conversation between the two leaders might take place in the future. Meanwhile, legal hurdles are mounting against Trump's proposed tariff measures. A recent US trade court verdict said that the president exceeded his authority by invoking emergency economic powers to warrant comprehensive tariffs. The court's decision halted the most extensive duties since Trump's return to office, though the ruling remains suspended pending an appeal process. Nevertheless, the verdict maintains the existing tariffs that the Trump administration had established on specific industry imports, including steel and automotive sectors. Also Read | 'Even if we lose…': Donald Trump administration readying two-part strategy to impose reciprocal tariffs, says 'we will do it another way' Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
US supreme court backs Donald Trump in ending legal status for 500,000 migrants
Donald Trump The US Supreme Court on Friday ruled in favour of US President Donald Trump , allowing his administration to revoke temporary legal status granted to over 500,000 immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. The court approved an emergency request by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem , effectively halting a Biden-era programme that had granted humanitarian parole to nationals from those four countries. The decision puts hundreds of thousands at risk of deportation and strips them of the ability to legally work or stay in the country. Liberal Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor dissented. Jackson wrote, 'The court had failed to take into account the devastating consequences of allowing the government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million noncitizens while their legal claims are pending.' The Biden administration's CHNV parole programme, started in 2022 by then-Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, allowed individuals who passed background checks and had sponsors in the US to stay for up to two years. It aimed to manage the growing influx at the southern border. But the Department of Homeland Security announced in October 2024 that it would not extend the two-year parole period once it expired. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like เริ่มแล้ว! ตลาด USDJPY อยู่ในช่วงขาขึ้นกว่าเดิม IC Markets สมัคร Undo Noem's move to end the policy was challenged by impacted individuals and rights groups like the Haitian Bridge Alliance. They warned that if the Trump administration's action is upheld, those granted parole would 'become undocumented, legally unemployable, and subject to mass expulsion.' A lower court judge, Indira Talwani in Massachusetts, had earlier ruled that the administration could not cancel the status of each person without individual review. However, the Supreme Court's latest ruling freezes that decision while litigation continues. Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued in court filings that Talwani lacked the authority to intervene, stating that Noem was entitled under federal immigration law to revoke the programme. He noted that the same law gave Mayorkas the discretion to launch it in the first place. The development comes amid broader tensions over immigration enforcement. The Department of Homeland Security also revealed that up to 500 so-called 'sanctuary jurisdictions' might lose federal funding for failing to comply with immigration laws. Meanwhile, Trump's Friday schedule included an Oval Office farewell for billionaire Elon Musk and a Pennsylvania rally where he's expected to promote a new investment by Japan-based Nippon Steel in US Steel.
