Government accused of 'gutting' potential bill to ban children from social media
The government has been accused of "gutting" a potential landmark bill to stop children "doom scrolling" after its proposals were watered down.
Labour MP Josh MacAlister had originally planned for his Safer Phones legislation to include a ban on the devices in classrooms, a well as raising the "digital age of consent" at which social media can be used to 16.
But in the face of ministerial opposition, the bill now just calls for chief medical officers to review the evidence on screen-based harms within a year - before deciding if there should be higher age restrictions on access to apps such as TikTok and Snapchat.
Former Tory education secretaries hit out at the changes during a debate on the bill's second reading in the Commons on Friday, which ended with the bill being adjourned for further consideration until July.
Kit Malthouse, who held the post under Liz Truss, said the bill is a "hollowed out gesture" and accused the government of "capitulating to big tech".
"I will be speaking not to celebrate progress, but to lament the gutting of what could have been a landmark bill," he said.
He also acknowledged his own party's past failures in getting the legislation passed, adding: "This government, sadly like the last... has dithered, diluted and capitulated.
"What remains, I'm afraid, is a hollowed out gesture and an opportunity missed."
4:12
Damien Hinds, who was education secretary under Theresa May and an education minister under Rishi Sunak, praised Mr MacAlister's campaigning but called the current version of the bill a "huge missed opportunity".
He said that while the Conservative's Online Safety Bill"made very good progress" on protecting children from harmful content, "we have a lot more to do on the topic of time and the addictiveness of social media".
Tory MP Sir Ashley Fox claimed nothing in the bill requires legislation and the watered-down proposals "could all be achieved by a minister just deciding to ask the chief medical officer to produce a report or the minister to produce a plan".
He asked: "What has happened to the legislative action that was clearly in earlier drafts in his legislation?"
Responding, former teacher Mr MacAlister said the bill had to be changed to "secure explicit government backing".
He said the bill had been written "to achieve change rather than just highlight the issue".
"That is why the bill before us is narrower than where I started when this campaign began six months ago," he added.
Changing the law 'not a big bang event'
Mr MacAlister has brought forward the legislation using the Private Members Bill (PMB) mechanism, which allows backbench MPs to propose changes to the law.
PMBs are rarely successful without government backing.
Introducing his bill - officially known as the Protection of Children (Digital Safety and Data Protection) Bill - Mr MacAlister said reducing smartphone harms in law relies on a "process" not one "big bang" event.
He said that the average 12-year-old spends 21 hours a week on their smartphone, which is "the equivalent of four full days of school teaching per week".
"This is a fundamental rewiring of childhood itself and it's happened in little over a decade," he said.
Many countries have already taken steps to strengthen laws on children's phone usage.
The French and Norwegian governments have set a 15-year age limit while last year Australia passed a world-first law banning under 16s from having social media accounts.
It is understood that Technology Secretary Peter Kyle wanted to make sure the Online Safety Act, which was passed by MPs in 2023 and is being implemented in stages this year, is completed first before any potential social media ban.
This intends to protect young people from illegal and harmful content with fines for tech companies who break the rules.
The government has opposed a smartphone ban in schools, saying this should be up to headteachers.
Most young people say social media causes harm
Ahead of the debate, extensive polling of young people aged 16-24 showed that 62% of this age group say social media does more harm than good.
Four in five also said they would try to keep their own children off social media for as long as possible.
Half of this generation, who grew up with smartphones, agree they spent too much time on their phones and social media during childhood.
Has Trump influenced the government?
Speaking during the debate, technology minister Chris Bryant said he was "not going to make arguments against action" and "everybody accepts that action is inevitable in this field".
He said the task the governent faces is "harnessing the good" of social media while losing what is bad, as children who are struggling with their sexuality or are neurodivergent can benefit from certain apps.
However, he admitted he had "no role" in negotiating with Mr MacAlister or Downing Street about changing the contents of the bill, leading to Mr Malthouse raising a point of order over whether the relevant minister had been put foward to take questions.
Mr Malthouse also asked whether Donald Trump had influenced the "filleting of this bill" as it would upset US tech firms.
Mr Byrant accused him of "subscribing to conspiracy theories", adding: "I haven't taken into consideration anything Donald Trump might think in this field."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Farage was the Spending Review's real winner
When Chancellors approach a major moment like a Spending Review, they tend to have a figure in their mind's eye – someone who embodies the type of voter they hope to win over at the next election: a Mondeo man or Stevenage woman. Rachel Reeves clearly had a very specific figure in mind for today's Spending Review. But unlike her predecessors, this was no Labour voter. Her Spending Review was laser-focused on Nigel Farage. Between a laundry list of spending pledges that would have you believe Britain is in a boom, Reeves took aim at Farage. She castigated him for backing Liz Truss's mini-budget and for spending too much time at the pub (arguably one of his best attributes). However, in choosing such tangential attacks, Reeves only drew attention to Labour's fear of Farage. Labour's spending commitments confirmed they view 2029 as a two-way fight with Reform. Record funding was announced for Scotland and Wales, ahead of local elections next year in which Reform are expected to wipe the floor. Days after Farage put steel-making front and centre of his campaign for Wales – at Port Talbot, no less – Reeves made sure to underline Labour's commitment to the steel industry, reconfirming half a billion for Tata Steel. This was paired with a cash injection for up to 350 of the most deprived communities: 'Funding to improve parks, youth facilities, swimming pools and libraries', with a focus on jobs, community assets and regeneration. In the absence of a plan to deliver real wage growth and long sought-after 'renewal', Reeves is hoping that, come the next election, quick and dirty projects can be plastered onto the leaflets of Labour MPs, in time for them to claim they have actually delivered change. You don't need to look far back to see whether or not this will work. It was not that long ago that the Conservatives also gave eye-watering sums to the NHS and tried to cling on to the Red Wall with an almost identical 'levelling up' plan, based on pots of funding for local regeneration projects. They too had Green Book reviews and bus fare caps, as recycled by Reeves today. So why double down on a strategy that was hardly popular with the electorate? With Starmer's 'missions' – of which only one even got a mention from Reeves today – so closely echoing the last government's 'five priorities', you'd be forgiven for thinking that Labour strategists are suffering from collective amnesia. Labour's failure to learn from recent political history speaks to their arrogance, rooted in a deeply held belief that Britain's problems are the result of '14 years of Conservative government'. It's why they came into No. 10 with no plan or narrative for what they wanted to achieve in government. And it's why they are pursuing the same strategy, choosing the same policies, to be implemented by the same group of civil servants – yet expecting a different result. The winner? Nigel Farage.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
NHS, houses, nuclear submarines: Labour sets out its spending plans
The last few weeks have proved difficult for Rachel Reeves. In public, the news has been dominated by Labour's U-turn on the winter fuel allowance. In private, the Treasury has been caught up in wrangle after wrangle with ministers, all negotiating what their departments would receive in the spending review. Reeves' speech to parliament on Wednesday announcing the review was a chance to tell a more positive story – particularly for a government accused of lacking direction and ambition. As economics editor Heather Stewart reports, there were some big winners: health, defence, and housing. Yet at the same time, day-to-day spending for some departments – such as local government or the environment – seems very tight. So, asks Helen Pidd, will Labour allow those services to come under even more pressure, or will Reeves have to eventually raise taxes to fund them too?
South Wales Argus
4 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Senedd called to act on 'existential crisis' of abuse
Plaid Cymru's Adam Price, the first out-gay man in his party to be elected to national office, warned prejudices based on sex, race and sexual orientation have been reinvigorated. He told the Senedd: "It is getting worse by the day, and it really represents an existential crisis for our democracy and our society." Mr Price said: "For our democracy to be effective, it has to be diverse. "Diversity trumps ability. "It's a piece of evidence in social science." The former Plaid Cymru leader called for a focus on representation of trans women and men, a community "under siege," to ensure their voices are heard in the Senedd. Mr Price highlighted harmful comments below news stories involving him in recent weeks. "That certainly won't deter me and I hope it won't deter anyone else," he said. "But we've got to do something about it collectively, haven't we?" Labour's Hannah Blythyn expressed concerns that Wales could go backwards in terms of equality of representation at the next Senedd election. Ms Blythyn told Senedd members: "I very much made an active decision when I had the opportunity to stand in this legislature because of the make-up – that there were more women here, that it was more representative." Jane Hutt, Wales' social justice secretary, acknowledged the rise of abuse, harassment and intimidation towards politicians, candidates and campaigners. She outlined voluntary diversity and inclusion guidance for political parties which aims to ensure democratic bodies are truly representative of all the people of Wales. Ms Hutt said safety costs will be exempt from spending limits for Welsh elections. Conservative Altaf Hussain warned guidance on equal representation risks crossing a dangerous line. He said: "Equality of access cannot come just by bureaucratic diktats or targets." Plaid Cymru's Sioned Williams said progress on underrepresentation of women in politics has slowed, warning the voluntary guidance was published "far too late." "Wales belongs to everyone," she said. "Everyone must have a voice in our nation's future."
