NHS to offer 'groundbreaking' sickle cell gene therapy
A gene-editing therapy for sickle cell disease, with a price tag of £1.65m, is to be offered to patients on the NHS in England.
About 50 people a year with the inherited blood disorder are likely to receive it, experts say.
Prof Bola Owolabi, of NHS England, called it a "monumental step forward", and said the one-off treatment Casgevy, also known as Exa-cel, "holds a very real prospect of a cure".
A confidential agreement has been made with manufacturer Vertex on how much the NHS will pay.
Campaigners have described the treatment as "groundbreaking" and its availability on the NHS as a "milestone".
Sickle cell disease can be life-threatening and cause recurring intense pain, when blood vessels become blocked by misshapen red cells.
About 15,000 people in England live with the condition, which mainly affects people of Black African and Black Caribbean heritage.
It is caused by genetic change that means people make haemoglobin - a key protein in red blood cells - that doesn't work properly.
This results in red blood cells becoming sickle in shape and stiff and sticky - rather than flexible smooth discs.
These sickle cells do not live as long as healthy red blood cells and can clump as they travel around blood vessels - reducing oxygen to vital parts of the body.
This puts people at risk of organ damage, stroke, heart failure and a greatly reduced quality of life.
In trials all patients who received the therapy - which tweaks a specific gene and allows the body to make more healthy red blood cells - avoided stays in hospital for a year after treatment and most for three-and-a-half years. Further data is still being studied.
NHS chief executive Amanda Pritchard said the therapy "could be absolutely transformative – it could enable patients to live free from the fear of sickle cell crises hanging over them".
Asiawu Imam, 26, lives in London, where she works as a nurse looking after people who have sickle cell disorder. She also lives with the condition.
When she was younger she was in and out of hospital three to four times a year with painful sickle cell crises.
"It feels like a stabbing pain, like someone is stabbing you form the inside outwards. It can last anything from half an hour to four days. It is excruciating," she said.
The therapy being made available on the NHS gives her hope, and a sense to the community that people with the condition are being taken seriously.
"This is going to be a life-changing moment for many of my patients."
It is a multi-step process.
First, blood stem cells from a patient's bone marrow (where all blood cells originate) are removed from the body.
In the laboratory, a gene-editing tool called Crispr is used.
This allows a specific gene to be pinpointed and very precise editing to take place.
However, instead of directly editing a faulty gene, Casgevy instead takes advantage of a process that happens when babies are in the womb, where they make red blood cells with foetal haemoglobin (a key protein that carries oxygen). This switches to the adult form once they are born.
Crucially foetal haemoglobin is not affected by sickle cell disease, so Crispr acts by dampening down the "switch" that makes the body produce the adult form.
Patients have to undergo "conditioning" chemotherapy to make sure their bodies are ready to accept the edited stem cells.
Modified stem cells are then transfused back into the body, where they multiply and increase the production of stable, well-functioning red cells.
The full treatment must be considered carefully - it can involve lengthy stays in hospital and may have side effects, including headaches and bleeding problems.
UK approves gene-edit drug for sickle cell disease
First gene-editing therapy may cure blood disorder
The only other current option for a cure is a stem cell transplant - but this can only happen if a closely matched donor is available. There is also a risk of the transplant being rejected.
The gene therapy will be available in specialist centres in London, Manchester and Birmingham to people aged 12 and over who get recurrent sickle cell crises and who cannot find a donor for a stem cell transplant.
John James, chief executive of the Sickle Cell Society, said: "We are absolutely thrilled to see this groundbreaking gene therapy treatment available on the NHS", adding "the significance of this milestone for the sickle cell community could not be understated".
He said the news would "give hope to many" and was "incredible".
However, he added: "We remain acutely aware that not everyone with sickle cell will be eligible for the potentially life-changing benefits of Casgevy.
"There is still much work ahead to ensure that everyone living with sickle cell has access to the care, treatments, and support they deserve."
The therapy has already been approved for another inherited blood disorder, transfusion-dependent beta thalassemia.
It is already being given to patients in other countries such as France, Germany and Italy.
Wales is also expected to provide it in the next few months.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘I'll use private sector to help clear NHS backlog', says Streeting
Wes Streeting has said he will consider leaning more heavily on the private sector as he bids to clear NHS waiting lists. The health secretary said he will not be 'bound by outdated ideological battles' when tackling the crisis in the service, where 7.39 million people are currently waiting to be seen by doctors. He said it would be 'foolish to turn away' from the private healthcare sector, but cautioned that 'we must see it for what it is'. Writing in the Sunday Telegraph, Mr Streeting said: 'Some ask if using private capacity contradicts NHS principles. Nonsense. What contradicts NHS principles is letting people suffer unnecessarily when capacity exists to treat them. 'The treatment remains free at the point of use – that's what matters. The independent healthcare sector won't affect this principle, and so it would be foolish to turn it away when we so desperately need it in certain specialities. But at the same time, we must see it for what it is.' The health secretary, who previously received treatment for kidney cancer, added: 'Cancer taught me that time is precious. When you're waiting for treatment, every day matters. That's why I won't waste a single day, or a single available appointment slot, in our mission to give patients the care they deserve.' His comments are likely to spark uproar from MPs on the left of the Labour Party, who fiercely opposed expanding the role of the private sector under Jeremy Corbyn. The former Labour leader has previously accused Sir Keir Starmer of 'betraying' the health service for relying more on private care. The government has said partnerships with the private sector under Labour so far have delivered more than 500,000 treatments, with waiting lists having fallen to a two-year low of 7.39 million in April. Darren Grewcock, a security guard, had hip replacement surgery at the Meriden Hospital through a full NHS referral after an injury left him unable to work. He said: 'The X-rays revealed that I had bone-on-bone osteoarthritis on my left hip. I was referred for surgery and given a list of places you can go – which included options in the independent sector. 'Within three days of booking, I had an appointment booked with the consultant. I couldn't believe how quickly he got back to me and the process started. My recovery has been a huge success. I am fitter, stronger, and more mobile than I was at 50." The charity, Patients Association, welcomed the greater role of the private sector in the NHS. Chief executive Rachel Power said: 'As the NHS continues to tackle the backlog, communication and choice must remain central to how care is delivered because patients don't just need treatment, they need to feel informed and empowered.'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
New 'state-of-the art' diagnostic centre opens
A "state-of-the-art" healthcare facility has opened at Woking Community Hospital. The new centre aims to provide quicker, more accessible diagnostic services and will provide faster diagnoses. The Woking Community Diagnostic Centre is part of the NHS initiative to expand access to diagnostic testing. Louise Stead, group chief executive said the centre will "improve healthcare accessibility for local residents". She said: "This facility will streamline the process for patients who require diagnostic services and reduce travelling time." Ms Stead added the facility aims to reduce waiting times and alleviate pressures on local hospitals. It will also include MRI and CT scanning, which allows patients to be diagnosed locally in a comfortable and convenient environment. The centre is operated by Ashford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. It is also working with North West Surrey Integrated Care Services, CSH Surrey, Alliance Medical Ltd, Skin Analytics, and partners operating out of Woking Community Hospital. Follow BBC Surrey on Facebook, on X. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@ or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250. Thousands to benefit from new NHS hub Royal Surrey NHS Trust leadership rated 'outstanding' Specialist children's dental service under threat Ashford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
I'm a GP, and I'm sick of the NHS always winning
Another Spending Review, another promise of increased funding for the NHS. This week Rachel Reeves has said £30 billion will be invested over the next five years in day-to-day maintenance and repair of the health service estate. But will these cash injections ever be enough? Or is a centrally run and funded system simply no longer able to keep pace with the population's needs and demands for healthcare in our modern era? The Times has also reported on Government plans to drastically shift care from hospitals into the community, in a bid to create a 'neighbourhood health service'; with the bulk of routine specialist appointments delivered in locations such as GP surgeries and high street opticians. How GP surgeries are expected to cope with the extra demand – when many patients are already unable to secure an appointment – is not made clear. Yet the crux of the matter is not primarily where appointments take place; but individual decisions made by the public around when, where and how they use the health service. Starmer is clutching at straws to meet his manifesto pledge for 92 per cent of patients to be seen within 18 weeks after referral for non-urgent conditions. Currently only 60 per cent of patients are receiving treatment within this timeframe. However, since Labour are focussing on the wrong problem, their solution will fail. Working as a GP in the NHS, it has frequently struck me how much of the healthcare demand in the UK might disappear if the public were contributing in some way. Take the patient who calls to discuss their child's difficult bedtime routine, or one who recently asked for exceptional NHS funding to have a small fatty lump removed from their back. Day after day, GPs see patients who would not contact the health service if they even had to pay £10 for an appointment. The same is repeated in A&E departments and outpatient clinics. Demand has been spiralling for years without the counterbalance that comes from a degree of personal responsibility. The result is that patients are offered tests and investigations they don't need, hospital referrals that may offer minimal benefit, and now many simply cannot get through to their GP at all. Emergency departments in the UK mirror scenes you might expect to see in a warzone: patients covered in blood and vomit, writhing in pain, or being left for hours in hospital corridors. Nobody seems able to rationalise which services the NHS should be delivering; meanwhile the system is descending into chaos and delivering increasingly substandard care. The Amazon Prime generation expects healthcare demands to be met at the click of a button – but better still, it is free! If the NHS can offer weight loss surgery, knee replacements, diabetes medication and more; then what is the point in striving to improve your health? The British public have, to a degree, learnt to expect the health service to pick up the pieces for their poor lifestyle choices. The results are seen across society: from overweight children in our primary schools, to millions declared unfit to work due to mental health conditions. Despite healthcare expenditure continuing to increase, and accounting for a larger share of the UK's GDP; productivity in NHS hospitals has fallen, waiting times for outpatient appointments have ballooned, the UK has markedly higher cancer mortality rates than other countries, and life expectancy improvements have stalled. Coupled with the number of working-aged people who are economically inactive due to long-term sickness, it is not unreasonable to wonder how long this can continue. Labour are right to identify that too many patients currently receive hospital treatment for conditions that could be managed by GPs, but they fail to see the bigger picture on the need for healthcare reform. If the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, while expecting different results – this seems to reflect our position on the NHS. Dr Katie Musgrave is a general practitioner Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.