logo
Opinion - Lee Zeldin should trash EPA's national recycling plan

Opinion - Lee Zeldin should trash EPA's national recycling plan

Yahoo01-03-2025

Like other Cabinet members in the Trump administration, new Environmental Protection Agency chief Lee Zeldin has hit the ground running, canceling ideology-driven contracts for diversity, equity and 'environmental justice.'
But it's not just these progressive favorites through which the agency has strayed far from its mandate to clean the environment.
One of its less controversial core goals — and one popular with municipalities and corporations across the country — is the vehicle for spreading environmental damage across the world. To reverse that trend, Zeldin should roll back an EPA edict aimed at every city and town in the country: the national recycling goal.
Instead of putting plastic in those blue bins, we should establish systems to recover valuable 'e-waste,' the rare earth elements and metals found in cellphones and other electronics — in other words, the very same things the Trump administration is working to get from Ukraine.
Per the EPA, the goal is to increase trash recycling to 50 percent of solid waste by 2030, with the aim of 'managing materials more sustainably.' Think here of the plastic, glass and paper piled in the ubiquitous blue bins found on curbsides. It sounds like an admirable goal — but what seems like an unobjectionable practice turns out to be both uneconomical and damaging.
The picture of just how that works is painted brilliantly in Alexander Clapp's forthcoming new book, 'Waste Wars.' Based on astounding on-the-ground reporting across the globe, 'Waste Wars' shines a spotlight on how plastic travels from rich countries to poor, where it is not recycled but dumped or burned.
Clapp lifts the veil on the 'wishcycling' ongoing across the U.S. 'The waste that travels across the globe and often inflicts irreversible environmental damage is not the trash that — to much chagrin — goes into the garbage bin and then into the local landfill. It's the stuff that you place in the recycling bin in the conviction that doing so is helping the planet.'
That's because the installed capacity to recycle those plastic bottles and other containers is both limited and domestically unprofitable.
There is no current realistic market for recycled plastic. It's simply far less expensive to make new plastic than to refine existing stock. 'Virgin plastics' are made from byproducts of oil and gas refining, which occurs anyway, and are of higher quality. Markets tend to reward products that are cheaper and better. Only 9 percent of U.S. plastic is nominally recycled at all.
Internationally, where the rate is higher, this eco-friendly practice relies on the lowest paid workers to do the required cleaning and sorting. U.S. plastic, long shipped to China before it closed its doors in 2017, is likely to wind up in what Clapp describes as a shadowy, informal market of those paid to send 'recyclables' in shipping containers bound for countries such as Ghana. It's what increasingly passes for industry in poor nations.
This is the environmentally damaging supply chain, which the EPA's national recycling goal is helping to stock, by pressuring local municipalities to divert plastic to those blue bins and not to send it to dumps or incinerators. As hard as it is to believe, absent a breakthrough in technology and markets, localities would be doing the environment a favor by sending plastic to sanitary landfills or burning it.
As I have described in my report on trends in recycling for the American Enterprise Institute, a new generation of 'waste-to-energy' incinerators holds the promise of mining the ash produced for valuable rare earth elements found in electronics, which are not separated at curbside, despite their high value. A February 2020 analysis by Purdue University of the e-waste stream finds 56 elements in electronic devices are routinely sent to dumps.
The current system which the EPA's broadbrush national goal encourages also does damage to local government finances. It is costly to run separate trucks to pick up what's in those blue bins — especially when the contents may well have to be sent to landfills anyway, for lack of an existing market. This is not to say that everything placed in the curbside bins is done so foolishly. Per the EPA, some 80 percent of paper and cardboard is actually recycled. This points toward how a pragmatic EPA can lead — encouraging municipalities to separate and sell those materials for which there is a market, while disposing of those for which there is not.
Those who believe they are saving the earth by not sending plastic to the landfill are currently doing the opposite, as rogue shippers dump 'microplastics,' some of which wind up in the water, poison sea life and pollute beaches. Nor is shipping plastic to Third World landfills, far less likely to be safely managed, an act of environmentalism. Just as we should strive to reshore some manufacturing, so should we do so with the disposal of all those Coke and water bottles.
Memo to Lee Zeldin: drop the misleading recycling goal.
Howard Husock is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I regret some of my posts about President Trump: Elon Musk expresses regret
I regret some of my posts about President Trump: Elon Musk expresses regret

Business Upturn

time21 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

I regret some of my posts about President Trump: Elon Musk expresses regret

By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on June 11, 2025, 12:44 IST In what appears to be a shift in tone, Elon Musk on Tuesday posted that he regrets some of his recent remarks about President Donald Trump, saying, 'They went too far.' I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 11, 2025 This comes just days after Trump addressed their ongoing feud, stating he wished Musk 'very well' and suggesting the tech mogul might be seeking a conversation. In a gesture that caught attention, Musk had responded with a heart emoji on X (formerly Twitter), sparking speculation about a possible reconciliation. Tensions between the two escalated last week after Musk called Trump's proposed 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' a 'pork-filled abomination' and accused the President of suppressing Jeffrey Epstein-related files. The latter post, which Musk later deleted, reportedly infuriated Trump, who retaliated with harsh criticism and even threatened to sever government contracts with Musk-led firms. The feud intensified when Musk countered by threatening to halt NASA-linked SpaceX missions and claimed Trump would have lost the 2024 election without his support. He also floated the possibility of impeachment. However, Musk's latest message—posted at 12:34 PM on June 11—marks a notable departure from his confrontational stance, possibly signaling the beginning of a de-escalation. While no official conversation has been confirmed, both camps appear to be softening their positions, leaving the door open for future dialogue. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.

Trump's actions in Los Angeles spur debate over deportation funds in his 'big, beautiful' bill

time24 minutes ago

Trump's actions in Los Angeles spur debate over deportation funds in his 'big, beautiful' bill

WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in Congress includes more than tax breaks and spending cuts — it also seeks to pour billions of dollars into the administration's mass deportation agenda. Republican leaders capitalized Tuesday on the demonstrations in Los Angeles, where people are protesting Trump's immigration raids at Home Depot and other places, to make the case for swift passage of their sprawling 1,000-plus-page bill over staunch Democratic opposition. House Speaker Mike Johnson said the One Big Beautiful Bill Act delivers 'much-needed reinforcements,' including 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, $45 billion to expand migrant detention facilities and billions more to carry out at least 1 million deportations a year. 'All you have to do is look at what's happening in Los Angeles to realize that our law enforcement needs all the support that we can possibly give them,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. The focus on some $350 billion in national security funding comes as action on the massive package is lumbering along in Congress at a critical moment. Trump wants the bill on his desk by the Fourth of July. But Senate Republicans trying to heave it to passage without Democrats are also running up against objections from within their GOP ranks over the details. At the same time, Democrats are warning that Trump's executive reach into California — sending in the National Guard over the governor's objections and calling up the Marines — is inflaming tensions in what had been isolated protests in pockets of LA. They warned the president's heavy-handed approach has the potential to spread, if unchecked, to other communities nationwide. 'We are at a dangerous inflection point in our country,' said Rep. Jimmy Gomez, who represents the Los Angeles area. 'Trump created this political distraction to divide us and keep our focus away from his policies that are wreaking havoc on our economy and hurting working families," he said. "It's a deliberate attempt by Trump to incite unrest, test the limits of executive power and distract from the lawlessness of his administration.' At its core, the bill extends some $4.5 trillion in existing tax breaks that would otherwise expire at the end of the year without action in Congress, cutting some $1.4 trillion in spending over the decade to help offset costs. The Congressional Budget Office found the bill's changes to Medicaid and other programs would leave an estimated 10.9 million more people without health insurance and at least 3 million each month without food stamps from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. At the same time, CBO said the package will add some $2.4 trillion to deficits over the decade. One emerging area of concern for Republican leaders has been the bill's status before the Senate parliamentarian's office, which assesses whether the package complies with the strict rules used for legislation under the so-called budget reconciliation process. Late Monday, Republicans acknowledged potential 'red flags' coming from the parliamentarian's office that will require changes in the House bill before it can be sent to the Senate. Leaders are using the reconciliation process because it allows for simple majority passage in both chambers, were GOP majorities are razor-thin. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said Republicans are preparing to address the concerns with a vote in the House, possibly as soon as this week, to change the package. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer seized on the House's upcoming do-over vote as a chance for Republicans who are dissatisfied with the package to reassert their leverage and 'force the bill back to the drawing board.' 'They say they don't like parts of the bill — now is their opportunity to change it,' Schumer said. On Tuesday, Vice President JD Vance was dispatched to speak with one GOP holdout, Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who has pushed for deeper spending reductions in the bill to prevent skyrocketing deficits from adding to the nation's $36 trillion debt load. Other Republican senators have raised concerns about the health care cuts. But Republicans are in agreement on border security, deportation and military funding, over the objections of Democrats who fought vigorously during the committee process to strip those provisions from the bill. The package includes about $150 billion for border security and deportation operations, including funding for hiring 10,000 new ICE officers — with what Johnson said are $10,000 hiring bonuses — as well as 3,000 new Border Patrol agents and other field operations and support staff. There's also funding for a daily detention capacity for 100,000 migrants and for flights for 1 million deportations annually. The package includes $46 billion for construction of Trump's long promised wall between the U.S.-Mexico border. Additionally, the bill includes $150 billion for the Pentagon, with $5 billion for the military deployment in support of border security, along with nearly $25 billion for Trump's 'Golden Dome' defense system over the U.S. Separately, the bill adds another $21 billion for the Coast Guard. Democrats have argued against the deportations, and warned that Trump appears to be stirring up protests so he can clamp down on migrant communities. Rep. Nanette Barragan — whose district represents the suburban city of Paramount, where the weekend Home Depot raid touched off protests — implored Americans: 'Listen to the words of this administration: They're using words like insurrection. They're using words like invasion.' She warned the administration is laying the groundwork for even steeper actions. 'That's a concern,' she said. 'That is dangerous. It's wrong.'

Musk says he regrets some posts he made about Trump
Musk says he regrets some posts he made about Trump

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Musk says he regrets some posts he made about Trump

(Reuters) -Billionaire Elon Musk said on Wednesday that he regrets some of the posts he made last week about U.S President Donald Trump, in a message on his social media platform X. "I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far," Musk wrote. Trump and Musk began exchanging insults last week on social media, with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO describing the president's sweeping tax and spending bill as a "disgusting abomination." Musk's post comes days after Trump said his relationship with Musk was over.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store