"I Did Not Know About This": Even Marjorie Taylor Greene Is Expressing Regret For Voting For The "Big, Beautiful" Bill
Well, one of the people who is no longer a fan of the "One Big, Beautiful Bill" is none other than someone who voted for it: Marjorie Taylor Greene.
The tax bill passed through Congress last month with a 215 to 214 vote (two Republicans voted no; Kentucky's Thomas Massie and Ohio's Warren Davidson). Within its 1,000+ pages, the bill offers greater benefits to the richest Americans, big cuts on Medicaid and SNAP, and a potentially troubling limitation on courts' abilities to enforce contempt. It's estimated to add $3.8 trillion to the federal deficit.
As the bill awaits its future in the Senate, Marjorie took to X to criticize it. "Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years," she wrote.
Related: A Republican's Response To A "Tax The Rich" Chant At His Town Hall Is Going Viral
"I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there," she continued. "We have no idea what AI will be capable of in the next 10 years and giving it free rein and tying states hands is potentially dangerous. This needs to be stripped out in the Senate."
Related: "I Am So Torn With What You Are Doing" — 11 Posts From MAGA Business Owners Who Are So Close To Getting It
"When the OBBB comes back to the House for approval after Senate changes, I will not vote for it with this in it. We should be reducing federal power and preserving state power. Not the other way around. Especially with rapidly developing AI that even the experts warn they have no idea what it may be capable of," she concluded.
Indeed, part of the bill plainly reads, "No State or political subdivision thereof may enforce, during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, any law or regulation of that State or a political subdivision thereof limiting, restricting, or otherwise regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems entered into interstate commerce."
Democrat Representative Eric Swalwell, among others, subsequently concluded that MTG likely hadn't actually read the bill itself.
Marjorie joins the company of Republican Representative Mike Flood, who got yelled at during a town hall when he was asked about the provision surrounding contempt orders. He replied, 'I do not agree with that section that was added to the bill...I am not going to hide the truth, this provision was unknown to me when I voted for that."
I mean, when even Elon Musk and Marjorie Taylor Greene are criticizing your bill...so glad these people get to make decisions over healthcare!!!
Also in In the News: People Can't Believe This "Disgusting" Donald Trump Jr. Post About Joe Biden's Cancer Diagnosis Is Real
Also in In the News: One Body Language Expert Spotted Something Very Telling When Donald Trump "Held His Own Hand" At His Recent Press Conference
Also in In the News: Republicans Are Calling Tim Walz "Tampon Tim," And The Backlash From Women Is Too Good Not To Share
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Please noooooo': Ye implores Trump, Musk to reconcile
Ye is hoping to prevent the unraveling of Tesla CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's relationship. The controversial rapper formerly known as Kanye West waded into the white-hot feud between POTUS and the one-time head of DOGE, encouraging them to call a truce in a post to X. "Broooos please noooooo," he wrote. "We love you both so much.' Musk and Trump's tiff began last week, when the former Trump adviser told CBS News last week that he was "disappointed" with Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' Musk continued to whale on this week, calling the bill a 'disgusting abomination and encouraging voters to oust any Republicans who supported it. The spat got worse on Thursday after Trump made his first public comments on Musk's critiques, saying he was 'very disappointed in Elon.' In a post to Truth Social, Trump speculated about the end of his relationship with the billionaire, saying that Musk 'just went CRAZY!' The president then threatened to terminate Musk's contracts with the federal government. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," he wrote. For his part, Musk accused Trump of being named in the case files of late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. "Time to drop the really big bomb: [Donald Trump] is in the Epstein files," he wrote. "That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" It's around this time that Ye jumped in, imploring the once-inseparable pair not to fight. and throwing in an emoji of two people hugging for good measure. Ye is a long-time Trump supporter who has courted controversy in recent years by sharing antisemitic theories and songs. He most recently showed his support for Trump on Sunday. "F**k anybody who don't love Trump," he wrote. "You're dumb."
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Trump-Musk alliance implodes: From the Politics Desk
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. In today's edition, we break down how President Donald Trump and Elon Musk's feud burst into public view. Plus, Jonathan Allen sifts through the spin to provide a reality check on what the 'big, beautiful bill' would actually do. Sign up to receive this newsletter in your inbox every weekday here. — Adam Wollner The simmering tension between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk boiled over into a full-blown public brawl Thursday. Act I: After a series of social media posts from Musk in recent days trashing Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' the president offered his first response during an Oval Office meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. 'I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill,' Trump said of his former adviser. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' Trump suggested that Musk, the world's richest man, was upset that the legislation cut out a tax credit meant to incentivize electric vehicle purchases. 'Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate, which was a lot of money for electric vehicles and they're having a hard time with electric vehicles and they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy,' Trump said. 'Elon knew this from the beginning.' Act II: Musk initially brushed off Trump's criticism, posting 'whatever' on X before firing off dozens of posts blasting the Republican bill and the president himself. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk said, referring to the hundreds of millions of dollars he spent on the last election. 'Such ingratitude,' he added. Act III: Trump then fired back on Truth Social, claiming that Musk 'went crazy' after the president 'asked him to leave' his White House role. Trump also suggested the government could sever ties with Musk's companies, which have billions of dollars in federal contracts. Act IV: In response, Musk claimed that the president was in what are known as the 'Epstein files' — a reference to a trove of documents and files spread across a number of investigations and lawsuits involving the late Jeffrey Epstein. The Justice Department earlier this year released hundreds more pages of documents related to the Epstein investigations. Although Trump and Epstein knew each other, there have been no new revelations about their relationship in any of those files. Trump has never been implicated in Epstein's abuse of underage girls. He denied any wrongdoing, saying in a post last year, 'I was never on Epstein's Plane, or at his 'stupid' Island.' Act V: Trump's latest word on the matter: 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago.' Read more on the back-and-forth → Related: Tesla's shares have fallen 16% since Musk began bashing Trump's bill last week, and the stock remains about 33% lower than on Inauguration Day, Steve Kopack reports. As the Senate considers President Donald Trump's 'one big, beautiful bill' (or 'OBBB'), there's a lot of dubious rhetoric flying around and, in some cases, hitting the fan. It can be hard for voters to know what to believe. So, it's worth assessing the purpose of the legislation, which the House has already passed a version of, and what it would actually do. The vehicle for the catchall measure is called budget reconciliation, a process created by Congress half a century ago to provide a fast track to bills that would bring spending and taxing into closer balance. That means it can't be filibustered, so Republicans only need a bare majority to get it through the Senate. But over the years, Republicans and Democrats alike have perverted the intent of reconciliation, using the advantage of the fast track to blow ever bigger holes in the budget. That's what OBBB would do, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The most obvious tell is that its enactment would require an increase in the legal cap on the national debt. If the debt were going down, there would be no need to raise the limit. Specifically, the House-passed bill would cut taxes by $3.7 trillion or so over a decade — largely by extending the rates that Trump and Congress put in place in 2017. At the same time, it would slash 'mandatory' spending — the accounts that pay out based on eligibility for long-standing programs rather than through annual 'discretionary' appropriations — by $1.3 trillion over a decade. The debt hole that's left is about $2.4 trillion. The White House argues that the CBO's bottom line is wrong because it wants congressional accountants to ignore the fact that current tax rates are set to expire. Instead, Trump's team contends, the CBO should assume that current rates will be extended — like an athlete assuming his income will continue to flow in when his existing contract is up. If Congress does nothing, taxes will go back up, which would bring a burst of revenue at a cost to taxpayers. In his bid to defeat the measure, or at least rewrite it, Elon Musk has charged that it is full of 'pork' — a term that, until he used it, was reserved for earmarks in the annual discretionary spending bills that are unaffected by OBBB. Calling the measure a 'disgusting abomination,' Musk treats it as a spending bill. But while there are some increases in funding — primarily for the Defense Department and efforts to combat illegal immigration — the main provisions are focused on slashing taxes and federal programs, including Medicaid and food stamps. The debt comes from the fact that the bill would not cut spending nearly as much as it would reduce revenue. And that's just arithmetic. 📱On line 1: Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping held a phone call amid ongoing tensions between the two superpowers, with a new in-person meeting planned soon. Read more → 🌎 Travel ban shock: Countries around the world criticized Trump after he announced a travel ban on nationals from a dozen countries and visa program cancellations for seven more. Read more → 🖊️ Auto-attack: Trump directed an investigation into former President Joe Biden and his close aides, accusing them of using 'autopen' signatures to cover up Biden's 'cognitive decline' and assert presidential power. Read more → ⚖️ Remaking the courts: Trump is taking a new approach to how he selects judges in his second term, focusing on more MAGA-friendly nominees and attacking the influential Federalist Society. Read more → ↗️ ICE ramp-up: Immigration and Customs Enforcement detained more than 2,200 people on Tuesday, the most arrests in a single day in its history. Read more → 👔 'A gut punch': Federal cuts to the Job Corps program have left thousands of low-income young people who have relied on the career training program for free housing and meals in limbo. Read more → 🗽 Big Apple showdown: The candidates running in the Democratic primary for mayor of New York City largely aimed their ire at Andrew Cuomo, the former New York governor and polling front-runner, during the debate last night. Read more → 🐊 2026 watch: Republican-turned-Democrat David Jolly announced he is running for Florida governor in 2026, aiming to become the first Democrat to lead the state in more than two decades. Read more → Follow live politics updates → That's all From the Politics Desk for now. Today's newsletter was compiled by Adam Wollner and Dylan Ebs. If you have feedback — likes or dislikes — email us at politicsnewsletter@ And if you're a fan, please share with everyone and anyone. They can sign up here. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bannon: Musk should be ‘deported from the country immediately'
MAGA insider and former White House adviser Steve Bannon called on President Trump to investigate Elon Musk's immigration status and deport the South African tech billionaire after the bitter implosion of the president's relationship with Musk on Thursday. 'They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately,' Bannon, a frequent critic of Musk, told The New York Times on Thursday. Musk and Trump spent much of Thursday afternoon trading barbs after their dispute over Trump's agenda-setting One Big Beautiful Bill Act erupted into a blistering public feud. During an appearance on his 'Bannon's War Room' live webcast, Bannon continued to lob attacks at the former head of the White House's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'Elon Musk is illegal, and he's got to go,' Bannon said. 'He's illegal? Deport immediately.' 'You're going to ship these other people home. Let's start with the South Africans, OK?' he added, alluding to the Trump administration's sweeping immigration crackdown. Musk, one of the largest donors to Trump's 2024 presidential campaign at roughly $250 million, was born and grew up in South Africa before he emigrated to Canada and later moved to the U.S., where he became a citizen while growing his tech empire, which includes SpaceX, the social platform X, Tesla and other endeavors. The Washington Post reported last year that Musk worked in the country illegally before gaining citizenship, prompting questions from Bannon and others about whether Musk's citizenship is legal. Bannon also noted Musk's reported drug usage as potential ammo for prompting his deportation. The New York Times reported last week that Musk's alleged use of ketamine and other substances on the campaign trail sparked concerns in Trump circles, but Musk denied the claims. 'The drug thing is going to be investigated,' Bannon said. Trump and Musk's relationship began to sour in recent days as Musk lashed out over the Trump-backed megabill currently under review in Congress. Musk called it a 'disgusting abomination,' while Trump pushed back and defended the bill. Bannon said he supports Trump's latest suggestion that Musk's massive government contracts should be pulled. 'It needs dramatic action. I would pull all the contracts immediately,' Bannon said. He also blasted Musk's abrupt and abrasive attacks against Trump, which escalated Thursday to a series of accusatory posts on his X platform that attempted to link Trump to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and claim credit for Trump's election win. 'President Trump empowered him more than anyone has ever been empowered in this government, had his back, promoted this guy, even when people like me said, 'You're making a mistake. This is a bad guy. He's going to turn on you. He's not with us. He's also totally incompetent,'' Bannon said on War Room. 'Then as soon as President Trump comes out today, and President Trump saying it in the nicest way possible about the bill … the guy gets up and starts tweeting the most vicious stuff you can tweet.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.