China bristles at Macron linking Ukraine defense to Taiwan threats
China on Saturday criticized as a 'double standard' attempts to link the defense of Ukraine with the need to protect Taiwan from a Chinese invasion — a thinly veiled reference to a speech by French President Emmanuel Macron in Singapore on Friday night.
As part of a broader address on the risks of division between China and the United States, Macron told the Shangri-La Dialogue defense meeting that if Russia was allowed to take any part of Ukraine without constraint, then 'what could happen in Taiwan?'
In a Facebook post, China's embassy in Singapore said that comparing the Taiwan issue with the Ukraine issue is 'unacceptable.'
'The two are different in nature and not comparable at all,' the post said, adding that Taiwan was entirely an internal affair for China.
'If one tries to denounce a 'double standard' with a double standard, the only result we can get is still a double standard,' the post said.
The embassy post did not mention Macron directly, but it was accompanied by a photo of him talking at the event.
Beijing has previously dispatched defense ministers and other senior military officials to the annual meeting, which ends Sunday, but this year sent a relatively low-level delegation of military academics.
China views democratically governed Taiwan as its own territory and has stepped up military and political pressure to assert those claims, including increasing the intensity of war games, saying the island is one of its provinces with no right to be called a state.
Taiwan's government rejects Beijing's sovereignty claims, saying only the island's people can decide their future.
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told the gathering on Saturday that China posed an 'imminent' threat and any attempt to conquer Taiwan 'would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world.'
Regional diplomats said that Macron's comments were far from isolated during the freewheeling, informal meeting, and risks of a Russian victory emboldening a Chinese invasion of Taiwan had at times surfaced in sideline discussions.
'The message from many backing Ukraine is that the line must be held if a message is to be sent to China,' said one East Asian envoy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
North Korea says military ties with Russia to ensure ‘peace'
North Korea on Monday defended its military cooperation with Russia, saying ties were aimed at 'ensuring peace and stability' in Europe and Asia. The two countries have strengthened military cooperation in recent years, with Pyongyang supplying arms and troops to support Moscow's war against Ukraine. Around 600 North Korean soldiers have been killed and thousands more wounded fighting for Russia, according to South Korean lawmaker Lee Seong-kweun, citing the country's intelligence service. A multilateral sanctions monitoring group including South Korea, the United States, Japan and eight other countries on Friday condemned those ties as 'unlawful'. In response, Pyongyang said its cooperation with Moscow was 'aimed at protecting the sovereignty, territorial integrity and security interests of the states' as well as 'ensuring peace and stability in the Eurasian region.' The statement by a foreign ministry official described ties with Russia as the 'cream of inter-state relations.' Pyongyang and Moscow, they added, could 'establish a multi-polar world order based on genuine respect for sovereignty, equality and justice.' The Multilateral Sanctions Monitoring Team, launched last October, monitors and reports violations of UN Security Council sanctions on North Korea, though it operates independently of the UN. Its creation followed Russia's veto of a Security Council resolution that effectively ended the system in place to monitor Pyongyang's compliance with UN sanctions first implemented in 2006 and subsequently strengthened several times. According to the group, Russian-flagged cargo vessels delivered as many as 'nine million rounds of mixed artillery and multiple rocket launcher ammunition' in 2024 from North Korea to Russia. In return, 'Russia is believed to have provided North Korea with air defense equipment and anti-aircraft missiles', it said. North Korea in April confirmed for the first time that it had deployed troops to Russia to support Moscow's war in Ukraine.
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
Explosions caused 2 bridges in western Russia to collapse, officials say
Explosions caused two bridges to collapse and derailed two trains in western Russia overnight, officials said Sunday, without saying what had caused the blasts. In one of the incidents, seven people were killed and dozens were injured. The first bridge, in the Bryansk region on the border with Ukraine, collapsed on top of a passenger train on Saturday, causing the casualties. The train's driver was among those killed, state-run Russian Railways said. In that collapse, a freight train was thrown off its rails onto the road below as the explosion collapsed the bridge, local acting Gov. Alexander Khinshtein said Sunday. The crash sparked a fire, but there were no casualties, he said. Russia's Investigative Committee, the country's top criminal investigation agency, said in a statement that explosions had caused the two bridges to collapse, but did not give further details. Several hours later, it edited the statement, which was posted on social media, to remove the words 'explosions' but did not provide an explanation. The committee said that it would be investigating the incidents as potential acts of terrorism. Rescue workers cleared debris from both sites, while some of those injured were transported to Moscow for treatment. Photos posted by government agencies in Bryansk appeared to show train carriages ripped apart and lying amid fallen concrete from the collapsed bridge. Other footage on social media was apparently taken from inside vehicles on the road that had managed to avoid driving onto the bridge before it collapsed. Bryansk regional Gov. Alexander Bogomaz announced three days of mourning for the victims, starting Monday. Damage to railway tracks was also found Sunday by inspectors working on the line elsewhere in the Bryansk region, Moscow Railway said in a statement. It did not say whether the damage was linked to the collapsed bridges. In the past, some officials have accused pro-Ukrainian saboteurs of attacking Russia's railway infrastructure. The details surrounding such incidents, however, are limited and cannot be independently verified. Ukraine's military intelligence, known by the Ukrainian abbreviation GUR, said Sunday that a Russian military freight train carrying food and fuel had been blown up on its way to Crimea. It did not claim the attack was carried out by GUR or mention the bridge collapses. The statement said Moscow's key artery with the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia region and Crimea has been destroyed. Russia forces have been pushing into the region of Zaporizhzhia in eastern Ukraine since Moscow's full-scale invasion in February 2022. Russia took Crimea and annexed it in 2014.
Arab News
9 hours ago
- Arab News
The US-China trade war's consequences for agriculture
The trade war initiated by the Trump administration, particularly focused on China, has sparked widespread debate about its implications for various sectors, especially agriculture. As tariffs have been imposed on numerous goods, the US agricultural sector faces significant challenges, particularly concerning essential exports like soybeans and corn. This article examines the consequences of the trade conflict, especially regarding food security and weaponry, while also assessing the position of developing countries, with a specific focus on Saudi Arabia. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for formulating strategies that mitigate negative impacts and foster collaboration in an increasingly interdependent global economy. The US-China trade war was started with the intent to rectify perceived trade imbalances and protect American industries. The administration's tariffs aimed to shield domestic producers from foreign competition and address issues related to intellectual property theft. However, the immediate fallout of these tariffs has been a disruption in agricultural exports, particularly to China, which has historically been one of the largest markets for US agricultural products. American farmers, particularly those in Republican strongholds, have reported significant declines in sales, leading to financial distress. The repercussions extend beyond individual farms, threatening the broader agricultural sector's viability and influencing global food security. This conflict has highlighted the fragility of agricultural markets, which are intricately linked to international trade dynamics. The imposition of tariffs has led to a significant decrease in US agricultural exports to China, particularly in commodities like soybeans, which have seen a dramatic fall in demand. As Brazil and Argentina have ramped up their production and captured market shares, US farmers are finding it increasingly difficult to regain access to these crucial markets. The historical example of the 1980s grain embargo against the Soviet Union serves as a cautionary tale, illustrating how protectionist measures can backfire, hurting domestic producers while leaving foreign competitors relatively unscathed. Additionally, the psychological burden on American farmers cannot be overlooked. The uncertainty surrounding trade relations has led to fears of economic instability, with farmers expressing concerns over unsold crops and the long-term viability of their operations. Kenneth Hartman of the National Corn Growers Association encapsulated this anxiety by emphasizing the dire consequences of prolonged disconnection from the Chinese market. Food security has historically been a pivotal aspect of international relations. The US has often leveraged its agricultural prowess to exert influence over other nations, particularly in developing countries. Following its sanctions on Russia, the US sought to intertwine agricultural economies with its own, thereby fostering dependency through strategic practices. This raises questions about the ethical implications of using food security as a tool of power. In contrast, Saudi Arabia's approach to agricultural self-sufficiency offers a compelling counternarrative. By investing significantly in domestic agriculture, the Kingdom aims to reduce reliance on external sources, thereby enhancing national food security. This strategic pivot underscores the importance of sovereignty in food production and highlights the potential of developing nations to chart their own paths in the face of global trade pressures. Historically, John R. Block, who was secretary of agriculture in the Reagan administration, advocated for self-sufficiency in developing nations, promoting the idea that countries should cultivate their agricultural capabilities to reduce reliance on imports. However, this notion becomes paradoxical when considering that many developing countries could achieve food security more efficiently through American agricultural products. This dynamic illustrates a broader strategy of domination: controlling food equates to wielding power. By fostering dependency on US agricultural exports, America not only secures its own economic interests but also reinforces its geopolitical influence. A compelling counterexample to this paradigm is Saudi Arabia, where King Fahd's administration made a strategic pivot toward agricultural self-sufficiency, directly challenging US recommendations that favored external dependence. Recognizing the vulnerabilities associated with food imports, the Saudi government invested heavily in domestic agriculture, focusing on initiatives that would enhance local production capabilities. These investments led to significant advancements in technology, irrigation systems and agricultural practices, resulting in increased yields and a reduced reliance on imported food. This pursuit of self-sufficiency not only enhanced food security for Saudi Arabia but also economically empowered its citizens by creating jobs, fostering local industries and integrating them into the agricultural mainstream. Farmers received training and resources that allowed them to contribute to a more robust domestic agricultural sector, ultimately leading to greater national pride and resilience against global market fluctuations. Saudi Arabia's approach underscores the importance of national sovereignty in food security, highlighting that self-sufficiency can be achieved through strategic planning and investment rather than reliance on external sources. This successful policy serves as a valuable lesson for other nations, particularly those in similar geopolitical situations, emphasizing that prioritizing local agricultural development can lead to sustainable food security and economic empowerment. Saudi Arabia's pursuit of agricultural self-sufficiency serves as a valuable lesson for other nations. Dr. Turki Faisal Al-Rasheed Furthermore, as global food systems continue to evolve, the Saudi model demonstrates that countries can effectively balance self-sufficiency with international trade. By developing a robust domestic agricultural sector while maintaining trade relationships, Saudi Arabia has positioned itself to navigate the complexities of global food markets more effectively. This dual approach not only secures its food supply but also enables the country to play a more influential role in regional and global food security discussions. In conclusion, while the US promotes self-sufficiency in developing nations as a means of encouraging independence, the Saudi experience illustrates that achieving food security can also involve strategic investments in local agriculture. By recognizing the interplay between self-sufficiency and international cooperation, countries can develop more resilient food systems that protect their interests while contributing to global food security efforts. Developing countries, often caught in the crossfire of US-China trade tensions, face unique challenges. Many of these nations rely on agricultural exports to sustain their economies, making them particularly vulnerable to market fluctuations triggered by trade wars. The trade conflict can exacerbate existing inequalities, as wealthier nations with greater resources can better absorb the shocks of tariffs and retaliatory measures. In the context of Saudi Arabia, while the nation has made strides toward agricultural self-sufficiency, it remains heavily dependent on imports for various food products. The trade war complicates these dynamics, as rising food prices and market instability can threaten food security for vulnerable populations. The interplay of global trade and domestic agricultural policies thus becomes crucial in ensuring that developing nations can navigate these challenges effectively. Given the complexities of the trade war and its implications for agriculture and food security, several strategies can help mitigate negative impacts on both the US and developing nations. Firstly, pursuing diplomatic resolutions to enhance trade access with key markets, particularly China, can create a more stable environment for agricultural exports. Constructive dialogue focused on fair trade practices can cultivate cooperation and trust. Secondly, innovating through sustainable farming practices can enhance productivity and food security. Investing in technology such as precision farming can position US farmers to compete effectively in both domestic and international markets. Thirdly, forming strategic partnerships with countries facing similar agricultural challenges can establish a united front in advocating fair trade practices. Collaborating with nations with aligned agricultural interests can bolster global food security. Fourthly, encouraging farmers to diversify their export markets can reduce dependence on any single nation. By exploring opportunities in emerging markets, US agriculture can build resilience against trade disruptions. Finally, providing support to developing nations through investment, technology transfer and capacity building can help them achieve greater self-sufficiency in food production. This, in turn, can enhance global food security by reducing reliance on a few dominant suppliers. In summary, the trade war's impacts reach far beyond the immediate economic consequences for US farmers. They challenge the very foundations of global food security and the strategies employed to navigate this conflict will determine the resilience of agricultural sectors worldwide. As nations strive to adapt to these changes, the lessons learned from both the US and Saudi Arabia will prove integral to developing sustainable pathways for food security and economic cooperation in the future. The ongoing trade war between the US and China has significant implications for agriculture and global food security. As American farmers grapple with the challenges posed by tariffs and market disruptions, it is essential to consider the broader consequences of these actions on developing nations. By adopting a balanced approach that emphasizes collaboration, innovation and strategic engagement, the US can navigate the complexities of the global trade landscape. The decisions made today will shape the future of agriculture and international relations for generations to come. Through resilience and strategic foresight, American agriculture can not only weather the storms of trade conflict but also reaffirm its role as a leader in global food production. In an interconnected world, fostering cooperation and embracing the realities of global trade will be crucial for ensuring a sustainable and secure future for all nations.
