Trump slams media who questioned Iran bombing strike
President Donald Trump continued his criticism of establishment media organizations for their emphasis on preliminary intelligence reports showing that the bombing strikes on Iran did not completely destroy its nuclear facilities. The president posted several posts throughout Wednesday and Thursday, many of them in all caps criticizing the reports and accusing them of publishing intentionally 'fake' stories. On Thursday, Trump teased a 'rumor' that the New York Times and CNN would fire their reporters who reported.
'Rumor is that the Failing New York Times and Fake News CNN will be firing the reporters who made up the FAKE stories on the Iran Nuclear sites because they got it so wrong,' Trump said. 'Let's see what happens?' CNN exclusively reported leaked details from preliminary intelligence assessments of the strikes by the Defense Intelligence Agency, citing 'seven people' briefed on the report. Trump and his officials, particularly Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth criticized the reports, targeting one of the lead reporters of the story Natasha Bertrand of being dishonest.
'Natasha Bertrand should be FIRED from CNN! I watched her for three days doing Fake News. She should be IMMEDIATELY reprimanded, and then thrown out 'like a dog,'' Trump wrote on social media. 'She should not be allowed to work at Fake News CNN. It's people like her who destroyed the reputation of a once great Network,' Trump continued. 'Her slant was so obviously negative, besides, she doesn't have what it takes to be an on camera correspondent, not even close. FIRE NATASHA!'
Trump's post about CNN firing Bertrand appeared to be wishful thinking, as CNN issued a statement standing by Bertrand and her reporting. 'We stand 100% behind Natasha Bertrand's journalism and specifically her and her colleagues' reporting of the early intelligence assessment of the U.S. attack on Iran's nuclear facilities,' the news outlet said in a statement. CNN denounced the criticism targeted at Bertrand as irrational.
'We do not believe it is reasonable to criticize CNN reporters for accurately reporting on the existence of the assessment and accurately characterizing its findings, which are in the public interest,' they wrote. The Trump administration continues to criticize the media for questioning the success of the mission after U.S. pilots aboard seven B-2 bombers dropped 14 Massive Ordinance Penetrator (MOP) bombs on the nuclear facilities in Fordow and Natanz. But the president continued posting criticism of both CNN and the New York Times, describing them on Thursday morning as 'bad people with evil intentions.'
'These reporters are just BAD AND SICK PEOPLE,' Trump wrote on social media on Wednesday. 'You would think they would be proud of the great success we had, instead of trying to always make our Country look bad.' Trump and his officials singled out Bertrand for her reporting on the infamous Steele Dossier and a 2020 Politico report reporting that 'former senior intelligence officials' believed that the Hunter Biden laptop was 'Russian disinformation.'
'She lied on the Laptop from Hell Story, and now she lied on the Nuclear Sites Story, attempting to destroy our Patriot Pilots by making them look bad when, in fact, they did a GREAT job and hit 'pay dirt' — TOTAL OBLITERATION!' Trump wrote on social media.
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth held a press conference on Thursday, complaining about the media reports based on 'biased leaks to biased publications.' 'How about we take a beat, recognize first the success of our warriors, hold them up, tell their stories, celebrate that, wave an American flag, be proud of what we accomplish?' he asked.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
32 minutes ago
- Times
BBC staff told not to fight with family and friends over Gaza coverage
The BBC's director-general has warned staff not to 'fight' with their friends and family who are critical of the broadcaster's coverage of the war in Gaza. Tim Davie acknowledged that the conflict has been 'incredibly difficult' for staff from communities who consider that its output has not been 'representative of its views' during an all-staff 'ask me anything' session earlier this month. He urged them to adopt 'common sense' in response to concerns from one staffer that they frequently faced accusations about the BBC being a propaganda machine and biased about Gaza, according to the entertainment industry website Deadline. 'I love my job, but sometimes I can't tell anyone I work here for fear of arguments,' they said. Davie told staff that there was no expectation for them to defend the BBC's output. 'There's no pressure on anyone to fight for the BBC in that context,' he said. 'They've got to look after themselves, protect their family relationships, protect their friendships. That is sacrosanct to me'. • Tim Davie warns staff about 'antisemitic behaviour' at the BBC He added that trust in the BBC among audiences remains high and suggested staff could point to the data that reflects this if they felt it was appropriate. 'We're all advocates for the BBC. We're all ambassadors for the BBC. But let's be reasonable, and let's use common sense about this,' he said. 'Some issues are very tough, and I know it's been incredibly difficult for some people within communities who do feel that the coverage is not representative, in their view, of what is going on.' Deborah Turness, the chief executive of BBC News, suggested that some critics of the BBC's coverage are stuck in online echo chambers. 'A lot of people are reading a lot of content on social media feeds, which are algorithmically driven. So it reinforces the rabbit hole of perspective,' she said. • Viewers' opinions on BBC News to be gathered for first time 'When people come out of that quite polarised environment in their media feeds and meet BBC content, which is striving to be impartial, they can feel that it is an attack on their values.' The BBC faced criticism this week from the producer of a documentary about doctors working in Gaza after it decided to drop the film. The corporation said that it was handing Gaza: Doctors Under Attack — also known as Gaza: Medics Under Fire — back to its producer, Basement Films, because of fears that it was biased. Basement Films' head, the former Channel 4 News editor Ben de Pear, apologised to the contributors and criticised the BBC for reversing its original decision, having promised to release it on six occasions. • BBC will not ban Kneecap from its Glastonbury coverage Production was paused in April pending the conclusion of an investigation into another programme, Gaza: How To Survive a Warzone, which featured the teenage son of a Hamas official as a narrator. The investigation was undertaken by Peter Johnston, the BBC's director of editorial complaints. The report is understood to have been delivered to Samir Shah, the BBC's chair, and is expected to be published shortly.
Reuters
36 minutes ago
- Reuters
Iran denies any meeting with US next week, foreign minister says
DUBAI, June 26 (Reuters) - Iran currently has no plan to meet with the United States, Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said on Thursday in an interview on state TV, contradicting U.S. President Donald Trump's statement that Washington planned to have talks with Iran next week. The Iranian foreign minister said Tehran was assessing whether talks with the U.S. were in its interest, following five previous rounds of negotiations that were cut short by Israel and the U.S. attacking Iran's nuclear facilities. The U.S. and Israel said the strikes were meant to curb Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons, while Iran says its nuclear programme is solely geared toward civilian use. Araqchi said the damages to nuclear sites 'were not little' and that relevant authorities were figuring out the new realities of Iran's nuclear programme, which he said would inform Iran's future diplomatic stance.
The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
How the US used its bunker-buster bombs at Iranian nuclear sites
The deep penetrating bombs that the U.S. dropped into two Iranian nuclear facilities were designed specifically for those sites and were the result of more than 15 years of intelligence and weapons design work, the Pentagon's top leaders said Thursday. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a press briefing that they are confident the weapons struck exactly as planned. Caine, the nation's top military officer, offered new details about the work that went into building the 'bunker-buster' bombs and how the U.S. used them to burrow into the Iranian sites. He sought to show the level of destruction but did not directly address President Donald Trump's assertion that Tehran's nuclear program has been 'obliterated.' A classified briefing that pushed US work on bunker busters The bombs, called the GBU-57 A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator, have their roots in a decades-old classified briefing 'of what looked like a major construction project in the mountains of Iran,' Caine said. That turned out to be the Fordo fuel enrichment plant, with construction believed to have started around 2006. It became operational in 2009, the same year Tehran publicly acknowledged its existence. The classified briefing was shown in 2009 to a Defense Threat Reduction Agency officer, who with a colleague 'lived and breathed' Fordo for the next 15 years, studying the geology, construction dig, the earth moved and 'every piece of equipment going in and every piece of equipment going out," Caine said. What they concluded: The U.S. didn't have a bomb that could destroy those sites. So the Pentagon got to work, Caine said. 'We had so many Ph.D.s working on the mock program — doing modeling and simulation — that we were quietly and in a secret way the biggest users of supercomputer hours within the United States of America,' he said. How the bunker busters are designed The 30,000-pound bomb is comprised of steel, explosive and a fuse programmed to a specific detonation time. The longer the fuse, the deeper the weapon will penetrate before exploding. Over the years, the military tested and retested it hundreds of times on mock facilities, Caine said. Crews fine-tuned the bombs to detonate in the mock enrichment rooms, delaying detonation until they had reached a position to send a pressure blast through open tunnels to destroy equipment underground. How the US said it bombed an Iranian underground nuclear facility Fordo had two main ventilation routes into the underground facility — and officials carefully eyed these entry points as a way to target the site. Each route had three shafts — a main shaft and a smaller shaft on either side, which looked almost like a pitchfork in graphics provided by the Pentagon. In the days preceding the U.S. attack, Iran placed large concrete slabs on top of both ventilation routes to try to protect them, Caine said. In response, the U.S. crafted an attack plan where six bunker-buster bombs would be used against each ventilation route, using the main shaft as a way down into the enrichment facility. Seven B-2 stealth bombers were used, carrying two of the massive munitions apiece. The first bomb was used to eliminate the concrete slab, Caine said. The next four bombs were dropped down the main shaft and into the complex at a speed of more than 1,000 feet per second before exploding, he said. A sixth bomb was dropped as a backup, in case anything went wrong. In addition to the 12 bombs dropped on Fordo, with six on each ventilation route, two more hit Iran's main Natanz facility, Caine said. Each crew was able to confirm detonation as they saw the bombs drop from the aircraft in front of them: 'We know that the trailing jets saw the first weapons function,' Caine said. The pilots reported back that it was the brightest explosion they had ever seen — that it looked like daylight, he said. Questions remain about the whereabouts of Iran's highly enriched uranium Caine said the munitions were built, tested and loaded properly, guided to their intended targets and then exploded as designed. 'Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed,' Hegseth said. However, questions remained as to whether the highly enriched uranium that Iran would need to develop a nuclear weapon was at the site at the time. Asked repeatedly, Hegseth did not say if the uranium had been destroyed or moved. 'I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be — moved or otherwise,' Hegseth said.
