
DeSantis appears to be winning the war on social media
With an open presidential primary coming in 2028, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is launching an offensive to win back supporters of the Republican leader whom he dared to challenge in the last election. And he's doing so by latching onto President Donald Trump's most prominent issue — immigration. The problem for DeSantis is his own state's Republicans think they know Trump better. DeSantis last week ordered lawmakers into a special legislative session to pass a raft of border-related proposals he floated, including criminal charges for officers if they didn't enforce immigration measures and restrictions on people who send money to families outside the US.
Within minutes of the session convening, legislators tossed out the governor's proposals and called their own special session. They ignored many of his requests and presented their own bill that cedes much of DeSantis' power on immigration enforcement to the state's agriculture commissioner. Lawmakers titled it the Tackling and Reforming Unlawful Migration Policy, or TRUMP, Act. The battle has exposed the term-limited governor's struggles to regain the power he lost in his first White House run as he prepares for a potential second try.
Having led Florida's transformation from a perennial swing state to one that votes solidly Republican, DeSantis is betting on his feel for his state's voters, who delivered a second term by a huge 19-point margin. But he has struggled to capture the unstoppable aura he had before he went against Trump — and his relative lack of relationships with lawmakers hasn't helped.
'This is a relationship business,' Republican political consultant Jamie Miller said. 'And he is not good at the relationship side.'
DeSantis' office did not respond to a request for comment. Back in 2023, when DeSantis braved the frigid Iowa winter to run for president — and brought some loyal legislators to campaign for him — he sold himself to voters as a brash, bold executive, a more effective version of Trump. And he could point to the results, thanks to the Florida legislature.
For six years, DeSantis kept lawmakers in line with his veto pen. But as DeSantis' chances faded on his way to a blowout loss in the Iowa caucuses, the presidential sheen wore off. In a sign DeSantis was not proving a threat to Trump, the Republican Party of Florida voted in September 2023 not to require participants in the state's 2024 presidential primary to pledge to support the eventual nominee, which ensured Trump would not have to pledge support to DeSantis when the two were locked in a bitter campaign.
DeSantis would never gain the national traction his campaign had set out to demonstrate, and would be out of the race within a week of the leadoff Iowa caucuses. Despite a year of Trump's taunts, they reached a public rapprochement last May, when DeSantis agreed to convene his top donors to raise money for Trump. 'Ron, I love that you're back,' Trump said during a conference call to the donors as they gathered at a Fort Lauderdale hotel, raising $3 million in a day for Trump's campaign.
By December, DeSantis had worked his way into the discussion for Trump's defence secretary when Pete Hegseth encountered public resistance. Hegseth was ultimately confirmed. DeSantis has never been comfortable with the backslapping and favor-trading side of politics, which some of his most influential supporters say may rub some lawmakers the wrong way. Even among his admirers, DeSantis is known for having little patience for greasing the wheels of government — shaking hands and making phone calls. Trump, meanwhile, is well-known for his personal touch, often calling lawmakers for their input and inviting current and would-be allies to his Mar-a-Lago estate or his other properties. And now the governor's attitude is costing him, some capitol watchers say.
Last month, when DeSantis announced he was calling lawmakers into special session, House Speaker Daniel Perez told The Associated Press the legislature was 'blindsided.' 'I called him immediately,' Perez said. 'He didn't answer. He didn't call me back.' State Sen. Randy Fine is a former ally of the governor who later endorsed Trump in the 2024 primary. The president returned the favour after his victory by endorsing Fine in a Republican primary for the US House seat previously held by Mike Waltz, who was picked to be national security adviser. Last week, Fine won the contest with more than 80% of the vote and is on track to win the seat in April, despite not living in the district he hopes to represent.
Fine compared his reward to the treatment of lawmakers who were loyal to DeSantis — and are now being attacked as 'Republicans in name only.'
'I was loyal. I'm going to Congress. They were loyal. They get called RINOs who want amnesty,' Fine said. 'There are female members of the Legislature who went to Iowa a year ago and walked through the snow to help him and got frostbite. And now a year later they're RINOs who want amnesty? I think it's hard to describe the sense of betrayal.' Both sides of the argument over Florida's immigration battle say they are best capturing Trump's desires.
The governor said the legislature's measure is a 'betrayal' of conservative voters and naming it after the president is a 'misnomer.'
'President Trump has been very strong coming out of the gate on immigration enforcement. He wants to solve this problem once and for all. The bill they did is more window dressing,' DeSantis said in a video he posted on X. Transferring his power to the agriculture commissioner, he said, would be like putting the 'fox in charge of the hen house,' implying farmers want to continue to hire immigrants who are in the country illegally.
But legislators say they have Trump's blessing. The bill sponsor, the Florida House speaker and the state senator expected to be sent to Congress visited the White House on Monday to celebrate NHL's defending Stanley Cup champion Florida Panthers. 'The whole goal of this bill is to help President Trump do his job,' said Republican state Sen. Joe Gruters, a bill sponsor and Trump ally. He said Stephen Miller, a senior adviser to the president and immigration hard-liner, gave lawmakers 'technical guidance' and they made changes to the bill 'to make sure we're doing everything that the president's team wants.'
DeSantis has picked up some support along the way. U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds, a key Trump ally who might run to replace the term-limited DeSantis next year, said his own relationship with the governor 'got frayed' when Donalds backed Trump two years ago. But last week, Donalds said in a podcast the governor was 'correct' that he needed to have enforcement powers over immigration.
Kevin Roberts, the president of the Heritage Foundation, chimed in on social media to highlight DeSantis' proposals. The think tank Roberts leads drafted Project 2025, the blueprint for a hard-right turn in American government and society that has inspired a number of Trump actions.
'Now is not the time for watered-down proposals,' Roberts posted on X, giving DeSantis a 'bravo.' Neither the president nor the White House has publicly expressed an opinion. The White House did not respond to a request for comment for this story. For now, DeSantis appears to be winning the war on social media and conservative airwaves, said Miller, the political consultant. 'But we all know that that microphone can be taken away with one tweet,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
29 minutes ago
- The National
The LA protests were exactly what Donald Trump has been waiting for
It's a real-life film noir in the City of Angels. US President Donald Trump is once again hurling Americans through the looking glass, this time – fittingly – in Los Angeles. It feels lifted from 1930s hard-boiled pulp fiction in which nothing is as it appears and everything is the inverse of what powerful men assert. It's genuinely shocking, while also seemingly inevitable, that US military forces are being deployed to major cities with the express purpose of trying to intimidate, quash and, ultimately, violently confront Americans who dare raise their voices against Mr Trump's policies and practices. It is one of the most significant inflection points since the last election took America on the road away from constitutional democracy and towards the kind of repressive lawlessness this President admires in other leaders and is seeking to emulate in the US. Yet the astonishing gap between rhetoric and reality, and what this underlying system of untruth versus truth reveals, bears precise unpacking. It reveals much about the current national condition and trajectory. Mr Trump says Los Angeles has been invaded, and so it has. But not by the protesters, who appear to be almost entirely Southern California locals outraged that federal immigration authorities are now using school pickup zones, areas where men gather seeking day labour, and, worst of all, routine immigration check-ins – thereby punishing the law-abiding – for seemingly arbitrary deportations. The evolving "system" typically lacks due process – or any legal process whatsoever. That this outrages communities that directly overlap with targeted or threatened migrants and their (often US citizen) families is hardly surprising. But it has shocked consciences sufficiently to bring out thousands of protesters in Southern California and gain the rest of the country's attention in the process. It's exactly what Mr Trump has been waiting for, not just for months or even years, but very possibly decades, if his rhetoric on immigration over his adult lifetime is taken seriously. The President didn't wait for the situation to get out of hand or even become remotely challenging to local authorities and systems. Los Angeles police and other authorities were having no apparent difficulty in handling largely peaceful crowds. These were mainly made up of chanting protesters relying on words and not deeds, punctuated by the occasional extremist, hothead or agitator employing excessive rhetoric and engaging in vandalism. By all accounts, including countless independent live video streams flowing online beyond the control of any content creator or editor, the protests were almost entirely peaceful and manageable. Some youths threw bottles, rocks and concrete at police, but few if any major injuries, and no deaths, have occurred. It really wasn't a big deal and certainly no crisis. There was never a question of either the California governor or Los Angeles mayor – albeit both are liberal Democrats – requesting federal troops. The soldiers weren't wanted and they clearly weren't needed. Some youths threw bottles, rocks and concrete at police, but few if any major injuries, and no deaths, have occurred. It really wasn't a big deal and certainly no crisis Yet Mr Trump jumped at the soonest opportunity to deploy federal troops under his control to a staunchly Democratic city experiencing angry protests against his policies. Six thousand federalised California National Guard troops and 700 Marines were dispatched to deal with Americans who Mr Trump called "animals" who "hate our country". Offering the usual complete absence of evidence, he accused California Governor Gavin Newsom of financing the protests, presumably because he called the troop deployment 'unconstitutional' and "authoritarian". California is suing the White House, hoping a court orders Mr Trump to remove his forces. The president preposterously countered that without the soldiers, Los Angeles would be "burning to the ground right now" as it did when wildfires ravaged the city in January. The deeper purpose of the deployments – and especially the open-ended executive order authorising them that apparently applies to any protest or even potential protests anywhere in the country in the coming weeks – is to acculturate Americans and their political system to the use of the military to suppress peaceful political demonstrations. It's likely Mr Trump is anticipating a growing wave of such protests over the next three years, and he's probably not wrong. During his first term, Mr Trump wanted to deploy federal troops against protesters insisting that "black lives matter" after the murder of George Floyd in May 2020. He was rebuffed by then-defence secretary Mark Esper and military Chief of Staff Mike Milley. But both men and all the other "adults in the room' during the first Trump term are gone, replaced by personal loyalists without any evident allegiance to US institutions or even the Constitution beyond this president's personal and political interests. This same lack of institutional or personal restraints has led the military to disgracefully agree to stage a highly provocative, entirely improper military parade through the streets of Washington DC on Saturday – Mr. Trump's 79th birthday. In his first term, he was bluntly told that the US military did not perform such sycophantic spectacles, which are incompatible with American republican traditions. Now, Mr Trump is getting everything he wants, at least from all of his executive branch subordinates, no questions asked. Mr Trump knows that peaceful street protests are a highly effective tool against would-be strongmen, and he's making it clear at the earliest possible opportunity to let everyone know that he intends to use the military to suppress street-level opposition to his policies and rule. They could, after all, be the nucleus of an American "colour revolution," in the style of European and Asian societies that resisted their own aspiring caudillos not merely at the ballot box but also the barricades. Mr Trump has been clear that, unlike most previous presidents, he doesn't regard peaceful protests as legitimate opposition, threatening that, "those people that want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force". Once upon a time in America, peaceful demonstrations constituted free speech and assembly, steeped in the finest traditions of a country literally founded upon political protests. But Mr Trump wants protesters who burn US flags to express outrage – which the Supreme Court repeatedly found to be protected speech – to be subjected to an 'automatic' year in prison. The land of the free is certainly 'going through some things'. As Los Angeles, home of Hollywood and setting of many of the greatest films noir, famously explained about arbitrary power, "forget about it, Jake. It's Chinatown".

Gulf Today
39 minutes ago
- Gulf Today
'Make a deal, before there is nothing left,' Trump warns Iran
US President Donald Trump urged Iran on Friday to "make a deal," warning that there will be more "death and destruction" after Israel launched deadly strikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities. His comments on his Truth Social platform came after Israel pounded Iran in a series of air raids on Friday, striking 100 targets. The operation killed senior figures — among them the armed forces chief and top nuclear scientists — and Iran has called Israel's wave of strikes a "declaration of war." On Friday morning, Trump said: "I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal." He added that Israel — which Trump has aligned Washington to since his return to the White House — has a lot of weapons thanks to the United States and "they know how to use it." "There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end," Trump said on his Truth Social platform. "Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left... JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE," he said. Trump earlier told Fox News he had been made aware of the Israeli strikes before they happened, and stressed that Tehran "cannot have a nuclear bomb," the US broadcaster said. He also said that "we are hoping to get back to the negotiating table," according to Fox News. During Trump's first term, he pulled the United States out of a landmark agreement to relieve sanctions on Iran in return for curbs on its nuclear program. Donald Trump (L), flanked by Melania Trump, addresses attendees during in the Congressional Picnic. AFP Fox News also reported that Trump's administration reached out to at least one key Middle Eastern ally to acknowledge that the strike was going to happen, but said the United States was not involved. "Trump noted the US is ready to defend itself and Israel if Iran retaliates," Fox News said. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said earlier on Thursday that the United States was "not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region." "Let me be clear: Iran should not target US interests or personnel." Agence France-Presse


Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Israel attacks Iran: Trump hails ‘excellent' strikes, warns more to come
Donald Trump has described Israel's Friday morning attacks on Iran as "excellent" and warned Iran that things will get worse if the country does not agree to a nuclear deal with the United States. Israel launched a huge attack on Iran in the early hours of Friday, targeting nuclear facilities, military commanders and scientists. "I think it's been excellent. We gave them a chance and they didn't take it. They got hit hard, very hard. They got hit about as hard as you're going to get hit. And there's more to come. A lot more," Trump was quoted as saying by an ABC reporter. Earlier on social media, Trump wrote: "I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal. I told them, in the strongest of words, to 'just do it,' but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn't get it done." Implying that he had been aware of the attacks ahead of time, Trump said that he told Iran that 'it would be much worse than anything they know, anticipated, or were told'. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters He said he told officials that the US 'makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR,' adding that Israel had a lot of those weapons with more to come. 'And they know how to use it,' said Trump. 'Certain Iranian hardliner's [sic] spoke bravely, but they didn't know what was about to happen. They are all DEAD now, and will only get worse.' The strikes killed Hossein Salami, the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, as well as Mohammad Bagheri, chief of staff of the country's armed forces, and Gholam Ali Rashid, the deputy commander of the Iranian armed forces. Several nuclear scientists were also killed. Who are the Iranian military chiefs and scientists killed by Israel? Read More » Earlier, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio claimed in his own posts on social media that Washington was not involved in the strikes, but an Israeli official quoted by Israeli state broadcaster Kan said that Israel fully coordinated its attack with the White House. The unnamed official also told Kan that recent reports of rifts between Israel and Washington were false, but had not been denied as part of a media ruse to confuse Iran. Trump also said in his posts that while there had already been 'great death and destruction', there was still time to stop the 'even more brutal' attacks to come. 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire. 'No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE,' he said. Josh Paul, who resigned from the State Department in October 2023 over continued US arms sales to Israel and has since co-founded political action committee A New Policy, said on Friday that Trump's statements placed US interests in harms way. "President Trump's 'statement' on social media this morning strikes me precisely as an attempt not to look weak in light of Netanyahu's decision to ignore Trump's public request for Israel not to strike Iran," Paul said on Friday. "It runs directly counter to Secretary Rubio's tweet that the US was not involved, and it places US troops and assets at absolutely unnecessary risk, again placing our interests behind those of Netanyahu." Retaliatory attacks Iran fired more than 100 drones towards Israel on Friday in retaliation to the strikes. In response, Israeli army spokesperson Effie Defrin said that "all [aerial] defence arrays have been operating to intercept the threats.' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Friday morning's attack was aimed at "rolling back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival," adding that it would take "many days". "We struck at the heart of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme," Netanyahu said in a recorded televised address. Israel's attack on Iran: How the world reacted Read More » "We targeted Iran's main enrichment facility in Natanz. We targeted Iran's leading nuclear scientists working on the Iranian bomb. We also struck at the heart of Iran's ballistic missile programme." In addition to top senior military commanders and key nuclear scientists killed in the attacks, Iranian state television reported that children had also been killed in at least one of the air strikes, on a residential area of Tehran. Nour News reported several "loud explosions" in and around Tehran, adding that the country's air defence system was on full alert, and all flights at Imam Khomeini international airport had been suspended. The attacks come one day after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN watchdog which monitors Iran's nuclear programme, said that Iran was not complying with its nonproliferation obligations. Iran said in response that it planned to open a new enrichment facility, and said the IAEA's statement called into question the organisation's credibility. Iran has long maintained that its nuclear programme is peaceful and denies seeking to acquire nuclear weapons.