Putin tells Trump Russia has to respond to Ukrainian attacks , World News
MOSCOW/WASHINGTON — Russian President Vladimir Putin told US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (June 4) that he would have to respond to Ukrainian drone attacks on Russia's nuclear-capable bomber fleet, while also describing peace talks with Ukraine as "useful."
The war in Ukraine is intensifying after nearly four months of cajoling and threats to both Moscow and Kyiv from Trump, who says he wants peace after more than three years of the deadliest conflict in Europe since World War Two.
After Ukraine bombed bridges and attacked Russia's fleet of bombers deep in Siberia and Russia's far north, Putin on Wednesday said he did not think Ukraine's leaders wanted peace.
Shortly after Putin discussed the attacks with top ministers in Moscow, Trump said he had spoken by telephone with Putin for one hour and 15 minutes, and that they had discussed the Ukrainian attacks and Iran.
"We discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides. It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace," Trump said on social media.
Russia has unleashed several massive aerial attacks on Ukraine over recent weeks.
"President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields," Trump said.
A foreign policy aide to Putin, Yuri Ushakov, said the Russian leader told Trump on the call that ceasefire talks between Moscow and Kyiv have been productive, despite what he termed attempts by Ukraine to "disrupt" them.
"Let me stress that our president described in detail the content of the talks and that these talks on the whole were useful," Ushakov said.
Memorandums outlining peace plans were exchanged and will be analysed, Ushakov said, "and we hope that afterwards the two sides will be able to continue their talks."
Ushakov confirmed the two presidents discussed other international issues, particularly the Middle East conflict and how Russia could help deal with Iran and its nuclear programme.
On Iran, Trump said he believed Putin agreed with Washington that Iran "cannot have a nuclear weapon," and accused Tehran of "slowwalking" decisions regarding the talks.
Trump has been unusually silent on the Ukrainian attacks on the Russian bombers — one of the three pillars of Russia's nuclear arsenal — though Moscow demanded that the United States and Britain restrain Ukraine.
The Kremlin said Trump had told Putin that Washington was not informed in advance of the Ukrainian attacks. Trump's Ukraine envoy said the risk of escalation from the war in Ukraine was "going way up" after the strikes.
Russia and the United States are by far the world's biggest nuclear powers: together they hold about 88 per cent of all nuclear weapons.
Each has three ways of nuclear attack — strategic bombers, land-launched intercontinental ballistic missiles and submarine-launched ballistic missiles — and any attack on any part of the "triad" is considered a grave escalation. War or peace?
In some of his most hawkish remarks in recent months on the outlook for peace, Putin on Wednesday said the bridge attacks had been directed against civilians and accused Ukrainian leadership of being a "terrorist organisation" supported by powers who were becoming "terrorist accomplices."
"The current Kyiv regime does not need peace at all," Putin said at a meeting with senior officials. "What is there to talk about? How can we negotiate with those who rely on terror?"
Ukraine has not commented on the bridge attacks. It denies it targets civilians, as does Russia, though civilians have been killed by both sides.
Kyiv has similarly accused Moscow of not seriously wanting peace, citing as evidence Russian resistance to an immediate ceasefire. Russia says certain conditions must first be met.
Putin, in his public remarks, did not mention the bomber attacks, which came just before Russia and Ukraine met for direct peace talks in Istanbul where Moscow set out what the United States has called "maximalist" aims.
Before Putin spoke, other Russian officials said military options were "on the table" for its response to Ukrainian attacks deep inside Russia and accused the West of being involved in them.
"We urge London and Washington to react in such a way as to stop further escalation," Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov was quoted by the Interfax news agency as saying. Ryabkov oversees relations with the US and arms control.
British and US officials have said they had no prior knowledge of the weekend attacks on Russian nuclear-capable long-range bombers. The White House has said Trump was not informed of Ukraine's drone attack before it unfolded.
[[nid:718619]]
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
31 minutes ago
- Business Times
Feuding Trump and Musk are now not expected to speak on Friday
[WASHINGTON] US President Donald Trump and his one-time close ally billionaire Elon Musk were now not expected to talk on Friday (Jun 6), despite efforts by White House aides to get a truce after a huge public clash the previous day. A White House official told Reuters that no call was planned for Friday. A White House official had said earlier that the two men would speak on Friday. A call could ease the feuding after an extraordinary day of hostilities – largely conducted over social media – that marked a stark end to a close alliance. Shares in Musk's Tesla closed down over 14 per cent on Thursday, losing about US$150 billion in market value in the largest single-day decline in value in the electric vehicle maker's history. In pre-market trading on Friday they pared some of those losses, rising as much as 5 per cent after the early news that the two men were scheduled to speak. Musk had bankrolled a large part of Trump's presidential campaign and was then brought as one of the president's most visible advisers, heading up a sweeping and controversial effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. The verbal punches erupted on Thursday after Trump criticised Musk in the Oval Office and the pair then traded barbs on their social media platforms: Trump's Truth Social and Musk's X. The falling-out had begun brewing days ago when Musk, who left his role as head of the Department of government Efficiency a week ago, denounced Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending Bill. REUTERS
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Trump and Musk to speak on Friday after alliance descends into public feud
[WASHINGTON] Donald Trump's aides scheduled a call between the US president and Elon Musk for Friday (Jun 6) after a huge public spat that saw threats fly over government contracts and included the world's richest man suggesting Trump should be impeached. A White House official said the two men would speak on Friday. The official did not give a time for the call, which could ease the feuding after an extraordinary day of hostilities – largely conducted over social media – that marked a stark end to a close alliance. Representatives for Musk's Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the planned call. Shares in the electric vehicle maker closed down over 14 per cent on Thursday, losing about US$150 billion in market value in the largest single-day decline in value in its history. In pre-market trading on Friday they pared some of those losses, rising as much as 5 per cent after the news that the two men were scheduled to speak. Politico first reported the planned call. Trump Media and Technology Group, the parent company for Trump's Truth Social platform, ended down 8.04 per cent to US$20.12 on Thursday and was up 0.2 per cent in pre-market trade. Musk had bankrolled a large part of Trump's presidential campaign and was then brought as one of the president's most visible advisers, heading up a sweeping and controversial effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The verbal punches erupted on Thursday after Trump criticised Musk in the Oval Office and the pair then traded barbs on their social media platforms: Trump's Truth Social and Musk's X. The falling-out had begun brewing days ago when Musk, who left his role as head of the Department of government Efficiency a week ago, denounced Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill. The president initially stayed quiet while Musk campaigned to torpedo the Bill, saying it would add too much to the nation's US$36.2 trillion in debt. Trump broke his silence on Thursday, telling reporters he was 'very disappointed' in Musk. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said. As Trump spoke, Musk responded on X. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' wrote Musk, who spent nearly US$300 million backing Trump and other Republicans in last year's election. In another post, Musk asserted that Trump's signature import tariffs would push the US into a recession later this year. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, billions and billions of US dollars, is to terminate Elon's governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump posted. Minutes after the closing bell, Musk replied, 'Yes,' to a post on X saying Trump should be impeached, something that would be highly unlikely given Trump's Republicans hold majorities in both chambers of Congress. Musk's businesses also include rocket company and government contractor SpaceX and its satellite unit Starlink. Musk, whose space business plays a critical role in the US government's space programme, said that as a result of Trump's threats he would begin decommissioning SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft. Dragon is the only US spacecraft capable of sending astronauts to the International Space Station. Late on Thursday, Musk backed off the threat. In another sign of a possible detente to come, Musk subsequently wrote: 'You're not wrong,' in response to billionaire investor bill Ackman saying Trump and Musk should make peace. Punching back Trump and Musk are both political fighters with a penchant for using social media to attack their perceived enemies, and many observers had predicted a falling-out. Musk hit at the heart of Trump's agenda earlier this week when he targeted what Trump has named his 'big, beautiful Bill', calling it a 'disgusting abomination' that would deepen the federal deficit. His attacks amplified a rift within the Republican Party that could threaten the bill's prospects in the Senate. Nonpartisan analysts say Trump's bill could add US$2.4 trillion to US$5 trillion to the nation's US$36.2 trillion in debt. A prolonged feud between the pair could make it harder for Republicans to keep control of Congress in next year's midterm elections if it leads to a loss of Musk's campaign spending or erodes support for Trump in Silicon Valley. 'Elon really was a significant portion of the ground game this last cycle,' said a Republican strategist with ties to Musk and the Trump administration who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity. 'If he sits out the midterms, that worries me.' On Tuesday, Musk posted that 'in November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.' Musk had already said he planned to curtail his political spending in the future. Musk's increasing focus on politics provoked widespread protests at Tesla sites, driving down sales while investors fretted that Musk's attention was too divided. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Europe seeks to welcome more Chinese students but it has visa restrictions even before US crackdown
At University College London, tuition fees from Chinese students are reputed to account for around 10 per cent of revenues. PHOTO: REUTERS Europe seeks to welcome more Chinese students but it has visa restrictions even before US crackdown – Universities across Europe are planning to attract more Chinese students after President Donald Trump's administration announced its latest crackdown on visas for Chinese nationals studying in the US. Hope for a boost in Chinese enrolment numbers is particularly strong in British universities, where Chinese students registered at higher educational establishments generate an estimated £5.5 billion (S$9.6 billion) in yearly revenues, accounting for about half of the income British universities receive from international students who pay full, rather than heavily subsidised, tuition fees. Even before the latest US immigration restrictions were introduced, an uptick in Chinese applications to British universities was under way. A study by Knight Frank, a consultancy, noted that in January 2025, just as President Trump was about to be sworn into office on Jan 20 , applications from China to study in British universities surged by 8.9 per cent. 'We remain dedicated to welcome the brightest and the best to study with us,' said Dr Michael Spence, president of University College London, where tuition fees from Chinese students are reputed to account for around 10 per cent of revenues. Comparable top educational establishments throughout Europe are making similar statements. While European officials claim to be shocked by the recently imposed US immigration restrictions on the admission of Chinese students, the reality is that European governments have imposed similar curbs for many years. Such European restrictions, however, very rarely affect undergraduates from China. Still, they are increasingly restrictive on Chinese nationals wishing to register for postgraduate degrees in leading scientific disciplines. Britain introduced its Academic Technology Approval Scheme (Atas) in 2007. This requires citizens of countries who need visas to come to Britain – such as China – to get special clearance if they wish to engage in postgraduate studies in dual-use disciplines that could be useful in manufacturing weapons or the handling of substances essential in producing weapons of mass destruction. Atas was expanded in 2020 to apply not only to weapons of mass destruction technologies but also to all advanced conventional military technologies, thereby encompassing a broad range of physics, engineering and computer science disciplines. The scheme was further expanded in 2021 to encompass both foreign researchers and postgraduate students. The British government is reluctant to discuss this scheme extensively or the nationality of the researchers and postgraduate students whose visas were rejected under Atas. But inquiries conducted by The Guardian, a British broadsheet newspaper, reveal that around 1,100 scientists and aspiring postgraduate students were refused entry in 2022 – the last period for which consolidated statistics are available – on national security grounds. This represented a small share of the total 50,000 applications submitted under Atas that year. Chinese nationals under the spotlight Still, total British visa refusals to researchers and students under this scheme have jumped almost tenfold from figures recorded in 2020, when the Atas provisions were first tightened. A majority of those denied entry are Chinese nationals. Similar measures are now being discussed elsewhere in Europe. The European Union's Council, representing the heads of state and governments of the EU's 27 member-states, has issued guidance documents urging European nations to consider the security implications of their international academic research cooperation. Most of these documents date back to 2022 and were clearly prompted by the outbreak of the war in Ukraine, as well as growing disquiet about China's response to the conflict and intensified technology competition. China has abstained from voting on United Nations resolution that condemned Russia's invasion. Denying visas to researchers and postgraduate students remains the responsibility of individual EU nations. Still, EU institutions have continued to sound alarm bells at what they term 'tech leakage' to foreign researchers registered at the continent's top academic institutions. This is an 'emerging risk', said Ms Iliana Ivanova, who until recently served as the European Commissioner for Innovation, Research, Culture, Education and Youth. Europe 'cannot afford any longer to be naive', she added. In January 2024, Ms Ivanova suggested that European universities engaged in sensitive technological research on microchips, quantum, biotech and artificial intelligence should accept the appointment of 'liaison officers' from their respective nations' intelligence agencies to advise academics on how to deal with foreign researchers who may be engaged in spying. The Netherlands, home to Europe's most advanced research into semiconductors, has already set up a single office dealing with the security implications of applications from foreign researchers at its national universities. Much of the attention is on Chinese nationals connected to seven universities affiliated with China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, popularly referred to as the 'Seven Sons of National Defence'. These include the Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics and the Harbin Engineering University. Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands – one of the world's leading technical universities – no longer accepts researchers from these seven Chinese establishments. But other European universities are barring Chinese scholars not so much due to their affiliations but more because of who funds their research in Europe. For instance, the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg in southern Germany, ranked among the top in the country's engineering and computer sciences, decided in 2023 to deny admission to doctoral students from China if the China Scholarship Council funded them. This was due to fears that information from any joint research could end up in the hands of the Chinese government. Even educational establishments in historically neutral Switzerland are restricting access to some Chinese researchers. ETH Zurich, renowned for its pioneering engineering and scientific research, issued a detailed outline in October 2024 of its new rules for foreign students applying for master's and doctoral degrees. The Swiss guidelines are stricter than those of other European universities in mandating the prior vetting of research students from China, particularly those with ties to military-linked universities. All university administrators in Europe continue to claim that they see no reason why such measures should restrict the majority of academic exchanges. Still, the reality remains that Europe's criticism of recent US measures restricting visas to Chinese students deserves to be taken with a large pinch of salt. Jonathan Eyal is based in London and Brussels and writes on global political and security matters. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
