'Apartheid Tactics' - Cholota's lawyer slams State after court declares her extradition unlawful
iol A South African court has ruled Moroadi Cholota's extradition from the US unlawful. Her lawyer called the arrest 'an abuse of power,' saying she was targeted for refusing to implicate Ace Magashule in the R255m asbestos case.
Image: NPA and Oupa Mokoena
"We have always said that the conduct of the State was unlawful and unfair."
These were the sentiments of Piet Thabane, attorney for Moroadi Cholota, Ace Magashule's assistant, who won her legal battle in the R255 million Free State Asbestos case.
The court recently ruled that Cholota's extradition from the United States of America (USA) was unlawful.
The 37-year-old was arrested in the US in April 2024, where she was kept in police custody and extradited to South Africa in August 2024.
She was charged with fraud and corruption in the R255 million Free State asbestos roofing case.
The final year political science student was kept in police custody for seven days and released on R2,500 bail in the Bloemfontein Magistrate's Court in August 2024.
Shortly after being released on bail, Cholota launched an urgent application against the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) to dismiss the charges against her and to declare her extradition unlawful, which was subsequently dismissed.
In her founding affidavit, Cholota claimed that the NPA's intention has always been to 'degrade, humiliate and inflict cruel punishment on me for what the State deems as a failure to co-operate with it'.
'As I stated previously, the Asbestos Project has been investigated at length by other State agencies over and above the State Capture Commission, such as the Public Protector, the Special Investigating Unit, and the Auditor General.
'In none of these reports was I ever mentioned, let alone implicated.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Speaking to IOL, Thabane said Cholota's arrest and extradition were an abuse of power.
"The main reason she was subjected to this unfair treatment was because she refused to implicate her boss, the former Premier Magashule."
This week, the court ruled that it had no jurisdiction to try Cholota as her extradition from the United States of America was unlawful.
Thabane said during the trial-with-a-trial, the State called two witnesses who had nothing to do with the extradition.
"We did not present new facts, but the State failed to meet the minimum standard of proving their case."
He described Cholota's arrest in the US as an apartheid tactic.
"They thought they could intimidate her."
Thabane said his client is relieved and vindicated.
"It has been over a year since she has been dealing with this. But it is far from over. We are considering various options because my client's Constitutional Rights were grossly violated."
When asked if she would be going back to the US to complete her political studies at Maryland University, Thabane said it was still early days.
Thabane said he was aware that the NPA intended to appeal the matter and welcomed the decision.
"They will only embarrass themselves."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
What happens if Afrikaner 'refugees' want to come home?
A second batch of Afrikaner 'refugees' have settled into the US, and thousands more are expected to arrive. However, with South African-born Elon Musk's ongoing feud with President Donald Trump, concern is mounting among those who now call America home. More importantly, will they be allowed to return to South Africa? It's no secret that President Donald Trump's view of South Africa was influenced by his former right-hand man, Elon Musk. Born in Pretoria, and having left at just 17, the world's richest man has actively accused his country of birth of promoting 'white genocide', 'farm confiscation,' and 'racist laws'. With Trump now threatening to cut all government contracts to Musk, and possibly distance himself from him altogether, what does this mean for the Afrikaner 'refugees' already in the US? What does Elon Musk's rant mean for Afrikaner 'refugees'? Images via X The group of white South Africans was offered asylum based on proving their fear of persecution on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group. Under US and international immigration laws, refugees who have received asylum cannot simply be deported to their country of persecution. Legislation also vigorously protects their rights to stay in their new adoptive country. However, their status can be terminated should they be found guilty of serious crimes or if they fraudulently sought asylum. According to the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), there is a strict vetting process for those who seek refugee status in the country. Once resettled in the US, refugees are permitted to work immediately. They will be eligible for a green card a year later. However, there are also stringent travel restrictions in place. The USCIS states that all refugees must obtain permission via a travel document before they depart the US. Failure to do so could result in asylees being denied re-entry into the US. These actions could also strip asylees of their refugee status, resulting in removal proceedings before an immigration judge. In the case of Afrikaners, returning to South Africa – considered the country of 'persecution' – could come at a cost. Here is how… Refugees who visit SA without prior permission shall be presumed to have abandoned their asylum unless they can establish compelling reasons for their return. Refugees are expected to explain the reason for their return in the process of obtaining permission. Returning to one's country of claimed persecution could result in termination of asylum if there are fundamental changes in circumstances back home. Termination could also occur due to fraud in the asylum application. This happens if an applicant is not eligible for refugee status. Returning to SA for business or pleasure can be considered evidence that the refugee's alleged fear of persecution is not genuine. For Afrikaner 'refugees' hoping to return home willingly for good, voluntary repatriation is always an option. Organisations like the UNHCR help those who wish to travel back to their countries by providing financial assistance. According to the South African Department of International Relations, 'refugees' would be welcomed back as citizens. However, they would have to revoke their status in order for this to happen. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X , and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Elon Musk's influence on Trump: A closer look at the Afrikaner genocide debate
US president Donald Trump shakes hands with billionaire businessman Elon Musk on May 30 before their public feud. Image: Allison Robbert / AFP The public fallout between US President Donald Trump and South African-born billionaire Elon Musk is not bothering one of the political parties in the Government of National Unity (GNU). Trump and Musk took to their social media platforms this week over differences in his administration's spending. Musk stated that Trump would not have won the 2024 presidential elections without his campaign spending hundreds of US dollars. Freedom Front Plus leader Dr Corné Mulder said he did not believe the approach by Trump or his administration would be changed due to the bitter feud and affect its response to allegations of 'genocide' against white Afrikaner farmers in South Africa. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Mulder was responding to questions about whether the fallout could see Trump dramatically changing his views on the white Afrikaner genocide in South Africa. Musk is widely regarded as a person who wielded immense influence on Trump. 'It is incorrect to assume that US foreign policy is based on the influence of specific individuals. Unhappiness with SA is not something new. Even during the (Joe) Biden administration, a bipartisan bill was introduced in the US Congress to relook the US-SA relationship,' he said. Political analyst Professor Dirk Kotzé said Musk has in the past been influential in these issues, but there are many other South Africans who are also influential and close to Trump. 'So it will not necessarily change this matter, I don't think Musk was the one who dealt with or promoted the issue of genocide necessarily, he was more there in terms of black economic empowerment and employment equity and those government policies that he criticised, so he will continue with that until there is an agreement about Starlink,' Kotzé explained. He added: 'When it comes to the Afrikaner issues and what is called genocide, I don't think he was ever a key person in that, I think that is more where the conservatives – AfriForum, Solidarity, (South African-born American conservative political commentator and radio host) Joe Pollak and others – came in to promote that idea.' Kotzé said his understanding is that there has been a smaller, second group that went to the US after the earlier AfriForum-Solidarity delegation, but without any public attention because it created much more disturbances within US politics in general. 'So I think it has become a controversial issue in the US, and Trump wants to avoid that. I can see that this is not going to be a public project in the future, it is not something they will announce in the media, welcome them, and have public events,' he predicted. Kotzé also anticipates that this initiative or project will, over time, actually slow down. 'I don't see it developing strong momentum that it will be something very prominent in the future. I think it is going to disappear over time,' he said.
Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
Political parties split over calls to fire NPA boss Batohi
CAPE TOWN - Political parties in Parliament are split on whether the National Director of Public Prosecutions, Shamila Batohi, should be fired. While ActionSA said Batohi should leave the position due to high-profile failures by the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), the Democratic Alliance (DA) said it doesn't support her removal. But the DA said the NPA is in desperate need of a massive overhaul and has introduced a 'reform package' for the NPA that includes passing the DA's 'Scorpions 2.0' bill to create an independent anti-corruption commission. ActionSA parliamentary leader, Athol Trollip, called for the immediate removal of Batohi and demanded a full parliamentary inquiry into the NPA's ongoing prosecutorial failures. READ: NPA shouldn't be let off the hook for faltering on several cases: GL community safety committee In a statement, Trollip said the NPA had once again 'exposed its deep dysfunction, either through incompetence or wilful neglect', with the latest disgrace being the collapse of the asbestos corruption case involving Former Free State Premier Ace Magashule and his former personal assistant, Moroadi Cholota. But DA Justice spokesperson, Glynnis Breytenbach, said earlier that her party would not support a motion to remove Batohi because the problems go deeper than just leadership. 'We certainly wouldn't table such a motion, and we certainly wouldn't support it. The national director is not the problem at the NPA. It's not a one-man job or a one-woman job, and while I think she possibly could have things differently, she's not doing a bad job.' She said the failures of the NPA are not attributable to her alone, saying she has less than a year left in office, which is more of a concern for the DA. ALSO READ: NPA's hopes of trying rape-accused Omotoso suffer blow after his voluntary departure
