Britain is waging war on Apple – it is already backfiring
On Dec 2 2015, Syed Rizwan Farook and his wife Tashfeen Malik left their six-month-old daughter and drove to a Christmas party at the disability support facility where he worked. Armed with assault rifles, they opened fire on the attendees, killing 14 and seriously injuring 22, before being killed in a shoot-out with police.
The shooting was America's deadliest terrorist attack since 9/11. It soon emerged that the two had become radicalised online. Islamic State hailed them as 'soldiers of the caliphate'. FBI agents started investigating their online connections, pursuing signs of a wider network or contacts who might have enabled the attack.
Few would have been inclined to stand up for the couple's privacy. But when the FBI asked Apple to unlock an iPhone 5c belonging to Farook, Tim Cook, Apple's chief executive, refused. He argued that creating a backdoor into the iPhone would compromise the security of its hundreds of millions of other users, causing catastrophe if it fell into the wrong hands.
'We have no sympathy for terrorists,' Cook later said, but added: 'The implications of the government's demands are chilling.'
In the end, both Apple and the government got what they wanted. The FBI eventually cracked the phone with the help of an Australian cybersecurity company. Cook kept his promise to customers never to create a backdoor.
But a decade later, Yvette Cooper has picked the same fight.
This month a bombshell report in The Washington Post revealed that the Home Office had secretly ordered Apple to devise a way to break the securely encrypted version of its iCloud storage service.
On Friday, Apple took the nuclear option.
Rather than obey Britain's order to build a backdoor, the company chose to stop offering what is seen as a vital security feature. The company pulled the iCloud encryption feature, known as Advanced Data Protection, from British iPhones.
The move led to widespread criticism of the Home Office from privacy and security campaigners. Apple said it was 'gravely disappointed' by developments.
Cooper is now set for a fight with the world's biggest company, and potentially, the White House. Apple's British customers, meanwhile, have just had their security downgraded.
The battle with Apple has been 13 years in the making.
During the coalition government, the then home secretary Theresa May's plans for a sweeping surveillance bill were torpedoed by the Lib Dems, who labelled it a 'snooper's charter'. But after David Cameron won a Commons majority in 2015, the plans were revived. The Investigatory Powers Act gave the Home Secretary the power to issue encryption-busting notices, which could only be appealed through a secret tribunal.
Apple opposed the law at the time, warning: 'A key left under the doormat would not just be there for the good guys. The bad guys would find it too.'
As the years passed, the threat of being ordered to break encrypted communications and storage seemed to subside. The technology became ubiquitous in messaging apps, and a string of high-profile cyber attacks and relentless scams appeared to settle the argument. Untampered with encryption was the safest option for everyone.
In December, after a widespread Chinese attack on US telecoms networks, US law enforcement officials recommended for the first time that people use end-to-end encryption wherever possible. The warning was signed by agencies in Australia, Canada and New Zealand. It was a clean sweep of the 'Five Eyes' intelligence-sharing nations, with one notable exception: the UK.
Successive British home secretaries have continued to attack end-to-end encryption plans from companies including Facebook. Last year, the Conservative government tightened up surveillance laws, requiring that in some circumstances companies seek secret approval from the Home Office before launching new security features.
'There's a passionately held view in government that it's just wrong for parts of the internet to be off-limits to those charged with lawful protection,' says one intelligence source.
The Home Office has increasingly found itself at odds with Apple, which has made privacy and security major parts of its marketing. In 2023, the company suggested that it would prefer to shut down services such as iMessage and FaceTime in Britain than weaken their protections. It later accused the Government of seeking powers to 'secretly veto' security features.
Some security experts believe that Apple's increasingly strong rhetoric indicates it has been preparing for a secret order for some time, since the Home Office must consult with companies before issuing them.
While Apple does regularly hand data over to security services when asked, Advanced Data Protection, the Apple feature at the heart of the secret notice, encrypts content such as messages and photos in a way that not even the company can access.
Breaking this – as the Government's secret order requires – could involve developing and then installing a custom piece of software on a target's phone, allowing Apple unfettered access to their cloud storage that it could then hand on to law enforcement.
Reports have suggested that the Home Office has demanded a wider 'blanket' capability to read anyone's backups. Peter Sommer, a cybersecurity expert who advised MPs scrutinising surveillance legislation, says this would be disproportionate and unlikely. 'It's technically entirely feasible to break encryption on a per phone basis,' he says.
However, even if the order was targeted, security experts argue that developing the ability to crack an account, even if of a single terrorist, would put others at risk. Creating a master key for every door in town means it is possible that your own door could be unlocked, no matter how well protected.
Cook has made his position clear. Apple told the Home Office last year that it would 'never build a backdoor' and would prefer to remove features like iCloud encryption in Britain rather than comply. When Apple removed the feature on Friday, ministers could not claim they were not warned.
That will not be the end of it, however.
In theory, Apple must still comply with the order, since it could cover overseas accounts. Even if the order is now dropped, Apple will not be satisfied with the new stalemate, where it is left offering a less secure service in a crucial market.
Diplomacy may be a more likely ending. Ron Wyden and Andy Biggs, a Democratic senator and Republican congressman respectively, have written to Tulsi Gabbard, Donald Trump's new intelligence director, attacking the UK's 'dangerous' and 'short-sighted' efforts, and urging Gabbard to tell the Home Office to back down.
The Trump administration is yet to comment. But Cook, who met the president on Thursday, will be urging him to intervene. While officials reportedly forced Apple to delay the introduction of Advanced Data Protection during Trump's first term, Silicon Valley has since forged strong links with the president, who has vowed to protect them from overseas interference.
Elon Musk, a close adviser to Trump, criticised the UK on Friday, claiming in a post on X that the same thing would have happened in America if last November's presidential election had ended differently.
Ciaran Martin, the former head of GCHQ's National Cyber Security Centre, says that US authorities are unlikely to accept the crackdown.
'If there's no momentum in the US political elite and US society to take on big tech over encryption, which there isn't right now, it seems highly unlikely in the current climate that they're going to stand for another country, however friendly, doing it,' he says.
'The argument is lost. The geopolitical forces and commercial imperatives for the companies make what the Home Office seems to be trying to achieve next to impossible, not just now, but likely in the future.'
By taking on Apple, Cooper may have picked a fight she cannot win. Her Cabinet colleague, Peter Kyle, the Technology Secretary, said last year that tech giants like Apple must be treated as nation states. The Government may be about to get a lesson in what that means.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Vantage Data Centers Completes Industry's First Euro-Based Data Center Asset-Backed Securitization (ABS) with €640M Transaction
Incremental green financing will drive continued, sustainable developments across the refinanced portfolio DENVER & LUXEMBOURG, June 09, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Vantage Data Centers, a leading global provider of hyperscale data center campuses, today announced it has raised €640 million in securitized term notes, marking the first-ever euro-based securitization of data center assets in Continental Europe. The transaction includes an additional €80 million in unfunded Variable Funding Notes. The Class A-2 Notes are rated A-, and the Class B Notes are rated BBB- by Standard & Poor's and Scope Ratings. This transaction follows Vantage's success last year with the first-ever EMEA data center ABS completed in British pound sterling. The notes will be used to refinance four data centers in Germany, two in Offenbach, Frankfurt, and two in Berlin, all of which are fully leased to hyperscale customers. The refinancing is part of Vantage's wider efforts to further expand its presence in the EMEA region and accelerate time to market to meet mounting demand for AI and cloud capacity. Surplus funds will be allocated toward capital expenditures and broader corporate initiatives. The notes have an anticipated five-year repayment date. "The issuance of the first euro-denominated ABS in the data center sector marks a significant milestone in digital infrastructure financing. Having previously issued the first data center ABS in both North America and EMEA (sterling-denominated), Vantage continues to showcase our innovative approach to capital markets and our ability to unlock new funding vehicles to fuel our global expansion," said Rich Cosgray, senior vice president, global capital markets for Vantage Data Centers. Vantage was represented by Clifford Chance LLP, and the transaction was led by Barclays and Deutsche Bank as active Joint Lead Managers. The transaction was supported by ING and Natixis as Joint Lead Managers and ABN Amro, Banco De Sabadell, SMBC and Societe Generale as Co-Managers. Barclays acted as Sole Structuring Advisor and Sole Green Structuring Advisor, and the transaction achieved a Green Bond designation via a Second-Party Opinion (SPO) from Morningstar Sustainalytics. The funds raised will contribute to advancing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and will facilitate the innovation of next-generation sustainable solutions aimed at reducing Vantage's environmental impact. For more information, please refer to the company's Green Bond Framework. Over the last 12 months, Vantage has raised €2.2 billion in new debt financing for its EMEA platform. For more information about Vantage's growing EMEA footprint, please visit: About Vantage Data Centers Vantage Data Centers powers, cools, protects and connects the technology of the world's well-known hyperscalers, cloud providers and large enterprises. Developing and operating across five continents in North America, EMEA and Asia Pacific, Vantage has evolved data center design in innovative ways to deliver dramatic gains in reliability, efficiency and sustainability in flexible environments that can scale as quickly as the market demands. For more information, visit Nothing in this press release constitutes an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy the notes in any jurisdiction, and there shall not be any sale of the notes in any state or jurisdiction in which the offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. View source version on Contacts Press Contacts Mark FreemanVantage Data Centersmfreeman@ +1-202-680-4243 Robin BectelREQ for Vantage Data Centersvdc@ +1-202-936-6335 Nigel ParkerFulfil Communications for Vantage Data Centers, EMEAnigelp@ +44-(0)-7778-872-457


Forbes
8 minutes ago
- Forbes
Oppose Car Bloat, London Assembly Members Tell Mayor
Old Mini next to new Mini. CarSized/montage A majority of Members of the London Assembly—the 25-member elected body that scrutinizes the work of the London Mayor—voted on June 5 to oppose 'carspreading,'the phenonomen of automobiles becoming wider, heavier and taller. This car bloat, also known as 'autobesity,' damages London's roads, said the vote, causing congestion, and putting pedestrians, cyclists and other drivers at greater risk of death and serious injury. Cars are getting bigger by an average of 1cm every two years, with most new cars now too large for U.K. minimum parking spaces. Elly Baker AM, who proposed the motion, said: 'London's streets weren't designed for larger vehicles like SUVs, which now make up a third of all cars on the road. Their greater size, weight, and higher [hoods] put vulnerable road users at greater risk, reduce available parking spaces, and cause more wear and tear on our roads.' She added: 'It's time we took sensible steps to manage the impact of oversized cars and ensure our streets remain safe and accessible for everyone.' The vote was won by 14 votes against eight. The motion states that the 'consequences of surging vehicle size undermine goals for road safety, air quality and put outsized pressure on public finances.' The Assembly now calls on the Mayor to write to the Department for Transport asking that they update vehicle regulations to introduce tighter limits on passenger vehicle size and bonnet height. The Mayor is further urged to write to HM Treasury asking that they introduce a progressive tax on passenger vehicle weight into Vehicle Excise Duty. The Assembly is also calling for London Councils to explore the feasibility of boroughs charging higher parking charges to SUVs to account for pressure they put on road space and local parking spaces. Today's BMW-built Mini is much wider than the British Motor Corporation's 1959 original, and is also taller and longer. Other famous car models—such as the VW Beetle and the Ford Fiesta—have also increased markedly in size and weight. Modern cars are larger partly because of airbags, crumple zones and air conditioning units, but also because consumers prefer larger motor vehicles—hence the success of SUVs. The motor vehicle 'arms race' has led to calls from motorists for road lanes to be widened and parking spaces to be enlarged. Roads in most British cities are becoming more and more choked as wider motor cars struggle to squeeze past each other. There's an epidemic of pedestrian-unfriendly 'pavement parking'—wheels half up on the sidewalk—and tempers fray when wing mirrors are bashed as porkier cars pass each other. Research from Transport & Environment (T&E) in 2022 found that 'autobesity'—car bloat—is real, with many cars getting too big for British roads, exceeding the 180 centimeter minimum for on-street parking. More than half of new cars sold in 2023 were too wide for the minimum specified on-street parking space (180 centimeters) in major U.K. cities. Off-street parking is now a tight squeeze even for the average new car, while large luxury SUVs often make it impossible. Fatter cars are heavier cars. And heavier cars cause more highway damage. Richard Hebditch, UK Director for T&E UK, said: 'The trend of cars getting wider has been progressing for decades and that trend will continue until the U.K. sets stricter limits. Currently we allow new cars to be as wide as trucks. This has meant our roads are now home to big SUVs and American style pick-up trucks that are parking on our footpaths, endangering pedestrians and cyclists and making everyone else on our roads less safe.' Paris voted to triple parking fees for SUVs in February last year.


New York Post
9 minutes ago
- New York Post
London's lefty mayor touts record numbers of Americans applying for British citizenship
They're trading their sneakers for trainers and elevators for lifts. A record number of Americans have applied to become British citizens, London's lefty mayor touted at an event in the UK Monday. 'I've got to say we're delighted that record numbers of Americans are applying for British citizenship or to live and work here, and that many are choosing to settle in London,' Sadiq Khan told the crowd at the Concordia Europe Summit, as he heralded the capital as a 'beacon of hope, progress and possibility.' Some 1,931 Americans applied for UK citizenship in the first three months of 2025, according to figures from the UK Home Office — marking the highest number since recordkeeping began in 2004. Advertisement REUTERS Meanwhile, the number of US citizens applying to settle in the UK as their permanent home — rather than just move there for an undefined period — also hit a record last year, with more than 5,500 Americans granted settled status, a 20% increase from 2023. 'Our city will always offer newcomers a warm welcome,' Khan added. Advertisement AP However, at the same time, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the government was planning to impose more stringent requirements on legal migrants, while also extending the time newcomers would have to wait to claim citizenship. In a news conference earlier this month, Starmer declared an end to a 'squalid chapter' that has seen migration to the UK more than triple over the last 10 years, which he called 'a failed experiment in open borders.' In a policy paper last month, Starmer — who previously championed the significant increase of migrants to the city — called the damage caused by immigration to the country 'incalculable.' Advertisement Around 5,800 Americans gave up their US citizenship during the first six months of 2020, at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic and at a time of widespread social and political upheaval in the country. However, taxes were also cited as another reason some made the decision, Alistair Bambridge, a partner at Bambridge Accountants, told CNN at the time. 'These are mainly people who already left the US and just decided they've had enough of everything,' he said. The surge in would-be expatriates in the first quarter of 2025 is a 12% increase from the previous quarter, continuing a sharp uptick in the trend which started in the middle of 2024.