Trump's attacks on trans community sow fear and paralysis in Illinois: ‘They're trying to make us disappear'
Ben Garcia thinks of himself as a typical high school senior. He plays Fortnite in a room his mom says is too messy. He watches TV with her on weeknights in their Rogers Park apartment — 'Severance' and 'Will Trent' are their current favorites. And every so often, he goes to Olive Garden with his friends for what they call an 'old man dinner.'
But these days, the 18-year-old feels like his mere existence is seen as a threat by a U.S. government that wants to force him to return to a time when something as simple as using a public bathroom could cause debilitating anxiety.
'I just don't get it,' he said, tugging at the sleeve of his Lane Tech High School sweatshirt. 'I think if a lot of people met a trans person, and I'm sure they have and just didn't know, they would see that it's not this big scheme to try to do whatever it is they think trans people are doing. It's just that this is how I am most comfortable, and that's it.'
Garcia is one of an estimated 1.6 million transgender Americans targeted in a series of executive orders issued by President Donald Trump during his first month in office.
The wide-ranging orders seek to strip transgender, nonbinary and intersex people of the ability to change their gender markers on passports or to serve in the military. They aim to force transgender women in federal prison to be housed with men and to bar them from participation in female sports.
The orders also attempt to end gender-affirming care for transgender people younger than 19, and prohibit federal spending on the promotion of 'gender ideology,' a vague directive that could have implications for anywhere from schools to rape crisis centers.
'Across the country, ideologues who deny the biological reality of sex have increasingly used legal and other socially coercive means to permit men to self-identify as women and gain access to intimate single-sex spaces and activities designed for women, from women's domestic abuse shelters to women's workplace showers,' Trump wrote in an executive order titled, 'Defending women from gender ideology extremism and restoring biological truth to the federal government,' issued on Jan. 20 following his inauguration.
'This is wrong. Efforts to eradicate the biological reality of sex fundamentally attack women by depriving them of their dignity, safety, and well-being. The erasure of sex in language and policy has a corrosive impact not just on women but on the validity of the entire American system. Basing Federal policy on truth is critical to scientific inquiry, public safety, morale, and trust in government itself.'
The fallout has been swift. Pages with resources and information for the trans and nonbinary communities were altered or in some cases deleted from federal websites belonging to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the U.S. Department of Education and the State Department.
The NCAA enacted a policy that aligns with the president's ban on trans athletes. Hospitals across the country have reportedly canceled appointments for gender-affirming care for young people.
Locally, Lurie Children's Hospital announced it had halted some gender-affirming procedures for people younger than 19, while an Illinois mother said in court filings that UI Health canceled a scheduled chest surgery for her 17-year-old transgender son.
Late last month, 10 staff members with the Puerto Rican Cultural Center's Trans Chicago Empowerment Center were let go after the CDC abruptly terminated two grants, totaling $600,000 a year, that funded much of the center's efforts.
Other organizations that work with LGBTQ+ people are bracing for a similar fate, fearful that any public opposition will put them in the cross-hairs of a president with a well-documented penchant for retaliation.
'It really does feel like they're trying to make us disappear,' Garcia said, 'and for people to not acknowledge that we exist.'
It was not even a month into Trump's second stint in the White House and Avi Rudnick could not keep up with the volume of emails flooding his inbox.
Rudnick is legal services director for Transformative Justice Law Project of Illinois, which, among its services, helps transgender and gender nonconforming people legally change their names and gender markers.
Illinois has taken steps in recent years to make it easier for those changes to happen. And yet, many of the emails he's read are from people who are scared to go through the process.
Some want to withdraw their requests for name changes, he said, fearful that the federal government will somehow discover their identities. They fear their names will end up on a government list and they and their families will be subjected to harassment or violence — research from the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law suggests that transgender people are four times more likely to be the victims of violent crime than cisgender people.
'People are terrified,' Rudnick said. 'I can try to provide as much calm and reassurance as possible, but when the language coming from the federal government is so malicious and hateful, it's an impossible task.'
Rudnick and other advocates have been quick to point out what a president can and cannot do via executive orders. Presidential executive orders, they say, are meant to be directives on how government agencies should operate and how laws should be enforced; those orders cannot change laws passed by the U.S. Congress or circumvent the Constitution or override laws in Illinois, which has some of the country's strongest protections for LGBTQ+ residents, according to the Colorado-based nonprofit Movement Advancement Project.
Indeed, some trans people and advocates said they've taken solace in the fact that the state's elected leaders have shown their support for the rights of residents across the spectrum of gender identities.
Gov. JB Pritzker, writing on the social platform X, formerly Twitter, earlier this month, said he's 'made it my mission to make our state the best to call home,' including, he continued, 'for our LGBTQ+ community. No matter who you are or who you love, everyone deserves dignity and equality. Hate has no home here.'
Also this month, Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul joined 14 of his counterparts in a statement pledging to protect gender-affirming care.
Eight days after his inauguration, about a half-dozen Illinois organizations were among the 175 signers of a letter to Trump condemning his 'cruel and lawless executive order' on gender identity.
'The order, which directs the federal government to regulate, control, and police gender, does absolutely nothing to protect women and girls,' the letter reads. 'We know that the true intent of this order is to demonize, stigmatize, and discriminate against transgender, nonbinary, and intersex people and to enforce gender roles and gender stereotypes. It is appalling you wage these attacks in the name of 'defending women,' and particularly because of your repeated attacks on women's rights.'
Multiple lawsuits have been filed in an attempt to claw back the president's orders. Some have led to temporary halts in the administration's plans to end funding for gender-affirming care or to transfer transgender women in federal prison to men's facilities. A federal judge presiding over a challenge to Trump's ban on trans people serving in the military recently described that executive order as 'unadulterated animus,' CNN reported.
Still, advocates say Trump appears to have accomplished at least part of his objectives.
'I think there are two goals driving a lot of these orders, and one is to try to undo the progress of the past five, 10 or 15 years,' said Kara Ingelhart, a clinical assistant professor of law at Northwestern Pritzker School of Law and director of the school's LGBTQI+ Rights Clinic. 'A very close second or parallel priority seems to be to cause fear and paralysis in doing so.'
It had been about a week after Trump returned to office and began his blitz of executive orders when the news started to trickle down to staff at the Puerto Rican Cultural Center's Trans Chicago Empowerment Center.
Two CDC grants — one set to expire in 2026; the other in 2027 — had been terminated 'in accordance with the president's executive order,' the agency memo read.
The grants totaled $600,000 a year and paid for staff salaries, rent and supplies at its community center on West Division Street in Humboldt Park, where they offered a range of services for trans people ages 13 and up: HIV screenings and prevention, support groups and individual therapy, legal clinics and free clothing pop-ups.
Suddenly, the PRCC's total annual budget for public health initiatives had been slashed by nearly 25%.
Ten staff members, several from the community the center serves, were let go.
'For a while, we just thought it was fear tactics or people just spewing hate for the sake of hate,' said Jai Perez, 24, one of the staffers who lost their jobs. 'And then we come in one day and they're like, we don't have funds. It was kind of eye opening and a wake up call to all of us … we felt so liberated in our form of expression and to have a space called the trans empowerment center, and then within that week it was gone.'
Trans Chicago's story illustrates what other advocacy organizations fear could become their reality: That the federal government will use perhaps its most powerful weapon — money — to exert tremendous pressure on any entity that doesn't comply with the president's orders.
'I've never seen anything like this, particularly in a country that has such a long history of First Amendment pride,' said one nonprofit executive director who asked to remain anonymous in fear of being stripped of federal funding, which accounts for about a quarter of the nonprofit's revenue.
'It is striking to me how quickly it has become clear that saying something that is politically opposed to this administration could have material consequences that are much more extreme than I believe is normal in other environments.'
The executive director, and others in similar positions, say the president's orders have left them with questions difficult and surreal: Will they be required to prove their clients fit into Trump's narrow definitions of male and female as a condition of federal funding? Will they be forced to revert to a 'don't ask, don't tell' policy of the 1990s that banned gay and lesbian people from military service? Will they continue to work with transgender and nonbinary people, but do so in secret?
'If we don't get this right, we fall apart,' the executive director said. 'And then every person we serve, where do they go?'
Since the layoffs, the now former staff at Trans Chicago Empowerment Center have looked to blunt the effect of the president's orders. They quickly opened a mutual aid to augment lost wages. Most found positions elsewhere in the Puerto Rican Cultural Center or with other entities while they try to figure out how to find independent funding to stay in the center's existing space or perhaps elsewhere in the PRCC.
The layoffs forced Trans Chicago to halt its behavioral health services — two counselors were among the positions covered by the CDC grants — and much of its community outreach. Other programs around HIV testing and prevention have been absorbed by the PRCC, which is bracing for the possible loss of more federal grants down the road.
Staff have pledged that the rest of the center's work, while hobbled, will not stop.
And so, a group of Trans Chicago staffers volunteered their time on a recent Monday to open the center's doors for a free gender-affirming haircut event. At least a dozen people signed up for haircuts from one of the three stylists who volunteered for the event.
Many were new to the center.
'I prefer to be in queer spaces every time I go out now,' said J.Y., a 22-year-old West Town resident who declined to give their full name. 'It feels safer.'
At 7 p.m., the scheduled conclusion of haircuts, the barber chairs were still full. In one, barber Davtrious Sanchez guided his clippers through Santiago Troncoso's hair as they alternated between typical barber shop talk — Troncoso's job and how the California Clipper is a good bar for a first date — and a discussion about how Troncoso found the center's programming last summer.
'Everyone here is so friendly,' he told Sanchez.
Next to them, barber Larissa Vetter was nearly finished trimming the last few inches from Sarah's hair, which once flowed past their shoulders and now rested near their chin. The 24-year-old Garfield Ridge resident, who declined to give their last name, said they wanted a short haircut for some time but had been scared to do so until they saw the center's Instagram post.
'As someone who came out later in life, finding this space has been very exciting for me,' they said. 'Finding security in community is very important, especially when things are so scary.'
On a snowy Wednesday in February, Ben Garcia and his mom sat in the waiting room inside Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago outpatient center for a routine checkup with his gender-affirming care physician.
The appointment was made three months ago. Days before the visit, they called to confirm.
'Places are canceling appointments,' Garcia said. 'I'm lucky mine wasn't one of them.'
He left with a replenished supply of weekly hormone injections and the hope it won't be his last.
'I can tell you it would have a serious toll on my mental health,' he said when asked what would happen if forced to stop the injections. 'I just can't say for sure how serious.'
It's not that Garcia felt a deep discomfort with his assigned sex at birth, or that there was a single, defining point in which his gender identity crystalized.
'I didn't necessarily have that moment where I was like, 'I'm a boy! I'm a boy!'' he said.
He was always gender nonconforming, he said. And that was met with looks from other kids and some adults, their eyes scanning his short-cropped hair before inevitably asking the same questions:
Are you a boy or a girl? If you're a girl, why do you look like a boy?
Those inquisitions followed him into public bathrooms. One particularly traumatic encounter at Boston's Fenway Park with a woman who accosted him in the restroom would form the basis for his college application essay.
Often, he'd stand motionless, silent, staring at his shoes, waiting for his interrogator to give up and leave. Eventually, he stopped using public restrooms, which lasted until he enrolled at Lane Tech's Academic Center in seventh grade.
By then, he had changed his name and pronouns and had started taking puberty blockers — which involved extensive discussions with his mom, Michelle Vallet, his doctor and a therapist. Additional conversations and research led to more gender-affirming care.
'I know right-wing people always think it's children being forced into this. And that is not the case whatsoever,' Garcia said. '(Mom) was the one doing the research and we were exploring it together and we looked at it and we talked about how I felt and what I wanted from it. We decided together we're maybe going to try this out, and if that didn't feel right, we could see what would work. But it turned out, that was right.'
For now, he's trying to avoid feeling hopeless when there is still so much to look forward to. Prom is in a few months. He recently discussed suit shopping with a friend after lunch at Taco Bell.
He and his mom are heading to Vermont soon for a college visit. The state university there is his leading choice, in part because of Vermont's political environment — schools in Indiana and Florida had been on his list, he said, but not anymore:
'I need to be in a safer state, I think.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Experts decry new language in tax-cut bill, say only billionaires could challenge U.S. government
Senate Republicans have shelved, at least for now, a provision of President Donald Trump's tax-cut bill that would prevent enforcement of some past court orders against Trump. It has been replaced by a provision that could make it virtually impossible for average Americans to seek injunctions against the government for violating their rights. The new language would require anyone seeking a court order requiring, or prohibiting, actions by the federal government to post a bond that would fully cover the government's potential damages and other costs of complying with the order. Opponents say the costs could amount to at least millions of dollars. Injunctions are judicial orders prohibiting the government, an organization or an individual from taking actions that a judge has found are likely illegal. The bill approved by the House on a 215-214 vote last month, which would cut taxes for the rich and health care for the poor, would also have allowed a judge to find a violator of an injunction in contempt of court, and impose fines or imprisonment, only if the judge had required the other party to post a bond of any amount. Judges commonly issue injunctions without ordering a bond. Because the House bill would have applied, retroactively, to past as well as future injunctions, it could have allowed Trump to ignore existing court orders like those prohibiting him from sending immigrants to prisons in El Salvador without facing penalties. That provision was quietly removed from the bill by Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans last week. In its place is a mandate that would apply to all future injunctions against the federal government and require a bond that would pay for the government's 'costs and damages' in complying with the injunction. If the injunction was upheld on appeal, the individual or group that sought it could recover the costs of the bond. If not, the funds would be transferred to the government. 'Finally, the Senate Judiciary Committee is advancing solutions in the One Big Beautiful Bill to restore the constitutional role of the federal judiciary,' Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, the committee chairman, said in a statement, using Trump's label for his tax-cut bill. Grassley said the new provision would 'enforce the existing, lawful requirement that courts impose a bond upfront when attempting to hit the government with a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order that results in costs and damages ultimately sustained by American taxpayers.' A different perspective came from Alicia Bannon, judiciary program director at New York University's Brennan Center for Justice. If this language becomes law, Bannon said, 'it will be financially impossible for ordinary Americans to go to court to protect their rights,' like trying to make sure they receive Social Security payments or are protected against unlawful deportation. Bonds for those orders could cost many millions of dollars, she said. Or much more, said attorneys at the National Women's Law Center, if Trump's deep budget cuts to agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs were challenged by a group of military veterans. 'If this measure stays in the bill, only a billionaire would be able to get prompt relief from the courts when this administration breaks the law,' said Emily Martin, chief program officer at the Washington, D.C.-based law center. And Erwin Chemerinsky, the law school dean at UC Berkeley, said the new provision would also prohibit judges from considering the ability of an individual or group to pay the bond. That would prevent many whose rights have been violated from seeking help from the courts 'at a time when the President is violating the Constitution as never before seen in American history,' he said. Trump has denied violating constitutional rights in his deportation orders, shutdowns of federal agencies and attempts to deny U.S. citizenship to U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants, disputes that are before the federal courts. But a more immediate legal battle could decide the fate of the injunction bond requirement in the tax bill. Because it is a budget-related measure, the legislation can win Senate approval by a majority vote in the Senate, where Republicans hold 53 of the 100 seats, rather than requiring 60 votes to overcome a Democratic filibuster. The newly added bond requirement, however, would not directly affect the federal budget, although it could lower the government's costs by discouraging lawsuits and limiting injunctions. Democrats could ask the Senate's parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, to advise Senate leaders that the bond limits are not budget-related and should be removed from the bill. The Senate normally follows the parliamentarian's conclusions unless 60 senators disagree, but opponents of the bond requirements say they can't take anything for granted. 'Senate Republicans have overruled the parliamentarian before,' said attorney Alison Gill of the National Women's Law Center. 'It is possible that they may do so to include this dangerous provision.'


Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Proposed bill would ban ICE agents, law enforcement from wearing masks in California
SACRAMENTO — In response to immigration raids by masked federal officers in Los Angeles and across the nation, two California lawmakers on Monday proposed a new state law to ban members of law enforcement from concealing their faces while on the job. The bill would make it a misdemeanor for local, state and federal law enforcement officers to cover their faces with some exceptions, and also encourage them to wear a form of identification on their uniform. 'We're really at risk of having, effectively, secret police in this country,' said state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), co-author of the bill. During a news conference in San Francisco announcing the legislation, Wiener criticized the Trump administration for targeting illegal immigrants without criminal records and alleged that current tactics allow ICE agents to make themselves appear to be local police in some cases. Under the proposal, law enforcement officials would be exempted from the mask ban if they serve on a SWAT team or if a mask is necessary for medical or health reasons, including to prevent smoke inhalation. Recent immigration enforcement sweeps have left communities throughout California and the country frightened and unsure if federal officials are legitimate because of their shrouded faces and lack of identification, said Sen. Jesse Arreguín (D-Berkeley), co-author and chair of the Senate Public Safety Committee. He said the bill would provide transparency and discourage impersonators. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection agencies, called the proposal 'despicable,' saying it posed a threat to law enforcement officers by identifying them and subjecting them to retaliation. 'We will prosecute those who dox ICE agents to the fullest extent of the law. The men and women of ICE put their lives on the line every day to arrest violent criminal illegal aliens to protect and defend the lives of American citizens,' the department said in a post on the social media site X. 'Make no mistake, this type of rhetoric is contributing to the surge in assaults of ICE officers through their repeated vilification and demonization of ICE.' Wiener, however, said members of law enforcement are public servants and people need to see their faces so they can be held accountable for their actions. He likened ICE officials to Stormtroopers, fictional helmeted soldiers from the movie 'Star Wars,' and said masking the faces and concealing the names of law enforcement officials shields them from public scrutiny and from the communities they are meant to serve. 'We don't want to move towards that kind of model where law enforcement becomes almost like an occupying army, disconnected from the community, and that's what it is when you start hiding their face, hiding the identity,' he said. California law already bans wearing a mask or other disguise, including a fake mustache, wig or beard to hide your identity and evade law enforcement while committing a crime, but there are no current laws about what police can or cannot wear. It was unclear whether the proposal would affect undercover or plainclothes police officers, or if a state law could apply to federal police forces. The proposal is being offered as an amendment to Senate Bill 627, a housing measure that would essentially be eviscerated. The bill also includes an intent clause, which is not legally binding, that says the legislature would work to require all law enforcement within the state to display their name on their uniforms. 'Finding a balance between public transparency and trust, along with officer safety, is critical when we're talking about creating state laws that change the rules for officers that are being placed into conflict situations,' Jason Salazar, president of the California Police Chief Assn., said in a statement. 'We have been in touch with Senator Wiener, who reached out ahead of the introduction of this bill, and we will engage in discussions with him and his office to share our concerns so that we ensure the safety of law enforcement first responders is a top priority.' Wiener said the new measure would make it clearer who is a police officer and who is not, which would be essential in the wake of the politically motivated killing of a Minnesota state lawmaker and her husband, and the attempted killing of another politician and his wife. The suspect, Vance Boelter, is accused of knocking on the doors of the lawmakers in the middle of the night and announcing himself as a police officer to get them to open up, authorities said. U.S. Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), wrote in an X post that the bill would endanger ICE agents. 'Do not forget — targeted attacks on ICE agents are up 413%. This is yet another shameless attempt to put them in harm's way,' she said.


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Trump leaves G7 summit early after "evacuate Tehran" warning
President Trump called on Iranian civilians to "immediately evacuate Tehran" on Monday evening, shortly after which the White House announced he would be departing the G7 summit early to "attend to many important matters." Why it matters: It's not immediately clear what triggered Trump's dramatic post on Truth Social or his early return from Canada. Israel has been conducting strikes in Tehran since Thursday night, but the U.S. has so far declined to join the operation. White House spokesperson Alex Pfeiffer denied reports the U.S. was attacking Iran: "American forces are maintaining their defensive posture, and that has not changed. We will defend American interests," he wrote. Trump later told reporters before departing Canada that "they (Iran) want to make a deal, and as soon as I leave here, we're going to be doing something. But I have to leave here." Tehran is home to around 10 million people, with around 17 million in the metropolitan area. What he's saying:" Iran should have signed the "deal" I told them to sign. What a shame, and waste of human life. Simply stated, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. I said it over and over again! Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!" Trump wrote. Trump followed up with a post chiding "kooky Tucker Carlson" for not understanding that "IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON." Next, he posted: "AMERICA FIRST means many GREAT things, including the fact that, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!" State of play: The Israeli military has said it has complete control of the skies over Tehran. It signaled Monday that it's expanding its targets beyond strictly military or nuclear sites, including by bombing Iranian state TV. Israel issued several evacuation orders for civilians in Tehran, in areas where hundreds of thousands of people live. One of those evacuation orders focused on the neighborhood where Iran's state TV is located. It's not clear how many civilians have managed to evacuate, or whether such a mass exodus is even possible on such a short timetable. Split screen: Less than two hours before his Truth Social post, Trump said at the G7 summit in Canada that the U.S. was talking to the Iranians by phone and even suggested it will be "better to talk in person." Trump expressed hope that Iran would make a deal. "I think a deal will be signed. I think Iran is foolish not to sign one," he said. French President Emmanuel Macron said Monday evening that Trump had told his fellow G7 leaders that the U.S. had been involved in discussions to get an Israel-Iran ceasefire, and had offered to meet with the Iranians. What's next: By skipping the second full day of the G7 summit, Trump is also skipping meetings with leaders including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum.