‘This can't happen to anyone else ever again': Call for ban on strip searching of children
A HUMAN rights expert called for a ban on strip searching of children in Wales, with black children disproportionately subject to the traumatising and degrading practice.
Rhian Croke, of the Children's Legal Centre Wales, warned strip search is a violation of children's rights as she called for less invasive alternatives such as body scanners.
Dr Croke said: 'Instead of traumatising and degrading children including those who may be involved in offending… children should be treated as children first with dignity and respect.
'In Wales, strip search is contrary to the nation's commitment to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Wales-only legislation that promotes children's rights….
'Wales should take the lead on ending the practice of strip search and instead invest in alternative technologies, so children have their rights protected.'
She stressed: 'Children in contact with the police may have already experienced layers upon layers of trauma, to then inflict a strip search on a child is completely inappropriate.'
Dr Croke, who holds a PhD in law, pointed out that in most cases nothing illegal was found during searches conducted in custody, 'yet the degrading practice continues'.
In a briefing for Senedd Members, jointly prepared with fellow campaigner Saqib Deshmukh, she expressed concerns about 'totally inadequate' monitoring of incidents of strip searches.
Warning of a failure in transparency and accountability, Dr Croke said freedom of information (FoI) requests revealed discrepancies and contradictions in the data reported by police.
A total of 5,428 strip searches of children were undertaken in Wales in two years to 2023, mostly for drugs and weapons, with six cases involving under 13s, according to one review. 85 involved a more thorough or intimate search beyond removing a coat, jacket or gloves.
South Wales Police was among the forces with the highest rate in Wales and England, with research suggesting black children are four times more likely to be strip searched.
In a letter revealed under FoI, Jason Davies, the deputy chief constable, acknowledged disproportionality in the number of ethnic minority children being strip searched.
But South Wales, Dyfed Powys, and Gwent Police refused to provide any data on child strip search cross-referenced by ethnicity in response to FoI requests, according to the briefing.
The researchers wrote: 'We question whether the struggle to access data across various agencies and governments is a question of competence.
'It is unclear if it is a failure to achieve basic professional standards of transparency or if it is an act of obfuscation – a failure to share clear and intelligible data to avoid legal challenge.'
Dr Croke raised concerns about the review showing North Wales Police were only able to confirm the presence of an appropriate adult in about half to two-thirds of searches.
'This report has taken over a year to come into the public domain,' she wrote. 'It is a report of significant public interest that reveals a lack of compliance with existing legislation, a failure to uphold children's rights and raises critical questions.'
Concerns first came to light in 2020 when a schoolgirl in London was wrongly accused of having drugs and strip searched while on her period without an appropriate adult present.
During a legal case, the girl said: 'I can't go a single day without wanting to scream, shout, cry or just give up. I don't know if I'm going to feel normal again. But I do know this can't happen to anyone else, ever again.'
In another case involving the Met police, an autistic girl, 15, was handcuffed, pinned down and searched, with her underwear cut off in front of male officers, after 20 hours in custody. She was so traumatised she tried to kill herself within weeks, her mother said.
Senedd Members discussed the issue during a social justice committee meeting on May 12.
Plaid Cymru's Sioned Williams said: 'The very thorough inquiry raises major questions about what's happening in Wales in terms of the fact that we say that we respect children's rights. I do think we should write as a committee stating that we want to see this come to an end.'
Plaid Cymru's shadow social justice minister, Sioned Williams
Welsh Liberal Democrat leader Jane Dodds, a social worker for 27 years, questioned whether the Welsh Government would have the powers to ban strip searching of children.
She said: 'It is about rights and it is about a complete injustice in that, sadly, we know that most children who are strip searched are those from black and minority ethnic groups.'
With most of the justice system non-devolved, Labour's Jenny Rathbone, who chairs the committee, said: 'I fear we don't have the powers, I'm sure it sits on the 'jagged edge'.'
In 2024, an independent commission recommended devolving more powers to Wales, beginning with youth justice, probation and policing.
Lord Timpson – the UK minister responsible for prisons, probation and reducing reoffending – is scheduled to give evidence at the committee's next meeting on May 19.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
Counter-terror police assessed Alexander Dighton a year before attack and found 'no cause for concern'
Counter-terror police assessed Alexander Dighton a year before attack and found 'no cause for concern' Alexander Dighton had been referred to the anti-terrorism programme Prevent in January 2024 Shattered glass can be seen on the ground outside the station (Image: Mark Lewis ) An anti-Islam terrorist had been reported to authorities a year before he attacked officers with Molotov cocktails and a hatchet outside a Welsh police station. Police have now defended the checks that were carried out into Alexander Dighton, 28, who has been jailed for life and ordered to serve a minimum of 22 years in prison. He knocked one officer unconscious and stabbed another in the leg when he launched an attack on Talbot Green Police Station in Rhondda Cynon Taf on January 31. In a police interview after the attack, Dighton, of Pontyclun, said he did not consider the scope of damage, 'merely that blood had to be spilt'. Don't miss a court report by signing up to our crime newsletter here He previously admitted 10 charges relating to the incident, including attempting to murder Detective Constable Jack Cotton and attempting to cause grievous bodily harm with intent to Sergeant Richard Coleman. Dighton also admitted assaulting PC Joshua Emlyn and threatening PC Stephanie Fleming with an adapted wooden pole. Judge Mark Lucraft KC sentenced Dighton, who had been referred to the anti-terrorism programme Prevent in January 2024, to life imprisonment and ordered him to serve a minimum of 22 years. Article continues below Alexander Stephen Dighton (Image: South Wales Police ) The judge told the defendant, who represented himself in court, that the offences had 'a terrorist connection'. He said: 'It is clear that you continue to hold entrenched views. Other than the early guilty pleas, there is little else to be said to your credit.' The judge said the police officers that encountered Dighton were experienced. He added: 'Whilst they accept potential violence and difficult confrontations are part of the role of being a police officer, they were all deeply shocked by the nature and ferocity of your attack.' Prosecuting, Nicholas Hearn described how Dighton's sister had reported him to Prevent due to concerns he held 'racist and anti-Muslim views' and was likely to be involved with incel groups. You can read more here about family concerns. The incel movement is made up of people who find themselves unsuccessful in relationships, often harbouring extreme and misogynistic views. Detective Superintendent Andrew Williams, who led the investigation, said it was clear that Dighton was motivated by strong anti-Government, anti-immigration, anti-Islam views and that he acted to "undermine democracy". He confirmed that Dighton was referred to counter terrorism programme Prevent a year before the attack but after three weeks of assessments, including interviews with Dighton, it was concluded that he was not high enough risk to be included. Defending that decision DS Williams said there was no indication he would launch a violent attack on officers. Detective Superintendent Andrew Williams from South Wales Police led the investigation (Image: WalesOnline ) He said it was hard to predict what people will do, despite rigorous checks: "It is very difficult to speculate on what radicalised him. We can say that Alex Dighton was a lonely individual who lived by himself and had challenges with his health. "He spent a lot of time on gaming channels. He identified with (the game) Warhammer and identified with characters from that game. Lots of misinformation goes online. "Over the past few years counter terrorism policing has processed 30,000 referrals to Prevent. Every year there are 20,000 referrals from the public into suspected terrorist action. So there has got to be a prioritisation of referrals. "These are highly trained and dedicated officers (doing referrals and prioritising) and in January 2024 they undertook extensive checks on Alex Dighton." He added: "Prevent has intervened successfully but behaviour is often unpredictable. Nothing predicted what he was going to go on to do. "It is easy to have hindsight but the information at the time was no cause for concern. Alex Dighton said in interviews that he only formulated his plan to attack one month before." Describing events that night he said: "Alex Dighton left home for a police station with the clear intent to cause as much damage and injury to others as he could. He had a lock knife, metal hatchet, wooden pole with sharp metal plates which he said he had sharpened with the intent to harm police. "I need to be clear - the courage of officers cannot be overstated. One of the officers attempted to subdue him by taser but that was ineffective as he was wearing body armour. Another officer was struck across the head with a pole. "When the officers took him to the ground he reached behind and pulled out his lock knife and stabbed an officer in the thigh narrowly missing his femoral artery. "Our investigation showed Dighton was motivated by a strong anti-state, anti-government , anti-Islam and anti-immigration mindset. "He acted to undermine our democracy. Alex Dighton was known to us. He was referred to Prevent in January 2024 - 12 months earlier. He was referred on the basis of expressing anti immigration and anti-Islam views as well as views on incel, the celibacy movement. "Police from Counter Terrorism Wales did a detailed assessment which included interviewing Alex Dighton at length. That assessment took three week. "After that the conclusion was he did not meet the criteria to be included on the Prevent programme. "Nothing in that assessment suggested he would go on to commit such an attack. The three week assessment included checks on local systems, partners, lengthy interview and we asked him what he was looking at and who he was associating with. "He later said he decided to do the attack a month before he did it." On the night of the attack, Dighton arrived at the police station shortly before 7pm, where he lit a petrol bomb and threw it at a police van. When that failed to ignite, he attempted to start a fire by pouring lighter fluid over the van before smashing the windows of two vehicles using a pole. When confronted by officers, Dighton said 'I'm fed up, I'm done', before launching his attack. Attempts to restrain him using a Taser were unsuccessful because of the body armour he was wearing. He swung a pole at one officer, punched one in the head and stabbed another in the thigh, narrowly missing his femoral artery. Two of the three injured officers were taken to hospital for treatment. Speaking after the case, Frank Ferguson of the Crown Prosecution Service said Dighton wanted to attack the Government and the state. 'We were able to show that Dighton's attack was not only pre-meditated and meticulously planned, but that his motivations were connected to terrorism,' he said. 'While it is not a criminal offence to hold extreme or offensive views, it is one to carry out attempted murder and attack police officers because of them.' Chief Superintendent Stephen Jones, of South Wales Police, paid tribute to the 'bravery and professionalism' of the officers at the scene. Article continues below 'Each officer is not just a public servant but also a husband, wife, or parent, and their families are undoubtedly deeply affected by incidents such as these that officers face daily,' he said. 'I want to also recognise the detectives' unwavering commitment throughout the investigation which is also commendable.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
MPs back bill changes to prevent medics raising assisted dying with under-18s
Medics would not be allowed to raise assisted dying as an option with under-18s, and advertising it would be banned under changes backed by MPs on Friday before a final vote expected next week. The Commons voted on amendments to the assisted dying bill, which would legalise the option for terminally ill adults in England and Wales who have been told they have fewer than six months to live. The final Commons vote is scheduled on 20 June, with support and opposition finely balanced – and growing scrutiny over timelines, loopholes and who would ultimately deliver the system. A majority of MPs approved a clause tabled by Labour MP Meg Hillier, an opponent of the bill, to ensure health professionals cannot raise the topic of assisted dying with under-18s. A separate amendment from Hillier to bar health workers from bringing up assisted dying with adult patients before they have raised it themselves was voted down. There were impassioned interventions from both sides of the debate. Rupa Huq, the Labour MP for Ealing Central, said the cost-of-living crisis would make assisted dying 'quite attractive' to people who were struggling. 'We know that BAME communities have lower disposable household income than standard households, and you can just imagine relatives in a housing crisis wanting to speed up grandad's probate to get a foot on the ladder, or granny or nanny, ma or daddy even convincing themselves that, 'look, they'd be better off out of the way given the cost of care,'' Huq said. Caroline Voaden, the Liberal Democrat MP for South Devon, recalled the death of her husband, who she said had been 'in extreme pain' with terminal oesophageal cancer, and urged her colleagues to 'mind our language' after words like 'murder' were used. 'This is about helping people die in a civilised way and helping their families not go through a horrendous experience of watching a loved one die in agony,' Voaden said. MPs voted in favour of a proposal by Kim Leadbeater, who is sponsoring the bill, to ban advertisements about assisted dying. But they rejected a separate proposal from Labour MP Paul Waugh for tighter regulations which would have limited exceptions on Friday's amendments. Waugh said he hoped that 'enough MPs now realise that it is not fit for purpose'. The bill passed its first stage by a majority of 55 in November. Since then more than a dozen are thought to have switched sides to oppose the bill, though at least three have moved to support it. A number of other amendments were passed on Friday, including a provision for assisted dying deaths to not automatically be referred to a coroner and an attempt to regulate substances for use in assisted dying. Demonstrators for and against a change in the law gathered outside parliament to make their views known. Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion Opening the debate, Leadbeater said it was not about a choice between assisted dying or palliative care. 'Palliative and end-of-life care and assisted dying can and do work side by side to give terminally-ill patients the care and choice they deserve in their final days,' she said. As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the bill and any amendments, meaning they vote according to their conscience rather than along party lines. The government is neutral on the legislation. Stephen Kinnock, a health minister, said there had been more than 90 hours of parliamentary time spent debating the proposals so far, and more than 500 amendments had been considered at committee stage earlier this year.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
MPs vote to let doctors raise assisted dying with terminally ill patients
MPs have voted to allow doctors to bring up assisted dying unprompted when speaking to terminally ill patients. An amendment to the Terminally Ill Adults Bill aimed at only allowing medical professionals to discuss assisted death if a patient raises it first was narrowly voted down on Friday. MPs debated Kim Leadbeater's proposals to legalise assisted dying for terminally ill adults over the age of 18 in England and Wales with six months or less left to live on Friday. The Commons will vote on the Bill as a whole next week, in a crunch vote that could see assisted dying effectively become law, subject to scrutiny in the House of Lords. Those who felt the Bill lacked safeguards for vulnerable adults put forward a change to prevent doctors mentioning assisted dying without their patient bringing it up. The amendment tabled by Dame Meg Hillier, a Labour MP, said: 'No registered medical practitioner or other health professional shall raise the subject of the provision of assistance in accordance with this Act with a person unless that person has first raised it.' The move was strongly opposed by the British Medical Association, which said that it would impede doctors from being able to freely talk to patients 'about all reasonable and legally available options'. But MP backers of the amendment said that it was vital to prevent subtle coercion of vulnerable adults. It was voted down by 256 votes to 230. But a second amendment banning medical professionals from raising assisted dying unprompted to a young person under the age of 18 narrowly passed. The safeguard for children will be added into the legislation, in a defeat for Ms Leadbeater, alongside a ban on advertising of assisted dying services. Labour MPs who oppose Ms Leadbeater's Bill said that her defeat represented an '11th-hour rejection of the claims made about the safety of this Bill'. 'Today's vote was a vote of no confidence in the Bill and has shattered the claim that this Bill was the safest in the world,' they added. They pointed to 'over 100' other amendments aimed to introducing other safeguards that had not been selected for debate 'and which MPs have not had a chance to scrutinise or vote on'. A number of other amendments were also passed, including a provision for deaths through assisted dying to not automatically be referred to a coroner. This comes after the Royal College of Pathologists, which represents medical examiners, saying that they were 'not qualified' for such a role and urging for coroners to be involved. The vote next Friday will be a free vote for MPs, which means that they are able to vote according to their conscience and will not have to follow a party whip. Kieran Mullan, a shadow health minister, expressed concerns that there had been insufficient time to scrutinise the 'deeply consequential and highly contentious piece of legislation for society'. But Stephen Kinnock, the care minister, argued that the over 90 hours of parliamentary time allotted to the Bill was 'more than most'.
