logo
Congresswoman: I Remember a World Without Medicaid. We Can't Go Back

Congresswoman: I Remember a World Without Medicaid. We Can't Go Back

Newsweek23-05-2025

Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
I know firsthand the importance of Medicaid—because I remember a time before it existed.
My mother was a domestic worker, cleaning homes all her life. She worked tirelessly, regularly pushing through pain, because she was determined to build a better future for my sister and me.
Despite working full time, my mother still couldn't afford health insurance and there was no Medicaid for her to fall back on.
My sister had sickle-cell disease which, if you don't know, is a rare hereditary disease that can cause excruciating pain. Growing up, I spent many late nights in the ER with my sister as she navigated her debilitating condition.
I often think what a difference it would have made to have health insurance. My sister wouldn't have suffered as much if she had access to comprehensive care and treatment. My mother wouldn't have had to work herself to exhaustion to provide for us.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said it best: "Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health is the most shocking and the most inhuman."
Government programs like Medicaid, Medicare, SNAP, housing vouchers—they exist to ensure that every American has the foundation they need to build a life of dignity and opportunity.
Yet, Republicans are putting these programs on the chopping block to fund their trillion-dollar tax cuts to billionaires.
WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 13: Protestors wearing "Hands Off Medicad" shirts line up outside of the Energy And Commerce Committee Markup Of Budget Reconciliation Hearing on May 13, 2025 in Washington, DC.
WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 13: Protestors wearing "Hands Off Medicad" shirts line up outside of the Energy And Commerce Committee Markup Of Budget Reconciliation Hearing on May 13, 2025 in Washington, DC.Over 2.6 million people in my home state of North Carolina rely on services funded by Medicaid—this includes care for veterans with chronic conditions, long-term care in nursing facilities for our elderly, and health care for working people whose jobs don't offer it.
I want to share a story from a constituent of mine, Laura Kelly, who works as a wheelchair assistant at Charlotte Douglas International Airport:
I've relied on Medicaid for as long as I can remember. When I was five, my aunt took my sister and me after we were placed in foster care. She didn't have much, but she had Medicaid, and it kept her from drowning in medical debt. Years later when I became a mom myself, Medicaid was there for me too. It covered my prenatal care giving my babies a strong start at life.
I work full-time at the airport. I take care of elderly passengers, disabled passengers, and unaccompanied minors. I get them where they need to go. I make sure they're safe. But when my shift ends, I go home to a motel room I can barely afford. I've faced eviction more than once. I work every day, and I still can't make ends meet.
Last year, I was rushed to the hospital with severe anemia. The costs on the first night alone—before any real treatment—were astronomical. Without Medicaid, I wouldn't have gone. I would have waited. And I might not be here to tell you this story. Or to wake up the next day and care for my daughter, who has epilepsy. Without Medicaid, she can't get her meds. And without them, she won't survive.
Programs like Medicaid are not budget-line items that we can cut without consequences. They are the difference between life and death.
Medicaid cuts only serve to harm people like Laura, like my sister, like my mother, and like so many of us.
Republicans in Congress will try to slash Medicaid without caring about the lives they threaten with their votes. Make no mistake—my colleagues and I will do everything we can to make sure these cuts don't happen.
But we need your help. Now is the time to make calls to congressional offices and attend town halls, get involved with advocacy organizations in your community, and let anyone trying to cut Medicaid know that they will hear the voice of the American people—both now and at the ballot box.
Alma Adams, Ph.D., a Democrat, is the U.S. Representative from North Carolina's 12th Congressional District.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exclusive: HHS watchdog finds more than $16B in health savings
Exclusive: HHS watchdog finds more than $16B in health savings

Axios

time3 hours ago

  • Axios

Exclusive: HHS watchdog finds more than $16B in health savings

The Department of Health and Human Services' watchdog identified more than $16 billion in overpayments, fraudulent billings and possible cost savings in health programs over a half year spanning the Biden and Trump administrations, including more than $3.5 billion to be returned to the government. Why it matters: The semiannual summary, first shared publicly to Axios, comes as the Trump administration says it's prioritizing government efficiency and rooting out waste, fraud and abuse. It reflects growing concern over federal payments to Medicare Advantage plans, along with enforcement actions like McKinsey agreeing to pay $650 million to settle charges that its advice caused Purdue Pharma to submit fraudulent claims stemming from the opioid crisis. The report was sent to Congress late Friday. By the numbers: The HHS Office of Inspector General identified $16.6 billion in real and potential savings from October 2024 through March of this year. The office's investigations identified $3.5 billion in funds due back to the federal government, and its audits found another $451 million that the government will recoup. More than $12 billion in potential cost savings were identified if HHS makes recommended policy changes. The office issued 165 recommendations over the six months. In one example, OIG found that Medicare could have saved $7.7 billion if it lowered payments for swing beds at critical access hospitals so that they match skilled nursing facilities. The change would require action from Congress, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said it didn't agree with the recommendation. Nearly 400 civil actions, including settlements, resulted from OIG's work during the period. OIG says its work returned $11 to the federal government for each $1 invested in its office. "Whether it's us, whether it's [the Government Accountability Office], whether it's DOGE, whether it's state auditors, there's always a need for program integrity and oversight," said John Hagg, assistant inspector general in the IG's office of audit services. Zoom in: OIG over the six months covered in the report continued its investigations that raise concerns over improper payments in Medicare Advantage. OIG found that many patient diagnoses reported by privately run Medicare plans were supported only through health risk assessments. That allowed plans to be paid more to care for sicker, more expensive patients without enough supporting documentation, raising questions about their validity, per OIG. OIG recommended that Medicare further restrict plans' abilities to get higher payments based on diagnoses reported only on in-home health risk assessments in order to save an estimated $4.2 billion for Medicare. The office plans to do more work on Medicare Advantage in the near future, Melicia Seay, assistant inspector general in the office of evaluation and inspection, told Axios. "There's a lot of areas in terms of Medicare Advantage that we're exploring, whether it is the payment policy related to the program, the service delivery, quality of care," she said. Catch up quick: President Trump in January abruptly fired several agency inspectors general, including longtime HHS watchdog Christi Grimm. He claimed that"some were not doing their job."

Poland Exit Polls Show Donald Trump-Backed Candidate Narrowly Ahead
Poland Exit Polls Show Donald Trump-Backed Candidate Narrowly Ahead

Newsweek

time3 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Poland Exit Polls Show Donald Trump-Backed Candidate Narrowly Ahead

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Exit polls for the Polish presidential election show populist Karol Nawrocki, who is also President Donald Trump's preferred candidate, with a narrow lead of 51 percent to 49 percent. Full results are expected later on Monday, with only 55 percent of the votes counted by early Monday morning local time. Why It Matters Right-wing parties in Europe experienced a surge in support over the past couple years, starting with Geert Wilders's victory in the 2023 Dutch parliamentary election, and accelerated by major gains in the 2024 European parliamentary elections. Trump's victory in the 2024 U.S. presidential election marked a major advance for right-wing groups, which have grown emboldened and have sought to once again borrow from Trump's playbook to secure further victories, including policies and ideological lines. Sunday's election will determine whether the country continues along Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk's pro-European path or shifts toward nationalist policies reminiscent of those championed by Trump. The president and prime minister must work together to pass legislation, making their alignment key. Tusk on Friday claimed that Russian hackers had targeted the websites of ruling coalition parties, just days ahead of the election, according to the Kyiv Independent. What To Know Nawrocki, a conservative historian with no previous political experience and supported by the Law and Justice Party, went head-to-head with Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski. Key issues include judicial reforms, abortion rights, and EU relations. Trzaskowski represents the pro-European Civic Coalition, while Nawrocki is aligned with nationalist and traditionalist views. Nawrocki holds a slender lead over his rival in what experts have noted as a marked shift from an initial exit poll released just after voting ended at 9 p.m. on Sunday night. Karol Nawrocki, candidate for the 2025 Polish presidential election supported by Poland's right-wing Law and Justice (PiS) party, flashes the victory sign in front of supporters as exit polls were announced on tv during their... Karol Nawrocki, candidate for the 2025 Polish presidential election supported by Poland's right-wing Law and Justice (PiS) party, flashes the victory sign in front of supporters as exit polls were announced on tv during their election night event at the Mala Warszawa Theatre in Warsaw, Poland, during the second round of the presidential elections on June 1, 2025. More Wojtek Radwanski/AFP via Getty Images In that poll, Trzaskowski had 50.3 percent of the vote, but the poll had a two percent margin of error, according to Politico. Trzaskowski attempted to hold that poll as a small victory, telling supporters that they would soon hear the phrase "razor-thin" everywhere as results continued to trickle in from various districts. "If everything is confirmed we will immediately get to work," Trzawkowski said. However, Nawrocki has remained defiant, telling his supporters that he will "win and save Poland!" "We will win, that difference is really so tiny," he said, as his supporters chanted "president of Poland." Nawrocki's victory would serve as a sharp rebuke from voters about Tusk's government by electing a president who could pose a major legislative hurdle to any policy aspirations the prime minister has. What People Are Saying Piotr Buras, ECFR: "Right wing and far-right candidates gathered as many as 54 percent of votes—this is the most surprising result. "The campaign in the next two weeks will be very polarizing and brutal—a confrontation of two visions of Poland: pro-EU, liberal and progressive versus nationalist, Trumpist and conservative."

Project 2025 Architect Denies Far-Right Master Plan Is Guiding Trump's Decisions
Project 2025 Architect Denies Far-Right Master Plan Is Guiding Trump's Decisions

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Project 2025 Architect Denies Far-Right Master Plan Is Guiding Trump's Decisions

With President Donald Trump's radical rehaul of America well underway, right-wing policy engineer Russell Vought wants you to believe Project 2025 was never meant to be his roadmap. During Sunday's episode of 'State of the Union,' CNN moderator Dana Bash got an icy answer when she asked Vought if the overlap between Trump's agenda and the hyper-conservative political program meant that Project 2025 was coming to fruition. Though the president repeatedly distanced himself from Project 2025 during his campaign, second-term Trump achievements like eliminating DEI, banning transgender troops and sending the military to crack down on the southern border were all detailed in the far-right policy wishlist, which Vought served on the advisory board for. But Vought, who is now Trump's director of the Office of Management and Budget, shot down the idea that the Heritage Foundation-helmed initiative inspired any of the president's actions. Claiming Trump was 'very public' about his plans during his campaign, the political operative told Bash it is 'delusional' to think the president was not the sole architect of his executive strategy. 'I'm not suggesting that he's not in charge,' Bash countered. 'I'm just saying that now it's pretty clear that what he wants to do and what you planned are dovetailing.' Vought still refused to acknowledge the influence of Project 2025, which also laid out tactics for shuttering the Department of Education, banning abortion medication and imposing work requirements for Medicaid recipients in a 900-plus page blueprint titled 'Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise.' 'I think the president was very clear with his agenda and he is going forward with that agenda and he has been at the helm and the originator of all of these ideas,' he told Bash. 'What's on the agenda is what the president has put on the agenda, most of which he ran on,' Vought continued. 'And you will continue to see the things that he's interested in doing and those people like me will be executing that vision.' Though Trump's policies seem to be in sync with what was outlined by Project 2025, he told voters during his campaign he had 'nothing to do' with the program. 'I haven't read it. I don't want to read it purposely. I'm not going to read it,' he claimed during his first and only debate with Democratic candidate, Vice President Kamala Harris. Senate Confirms Project 2025 Architect As Trump's Budget Director Bradley Whitford Spots Exactly Why 'Handmaid's Tale' Is 'Terribly Relevant' In 2025 This GOP Bill, Straight Out Of Project 2025, Would Make Pornography A Federal Crime

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store