Creatine Is No Longer Just for Muscles. The Benefits on Brain Health, Memory, and Mood Are Shocking Experts.
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links."
IN A SMALL Missouri pharmacy, Drew Dible carefully measures out a five-gram dose of a fine white powder. The almost crystalline substance isn't for a customer, but for him. And it's not a prescription medication, but a supplement: creatine monohydrate.
Dible is a 31-year-old pharmacist with an athletic build, standing 6'4" and weighing roughly 200 pounds. He's always stayed in shape—5Ks, 10Ks, weightlifting—but he's never taken any supplements except for a multivitamin.
'Most of this wellness stuff always struck me as a bit scammy, so I didn't waste my money on it,' he says. But Dible isn't taking creatine because he's looking to enhance his kipping power, or hit a race PR, or really for any reason related to physical fitness. He's taking creatine for his brain.
When he hit his early 30s, Dible says, he wanted to hedge against any age-related mental decline. For all of us entering our 30s, distractions accumulate and the mental sharpness we took for granted in our teens and 20s gives way to something else. 'I didn't feel a lack of focus at the time so much as a desire for more focus,' Dible says.
During the pandemic, he started listening to Huberman Lab, the powerhouse podcast from wellness influencer Andrew Huberman, PhD, associate professor of neurobiology at Stanford Medicine. Since 2021, Huberman has released eight episodes with 'creatine' in the title. He and his guests have extolled the numerous mental health virtues of the supplement, from boosting memory to mitigating the effects of traumatic brain injury and concussion.
'Creatine, known for its role in improving physical performance, has also been shown (in several quality clinical trials) to improve mood and help the symptoms of major depression,' Huberman posted on Twitter in 2021.
He's all in—taking 10 to 15 grams daily—and so are longevity and performance expert Peter Attia, MD, and bro-whisperer extraordinaire Joe Rogan. So Dible began taking creatine, stirred into water and chugged before work. The hope was that it would help him maintain focus during his busy days.
Once relegated to the dark recesses of bodybuilders' gym bags, creatine is creating all kinds of buzz in the neuroscience world for its supposed brain benefits and is muscling its way into mainstream wellness culture. You may have noticed: Creatine is everywhere.
You can now find the stuff featured as the special ingredient in protein bars, energy drinks, and (because it's 2025) gummies. Next-gen supplement companies like Momentous, Thorne, and Onnit are making creatine cornerstone products—and many of them are spotlighting brain health benefits as part of their sell.
SHOP OUR FAVORITE CREATINE SUPPLEMENTS
The market for creatine is booming. The Vitamin Shoppe's trend report from 2023 showed creatine sales up 120 percent year over year. The global creatine supplement market is currently valued at a hulking $501 million—and projected to swell to $923 million by 2033, according to Future Market Insights.
All this is wild if you consider where creatine was 35 years ago. Back then, the supplement was widely regarded as (and sometimes even marketed as) a cousin of steroids. Any talk of creatine's powers was not broadcast, and there were, supposedly, risks.
Creatine could help you bulk up fast, but it might also wreck your kidneys, destroy your liver, and bloat you beyond recognition in the process. Supplementing with creatine was considered by many a potentially dangerous ploy by strength athletes in need of a boost.
Now you can find the stuff at Target. What's changed? And are all these supposed brain benefits for real?
TO KNOW WHERE creatine is going, it's important to know where it's been—and especially what the stuff actually is. Biologically, creatine is a compound found in red meat, fish, and milk. Your body can make creatine on its own, but not close to the levels found in modern supplements. And those supplements, up until just a few years ago, were marketed as muscle enhancers. That's because creatine's primary function, according to research from as far back as the 1930s, is to enhance performance of quick bursts of activity by producing adenosine triphosphate, or ATP, the body's energy currency.
Creatine monohydrate, the synthetic form of creatine, wasn't commercially available until 1993. Taking the supplement wasn't without some sense of risk, either. Back in the early '90s, the FDA possessed limited power to regulate supplements—the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act, which equipped the FDA with some oversight authority, wasn't passed until 1994.
Plus, there were no third-party testing facilities to verify the safety and quality of supplements. (Those facilities didn't really exist until 1999.) So if you wanted to take creatine monohydrate—or, really, any supplement—you were on your own in terms of effectiveness and risk. In addition, the scientific research that existed on creatine monohydrate in the '90s was largely conducted by the same companies that were pushing supplements.
Despite the roll-the-dice nature of taking creatine back then, the supplement gained popularity in key markets: professional and collegiate athletes looking for a legal competitive edge, as well as teens looking to bulk up their mirror muscles. But as creatine use spread, so, too, did the rumors that the supplement would damage your kidneys and liver—and might even be just as hazardous as steroids.
A front-page New York Times story from 1997 connected deaths in wrestling to creatine use. (Soon after, the FDA determined that creatine was not the cause of death, and in fact, the weight-loss drug ephedrine may have played a role.)
Bad press didn't stop supplement manufacturers from selling creatine—or trying to expand its reach. Experimental & Applied Sciences, the first big-name supplement company to market creatine for muscle builders in the '90s, was sold for $320 million in 2004 (roughly $535 million in today's money). Creatine still lingered on the fringes. Even if lifters loved it, the general public was scared off by reports of its alleged dangers. The independent scientific community still hadn't determined if the supplement even delivered on its promises, either. Except—plot twist—the research would soon come through.
LET'S SAY THAT you wanted to chisel a Mount Rushmore of creatine's elite researchers. You'd honor three men: Darren Candow, PhD, of the University of Regina in Saskatchewan, Canada; Richard Kreider, PhD, of Texas A&M University; and Scott Forbes, PhD, of Brandon University in Manitoba, Canada.
In 2001, for example, Candow backed up what many weightlifters and bodybuilders already knew: that supplementing with creatine and protein powder resulted in greater lean-muscle gains than with protein powder alone. In 2003, Kreider helped determine that long-term creatine supplementation (we're talking 21 months) produced zero negative health changes—including to the kidneys and liver. In 2008, Forbes and Candow showed that lifters who took creatine experienced greater muscle endurance and power on the bench press than those who didn't.
The mounting evidence largely cleared creatine of its stigma. In 2007, the International Society of Sports Nutrition issued a statement saying that creatine was 'safe, effective, and ethical.' In the next decade, as online shopping made it easier for customers to buy supplements, creatine joined protein powder as a go-to for muscling up.
As the popularity of creatine grew further, creatine researchers decided to comb through prior studies on the supplement. What they found was that the benefits of creatine supplementation extended far beyond the bench press. In 2017, Kreider, Candow, and their coauthors assessed nearly three decades of research—hundreds of studies—on creatine and saw a trove of potential benefits.
Among the data that prior scientists had gathered, but not studied, was a link between creatine and brain health. There were signs that creatine supplementation, in clinical settings, might ease symptoms in people with neurodegenerative diseases, stroke, and even adolescent depression. This promise of creatine as a mental health hero set off a new wave of ongoing research on the supplement.
'We're seeing a lot of other applications for creatine now in terms of its role with certain neurodegenerative diseases, its role in brain health, and potentially both a prophylactic and treatment role for [traumatic brain injury] and concussion,' says Shawn Arent, PhD, CSCS*D, chair of the department of exercise science at the University of South Carolina.
For instance, one 2024 meta-analysis of 16 creatine studies in Frontiers in Nutrition found that supplementation may improve memory, attention, and information processing in adults. Even more surprising: A Scientific Reports study from last year found that an acute dose of 15 to 20 grams of creatine monohydrate actually mitigated the drag of a bad night's sleep by revving up the brain's mitochondria.
The possible mechanism behind creatine's mental health benefits is complex. Scientists believe that your brain, like your muscles, is metabolically active, accounting for as much as 20 percent of your body's energy consumption. Your gray matter—while not a muscle—may also store ATP, that valuable energetic compound made from creatine, which it uses for tasks and its general health.
So influencers and forward-looking supplement companies might be onto something with their creatine-for-all recommendations. Emphasis on might.
IF EXPERIMENTAL & Applied Sciences was the company that pushed creatine monohydrate into the world of muscle builders, Momentous is the company best known today for pushing the supplement to everyone else.
The 'human performance' company (don't call it a supplement seller) was founded in 2016, but it struggled to find success in a crowded supplement market.
In 2021, Jeff Byers, the current CEO of Momentous, along with business colleague Erica Good bought the company. Byers's résumé is far-ranging and includes both an MBA from the University of Southern California and a four-year career as an NFL center. 'In my playing days, I never understood creatine beyond building muscle mass,' Byers says. 'I didn't realize the cognitive and neuroprotective benefits until about three or four years ago.' And Good has said in company materials that, after watching her grandmother slip away to Alzheimer's, 'I'm a daily user of creatine…and probably will be for life.'
In 2022, Momentous decided to lean in harder on the brain sell of its creatine supplement, which it had launched the year before with some success. But Byers says the decision to emphasize the mental benefits of creatine didn't come without lots of input. 'We started hearing more and more about it from our advisory board and research partners,' he says. 'Everyone was telling us that this is what people should be doing for long-term brain health.'
On the product's label, Momentous now advertises: 'Daily supplementation may help improve muscle performance and cognitive function.' (Emphasis added.) The move, along with stronger messaging around creatine and brain health in its press and marketing materials, worked. Creatine is now one of Momentous's best-selling supplements and is sold as part of the Momentous Three, a $130 bundle of the company's most essential products (the others being protein powder and an omega-3 supplement).
Momentous's advisory board is vast. Beyond pro athletes and coaches, it includes human-performance scientist Andy Galpin, PhD, and neurophysiologist Louisa Nicola, who has a master's degree in medicine. And since 2022, Momentous has also had one high-powered creatine advocate on its board: Andrew Huberman.
Byers says Huberman had a direct role in the company's pivot to focusing on creatine for brain health. (Huberman discloses on his website that he receives financial compensation from Momentous for serving as a scientific advisor. Momentous is a former sponsor of Huberman Lab. Huberman did not respond to a request for comment for this article.)
Byers predicts that creatine will become a staple for Americans, much as multivitamins are. 'Our market is everyone—from executives to stay-at-home parents to seniors—who can benefit from taking creatine daily,' he says.
That older demo is especially interesting. Sales of brain health supplements (not just creatine) are projected to rise, due in part to baby boomers looking to slow or prevent cognitive disorders. Seniors. Taking creatine. Who would have thought, right?
FIRST, UNDERSTAND THAT the overwhelming majority of creatine supplements on the market still aren't third-party certified for sports, meaning that athletes who routinely take them may risk being banned if their creatine is tainted and they're tested. Also concerning: Uncertified products may not contain the level of creatine advertised on the label.
Which is important because, second, dosing is critical. The actual amount of creatine in products can vary widely—especially in packaged foods and drinks looking to hitch their wagons to the next creatine gold rush. Swoly Creatine Mono Gummies contain four grams in five gummies. Creatine-enhanced energy bars like Fx Chocolate's Yes Whey!!! have only two grams per serving. LifeAid's FitAid RX creatine recovery drinks don't even list the amount of creatine per can. 'For most people, five grams will get the job done,' says Arent, the exercise scientist. But that's five grams daily for as long as you want to see physical results.
And that five grams is for muscle growth and performance benefits only. Science hasn't yet established a threshold for cognitive gains—some researchers believe that it might be at least 10 grams and as much as 15. (The bulk of the research currently indicates that taking 0.1 grams per kilogram of body mass per day is safe.)
As far-reaching as these potential cognitive benefits are, though, some experts urge caution for an important reason: Most research on creatine supplementation and brain health has been conducted on people who are deficient in creatine—not healthy people.
A 2024 review in Behavioural Brain Research concluded that creatine supplementation has no significant effect on the brain health of young, healthy participants—and only mixed results for those with creatine deficiencies (vegans/vegetarians, the elderly, the sleep deprived, and the mentally fatigued).
'Remember, correction of any nutritional deficiency often shows really dramatic effects. We have a long history of people trying to extrapolate that to populations without the nutritional deficiency, and it never works out,' says Peter Robinson, MD, clinical assistant professor of neurology at The Ohio State University, who has been tracking creatine research. 'In other words, creatine doesn't appear likely to turn healthy individuals into superhumans.'
So while the optimization camps push for everyone to take creatine for the mental health benefits, the scientific community isn't there yet—and may never be.
But for the physical benefits, Arent says go for it—with conditions. 'Creatine monohydrate is still the go-to,' he explains. 'There are plenty of [other forms of creatine supplements], but if they have been shown to work, they work no better than creatine monohydrate.' Avoid liquid forms (creatine's effectiveness diminishes over time in a solution), find a product with five grams per dose, and make sure that product is third-party certified to ensure quality.
'Creatine should start to be considered part of an overall health plan,' Arent says. 'The same way we look at the importance of resistance training and aerobic exercise, and [it's] arguably even more important than a multivitamin.'
Dible, the pharmacist in Missouri, says he has felt a subtle mental edge since he began his daily creatine regimen. 'I've started using it myself as a sort of personal biohacking project. I want to see if I notice any improvements in memory or focus.'
Still, Dible says, he's not 100 percent convinced.
You Might Also Like
The Best Hair Growth Shampoos for Men to Buy Now
25 Vegetables That Are Surprising Sources of Protein
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former LeBron James Teammate Tells Wild Club Story About Lakers Star
Former LeBron James Teammate Tells Wild Club Story About Lakers Star originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Los Angeles Lakers star LeBron James takes precise care of his body, which has helped him play 22 seasons in the NBA at an elite level. Advertisement James is 40 years old. He's the oldest active player in the NBA. The average person wouldn't know that by watching him play, as James made the All-NBA Second Team this year and became the oldest player in NBA history to receive an MVP vote, breaking Michael Jordan's 23-year-old record. A four-time MVP, James has played for the Cleveland Cavaliers (twice), Miami Heat and Lakers. He's a four-time champion and a four-time Finals MVP. James is the only player in NBA history to win a Finals MVP Award with three teams. Los Angeles Lakers star LeBron James© Soobum Im-Imagn Images A future Hall of Famer, James won his first two titles with the Heat in 2012 and 2013. Mario Chalmers, who was on those Miami teams, recently told NFL legend Shannon Sharpe that James used to get treatment in the clubs. Advertisement "I tell people this all the time, Bron will really get treatment if he was in the club. Like, he would literally have something on his knees or something on his back inside the club. So it's like why is somebody doing that, like that's a real dedication to just be in the club with treatment." Chalmers said. Sharpe went on asking what were the kind of treatments he is doing in the club. "Not ice bags, it'd be like the stim, like the stim machine that shoot electrolyte or electricity in your knees and stuff like that. He always have something [for] recovery." James has said many times that he takes recovery very seriously. The leading scorer in NBA history has never undergone surgery on his body because of an injury. The small forward is arguably the most durable athlete in NBA history. Advertisement Arguably the greatest player of all time, James has career averages of 27.0 points, 7.5 rebounds, 7.4 assists, 1.5 steals and 0.7 blocks. He's the only player in NBA history to rank top five all-time in points and assists. James, who turns 41 in December, has a player option to return to the Lakers next season worth $52.6 million. The King is widely expected to pick up his option and play his 23rd NBA season. Related: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Predicted to Repeat Feat Not Seen Since LeBron James This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 1, 2025, where it first appeared.


Medscape
an hour ago
- Medscape
ED Work Environment Discord Affects Patient Outcomes
In a recent study, emergency nurses and physicians in approximately half of the study hospitals disagreed on the quality of the work environment. An environment rated "unfavorable" by both groups was significantly associated with worse clinician and patient outcomes. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional analysis included emergency department (ED) clinicians (1190 nurses and 414 physicians) from 47 Magnet hospitals who completed the 2021 US Clinician Wellbeing Study. Researchers classified hospitals into profiles according to the level of agreement between nurses and physicians regarding the hospital work environment. Researchers assessed clinician job outcomes (burnout, job dissatisfaction, and intent to leave), patient safety, and quality-of-care metrics. TAKEAWAY: Hospital profiles revealed three distinct patterns: "Agree, Unfavorable Environment" (10 hospitals); "Agree, Favorable Environment" (15 hospitals); and "Disagree, Less Favorable Environment Among Nurses" (22 hospitals). Compared with hospitals where clinicians agreed on a favorable environment, hospitals where clinicians agreed on an unfavorable environment had significantly higher rates of burnout (β, 25.8), job dissatisfaction (β, 32.5), intent to leave (β, 31.7), and unfavorable patient safety grades (β, 29.1), after adjustment for hospital characteristics ( P < .001 for all). < .001 for all). Hospitals where nurses rated the environment less favorably than physicians demonstrated increased burnout (β, 15.4; P < .001) and poorer patient safety grades (β, 11.9; P < .01), after adjustment for hospital characteristics. < .001) and poorer patient safety grades (β, 11.9; < .01), after adjustment for hospital characteristics. Compared with physicians in hospitals with an "Agree, Favorable" profile, those in hospitals rated as having an "Unfavorable" work environment showed significantly higher rates for all outcomes except burnout and patient-care quality. Similarly, nurses in hospitals with a "Disagree, Less Favorable Among Nurses" profile experienced higher rates across all job-related and patient-care outcomes. IN PRACTICE: "This cross-sectional study found that ED nurses and physicians in close to half of study hospitals disagreed on the quality of their work environment. Clinician job and patient outcomes were worse when both clinicians rated their work environment unfavorably and when nurses only reported their work environments as unfavorable," the authors wrote. "The implication of these findings is that, if two essential partners in emergency care within the same institution do not agree on the deficiencies in ED work environments, significant interdisciplinary research is needed to bridge these gaps and disparate experiences," they added. SOURCE: The study was led by Jane Muir, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. It was published online on May 16, 2025, in BMC Health Services Research . LIMITATIONS: The study included only Magnet hospitals, which are known for favorable work environments and good physician-nurse collaboration, suggesting the findings may have underestimated the variation in clinician work environment agreement across all hospitals. The cross-sectional design prevented causal inference, and the sample had more nurses than physicians. DISCLOSURES: The research was funded by the Clinician Well-being Study Consortium and the National Institutes of Health. Additionally, it was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the National Institute of Nursing Research, the National Clinician Scholars Program, and the Emergency Medicine Foundation/Emergency Nurses Association Foundation. The authors reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Diamondbacks ace Corbin Burnes leaves game against Nationals with elbow discomfort
PHOENIX (AP) — Arizona Diamondbacks ace Corbin Burnes was lifted after just 70 pitches Sunday against the Washington Nationals with right elbow discomfort. Manager Torey Lovullo told reporters after Arizona's 3-1 win that Burnes will have an MRI on Monday. Advertisement Arizona led 3-0 in the top of the fifth inning when Burnes allowed a single by CJ Abrams with two outs. The right-hander then gestured toward the dugout with his glove and yelled in frustration. Jalen Beeks replaced Burnes and gave up an RBI single before getting the third out. Burnes allowed a run and four hits in 4 2/3 innings, with a walk and six strikeouts. He is 3-2 with a 2.66 ERA in 11 starts this season. Arizona signed Burnes to a $210 million, six-year contract before the season. He's been effective, but the Diamondbacks have dealt with a slew of pitching injuries. Jordan Montgomery (Tommy John surgery) is out for the season, Eduardo Rodríguez (shoulder) is on the injured list and reliever A.J. Puk (elbow) is on the IL as well. Advertisement Arizona allowed 10 runs in the first inning Saturday, its ninth loss in 10 games. Durability hasn't been much of a concern for the 30-year-old Burnes, who has made at least 28 starts in every season since he won the 2021 National League Cy Young Award for Milwaukee. He spent his first six years with the Brewers before being traded to Baltimore before the 2024 season. After one year with the Orioles, he signed with the Diamondbacks as a free agent.