logo
Russia's Kalibr Missile vs. US Tomahawk: Which Comes Out on Top?

Russia's Kalibr Missile vs. US Tomahawk: Which Comes Out on Top?

Newsweek02-05-2025

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Russia continues to project power with its Kalibr cruise missile systems, maintaining missile-equipped warships in the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea and Pacific Ocean.
In response to the latest Russian drone and missile attacks in the ongoing war with Ukraine, Odesa lawmaker Oleksiy Goncharenko accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of waging war on civilians, describing the strikes as "terrorist tactics."
Goncharenko told Newsweek that more than 20 drones hit Odesa in a single night, killing two people and damaging homes, a post office and a school—adding that in some buildings, "an entire floor was blown away." Ukrainian authorities also reported fresh Kalibr threats coming from Russia's Black Sea fleet.
Russia has made extensive use of the Kalibrs to hit targets in southern and eastern Ukraine since the war began on February 24, 2022.
Meanwhile, the U.S. has expanded its Tomahawk missile deployments across the Indo-Pacific, bringing the strategic role of sea-launched cruise missiles into focus.
But how does the Kalibr compare to the United States' flagship cruise missile, the Tomahawk? Here's a breakdown of both systems.
A Tomahawk Land Attack Missile (TLAM) launches from the guided missile cruiser USS Cape St. George (CG 71).
A Tomahawk Land Attack Missile (TLAM) launches from the guided missile cruiser USS Cape St. George (CG 71).
Intelligence Specialist 1st Kenneth Moll/U.S. Navy via AP, File
Range
The range of cruise missiles can vary based on launch conditions, altitude and flight profile. The 3M-14 Kalibr, the land-attack version of Russia's Kalibr missile family, has an estimated range of 930 to 1,500 miles.
The U.S. Navy's Tomahawk Block IV and Block V variants feature a range of about 1,000 miles. While not as long-ranged as some Kalibr variants, Tomahawks benefit from real-time retargeting, which means it can detect, identify and strike a target almost immediately after it is located, often within minutes or seconds, using live or near-instantaneous data from sensors or reconnaissance systems.
U.S. Tomahawk Missile Deployment
The United States deploys Tomahawk cruise missiles primarily through its Ohio-class guided-missile submarines, such as the USS Michigan. These submarines are capable of carrying up to 154 Tomahawk missiles and have been observed operating in strategic locations like the Western Pacific, including Guam. ​
Additionally, U.S. Navy destroyers and cruisers equipped with vertical launch systems can deploy Tomahawks, extending their reach across various theaters. The U.S. has also been enhancing its missile capabilities in the Indo-Pacific region, with plans to deploy land-based Tomahawk missiles in areas such as Japan. ​
Given the Tomahawk cruise missile's range of roughly 1,000 miles, U.S. deployments allow it to strike targets across East Asia—including parts of China, North Korea and Russia's Far East—as well as regions in the Middle East and Europe, depending on the positioning of naval launch platforms such as submarines or surface ships.
Inland penetration deep into central China and Russia would exceed the missile's range without closer deployment.
Russia's Kalibr Missile Deployment​
Russia has been actively deploying its Kalibr cruise missiles across various naval platforms. Notably, the Russian Navy has positioned Kalibr-equipped vessels in the Mediterranean, enhancing its strategic presence in the region. Further, Russian submarines, such as the Krasnoyarsk, have conducted Kalibr missile launches during exercises in the Pacific, demonstrating the missile's operational versatility. ​
The Kalibr missile, with a range of up to 1,500 miles, allows Russia to project power across vast distances. From the Mediterranean, Kalibr missiles can reach targets throughout the Middle East and parts of Europe. Deployments in the Pacific enable coverage of areas in East Asia, including Japan and the Korean Peninsula. Additionally, Russia's Black Sea Fleet, equipped with Kalibr missiles, poses a strategic threat to regions in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus.​
The deployments underscore Russia's intent to maintain a robust and flexible long-range strike capability across multiple theaters.
Long-range Kalibr cruise missiles launched by a Russian military ship from an unknown location.
Long-range Kalibr cruise missiles launched by a Russian military ship from an unknown location.
Russian Defense Ministry Press Service photo via AP, File
Speed
Kalibr flies at subsonic speeds (Mach 0.8) for most of its flight but can reportedly accelerate to Mach 2.5–3.0 in terminal phase for certain anti-ship variants.
The Tomahawk is a consistent subsonic missile (Mach 0.74), designed for stealth and terrain-hugging flight. Its steady pace allows for long loiter times and precise navigation, but it lacks a terminal speed boost.
Accuracy
Kalibr uses GLONASS satellite navigation and inertial guidance, with claimed precision in Syria and Ukraine. While official CEP (circular error probable) data is unavailable, open-source assessments suggest it is accurate within a few meters.
Tomahawk employs GPS, TERCOM (terrain contour matching), and DSMAC (digital scene-matching) for high precision. According to the U.S. Navy, its CEP is under 10 meters, with decades of proven accuracy in Iraq, Syria and Libya.
Power
Both missiles carry a 450 kg high-explosive warhead. Kalibr variants are reportedly nuclear-capable, a fact referenced in strategic deterrence exercises like the recent Barents Sea launch.
The Tomahawk formerly had a nuclear version (TLAM-N), but the U.S. retired it in the 2000s. Current variants are conventionally armed only.
A Russian submarine launches several 3M-54 Kalibr (Klub) anti-ship missiles, for the first time from under water, on December 9, 2015.
A Russian submarine launches several 3M-54 Kalibr (Klub) anti-ship missiles, for the first time from under water, on December 9, 2015.
Russian Federation via AP
Combat History
Kalibr was first used operationally by Russia in 2015 in Syria, launched from the Caspian Sea. It has since been used in Ukraine, with Russia claiming precision strikes on infrastructure targets.
Tomahawk's combat record dates to Operation Desert Storm (1991). It has been used in more than 2,000 strikes, including in Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria (U.S. Navy).
Launch Platforms
Kalibr is versatile, launched from ships, submarines and possibly ground-based mobile launchers (as seen in Kaliningrad). Russia has emphasized the modularity of its vertical launch systems.
Tomahawk is also highly flexible, launched from U.S. Navy destroyers, cruisers and submarines, with integration into NATO allies' fleets underway.
Both missiles offer multi-platform flexibility, with Kalibr edging ahead in strategic surprise deployments.
Overall
While the Kalibr impresses with speed and range, the Tomahawk wins in battlefield track record and accuracy. Both missiles are formidable.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iranian President Issues New 'Response' Warning to US
Iranian President Issues New 'Response' Warning to US

Newsweek

time34 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Iranian President Issues New 'Response' Warning to US

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has issued a new warning that the United States must face consequences for its attacks on nuclear facilities within the country. During a Sunday phone call with French President Emmanuel Macron, Pezeshkian said that the U.S. must "receive a response to their aggression," according to Iran's official news agency, IRNA, as reported by The Times of Israel. Earlier in the day, President Pezeshkian could be seen in videos joining demonstrators in Tehran protesting the recent U.S. strikes. State television broadcast footage of the president walking through a crowd gathered in a central square. Iranian President Masoud #Pezeshkian has joined a student-led protest in #Tehran's Revolution Square, voicing opposition to the ongoing war on #Iran. Earlier this month, "Israel" launched an unprovoked attack on Iran, primarily targeting residential areas and civilian… — Al Mayadeen English (@MayadeenEnglish) June 22, 2025 Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian attends a protest following the U.S. attacks on nuclear sites in Iran, in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, June 22, 2025. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian attends a protest following the U.S. attacks on nuclear sites in Iran, in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, June 22, 2025. Associated Press This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

Full List of Congress Members Backing War Powers Resolution Against Trump
Full List of Congress Members Backing War Powers Resolution Against Trump

Newsweek

time44 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Full List of Congress Members Backing War Powers Resolution Against Trump

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Representatives Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, and Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, introduced a bipartisan House resolution last week in a bid to curb President Donald Trump's ability to escalate tensions with Iran. After the U.S. military carried out strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites on Saturday, Massie told CNN that he believed the resolution would have enough co-sponsors to "be able to force a vote unless [House Speaker Mike] Johnson pulls some shenanigans." Why It Matters Trump on Saturday evening announced what he described as a "very successful attack" against three Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan The president's decision came after Israel and Iran have exchanged consistent strikes since June 13. Israel had urged the U.S. to target Iran's nuclear facilities, saying that Tehran was moving close to creating a nuclear weapon. Iran maintains that its nuclear program is for civilian purposes—not for weapons. The strikes have sparked concerns from some Democrats and some Republicans about a wider war breaking out—with some lawmakers accusing the president of violating the U.S. Constitution with the strikes. What to Know Massie and Khanna introduced their War Powers Resolution in an effort to prohibit U.S. military involvement in Iran last Tuesday, amid the backdrop of escalating tensions with Iran. "The Constitution does not permit the executive branch to unilaterally commit an act of war against a sovereign nation that hasn't attacked the United States," Massie said in a press release announcing the resolution. "Congress has the sole power to declare war against Iran. The ongoing war between Israel and Iran is not our war. Even if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution." Khanna shared similar concerns in a statement emailed to Newsweek on Sunday after the strikes on Iran moved forward. "Stopping Iran from having a nuclear bomb is a top priority, but dragging the U.S. into another Middle East war is not the solution. Trump's strikes are unconstitutional and put Americans, especially our troops, at risk," the congressman said. "Congress needs to come back to DC immediately to vote on Rep. Thomas Massie and my bipartisan War Powers Resolution to ensure there is no further conflict and escalation." Senator Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat, introduced companion legislation to the House resolution the day before his House colleagues. "It is not in our national security interest to get into a war with Iran unless that war is absolutely necessary to defend the United States. I am deeply concerned that the recent escalation of hostilities between Israel and Iran could quickly pull the United States into another endless conflict," the senator said in a press release. President Donald Trump addresses the nation, alongside Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth from the White House in Washington, D.C., on June 21, following the announcement... President Donald Trump addresses the nation, alongside Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth from the White House in Washington, D.C., on June 21, following the announcement that the U.S. bombed nuclear sites in Iran. Left inset: Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, is seen on June 4 in Washington, D.C. Right inset: Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, is seen on June 11, 2024, in Washington, D.C. More Carlos Barria/AFP/Kevin Dietsch/Full List of Members of Congress Backing the War Powers Resolution Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat Representative Val Hoyle, an Oregon Democrat Representative Rashida Tlaib, a Michigan Democrat Representative Pramila Jayapal, a Washington Democrat Representative Donald Beyer, a Virginia Democrat Representative Lloyd Doggett, a Texas Democrat Representative Greg Casar, a Texas Democrat Representative Ayanna Pressley, a Massachusetts Democrat Representative Delia Ramirez, an Illinois Democrat Representative Summer Lee, a Pennsylvania Democrat Representative Ilhan Omar, a Minnesota Democrat Representative Jesus "Chuy" Garcia, an Illinois Democrat Representative Nydia Velazquez, a New York Democrat Representative James McGovern, a Massachusetts Democrat Representative Chellie Pingree, a Maine Democrat Representative Mark Pocan, a Wisconsin Democrat Representative Veronica Escobar, a Texas Democrat Representative Paul Tonko, a New York Democrat Representative Becca Balint, a Vermont Democrat Representative Bonnie Watson Coleman, a New Jersey Democrat Representative Henry "Hank" Johnson, a Georgia Democrat Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, a Washington, D.C., Democrat Representative Sara Jacobs, a California Democrat Representative Janice Schakowsky, an Illinois Democrat Representative Lateefah Simon, a California Democrat Representative Christopher Deluzio, a Pennsylvania Democrat Representative Gwen Moore, a Wisconsin Democrat Representative Mike Thompson, a California Democrat Representative Yassamin Ansari, an Arizona Democrat Representative Bennie Thompson, a Mississippi Democrat Representative Luis Correa, a California Democrat Representative Betty McCollum, a Minnesota Democrat Representative Marcy Kaptur, an Ohio Democrat Representative Mark DeSaulnier, a California Democrat Representative Stephen Lynch, a Massachusetts Democrat Representative Andre Carson, an Indiana Democrat Representative Mary Gay Scanlon, a Pennsylvania Democrat Representative Joaquin Castro, a Texas Democrat Representative Maxwell Frost, a Florida Democrat Representative Al Green, a Texas Democrat Representative Debbie Dingell, a Michigan Democrat Representative Jamie Raskin, a Maryland Democrat Representative Melanie Stansbury, a New Mexico Democrat Representative Sylvia Garcia, a Texas Democrat Representative Teresa Leger Fernandez, a New Mexico Democrat Representative Diana DeGette, a Colorado Democrat Senator Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat What People Are Saying Jennifer Kavanagh, senior fellow and director of military analysis at Defense Priorities told Newsweek: "Iran has several options when it comes to retaliation, but will need to weigh them carefully. A stronger response may be useful for signaling Tehran's continuing resolve to internal and external audiences but it could also bring further U.S. military action and deeper U.S. involvement. Iran could target U.S. military bases and personnel in the Middle East." President Donald Trump on Truth Social on Saturday evening: "ANY RETALIATION BY IRAN AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL BE MET WITH FORCE FAR GREATER THAN WHAT WAS WITNESSED TONIGHT. THANK YOU!" Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Sunday: "The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has committed a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the NPT by attacking Iran's peaceful nuclear installations. The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences. Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behavior. In accordance with the UN Charter and its provisions allowing a legitimate response in self-defense, Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people." What Happens Next? Iran's foreign minister said after the attack that his country reserves "all options to defend its sovereignty." The U.S. military is preemptively preparing for any attack from Tehran in response. It's unclear whether the War Powers Resolution sponsored by Khanna and Massie, which aims to curb Trump's ability to take military action against Iran, will move forward in the House. However, with Republican control of both chambers of Congress, it is not widely expected to succeed.

Hundreds protest in The Hague against NATO, days before the Dutch city hosts alliance summit

timean hour ago

Hundreds protest in The Hague against NATO, days before the Dutch city hosts alliance summit

THE HAGUE, Netherlands -- Hundreds of people protested Sunday against NATO and military spending and against a possible conflict with Iran, two days before a summit of the alliance in The Hague that is seeking to increase allies' defense budgets. 'Let's invest in peace and sustainable energy,' Belgian politician Jos d'Haese told the crowd at a park not far from the summit venue. Although billed as a demonstration against NATO and the war in Gaza, protesters were joined by Iranians who held up banners saying 'No Iran War,' the day after the United States launched attacks against three of Iran's nuclear sites. 'We are opposed to war. People want to live a peaceful life,' said 74-year-old Hossein Hamadani, an Iranian who lives in the Netherlands. Look at the environment. 'Things are not good. So why do we spend money on war?' he added. The Netherlands is hosting the annual meeting of the 32-nation alliance starting Tuesday, with leaders scheduled to meet Wednesday. The heads of government want to hammer out an agreement on a hike in defense spending demanded by U.S. President Donald Trump. The deal appeared largely done last week, until Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez wrote to NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte that committing Madrid to spending 5% of its gross domestic product on defense "would not only be unreasonable, but also counterproductive.' U.S. allies have ramped up defense spending since Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered a full-scale invasion of Ukraine more than three years ago, but almost a third of them still don't meet NATO's current target of at least 2% of their gross domestic product. The summit is being protected by the biggest ever Dutch security operation, code named 'Orange Shield," involving thousands of police and military personnel, drones, no-fly zones and cybersecurity experts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store